Albertson v. Subversive Activities Control Board

{{Use mdy dates|date=September 2023}}

{{Infobox SCOTUS case

| Litigants = Albertson v. Subversive Activities Control Board

| ArgueDate = October 18

| ArgueYear = 1965

| DecideDate = November 15

| DecideYear = 1965

| FullName = Albertson, et al. v. Subversive Activities Control Board

| USVol = 382

| USPage = 70

| ParallelCitations = 86 S. Ct. 194; 15 L. Ed. 2d 165; 1965 U.S. LEXIS 263

| Prior =

| Subsequent =

| Holding = Persons believed to be members of the Communist Party of the United States of America could not be required to register as party members with the SACB because that would violate their self-incrimination rights under the Fifth Amendment.

| Majority = Brennan

| JoinMajority = Warren, Black, Douglas, Clark, Harlan, Stewart, Fortas

| Concurrence = Black

| Concurrence2 = Clark

| NotParticipating = White

| LawsApplied=U.S. Const. amend. V

}}

{{wikisource}}

Albertson v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 382 U.S. 70 (1965), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled on November 15, 1965, that persons (in this case, William Albertson) believed to be members of the Communist Party of the United States of America could not be required to register as party members with the Subversive Activities Control Board because the information which party members were required to submit could form the basis of their prosecution for being party members, which is a crime, and therefore deprived them of their self-incrimination rights under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.