Algebraic matroid
{{Short description|Abstraction of algebraic independence}}
In mathematics, an algebraic matroid is a matroid, a combinatorial structure, that expresses an abstraction of the relation of algebraic independence.
Definition
Given a field extension L/K, Zorn's lemma can be used to show that there always exists a maximal algebraically independent subset of L over K. Further, all the maximal algebraically independent subsets have the same cardinality, known as the transcendence degree of the extension.
For every finite set S of elements of L, the algebraically independent subsets of S satisfy the axioms that define the independent sets of a matroid. In this matroid, the rank of a set of elements is its transcendence degree, and the flat generated by a set T of elements is the intersection of L with the field K[T].Oxley (1992) p.216 A matroid that can be generated in this way is called algebraic or algebraically representable.Oxley (1992) p.218 No good characterization of algebraic matroids is known,Oxley (1992) p.215 but certain matroids are known to be non-algebraic; the smallest is the Vámos matroid.{{cite journal | last1 = Ingleton | first1 = A. W. | last2 = Main | first2 = R. A. | doi = 10.1112/blms/7.2.144 | journal = Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society | mr = 0369110 | zbl=0315.05018 | pages = 144–146 | title = Non-algebraic matroids exist | volume = 7 | year = 1975| issue = 2 }}.
Relation to linear matroids
Many finite matroids may be represented by a matrix over a field K, in which the matroid elements correspond to matrix columns, and a set of elements is independent if the corresponding set of columns is linearly independent. Every matroid with a linear representation of this type over a field F may also be represented as an algebraic matroid over F,Oxley (1992) p.220White (1987) p.24 by choosing an indeterminate for each row of the matrix, and by using the matrix coefficients within each column to assign each matroid element a linear combination of these transcendentals. For fields of characteristic zero (such as the real numbers) linear and algebraic matroids coincide, but for other fields there may exist algebraic matroids that are not linear;{{cite book | last = Ingleton | first = A. W. | chapter = Representation of matroids | location = London | mr = 0278974 | zbl=0222.05025 | pages = 149–167 | publisher = Academic Press | title = Combinatorial Mathematics and its Applications (Proc. Conf., Oxford, 1969) | year = 1971}}{{citation|title=Applied Discrete Structures|first=K. D.|last=Joshi|publisher=New Age International|year=1997|isbn=9788122408263|page=909}}. indeed the non-Pappus matroid is algebraic over any finite field, but not linear and not algebraic over any field of characteristic zero. However, if a matroid is algebraic over a field F of characteristic zero then it is linear over F(T) for some finite set of transcendentals T over FOxley (1992) p.221 and over the algebraic closure of F.
Closure properties
If a matroid is algebraic over a simple extension F(t) then it is algebraic over F. It follows that the class of algebraic matroids is closed under contraction,Oxley (1992) p.222 and that a matroid algebraic over F is algebraic over the prime field of F.Oxley (1992) p.224
The class of algebraic matroids is closed under truncation and matroid union. It is not known whether the dual of an algebraic matroid is always algebraicOxley (1992) p.223 and there is no excluded minor characterisation of the class.
Characteristic set
The (algebraic) characteristic set K(M) of a matroid M is the set of possible characteristics of fields over which M is algebraically representable.
- If 0 is in K(M) then all sufficiently large primes are in K(M).
- Every prime occurs as the unique characteristic for some matroid.{{cite journal | last=Lindström | first=Bernt | title=On the algebraic characteristic set for a class of matroids | journal=Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society | volume=95 | pages=147–151 | year=1985 | issue=1 | zbl=0572.05019 | jstor=2045591 | doi=10.2307/2045591}}
- If M is algebraic over F then any contraction of M is algebraic over F and hence so is any minor of M.White (1987) p.25
Notes
{{reflist|30em}}
References
- {{cite book | last=Oxley | first=James G. |author-link = James Oxley| title=Matroid theory | series=Oxford Science Publications | location=Oxford | publisher=Oxford University Press | year=1992 | isbn=0-19-853563-5 | zbl=0784.05002 }}
- {{cite book | last = Welsh | first = D. J. A. | author-link = Dominic Welsh | isbn = 9780486474397 | publisher = Courier Dover Publications | title = Matroid Theory | year = 2010 | orig-year=1976 }}
- {{citation | editor-last=White | editor-first=Neil | title=Combinatorial geometries | series=Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications | volume=29 | location=Cambridge | publisher=Cambridge University Press | year=1987 | isbn=0-521-33339-3 | zbl=0626.00007 | url-access=registration | url=https://archive.org/details/combinatorialgeo0000unse }}