Allan Hills 84001

{{short description|Martian meteorite discovered in Antarctica in 1984}}

{{Infobox meteorite

|Name= Allan Hills 84001

|Image= ALH84001.jpg

|Image_caption= Meteorite fragment ALH84001

|Type= Achondrite

|Clan= Martian meteorite

|Group=

|Grouplet= Orthopyroxenite

|Structural_classification=

|Composition= Low-Ca Orthopyroxene, Chromite, Maskelynite, Fe-rich carbonate

|Shock= B

|Weathering= A/B

|Country= Antarctica

|Region= Allan Hills, Far Western Icefield

|Lat_Long= {{Coord|76|55|13|S|156|46|25|E|display=inline,title}}

|Observed_fall= No

|Fall_date=

|Found_date= 1984

|TKW= 1930.9 g

|Image2=

|Image2_caption=

}}

Allan Hills 84001 (ALH84001{{cite web|url= https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?sea=Allan+Hills+84001&sfor=names&ants=&nwas=&falls=&valids=&stype=contains&lrec=50&map=ge&browse=&country=All&srt=name&categ=All&mblist=All&rect=&phot=&strewn=&snew=0&pnt=Normal%20table&code=604|title=Meteoritical Bulletin Database: Allan Hills 84001}}) is a fragment of a Martian meteorite that was found in the Allan Hills in Antarctica on December 27, 1984, by a team of American meteorite hunters from the ANSMET project. Like other members of the shergottitenakhlitechassignite (SNC) group of meteorites, ALH84001 is thought to have originated on Mars. However, it does not fit into any of the previously discovered SNC groups. Its mass upon discovery was {{convert|1.93|kg}}.

In 1996, a group of scientists found features in the likeness of microscopic fossils of bacteria in the meteorite, suggesting that these organisms also originated on Mars. The claims immediately made headlines worldwide, culminating in U.S. president Bill Clinton giving a speech about the potential discovery.{{cite web|url=http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/snc/clinton.html|title=President Clinton Statement Regarding Mars Meteorite Discovery|website=archive.is/yTTe|access-date=2024-11-15|archive-date=2012-08-05|archive-url=https://archive.today/20120805214940/http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/snc/clinton.html|url-status=bot: unknown}} These claims were controversial from the beginning, and much of the scientific community ultimately rejected the hypothesis once all the unusual features in the meteorite had been explained without requiring life to be present. Despite there being no convincing evidence of Martian life, the initial paper and the enormous scientific and public attention caused by it are considered turning points in the history of the developing science of astrobiology.

History and description

File:ALH84001 meteorite Smithsonian.jpg

ALH 84001 was found on the Allan Hills Far Western Icefield during the 1984–85 season, by Roberta Score, Lab Manager of the Antarctic Meteorite Laboratory at the Johnson Space Center.{{cite book |last1=Cassidy |first1=William |title=Meteorites, Ice, and Antarctica: A personal account |url=https://archive.org/details/meteoritesiceant00waca |url-access=limited |date=2003 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge |isbn=9780521258722 |pages=[https://archive.org/details/meteoritesiceant00waca/page/n137 122]}}

ALH84001 is thought to be one of the oldest Martian meteorites, proposed to have crystallized from molten rock 4.091 billion years ago.{{Cite journal|last1=Lapen|first1=T. J.|date=2010|title=A Younger Age for ALH84001 and Its Geochemical Link to Shergottite Sources in Mars|journal=Science|volume=328|issue=5976|pages=347–351|doi=10.1126/science.1185395|pmid=20395507|bibcode = 2010Sci...328..347L |last2=Righter|first2=M.|last3=Brandon|first3=A. D.|last4=Debaille|first4=V.|last5=Beard|first5=B. L.|last6=Shafer|first6=J. T.|last7=Peslier|first7=A. H.|s2cid=17601709|display-authors=1}} Chemical analysis suggests that it originated on Mars{{cite web |url=http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?sea=Martian+(OPX)&sfor=types&stype=exact |title=Martian (OPX) Meteorites |work=The Meteoritical Society |publisher=Lunar And Planetary Institute |access-date=2014-05-07 }}{{cite web |url=http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?sea=Martian+%28OPX%29&sfor=types&ants=&falls=&valids=&stype=exact&lrec=50&map=ge&browse=&country=All&srt=&categ=All&mblist=All&rect=&phot=&snew=0&pnt=Normal_table&code=604 |title=Information on the Allan Hills 84001 |work=The Meteoritical Society |publisher=Lunar and Planetary Institute |access-date=2014-05-07 }} when there was liquid water on the planet's surface.{{cite web |url=http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/snc/alh.html |title=The ALH84001 Meteorite |work=NASA |publisher=Jet Propulsion Laboratory |access-date=2014-05-07 |quote=Orange carbonate grains, 100 to 200 microns across, indicate that the meteorite was once immersed in water. }}

In September 2005, Vicky Hamilton, of the University of Hawaii at Manoa, presented an analysis of the origin of ALH84001 using data from the Mars Global Surveyor and 2001 Mars Odyssey spacecraft orbiting Mars. According to the analysis, Eos Chasma in the Valles Marineris canyon appears to be the source of the meteorite.{{cite web|url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn8004-birthplace-of-famous-mars-meteorite-pinpointed/|title=Birthplace of famous Mars meteorite pinpointed|work=New Scientist|access-date=March 18, 2006}} The analysis was not conclusive, partly because it was limited to areas of Mars not obscured by dust.{{Citation needed|date=August 2019}}

The theory holds that ALH84001 was blasted away from the surface of Mars by the impact of a meteor about 17 million years ago,{{Cite web|title=Evidence for ancient Martian life|url=http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/mgs/sci/fifthconf99/6142.pdf}} and fell on Earth about 13,000 years ago.{{cite web |url=http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lpi/meteorites/The_Meteorite.shtml |title=How could ALH84001 get from Mars to Earth? |work=Lunar and Planetary Institute |publisher=LPI |date=2014 |access-date=2014-05-07 }} These dates were established by a variety of radiometric dating techniques, including samarium–neodymium (Sm–Nd), rubidium–strontium (Rb–Sr), potassium–argon (K–Ar), and carbon-14 dating.{{Cite journal|last=Nyquist|first=L. E.|author2=Wiesmann, H.|author3= Shih, C.-Y.|author4= Dasch, J.|date= 1999|title=Lunar Meteorites and the Lunar Crustal SR and Nd Isotopic Compositions|journal=Lunar and Planetary Science|volume=27|page=971|bibcode=1996LPI....27..971N}}{{Cite journal|last1=Borg|first1=Lars|display-authors=1|date= 1999|title=The Age of the Carbonates in Martian Meteorite ALH84001|journal=Science|pmid=10506566|volume=286|issue=5437|pages=90–94|doi=10.1126/science.286.5437.90|bibcode = 1999Sci...286...90B |last2=Connelly|first2=J. N. |last3=Nyquist |first3=L. E. |last4=Shih|first4=C. Y.|last5=Wiesmann|first5=H|last6=Reese|first6=Y|url=https://zenodo.org/record/1231165}} Other meteorites that have potential biological markings have generated less interest because they do not contain rock from a "wet" Mars; ALH84001 is the only meteorite originating when Mars may have had liquid surface water.

In October 2011, it was reported that isotopic analysis indicated that the carbonates in ALH84001 were precipitated at a temperature of {{convert|18|C|F}} with water and carbon dioxide from the Martian atmosphere. The carbonate carbon and oxygen isotope ratios imply deposition of the carbonates from a gradually evaporating subsurface water body, probably a shallow aquifer meters or tens of meters below the surface.{{cite journal|title=Carbonates in the Martian meteorite Allan Hills 84001 formed at 18 ± 4 °C in a near-surface aqueous environment|journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences|date=11 October 2011|volume=108|issue=41|pages=16895–16899|publisher=PNAS|doi=10.1073/pnas.1109444108|last1=Eiler|first1=John M.|last2=Fischer|first2=Woodward W.|last3=Halevy|first3=Itay|pmid=21969543|pmc=3193235|doi-access=free}}

In April 2020, researchers reported discovering nitrogen-bearing organics in Allan Hills 84001.{{cite journal |author=Koike, Mizuho |display-authors=et al. |title=In-situ preservation of nitrogen-bearing organics in Noachian Martian carbonates |date=24 April 2020 |journal=Nature Communications |volume=11 |number=1988 |page=1988 |doi=10.1038/s41467-020-15931-4 |pmid=32332762 |pmc=7181736 |bibcode=2020NatCo..11.1988K }}

A later study in January 2022 concluded that ALH84001 did not contain Martian life; the discovered organic molecules were found to be associated with abiotic processes (i.e., "serpentinization and carbonation reactions that occurred during the aqueous alteration of basalt rock by hydrothermal fluids") produced on the very early Mars 4 billion years ago instead.{{cite web|url=https://apnews.com/article/space-exploration-science-business-planets-mars-33dc55ce0ebced0b65322b03ae06feda|title=Study nixes Mars life in meteorite found in Antarctica|last=Dunn|first=Marcia|date=13 January 2022 |publisher=Associated Press|access-date=13 January 2022}}{{cite journal |author=Steele, A. |display-authors=et al. |title=Organic synthesis associated with serpentinization and carbonation on early Mars |url=https://www.science.org/doi/epdf/10.1126/science.abg7905 |date=13 January 2022 |journal=Science |volume=375 |issue=6577 |pages=172–177 |doi=10.1126/science.abg7905 |pmid=35025630 |bibcode=2022Sci...375..172S |s2cid=245933224 |accessdate=15 January 2022 |url-access=subscription }}

Hypothetical biogenic features

{{see also|Nanobe}}

File:ALH84001 structures.jpg

On August 6, 1996, a team of researchers led by NASA scientists including lead author David S. McKay announced that the meteorite may contain trace evidence of life from Mars.{{cite web|title=After 10 years, few believe life on Mars|url=https://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/space/2006-08-06-mars-life_x.htm|last=Crenson|first=Matt|publisher=Associated Press on USA Today|date=2006-08-06|access-date=2009-12-06|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120114141927/https://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/space/2006-08-06-mars-life_x.htm|archive-date=14 January 2012}} This was

published as an article in Science a few days later.{{Cite journal|last1=McKay|first1=David S.|date= 1996|title=Search for Past Life on Mars: Possible Relic Biogenic Activity in Martian Meteorite ALH84001|journal=Science|pmid=8688069|volume=273|issue=5277|pages=924–930|doi=10.1126/science.273.5277.924|bibcode = 1996Sci...273..924M |display-authors=2|last2=Gibson|first2=E. K. Jr.|last3=Thomas-Keprta|first3=Kathie L.|last4=Vali|first4=H|last5=Romanek|first5=C. S.|last6=Clemett|first6=S. J.|last7=Chillier|first7=X. D.|last8=Maechling|first8=C. R.|last9=Zare|first9=R. N.|s2cid=40690489}} Under a scanning electron microscope, structures were visible that some scientists interpreted as fossils of bacteria-like lifeforms. The structures found on ALH84001 are {{Nowrap|20–100 nanometres}} in diameter, similar in size to theoretical nanobacteria, but smaller than any cellular life known at the time of their discovery. If the structures had been fossilized lifeforms, as was proposed by the so-called biogenic hypothesis of their formation, they would have been the first solid evidence of the existence of extraterrestrial life, aside from the chance of their origin being terrestrial contamination.{{Cite journal|author=McSween, H. Y.|title=Evidence for life in a martian meteorite?|journal=GSA Today|volume=7|issue=7|pages=1–7|date=1997|pmid=11541665}}

The announcement of possible extraterrestrial life caused considerable controversy. When the discovery was announced, many immediately conjectured that the fossils were the first true evidence of extraterrestrial life—making headlines around the world, and even prompting President of the United States Bill Clinton to make a formal televised announcement to mark the event.{{cite web|title=President Clinton Statement Regarding Mars Meteorite Discovery|url=http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/snc/clinton.html|last=Clinton|first=Bill|publisher=NASA|date=1996-08-07|access-date=2006-08-07}}

McKay argued that likely microbial terrestrial contamination found in other Martian meteorites does not resemble the microscopic shapes in ALH84001. In particular, the shapes within ALH84001 look intergrown or embedded in the indigenous material, while likely contamination does not.{{cite journal |title=Origins of magnetite nanocrystals in Martian meteorite ALH84001 |journal=Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta |date=2009 |last1= Thomas-Keprta |first1=K. L. |last2=Clemett |first2=S. J. |last3=McKay |first3=D. S. |last4=Gibson |first4=E. K. |last5=Wentworth |first5=S. J. |volume=73 |issue=21 |pages=6631–6677 |url=http://www.nasa.gov/centers/johnson/pdf/403099main_GCA_2009_final_corrected.pdf |access-date=2014-05-07 |doi=10.1016/j.gca.2009.05.064|bibcode = 2009GeCoA..73.6631T }} While it has not yet conclusively been shown how the features in the meteorite were formed, similar features have been recreated in the lab without biological inputs by a team led by D.C. Golden.{{cite web |url=http://www.nasa.gov/centers/johnson/news/releases/2004/J04-025.html |title=NASA – Press Release #J04-025 |publisher=Nasa.gov |access-date=2012-03-29 |archive-date=2010-03-18 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100318072502/http://www.nasa.gov/centers/johnson/news/releases/2004/J04-025.html |url-status=dead }} McKay says these results were obtained using unrealistically pure raw materials as a starting point, and "will not explain many of the features described by us in ALH84001." According to McKay, a plausible inorganic model "must explain simultaneously all of the properties that we and others have suggested as possible biogenic properties of this meteorite." Much of the scientific community disagreed with McKay.

In January 2010, a team of scientists at Johnson Space Center, including McKay, argued that since their original paper was published in November 2009, the biogenic hypothesis has been further supported by the discovery of three times the original amount of fossil-like data, including more "biomorphs" (suspected Martian fossils), inside two additional Martian meteorites, as well as more evidence in other parts of the Allan Hills meteorite itself.{{Cite web |url=https://spaceflightnow.com/news/n1001/09marslife/ |title=Three Martian meteorites triple evidence for Mars life |first=Craig |last=Covault |work=Spaceflight Now |access-date=2019-02-15 |date=9 January 2010}} However, many in the scientific community have pointed out that "morphology alone cannot be used unambiguously as a tool for primitive life detection."{{cite book | title = Instruments, Methods, and Missions for Astrobiology II | journal = SPIE Proceedings | date = December 30, 1999 | first1 = Juan-Manuel Garcia-Ruiz | volume = Proc. SPIE 3755 | pages = 74–82 | doi = 10.1117/12.375088 | quote = It is concluded that "morphology cannot be used unambiguously as a tool for primitive life detection."| last1 = Garcia-Ruiz | editor-first1 = Richard B. | editor-last1 = Hoover | chapter = Morphological behavior of inorganic precipitation systems | s2cid = 84764520 }}{{cite news|author=Agresti|author2=House|author3=Jögi|author4=Kudryavstev|author5=McKeegan|author6=Runnegar|author7=Schopf|author8=Wdowiak|title=Detection and geochemical characterization of Earth's earliest life|date=3 December 2008|publisher=NASA|url=http://astrobiology.ucla.edu/pages/res3e.html|work=NASA Astrobiology Institute|access-date=2013-01-15|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130123132429/http://astrobiology.ucla.edu/pages/res3e.html|archive-date=23 January 2013}}{{cite journal | title = Evidence of Archean life: Stromatolites and microfossils | journal = Precambrian Research | date = 28 April 2007 | first1 = J. William | last1 = Schopf | first2 = Anatoliy B. | last2 = Kudryavtsev | first3 = Andrew D. | last3 = Czaja | first4 = Abhishek B. | last4 = Tripathi | volume = 158 | issue = 3–4 | pages = 141–155 | url = http://www.cornellcollege.edu/geology/courses/greenstein/paleo/schopf_07.pdf | access-date = 2013-01-15 | doi = 10.1016/j.precamres.2007.04.009 | bibcode = 2007PreR..158..141S | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20121224202951/http://www.cornellcollege.edu/geology/courses/greenstein/paleo/schopf_07.pdf | archive-date = 24 December 2012 | url-status = dead | df = dmy-all }} Interpretation of morphology is notoriously subjective, and its use alone has led to numerous errors of interpretation.

Features of ALH84001 that have been interpreted as suggesting the presence of microfossils include:

  • The structures resemble some modern terrestrial bacteria and their appendages. Though some are much smaller than any known extant Earth microbes, others are of the order of 100–200 nm in size, within the size limits of Pelagibacter ubique, the most common bacterium on Earth, which ranges from 120 to 200 nm, as well as hypothetical nanobacteria. RNA organisms, which are expected to have lived on Earth during the time period when ALH84001 was ejected from Mars, may also have been as small or smaller than these structures, as modern RNA viruses and viroids are often as little as a few dozen nanometers. Some of the structures are even larger, 1–2 microns in diameter. The smallest structures are too small to contain all the systems required by modern life.
  • Some of the structures resemble colonies and biofilms. However, there are many instances of morphologies that suggested life and were later shown to be due to inorganic processes.
  • The meteorite contains magnetite crystals of the unusual rectangular prism type, and organized into domains all about the same size, indistinguishable from magnetite produced biologically on Earth and not matching any known non-biological magnetite that forms naturally on Earth. The magnetite is embedded in the carbonate. If found on Earth it would be a very strong biosignature. However, in 2001, scientists were able to explain and produce carbonate globules containing similar magnetite grains through an inorganic process simulating conditions ALH84001 likely experienced on Mars.
  • It contains polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) concentrated in the regions containing the carbonate globules, and these have been shown to be indigenous. Other organics such as amino acids do not follow this pattern and are probably due to Antarctic contamination. However, PAHs are also regularly found in asteroids, comets and meteorites, and in deep space, all in the absence of life.{{Cite journal |title=Habitability on Early Mars and the Search for Biosignatures with the ExoMars Rover |journal=Astrobiology |volume=17 |number=6–7 |year=2017 |doi=10.1089/ast.2016.1533 |first1=Jorge L. |last1=Vago |first2=Frances |last2=Westall |pages=471–510 |pmid=31067287 |pmc=5685153 |bibcode=2017AsBio..17..471V |display-authors=1}}

See also

Notes

{{Reflist}}

References

{{Refbegin}}

  • {{cite web|last=Mittlefehldt|first=D. W.|date=1994|url=http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lpi/meteorites/mitm96.html|title=ALH84001, a cumulate orthopyroxenite member of the SNC meteorite group|publisher=lpi.usra.edu|work=Meteoritics|number=29|pages=214–221|access-date=March 18, 2006}}
  • {{cite web|last1=Stephan|first1=T.|last2=Jessberger|first2=E. K.|last3=Heiss|first3=C. H.|last4=Rost|first4=D.|date=2003|url=https://www.uni-muenster.de/Planetologie/en/members/stephan/Stephan_MAPS38_109.html|archive-url=https://archive.today/20070812074816/http://www.uni-muenster.de/Planetologie/en/members/stephan/Stephan_MAPS38_109.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=2007-08-12|title=TOF-SIMS analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Allan Hills 84001|publisher=uni-muenster.de|work=Meteorit. Planet. Sci.|number=38|pages=109–116}}

{{Refend}}

Further reading

  • {{cite book|last=Sawyer|first=Kathy|date=2006|title=The Rock from Mars: A Detective Story on Two Planets|publisher=Random House|isbn=1-4000-6010-9|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/rockfrommarsdete00sawy}}