American Plan (union negotiations)

{{Short description|1920s plan for refusing to negotiate with trades unions}}

{{About||the economic program of Henry Clay and the Whig Party that Clay called his American Plan|American System (economic plan)|the U.S. presidential primary allocation system known as the American Plan|Graduated Random Presidential Primary System}}

{{use mdy dates|date=September 2021}}

File:The_Trap,_Open_Shoppers_Clearing_Decks.png

Adjacent to article criticizing employers open shop drives and the American Plan Conference effects on workers well-being.]]

The American Plan is the term used to refer to open shop strategies pursued by employers in the United States in the 1920s.{{Cite journal|last=Wakstein|first=Allen M.|date=December 1964|title=The Origins of the Open-Shop Movement, 1919-1920|journal=The Journal of American History|volume=51|issue=3|pages=460–475|doi=10.2307/1894896|jstor=1894896 |issn=0021-8723}} The American Plan deemed unions to be "un-American,"{{Cite news|url=http://financial-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/American+Plan|title=American Plan|work=TheFreeDictionary.com|access-date=2017-09-26}} and the resulting anti-union efforts of employers decreased union membership and efficacy until the 1930s. During World War I, U.S. Steel took a strong anti-union stance in its Chicago mills, calling union organizers "German propagandists." U.S. Steel also required that steelworkers sign a "Pledge of Patriotism," promising not to strike.{{Cite web|url=http://www.encyclopedia.chicagohistory.org/pages/43.html|title=American Plan|website=www.encyclopedia.chicagohistory.org|access-date=2017-09-26}}{{Cite journal |last=Wakstein |first=Allen M. |date=December 1, 1964 |title=The Origins of the Open-Shop Movement, 1919-1920 |url=https://academic.oup.com/jah/article-lookup/doi/10.2307/1894896 |journal=The Journal of American History |volume=51 |issue=3 |pages=460–475 |doi=10.2307/1894896|jstor=1894896 }}

The National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) endorsed the anti-union strategy in 1920.{{Cite book |url=https://archive.org/details/sim_industry-week_1920-03-11_66_11/page/766/mode/2up?q=americanism |title=Business Men Plan War on Reds |date=February 11, 1920 |publisher=The Iron Trade Review |others=Internet Archive |volume=66 |language=English |issue=11}} The term, American Plan, comes from a meeting of anti-union employers held in Chicago in 1921. The employers agreed not to negotiate with unions, and to require that employees sign a pledge that they would not join a union.{{Cite book |last1=Dunn |first1=Robert W. |url=http://archive.org/details/americanizationo00dunnrich |title=The Americanization of labor. The employers' offensive against the trade unions. With an introd. by S. Nearing |last2=Nearing |first2=Scott |date=1927 |publisher=New York : International Publishers |others=Prelinger Library}} Some hardline employers refused to recognize or negotiate with union leaders, and some boycotted unionized vendors and refused to sell supplies to striking employees. In some highly unionized cities, NAM members would fund deputized armed "patrols." While ostensibly charged with keeping the peace, these "imported thugs" were accused of intimidating striking workers and breaking up peaceful demonstrations by force.Soderstrom, Carl; Soderstrom, Robert; Stevens, Chris; Burt, Andrew (2018). [http://www.fortygavels.com Forty Gavels: The Life of Reuben Soderstrom and the Illinois AFL-CIO.] 1. Peoria, IL: CWS Publishing. pp. 165–167. {{ISBN|978-0998257532}}. They would also pursue court-ordered injunctions against labor leaders, such as Illinois labor leader Reuben Soderstrom, to prevent them from organizing protests. When Soderstrom and his fellow Labor Council members protested, they were issued injunctions and charged with conspiracy. The American Plan implied a connection between union activity and the Bolsheviks and played on fears during the First Red Scare.

As a result, the American Plan drove down union membership by at least 25% between 1921 and 1923. From companies' participation in the American Plan, as well as anti-union decisions from the Supreme Court of the United States, union membership fell from 5.1 million in 1920 to 3.6 million in 1929. In the 1930s, successful organizing drives by industrial unions weakened the American Plan, and employer resistance to unions.{{Cite book|last=Kochan, Thomas A.|display-authors=etal|date=1984|title=Worker Participation and American Unions. Threat or Opportunity?.|isbn=9780880990226 |url=https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED247439|language=en}}

{{Clear|right}}{{right|

File:American Plan Open Shop Logo 04.png|alt=

File:American Plan Open Shop Logo 01.png|alt=

File:American Plan Open Shop Logo 03.png|alt=

File:American Plan Open Shop Logo 05.png|

File:American Plan Open Shop Logo 02.png|alt=

}}{{Br}}

See also

References

Further reading

  • [http://www.worldhistory.biz/modern-history/82342-american-plan.html "American Plan," Www.worldhistory.biz.]
  • {{Cite journal |last=Montgomery |first=Royal E. |date=1926 |title=The Landis Arbitration and Award |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2354794 |journal=The University Journal of Business |volume=4 |issue=3 |pages=260–293 |doi=10.1086/506860 |jstor=2354794 |issn=1525-6979}}

Category:1920s in the United States

Category:1920 in the United States

Category:History of labor relations in the United States

Category:1920 labor disputes and strikes

{{job-stub}}

{{US-hist-stub}}