Antidicomarians

{{Short description|Christian sect active from the 3rd to the 5th century}}

The Antidicomarians or Antidicomarianites,Greek ἀντιδικομαριανῖται, literally "opponents of Mary", from ἀντίδικος 'adversary' + Μαρία 'Mary' (OED). also called Dimoerites,Epiphanius uses the term Dimoerite for both the Apollinarians and the Antidicomarians. See Frank Williams (ed.), The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis: Books II and III. De Fide, 2nd rev. ed. (Brill, 2013), §§77–78. were a Christian sect active from the 3rd to the 5th century.William H. Brackney, Historical Dictionary of Radical Christianity (Scarecrow Press, 2012 [{{ISBN|978-0-8108-7179-3}}]), [https://books.google.com/books?id=ZP6fv8LqJ4MC&pg=PA31 p. 31]. Their name was invented by an opponent, Epiphanius of Salamis, who described them as heretical in his Panarion.Petri Luomanen, Recovering Jewish-Christian Sects and Gospels (Brill, 2012), p. 77n. The existence of the Antidicomarians as an organized sect may be doubted, as it is attested only in Epiphanius, but the doctrines he attributes to them were certainly matters of live debate in the late 4th century.Stephen J. Shoemaker, "Epiphanius of Salamis, the Kollyridians, and the Early Dormition Narratives: The Cult of the Virgin in the Fourth Century", Journal of Early Christian Studies, Vol. 16, No. 3 (2008), pp. 371–401. {{doi|10.1353/earl.0.0185}}

The Antidicomarians refused to accord any special status to Mary, mother of Jesus, and rejected the doctrine of her perpetual virginity. Joseph they considered a widower with six children from a previous marriage. At first, they rejected the virgin birth and considered Joseph the father of Jesus. Later, they came to accept the virgin birth, but held that Joseph and Mary had normal sexual relations after Jesus' birth. They viewed the brothers of Jesus mentioned in the New Testament as Mary and Joseph's other children. The sect can be seen as a reaction to the rise of Marian devotion and celibacy.Vasiliki Limberis, Divine Heiress: The Virgin Mary and the Making of Christian Constantinople (Routledge, 1994), pp. 119–120. According to Epiphanius, the Antidicomarians attributed their position to Apollinaris of Laodicea. He wrote a letter defending the majority opinion about Mary to the Christians of Arabia, a copy of which he included in his Panarion.Frank Williams (ed.), The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis: Books II and III. De Fide, 2nd rev. ed. (Brill, 2013), §§77–78.

The view that the brothers of Jesus were the children of Mary and Joseph was held independently of the Antidicomarian sect in the early church: Tertullian, Hegesippus and Helvidius held it,Cross, FL, ed. (2005), "Brethren of the Lord", The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, New York: Oxford University Press. while Origen mentions it.{{cite book|author= Origen |editor-last= Lienhard |editor-first= Joseph T. |title= Homilies on Luke |volume= 94 |series= The Fathers of the Church Series |publisher= Catholic University of America Press |year= 1996 |isbn= 9780813200941 |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=sUCQS0X1BLMC}} The Antidicomarian position on Mary became standard in Protestantism.

See also

  • Bonosus of Sardica, 4th-century theologian who rejected the perpetual virginity of Mary
  • Collyridianism, a contemporary Arabian sect said to have worshipped Mary

References

{{CE1913 poster|Antidicomarianites}}

{{reflist}}

{{Virgin Mary}}

{{Beliefs condemned by the Catholic Church}}

Category:Ancient Christian controversies

Category:Mariology