Architects/Designers/Planners for Social Responsibility
Architects/Designers/Planners for Social Responsibility (ADPSR) is a 501(c)(3) non profit organization established in 1981. Its stated mission is to work "for peace, environmental protection, ecological building, social justice, and the development of healthy communities."{{Cite web |url=http://adpsr.org/home/about_us |title=ADPSR About Us |access-date=2015-02-17 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150217223030/http://adpsr.org/home/about_us |archive-date=2015-02-17 |url-status=dead }} ADPSR programs promote professional and public awareness of critical social and environmental issues, and the non profit also honors individuals and organizations that "exemplify ADPSR's goals of peace, preservation of the natural and build environment, and socially responsible development"{{Cite web |url=http://www.adpsr.org/home/mumford_award_history |title=Mumford Award History |access-date=2015-02-17 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150217220129/http://www.adpsr.org/home/mumford_award_history |archive-date=2015-02-17 |url-status=dead }} with its annual Lewis Mumford Awards. ADPSR was first established to promote nuclear disarmament and correct the imbalances caused by military excesses overshadowing domestic needs. Throughout the 1980s, the non-profit initiated numerous peace projects including peace parks, conferences, exhibits, and citizen diplomacy exchange programs with the former Soviet Union. ADPSR was honored for this work in 1993 by the American Institute of Architects, which called ADPSR "a strong, resounding voice for social and political justice."{{Cite web|url=https://www.aia.org/aia-architects?filters=typeFilters%3A2491%3B|title=Architects|website=www.aia.org|access-date=2019-06-13|archive-date=2019-05-02|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190502134536/https://www.aia.org/aia-architects?filters=typeFilters%3A2491%3B|url-status=live}} Since the 1990s, the organization has focused much of its effort on ecological and socially responsible development.
Projects
ADPSR has received media attention for its proposal to amend the American Institute of Architects' Code of Ethics. The proposed rule reads, "Members shall not design spaces intended for execution or for torture or other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment, including prolonged solitary confinement,"{{Cite web |url=http://www.adpsr.org/home/proposed_amendment |title=ADPSR Proposed Amendment |access-date=2015-02-17 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150217215840/http://www.adpsr.org/home/proposed_amendment |archive-date=2015-02-17 |url-status=dead }} citing multiple organizations' identification of prolonged solitary confinement as torture. In December 2014, the AIA rejected this petition to disallow members to design solitary confinement cells, death chambers, and facilities for torture.{{Cite web|url=http://www.cnn.com/2014/12/23/opinion/sperry-architects-torture/index.html|title=Architects and torture: What color is your waterboard?|last=Sperry|first=Raphael|date=2014-12-23|website=CNN|language=en-US|access-date=2019-05-29|archive-date=2018-09-01|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180901003233/http://www.cnn.com/2014/12/23/opinion/sperry-architects-torture/index.html|url-status=live}} This rejection, according to Raphael Sperry, President of ADPSR, goes against the AIA's current ethics code which states, "Members should uphold human rights in all their professional endeavors."{{Cite web |url=http://www.aia.org/aiaucmp/groups/aia/documents/pdf/aiap074122.pdf |title=AIA Code of Ethics |access-date=2015-02-17 |archive-date=2015-02-24 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150224213644/http://www.aia.org/aiaucmp/groups/aia/documents/pdf/aiap074122.pdf |url-status=live }} Helene Combs Dreiling, former president of the AIA, has spoken on behalf of the institute, stating that "The AIA Code of Ethics should not exist to create limitations on the practice by AIA members of specific building types,"{{Cite web |url=https://dk-media.s3.amazonaws.com/AA/AP/adpsr-org/downloads/292806/AIAResponseAnnotatedADPSR.pdf |title=AIA Response with Annotations by Raphael Sperry |access-date=2015-02-17 |archive-date=2015-02-18 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150218003312/https://dk-media.s3.amazonaws.com/AA/AP/adpsr-org/downloads/292806/AIAResponseAnnotatedADPSR.pdf |url-status=dead }} and that "[the Code] isn’t about what architects build."{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/17/arts/design/prison-architecture-and-the-question-of-ethics.html|title=Prison Architecture and the Question of Ethics|last=Kimmelman|first=Michael|date=2015-02-16|work=The New York Times|access-date=2019-05-29|language=en-US|issn=0362-4331|archive-date=2023-01-18|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230118041147/https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/17/arts/design/prison-architecture-and-the-question-of-ethics.html|url-status=live}}
This proposal and rejection have sparked a debate to which several publications, including The New York Times, ArchDaily,{{Cite web|url=http://www.archdaily.com/592454/architecture-and-human-rights-aia-rejects-controversial-ethics-amendment/|title=Architecture & Human Rights: AIA Rejects Controversial Ethics Amendment|last=Giermann|first=Holly|date=2015-01-29|website=ArchDaily|language=en-US|access-date=2019-05-29|archive-date=2019-08-07|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190807130920/https://www.archdaily.com/592454/architecture-and-human-rights-aia-rejects-controversial-ethics-amendment/|url-status=live}} and Architectural Record,{{Cite web|last=Edelson|first=Zachary|date=2015-01-20|url=https://www.architecturalrecord.com/articles/3307-aia-rejects-ethics-amendment?v=preview|title=AIA Rejects Ethics Amendment|website=www.architecturalrecord.com|language=en|access-date=2019-05-29|archive-date=2019-05-29|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190529092915/https://www.architecturalrecord.com/articles/3307-aia-rejects-ethics-amendment?v=preview|url-status=live}} have added their voices. In response to the AIA's rejection, Sperry states, "Is there nothing so odious that the A.I.A. wouldn't step in? ... What about concentration camps? The A.I.A. is basically saying business is more important than human rights. Yes, this is a tough profession. But you don't gain respect by hunkering down in a position of fear. You just dig yourself deeper into a hole."
ADPSR is an NGO in the United Nations program UN-Habitat, whose mission is "to promote socially and environmentally sustainable human settlements development and the achievement of adequate shelter for all."{{Cite web|url=https://unhabitat.org/un-habitat-at-a-glance/|title=UN-Habitat at a glance – UN-Habitat|access-date=2019-05-29|archive-date=2019-08-09|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190809110555/https://unhabitat.org/un-habitat-at-a-glance/|url-status=live}}
References
{{Reflist}}
External links
- {{Official website|https://www.adpsr.org/}}
{{Authority control}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Architects Designers Planners for Social Responsibility (ADPSR)}}
Category:Non-profit architecture organizations based in the United States
Category:Social justice organizations
Category:Human rights organizations based in the United States
Category:Architectural controversies