Ardcharnich#Enlargement of holdings appeals

The name Ardcharnich has been spelled in different ways. The [https://hdl.handle.net/2027/nyp.33433075881460?urlappend=%3Bseq=219 Collectanea de Rebus Albanicis] includes a contract from 1628 for the preservation of deer and roe in various estates including Ardchernich.{{Cite book|last=Gregory|first= Donald|last2= Skene|first2= W. F. |title=Collectanea de rebus albanicis, consisting of original papers and documents relating to the history of the highlands and islands of Scotland.|date=1847|publisher=T.G. Stevenson|oclc=1005684660}} This spelling also appears on an [https://maps.nls.uk/rec/18 early map] drawn by Robert Gordon dated ca. 1636-52.Gordon, Robert. Coygach and Loch Breyn drawn out of many imperfyt papers of M.T. Pont, ca. 1636-52 . In 1807 a newspaper piece in the Caledonian Mercury advertised the sale of a "valuable sheep farm" in the lands of [https://canmore.org.uk/site/12120/inverlael Inverlael] including Ardcharnick.{{Cite news|title=Valuable Sheep Farm in the County of Ross|date=3 August 1807|work=Caledonian Mercury}} The Handbook for Travellers in Scotland (1875) describes Ardcharnac as a hamlet.{{Cite book|last=Murray|first=John|title=Handbook for Travellers In Scotland|url=https://archive.org/details/handbookfort00john|publisher=J. Murray; [etc., etc.]|year=1875|location=London|pages=[https://archive.org/details/handbookfort00john/page/426 426]}}

In 1890 the estate of [https://canmore.org.uk/site/12120/inverlael Inverlael] in the township of Ardcharnich, belonged to Sir Arthur Mackenzie of Coul. Nine crofters from Ardcharnich appealed to Mackenzie for enlargement of their holdings. They argued that since the crofts had been cleared in the early 1800s, this once grazeable land which had been used by their predecessors, had become wild.{{Cite journal|title=Parliamentary papers. 1895:v.39:pt.2.| journal=Includes:reports from Commissioners, Inspectors and Others | year=1731 |hdl = 2027/hvd.32044106507858|language=en}} The crofters said they needed more cultivated lands, that their crofts are poor and in a bad place.

Mackenzie opposed the application for the return of 150 acres but consented to about ten acres, the land and rent to be divided between the applicants. A few years later ca.1902 the Estate was acquired by Mr. W. E. Gilmour. The crofters were once again cleared from the land along with most of the sheep. The land was added to the Inverlael deer forest.{{Cite book|title=Sessional papers. Inventory control record 1.|hdl = 2027/uc1.c3636375}}

The crofters made a second appeal for enlargement. The application for land was opposed by Mr. Gilmour. He argued that the land was essential to him for the preservation of his forest, or as a farm if he needed it. The Crofting Commission found that his arguments were unfounded, and that the applicants needed the land. Twenty three acres were granted to the crofters, subject to suitable fencing being erected.

In March 1911 the crofters or their successors applied for the grazing land previously requested in 1890. At the time the Commission felt that this was not feasible as it would require a large amount of fencing. On inspection it was found that the applicants holdings were small and they were in need of enlargement. It was also found that the small size of their holdings was due to the previous actions of the former proprietors of the Estate. With the help of the Commission enough fencing was purchased and the crofters were assigned 847 acres of grazing ground, to be divided between their households with a total rent of £21, 3s, or £2, 7s for each of nine shares.{{Cite journal|url=https://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015087752039?urlappend=;seq=236|title=Report. 1913 v.19.|website=HathiTrust|series=Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons. Sessional papers |hdl=2027/mdp.39015087752039?urlappend=%3Bseq=236|language=en|access-date=2020-02-18}}

Category:Populated places in Ross and Cromarty