Arizona Supreme Court
{{short description|Highest court in the U.S. state of Arizona}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=February 2025}}
{{Infobox high court
|court_name = Arizona Supreme Court
|image =Seal of the Arizona Supreme Court.png
|imagesize =150px
|caption = Seal of the Arizona Supreme Court
|established = 1912
|jurisdiction = Arizona
|location=Phoenix, Arizona
|type = Missouri plan with retention elections
|authority = Arizona Constitution
|appealsto = Supreme Court of the United States
|terms = 6 years
|positions = 7
|website = [https://www.azcourts.gov/AZ-Supreme-Court Official site]
|chiefjudgetitle = Chief Justice
|chiefjudgename = Ann Timmer
|termstart = July 1, 2024
|termend = June 30, 2029{{cite web |title=Supreme Court of Arizona - Administrative Order No. 2024-17 |url=https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/24359289/timmer-replacing-brutinel-2024-17.pdf}}
|termend2 =
}}
The Arizona Supreme Court is the state supreme court of the U.S. state of Arizona. Sitting in the Supreme Court building in downtown Phoenix, the court consists of a chief justice, a vice chief justice, and five associate justices. Each justice is appointed by the governor of Arizona from a list recommended by a bipartisan commission. Justices stand for retention in an election two years after their appointment and then every six years.[https://www.azleg.gov/viewDocument/?docName=http://www.azleg.gov/const/6/37.htm Ariz. Const. Art. VI, § 37.] They must retire at age 70.
Court history
The court started in 1912 with three justices. Alfred Franklin, Donald L. Cunningham, and Henry D. Ross took office on February 14, 1912. In 1949, the Court expanded from three to five justices.William O. Douglas, Arizona's New Judicial Article, 2 ARIZ. L. REV. 159 (1960). In 2016 it was further expanded from five to seven justices.{{Cite web|url=https://kjzz.org/content/269920/bill-would-add-2-new-justices-arizona-supreme-court|title=Bill Would Add 2 New Justices To Arizona Supreme Court|date=February 25, 2016|website=KJZZ}} This expansion was criticized at the time by some as court packing.{{Cite web |last=Berman |first=Russell |date=2016-05-10 |title=Arizona Republicans Try to Bring Back Court-Packing |url=https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/05/court-packing-enjoys-a-political-renaissance/481758/ |access-date=2024-04-09 |website=The Atlantic |language=en}}
The jurisdiction of the court is prescribed by Article VI, Section 5 of the Arizona Constitution.[https://www.azleg.gov/viewDocument/?docName=http://www.azleg.gov/const/6/5.htm Ariz. Const. Art. VI, § 5.] Most of the appeals heard by the court go through the Arizona Court of Appeals, except for death penalty cases, over which the Arizona Supreme Court has sole appellate jurisdiction. The court also has original jurisdiction in a few other circumstances as outlined in the Arizona Constitution. A quorum is three, but the whole court must sit in order to declare a law unconstitutional.[https://www.azleg.gov/viewDocument/?docName=http://www.azleg.gov/const/6/2.htm Ariz. Const. Art. VI, § 2.]
Selection of justices
File:Arizona Supreme Court, Phoenix, Arizona - panoramio.jpg.]]
The chief justice is chosen for a five-year term by the court, and is eligible for re-election. They supervise the administration of all the inferior courts. They are chairman of the Commission on Appellate Court Appointments, which nominates candidates to fill vacancies in the appellate courts. If the governor fails to appoint one of the nominated candidates within sixty days of their names being submitted to her or him, the chief justice makes the appointment.
The vice chief justice, who acts as chief justice in the latter's "absence or incapacity," is chosen by the court for a term determined by the court.[https://www.azleg.gov/viewDocument/?docName=http://www.azleg.gov/const/6/3.htm Ariz. Const. Art. VI, § 3.]
Justices are selected by a modified form of the Missouri Plan. A bipartisan commission considers applicants and sends a list of nominees to the governor. The governor is required by law to appoint from this list based on merit, without regard to party affiliation. Justices are then retained for an initial period, after which they are subject to a retention election. If the justice wins the election, their term is six years.
Between February and April 2024, the Arizona Senate (with all Republican state senators approving and all Democratic state senators objecting) passed a resolution to change the Arizona Supreme Court term length from six years to lifelong, which would apply retroactively and override the result of the November 2024 Arizona Supreme Court retention elections. The resolution was approved by the{{Cite web |title=Bill Status Inquiry |url=https://apps.azleg.gov/billStatus/BillOverview/81301 |access-date=2024-09-27 |website=apps.azleg.gov}} Arizona House of Representatives and sent to voters as Prop 137 for the November 2024 election.{{cite news |last1=Priest |first1=Regan |title=GOP-backed ballot measure would keep Arizona Supreme Court intact, even justices voted out |url=https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/legislature/2024/04/19/senate-resolution-could-keep-az-supreme-court-justices-from-removal/73374965007/ |access-date=April 20, 2024 |work=Arizona Republic |date=April 19, 2024 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20240419153007/https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/legislature/2024/04/19/senate-resolution-could-keep-az-supreme-court-justices-from-removal/73374965007/ |archive-date=April 19, 2024}} Prop 137 was overwhelmingly rejected, with 77.7% of voters voting “no”.{{Cite web|url= https://www.washingtonpost.com/elections/results/2024/11/05/arizona-proposition-137/ |title=Arizona Proposition 137|website=www.washingtonpost.com}}
=Qualifications=
- Admitted to the practice of law in Arizona and be a resident of Arizona for the 10 years before taking office;
- May not practice law while a member of the judiciary;
- May not hold any other political office or public employment;
- May not hold office in any political party;
- May not campaign, except for him/herself; and,
- Must retire at age 70.{{Cite web|url=https://www.azcourts.gov/AZ-Supreme-Court|title=AZ Supreme Court|website=www.azcourts.gov}}
Justices
{{main|List of justices of the Arizona Supreme Court}}
The current Arizona Supreme Court includes:
class="wikitable sortable" |
Justice
! Born ! Joined ! Term ends{{efn|Term ends Dec. 31 of the year listed.}} ! Mandatory retirement ! Appointed by ! Law school |
---|
{{sortname|Ann|Timmer}}, Chief Justice
| {{Birth date and age|1960|09|12}} | {{dts|2012|10|12}}{{efn|Elected Chief Justice on July 1, 2024}} | 2028 | 2030 | {{Party shading/Republican}} | Jan Brewer (R) |
{{sortname|John|Lopez IV}}, Vice Chief Justice
| {{Birth year and age|1968}} | {{dts|2016|12|19}}{{efn|Elected Vice Chief Justice on July 1, 2024}} | 2026 | 2038 | {{Party shading/Republican}} | Doug Ducey (R) | Arizona State |
{{sortname|Clint|Bolick}}
| {{Birth date and age|1957|12|26}} | {{dts|2016|01|06}} | 2030 | 2027 | {{Party shading/Republican}} | Doug Ducey (R) | UC Davis |
{{sortname|James|Beene}}
| {{Birth year and age|1965}} | {{dts|2019|04|26}} | 2028 | 2035 | {{Party shading/Republican}} | Doug Ducey (R) |
{{sortname|Bill|Montgomery|dab=Arizona politician}}
| {{Birth date and age|1967|3|2}} | {{dts|2019|09|06}} | 2028 | 2037 | {{Party shading/Republican}} | Doug Ducey (R) | Arizona State |
{{sortname|Kathryn Hackett|King}}
| {{Birth year and age|1980}} | {{dts|2021|07|08}} | 2030 | 2050 | {{Party shading/Republican}} | Doug Ducey (R) | University of Arizona |
{{sortname|Maria Elena|Cruz}}
| {{Birth year and age|1972}} | {{dts|2025|02|03}} | 2028 | 2042 | {{Party shading/Democratic}} | Katie Hobbs (D) | University of Arizona |
{{Notelist}}
{{image array |perrow=7 |width=140 |height=150
| image1 = Ann Timmer by Gage Skidmore.jpg
| caption1 = Chief Justice Ann Timmer
| image2 = John Lopez IV by Gage Skidmore.jpg
| caption2 = Vice Chief Justice John Lopez IV
| image4 = Clint Bolick January 2019.jpg
| caption4 = Justice Clint Bolick
| image5 = James Beene by Gage Skidmore.jpg
| caption5 = Justice James Beene
| image6 = Bill Montgomery by Gage Skidmore 3.jpg
| caption6 = Justice Bill Montgomery
| image7 = Kathryn Hackett King by Gage Skidmore.jpg
| caption7 = Justice Kathryn Hackett King
}}
Chief Justices
{{Unreferenced section|date=April 2022}}
- Alfred Franklin (1912–1914, 1917)
- Henry D. Ross (1915–1916, 1921–1922, 1927–1928, 1933–1934, 1939–1940, 1945)
- Donald L. Cunningham (1918–1920)
- Archibald G. McAlister (1923–1926, 1931–1932, 1937–1938, 1943–1944)
- Alfred C. Lockwood (1929–1930, 1935–1936, 1941–1942)
- Rawghlie Clement Stanford (1945–1948)
- Arthur T. LaPrade (1949–1950, 1955–1956)
- Levi Stewart Udall (1951–1952)
- Rawghlie Clement Stanford (1953–1953)
- Marlin T. Phelps (1954–1954, 1959)
- Levi Stewart Udall (1957–1958)
- Fred C. Struckmeyer Jr. (1960–1961, 1966, 1971, 1980–1981)
- Charles C. Bernstein (1962–1963, 1967–1967)
- Jesse Addison Udall (1964–1964, 1969)
- Lorna E. Lockwood (1965–1965, 1970) (First female chief justice in the United States)
- Ernest McFarland (1968–1968)
- Jack D. H. Hays (1972–1974)
- James Duke Cameron (1975–1979)
- William A. Holohan (1982–1987)
- Frank Gordon Jr. (1987–1992)
- Stanley G. Feldman (1992–1997)
- Thomas A. Zlaket (1997–2002)
- Charles E. Jones (2002–2005)
- Ruth McGregor (2005–2009)
- Rebecca White Berch (2009–2014)
- Scott Bales (2014–2019)
- Robert M. Brutinel (2019–2024)
- Ann Timmer (2024–present)
Notable cases
- Harrison v. Laveen, 67 Ariz. 337, 196 P.2d 456 (1948), a case in which the Court held that the state constitution's use of the phrase "persons under guardianship" applied only to judicial guardianship and had "no application to the plaintiffs or to the Federal status of Indians in Arizona as a class."{{cite journal|url=https://arizonastatelawjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Ferguson_Final.pdf| title=The History of Indian Voting Rights in Arizona: Overcoming Decades of Voter Suppression| first=Patty| last=Ferguson-Bohnee| journal=Arizona State Law Journal| pages=1099–1112}}
- Spur Industries, Inc. v. Del E. Webb Development Co., 108 Ariz. 178, 494 P.2d 700 (1972), a case addressing the principles of nuisance law.
- Planned Parenthood Arizona v. Mayes, CV-23-0005-PR (2024), a case upholding Arizona's abortion ban enacted in 1864.{{cite web |title=Planned Parenthood Arizona v. Mayes |url=https://www.lwv.org/legal-center/planned-parenthood-arizona-v-mayes |publisher=League of Women Voters |access-date=10 April 2024}}
See also
{{Portal|Arizona|Law}}
References
{{reflist}}
External links
- Map: {{Coord|33|26|51|N|112|05|33|W|format=dms|display=inline,title|type:landmark_region:US-AZ}}
- [https://www.azcourts.gov/meetthejustices/Judicial-History Arizona Supreme Court Justices]
- [https://www.azleg.gov/constitution/?article=6 Arizona Constitution, Article VI]
- [https://www.azcourts.gov/ Arizona Judicial Branch]
{{US Judiciaries}}
{{authority control}}