Armadillo Aerospace#Stig

File:Armadillo Aerospace Pixel Hover.jpg]]

The company placed a strong emphasis on a rapid build and test cycle. Armadillo Aerospace designed and built more than 12 vehicles which used about 50 engine designs for over 100 rocket flights.{{cite web|url=https://www.space.com/3995-armadillo-aerospace-scaling-modularized-spaceships.html|title=Armadillo Aerospace: Scaling Up for Modularized Spaceships|website=Space.com |date=June 25, 2007 |access-date=September 28, 2016}} Each design had several features in common. One was the use of modern computer technologies and electronics to simplify rocket control and reduce development costs. Another was the use of liquid propellants and VTVL to facilitate short launch-to-launch times.{{Citation needed|date=September 2009}}

The company was a competitor for the Ansari X-Prize. Armadillo's X-Prize vehicle was unorthodox among modern rockets in that instead of using stabilization fins, which complicate the design and increase drag, Armadillo used an aerodynamically unstable design, where the computer controlled jet vanes based on feedback from fibre optic gyroscopes.{{citation needed|date=November 2011}}

Armadillo stated a preference for simplicity and reliability over performance, which was evident in its choice{{when|date=November 2011}} of hydrogen peroxide (50% concentration in water) and methanol as a mixed monopropellant for the vehicle. A monopropellant-based engine requires only a single tank as well as greatly simplified plumbing and other hardware.{{citation needed|date=March 2015}}

File:ArmadilloAerospace Pixel Attempt1 c.jpg, grey tanks contain ethanol.]]

Armadillo Aerospace competed in the 2006 X PRIZE Cup. Armadillo Aerospace was the only competitor in the Lunar Lander Challenge. The company took two similar vehicles, Pixel and Texel, to the event. The vehicles narrowly failed to win the Level 1 prize, after making three dramatic attempts totalling over 5 minutes in the air,[http://www.armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/Armadillo/Home/News?news_id=337 Armadillo Aerospace – News Archive] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070315233935/http://www.armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/Armadillo/Home/News?news_id=337 |date=March 15, 2007 }} finally crashing out on the final attempt. Persistent landing problems were the main cause of failure, with the undercarriage breaking several times, and landing slightly off the pad on one occasion due to guidance difficulties. These flights were a highlight of the Wirefly X-prize cup.

{{Main|Quad (rocket)}}

The quad vehicle design is pressure-fed in blow down mode from an initial pressure of 320 psi for level 1 (400 psi level 2). The roll thrusters are cross-fed by gas drawn from ullage space of the opposite tank. The vehicle is able to transfer propellant through connecting pipes between opposite tanks by controlling ullage pressures with the thrusters; this helps it balance, minimizing gas use. The main engine has two-axis thrust vectoring. The vehicle is fully computer controlled; with guidance from GPS and fiber optic gyroscopes.{{Citation needed|date=September 2009}}

Armadillo Aerospace competed in the 2007 Lunar Lander Challenge event in the Wirefly X-Prize Cup 2007.

During testing one of the two Quad vehicles (named Texel) crashed on a tethered flight after a guidance problem caused the vehicle to rapidly gain altitude until 3 separate flight termination procedures were activated at approximately 20–30 feet. The vehicle fell, and the impact broke open one of the alcohol tanks and a large fireball engulfed the vehicle.[http://media.armadilloaerospace.com/2007_09_04/texelCrash.mpg Texel crash video] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070928172125/http://media.armadilloaerospace.com/2007_09_04/texelCrash.mpg |date=September 28, 2007 }} The vehicle was irreparably damaged, and only its sister Pixel could compete in the upcoming event. The plan was to have the first module (of the next generation modular design) compete at level 1, and have Pixel compete at level 2 challenge.

{{cite news|url=http://www.armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/Armadillo/Home/News?news_id=349 |title=News Archive: Texel crash, Pixel back-to-back 180, Module 105|date=September 4, 2007|website=armadilloaerospace.com|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20070928171801/http://www.armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/Armadillo/Home/News?news_id=349 |archive-date=September 28, 2007}}

In the level 1 events, Armadillo's craft MOD (actually, module #1) logged several attempts, including several successful first leg flights but was unable to complete the return trip during any attempt.{{Citation needed|date=September 2009}}

On its first attempt, a clogged igniter orifice prevented ignition. On the second attempt, the first leg flight was perfect; increased guidance and control capabilities allowed the module to, in Carmack's words, 'burn the X-mark off the target pad'. The return leg was delayed slightly, because the igniter had clogged again. When the second leg was attempted, a 'hard start' cracked the graphite combustion chamber. As the vehicle was still flying, Carmack flew the crippled vehicle through the course as quickly as possible and hovered 2–3 meters above the landing pad. With only a few seconds remaining in the required flight time, the damaged combustion chamber cracked again, which caused the vehicle to tilt enough to trigger a computer abort. The vehicle performed an auto-land, but the tilt caused the module to tip over on landing after only 82 seconds in the air.{{Citation needed|date=September 2009}}

The second attempt began with another perfect first leg, but the return was marred by another hard start. Seeing that the engine was badly damaged (although flying), the team commanded an abort. The module landed back on the pad after only a few seconds.{{Citation needed|date=September 2009}}

On the final attempt, MOD suffered a violent "hard start", resulting in engine explosion. The violence of the explosion embedded a piece of the graphite chamber in the ground 64 meters from the launch pad and ended their attempts in 2007 for the prize.{{cite news|url=http://www.armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/Armadillo/Home/News?news_id=350 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071217053026/http://armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/Armadillo/Home/News?news_id=350 |url-status=dead |archive-date=2007-12-17 |title=Armadillo Aerospace News Archive |first=John |last=Carmack }}{{cite news| url=https://www.livescience.com/blogs/2007/10/28/armadillo-setback-as-vehicle-flames-out/| title=Armadillo Setback As Vehicle Flames Out| first=Leonard| last=David| publisher=livescience.com| date=October 28, 2007}}

File:Armadillo LLC 2008 Flight 1 liftoff.jpg

The 2008 Lunar Lander Challenge took place October 24–25 at the Las Cruces International Airport in New Mexico. Armadillo Aerospace competed for the third year but for the first time had competition, from the TrueZer0 team. Both received waivers from the FAA to fly experimental rockets.

TrueZero attempted level 1, achieved hover, then lost roll control and was aborted and crashed.

Armadillo had an unsuccessful first attempt at level 1 and landed early due to inadequate thrust. On their second attempt they completed the first leg, but the second leg was cut short by the FAA closing the flight window. The second leg was held in the afternoon, and they were able to take the Level 1 top prize of $350,000.{{cite news|title=Armadillo rocket takes $350,000 prize|work=NBC News|date=October 24, 2008|url=http://www.nbcnews.com/id/27368176|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140114035833/http://www.nbcnews.com/id/27368176/|url-status=dead|archive-date=January 14, 2014|access-date=October 25, 2008}}

Armadillo's attempt at the level 2 prize on October 25 was aborted due to their vehicle toppling over after the engine casing burned through due to a fuel-line problem.{{Citation needed|date=September 2009}}

{{Main|Lunar Lander Challenge#2009}}

Armadillo attempted the Level 2 prize on September 12, 2009. Armadillo successfully flew both legs with their Mod vehicle, each flight lasting over 180 seconds, landing safely. However their landing accuracy was not sufficient to win the first prize, instead they won the {{currency|500000|US}} second prize while Masten Space Systems' Xoie lander won the {{currency|1000000|US}} Level 2 first prize.{{cite web |title=Masten and Armadillo Claim Lunar Lander Prizes|url=http://www.nasa.gov/offices/ipp/innovation_incubator/centennial_challenges/cc_ll_feature_lvl2.html |work=Centennial Challenges: NASA's Prize Program for the "Citizen Inventor" |publisher=NASA |access-date=March 10, 2011 |date=November 2, 2009 |quote=With only a few days remaining in the 2009 competition period, Masten Space Systems of Mojave, California successfully met the Level Two requirements for the Centennial Challenges — Lunar Lander Challenge and by posting the best average landing accuracy, won the first place prize of $1,000,000. The flights were conducted with their “Xoie” (XA-0.1E) vehicle on Oct. 30 at the Mojave Air and Space Port. Armadillo Aerospace, the long-time leader in Lunar Lander Challenge efforts, was the first team to qualify for the Level Two prize with successful flights on Sept. 12 in Caddo Mills, Texas. The average landing accuracy determines which teams will receive first and second place prizes. The average accuracy for Armadillo Aerospace flights was 87 cm. but the Masten team achieved an accuracy of 19 cm, moving them into first place. Armadillo Aerospace will receive the $500,000 second place prize.}}

In 2008, the Rocket Racing League announced that Armadillo Aerospace engines would be used in a second generation of X-Racer aircraft.[http://www.rocketracingleague.com/pdf/Armadillo-Success-FINAL.pdf Rocket Racing] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090106190032/http://www.rocketracingleague.com/pdf/Armadillo-Success-FINAL.pdf |date=January 6, 2009 }}, August 2008

{{asof|March 2010}}, the Rocket Racing League was utilizing a highly modified Velocity XL FG airframe and an Armadillo Aerospace 2,500 pound thrust liquid oxygen (LOX) and ethanol rocket engine in both the Mark-II X-Racer and Mark-III X-Racer demonstration vehicles.

[http://www.rocketracingleague.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/RRL_PR_Milestones_030310_final.pdf Rocket Racing League Announces Milestone Development in X-Racer] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110715195234/http://www.rocketracingleague.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/RRL_PR_Milestones_030310_final.pdf |date=July 15, 2011 }}, press release, 2010-03-10, accessed May 3, 2010.

The Rocket Racing league never got out of its early development mode, and no racing season was ever held.

The Super Mod reusable launch vehicle is a vertical-takeoff, vertical-landing (VTVL){{cite web |title=sRLV platforms compared |url=https://flightopportunities.nasa.gov |publisher=NASA |access-date=March 10, 2011 |date=March 7, 2011 |quote=Super Mod: Type: VTVL/Unpiloted}} uncrewed rocket which was developed by Armadillo in 2010–2011. It was submitted to NASA as a potential suborbital vehicle for use as a suborbital reusable launch vehicle (sRLV) under NASA's Flight Opportunities Program. It added aerodynamic fairings, partially extendable landing legs with lower aerodynamic drag, and systems improvements to the basic Mod vehicle structure and systems.

File:Mod-Rocket-Hovering.jpg|Lunar Lander Cup era Mod rocket hovering in free flight

File:Mod-Rocket-Nosecone-Hovering.jpg|The Mod rocket with an early nose cone, hovering in free flight

File:SuperMod-Rocket-Shop.JPG|The SuperMod rocket during final assembly

File:Stig-Rocket-Hovering-Tethered.JPG

In late 2010, Armadillo started development of a new, longer rocket design created for lower-drag, higher-speed high-altitude flights, which they named Stig in homage of the Top Gear driver The Stig.[http://www.armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/Armadillo/Home/News?news_id=372 Armadillo Aerospace - News Archive - Jan 22, 2011] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110427210952/http://www.armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/Armadillo/Home/News?news_id=372 |date=April 27, 2011 }} This rocket had similar systems, motors, and component weights as the Super Mod vehicles but was aerodynamically optimized for high-altitude flights with long {{convert|15|in|cm}} diameter cylindrical tanks instead of larger spherical tanks.

The second flight, which took place in 2012, reached 50 miles (82 kilometers), but the recovery chute did not work as planned.{{cite web|url=https://www.space.com/14499-private-rocket-launch-armadillo-aerospace-test.html|title=Private Rocket Launch Tests Supersonic Parachute|website=Space.com |date=February 8, 2012 |access-date=August 11, 2017}}

The third flight took place in January 2013, and the vehicle experienced a hard landing following a parachute failure-to-deploy, though the launch was successful.[http://www.armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/Armadillo/Home/News?news_id=430 STIG B-III mission, January 5, 2013] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130503032534/http://www.armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/Armadillo/Home/News?news_id=430 |date=May 3, 2013 }}. Armadillo Aerospace.

Armadillo was headed, and largely funded, by John Carmack, a developer of video games including the Doom and Quake series. During its early days, all of its employees (including Carmack) had other, full-time jobs and contributed their efforts twice weekly to Armadillo on a voluntary basis. Armadillo had a relatively small budget and was not supported by aerospace companies or agencies like NASA, ESA, or Boeing. Armadillo Aerospace publicly declared itself fully self-funded.{{when|date=March 2015}}{{cite web|url=http://www.armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/Armadillo/Home/Business/Investment |title=Investment |access-date=2004-05-20 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20040625103908/http://armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/Armadillo/Home/Business/Investment |archive-date=June 25, 2004 |df=mdy }}

In February 2006, Carmack stated that the program to date had cost slightly over $2 million.{{cite web|url=http://www.hobbyspace.com/nucleus/index.php?itemid=1026|title=RLV and Space Transport News » Alt.space spending|access-date=August 11, 2017|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120524192303/http://hobbyspace.com/nucleus/index.php?itemid=1026|archive-date=May 24, 2012|df=mdy-all}} Even by the standards of X-Prize candidates, this is a low budget. Scaled Composites is estimated to have spent $25 million on its SpaceShipOne development program.

On August 8, 2006, Armadillo Aerospace announced that it had reached a sponsorship deal with Nvidia. While details were sparse, John Carmack said, "There is a chance at this point that I may have written the last personal cheque I need to for Armadillo."{{cite web|url=http://www.armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/Armadillo/Home/News?news_id=331 |title=NVIDIA Sponsorship|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060822211037/http://www.armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/Armadillo/Home/News?news_id=331 |archive-date=August 22, 2006|date=August 7, 2006}}

In April 2008, Carmack offered an updated figure of "total cost to date, about $3.5 million." He estimated that another $2 million would be needed to achieve a crewed flight to 100 km using Armadillo's modular design in a "six-pack" configuration.[http://armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/Armadillo/Home/News?news_id=357 Armadillo Aerospace - News Archive] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080411015830/http://armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/Armadillo/Home/News?news_id=357 |date=April 11, 2008 }}

By 2010, Armadillo had 7 full-time employees and was profitable on ongoing operations (though Carmack was continuing to invest in development efforts).[http://www.armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/Armadillo/Home/News?news_id=371 Armadillo Aerospace - News Archive August 10, 2010] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101212002650/http://armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/Armadillo/Home/News?news_id=371 |date=December 12, 2010 }}

The company mascot was an armadillo named Widget.

In August 2013, Carmack indicated that following the crash of the STIG-B rocket earlier that year, he had wound down the company operations and had put the company in "hibernation mode." Armadillo had stopped accepting (profitable) contract R&D work two years prior in order to focus on development of a suborbital reusable rocket. During those two years, Armadillo operated at an approximately US$1 million per year burn rate funded personally by Carmack. Several reasons were offered for this outcome, including a failure to adopt a multi-test-vehicle build strategy, making the loss of a single rocket more significant than it would have otherwise been.{{cite news |last=Foust|first=Jeff |title=Carmack: Armadillo Aerospace in "hibernation mode" |url=http://www.newspacejournal.com/2013/08/01/carmack-armadillo-aerospace-in-hibernation-mode/ |access-date=August 6, 2013 |newspaper=NewSpace Journal |date=August 1, 2013 }}

{{asof|2013|08}}, Carmack was "actively looking for outside investors to restart work on the company’s rockets."

In 2015, the assets of Armadillo Aerospace were sold to EXOS Aerospace Systems & Technologies, Inc.

Carmack stated in his monthly reports and in forum posts that he expected his path to an orbital vehicle to include modular rockets similar to OTRAG technology. Lutz Kayser, the founding engineer of OTRAG, visited Armadillo in May 2006 and loaned Carmack some of their original research hardware.

"I have been corresponding with Lutz for a few months now, and I have learned quite a few things. I seriously considered an OTRAG style massive-cluster-of-cheap-modules orbital design back when we had 98% peroxide (assumed to be a biprop with kerosene), and I have always considered it one of the viable routes to significant reduction in orbital launch costs. After really going over the trades and details with Lutz, I am quite convinced that this is the lowest development cost route to significant orbital capability. Eventually, reusable stages will take over, but I actually think that we can make it all the way to orbit on our current budget by following this path. The individual modules are less complicated than our current vehicles, and I am becoming more and more fond of high production methods over hand crafter prototypes." -- June 2006 Armadillo Aerospace Update[http://www.armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/Armadillo/Home/News?news_id=328 June 2006 Armadillo Aerospace Update.] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303185554/http://armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/Armadillo/Home/News?news_id=328 |date=March 3, 2016 }}

{{ external media| float = right| images= [https://web.archive.org/web/20100918160817/http://armadilloaerospace.com/n.x/Armadillo/Home/Gallery Gallery of CCA3 images and video]
[https://www.youtube.com/armadilloaerospace Official Youtube channel]}}

{{div col}}

• Alt.space
• NewSpace
• List of private spaceflight companies
• {{annotated link|Masten Space Systems}}
• {{annotated link|Interorbital Systems}}
• Blue Origin
• Space Fellowship – hosts the official Armadillo Aerospace Forum
• Reusable Vehicle Testing – program of the Japanese Space Agency JAXA
• Commercial Spaceflight Federation
• Blue Origin New Shepard
• {{annotated link|McDonnell Douglas DC-X}}
• {{annotated link|Lockheed Martin X-33}}
• {{annotated link|VentureStar}}
• {{annotated link|Quad (rocket)}}
• {{annotated link|Zarya (spacecraft)|Zarya}}
• {{annotated link|Kankoh-maru}}
• {{annotated link|Lunar Lander Challenge}}

{{div col end}}

{{Reflist|30em}}

• {{Official website}}

{{space tourism}}

{{Ansari X-Prize}}

Category:Defunct spaceflight companies

Category:Aerospace companies of the United States

Category:Space companies in the Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex

Category:Mesquite, Texas

Category:Manufacturing companies established in 2000

Category:Private spaceflight companies

Category:Rocket engine manufacturers of the United States

Category:Privately held companies based in Texas

Category:Manufacturing companies based in Texas

Category:Space access

Category:Companies based in the Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex