Aryama Sundaram

{{short description|Indian lawyer}}

{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2019}}

C. Aryaman Sundaram is an Indian lawyer who practices in the Supreme Court of India.

He was the youngest in the history of the Madras High Court to be designated as a senior advocate.{{cite news|first= Samanth |last=Subramanian |title=From Tamil Film, a Landmark Case on Free Speech|url=http://india.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/14/from-tollywood-a-landmark-case-on-free-speech/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0|accessdate=29 March 2014|newspaper=The New York Times|date=14 February 2012}}

He has represented the Board of Control for Cricket in India, Anil Ambani and several other high-profile clients at various judicial forums, including representing the Mistry family against Tata & Sons,{{Cite news|first=Dev |last=Chatterjee |title=Legal titans Harish Salve and C A Sundaram clash in Tata vs Mistry battle |url=https://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/legal-titans-harish-salve-and-c-a-sundaram-clash-in-tata-vs-mistry-battle-120121300358_1.html|date=13 December 2020 |work=Business Standard}}{{cite web|last=Singh|first=Gyanant|newspaper=India today|title=Meet India's supermen in black: When people like Robert Vadra get into trouble, only a handful of lawyers are called to bail them out|date=21 October 2012 |url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/meet-india-supermen-in-black/1/225634.html|accessdate=29 March 2014}} the Travancore Devaswom Board in matters relating to the Sabarimala Temple and its admissions policy,{{Cite news |last=Correspondent |first=Special |date=2018-11-09 |title=Aryama Sundaram to appear for TDB in SC |url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/kerala/aryama-sundaram-to-appear-for-tdb-in-sc/article25457956.ece |access-date=2024-03-22 |work=The Hindu |language=en-IN |issn=0971-751X}} Haldia Petrochemicals and Cyrus Mistry, BALCO, Khushwant Singh against pre-release banning and suppression of his book, Minister V. Senthil Balaji,{{Cite news |date=2024-02-22 |title=ED relying on tampered evidence, argues Senthil Balaji's counsel |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/ed-relying-on-tampered-evidence-argues-senthil-balajis-counsel/articleshow/107897641.cms |access-date=2024-03-22 |work=The Times of India |issn=0971-8257}} and Nikhil Gupta as charged for the attempted assassination of Khalistani separatist Gurpatwant Singh Pannun.{{Cite web |title=Pannun 'Murder Plot': SC Junks Plea Against Nikhil Gupta's Arrest, Cites Lack of Jurisdiction |url=https://thewire.in/law/pannun-murder-plot-sc-junks-plea-against-nikhil-guptas-arrest-cites-lack-of-jurisdiction |access-date=2024-03-22 |website=The Wire}}

He was a lawyer in the S. Rangarajan case which resulted in one of the landmark judgments on the freedom of speech and expression.