Association française pour l'information scientifique

{{Short description|Organization of European skeptics}}

{{Infobox organization

| name = Association française pour l'information scientifique

| image = AFIS logo.png

| image_border =

| alt =

| caption =

| abbreviation = AFIS

| formation = {{start date and age|1968|11}}

| type = Nonprofit organisation

| status =

| purpose = Furthering scientific literacy and scientific skepticism

| membership = 700{{cite web |url=http://www.pseudo-sciences.org/IMG/pdf/AG2011.pdf |title=Rapport d'activités |work=Website AFIS |publisher=AFIS |date=May 2011 |accessdate=2 April 2015|language=fr}}

| membership_year = 2010

| leader_title = President

| leader_name = Jean-Jacques Ingremeau

| affiliations = European Council of Skeptical Organisations

| headquarters = 4 Rue des Arènes 75005

| location = Paris

| region_served = France

| website = [http://www.pseudo-sciences.org/ pseudo-sciences.org]

{{Listen|embed=yes|filename=AFIS pronunciation.ogg|title=Pronunciation of 'Association française pour l'information scientifique'|type=speech}}

}}

The Association française pour l'information scientifique or AFIS (English: French Association for Scientific Information) is an association regulated by the French law of 1901, founded under the leadership of Michel Rouzé in November 1968.{{cite web |url=http://www.pseudo-sciences.org/spip.php?article23 |title=Notre histoire |author=Jean-Pierre Thomas |work=Website AFIS |publisher=AFIS |accessdate=2 April 2015|language=fr}} As a skeptical organisation, it has been a member of the European Council of Skeptical Organisations since 2001,{{cite web |url=http://www.aske-skeptics.org.uk/resources/Adversaria/Adversaria5.doc |title=From the Chairman: The 10th European Skeptics Congress |author=Mike Heap |work=Skeptical Adversaria |publisher=Association for Skeptical Enquiry |date=June 2002 |accessdate=2 April 2015}} and publishes the magazine Science et pseudo-sciences ("Science and pseudosciences").

Purpose

Statement of principles: "The AFIS strives to promote science against those who deny its cultural value, abuse it for criminal purposes or as a cover for quackery." According to the AFIS, science itself cannot solve humanity's problems, nor can one solve them without using the scientific method. Citizens should be informed about scientific and technical advancements and the problems it helps to solve, in a way that is accessible to everyone, regardless of the pressure from particular interests. They should be warned against false sciences and against those who propagate them in the media for personal or financial gain. Via its magazine, Science et pseudo-sciences, the association states it wants:

  • to collect a number facts from current affairs in science and technology to consider them from a human perspective first;
  • to distribute scientific information about all disciplines of research via the news, in a language that everyone can understand;
  • to unconditionally denounce peddlers of false science or pseudoscience (astrology, flying saucers, sects, the "paranormal", fake medicine), malevolent charlatans and suppliers of irrationality;
  • to defend scientific thinking against the threat of a new obscurantism.

Independent of all pressure groups, it rejects any concession to sensationalism, disinformation and complacency regarding the irrational.{{cite web |url=http://www.pseudo-sciences.org/spip.php?article443 |title=Principes |work=Website AFIS |publisher=AFIS |accessdate=2 April 2015|language=fr}}

Publication

AFIS publishes a quarterly magazine Science et pseudo-sciences ("Science and pseudosciences"). According to the association, the magazine had 1400–1500 subscribers and a readership of 1400–2800 per issue in 2010. In 2010, the sale of the magazine delivered a revenue of €82,232 for production costs and €60,125 for postage costs.{{cite web|url=http://www.pseudo-sciences.org/IMG/pdf/Comptes2010.pdf |title=Comptes de l'exercice 2010|work=Website AFIS |publisher=AFIS |date=2010 |accessdate=2 April 2015|language=fr}} Engineer and physicist Sebastien Point is a member of AFIS and of the magazine. He has also written for the English magazine Skeptical Inquirer about free energy and chromotherapy,{{cite journal |last1=Point |first1=Sebastien |title=Free Energy: When the Web Is Freewheeling |journal=Skeptical Inquirer |date=2018 |volume=42 |issue=1 |pages=52–55 |publisher=Committee for Skeptical Inquiry}} and about wrong beliefs surrounding electromagnetic radiations.{{Cite web|url=https://www.europeanscientist.com/en/features/shouldnt-afraid-leds/|title = Why you shouldn't be afraid of LEDs|date = February 2018}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.europeanscientist.com/en/public-health/electromagnetic-waves-and-health-when-lawyers-think-they-are-physicists/|title=Electromagnetic waves and health: When lawyers think they are physicists|date=2 March 2018}}

Controversies

= Astrology =

When Élizabeth Teissier's dissertation Situation épistémologique de l'astrologie à travers l'ambivalence fascination/rejet dans les sociétés postmodernes ("Epistemological Situation of Astrology across the Ambivalence of Fascination/Rejection in Postmodern Societies") was accepted at the Paris Descartes University in April 2001, it caused an uproar within the scientific community. The AFIS took the initiative to critically analyse Teissier's thesis.{{cite web |url=http://www.pseudo-sciences.org/spip.php?article389 |title=Communiqué de l'AFIS Thèse d'Élizabeth Teissier |work=Website AFIS |publisher=AFIS |date=26 April 2001 |accessdate=2 April 2015|language=fr}} It turned out to be a plea for astrology, presented as a sociological study, and did not comply with any academic standards for a dissertation. The analysis was conducted by a group of astrophysicists and astronomers (Jean-Claude Pecker, Jean Audouze and Denis Savoie), sociologists (Bernard Lahire and Philippe Cibois), a philosopher (Jacques Bouveresse) and specialists of pseudosciences (Henri Broch and Jean-Paul Krivine).{{cite web |url=http://www.homme-moderne.org/societe/socio/teissier/analyse/ |title=Analyse de la thèse de Madame Élizabeth Teissier |id=Analyse de la thèse de Madame Élizabeth Teissier |author1=Bernard Lahire |author2=Philippe Cibois |author3=Dominique Desjeux |author4=Jean Audouze |author5=Henri Broch |author6=Jean-Paul Krivine |author7=Jean-Claude Pecker |author8=Jacques Bouveresse |date=6 August 2001 |accessdate=2 April 2015|language=fr}} Teissier rejected the criticism of the contents of her sociological dissertation, and branded the AFIS as the "Taliban of culture."{{cite web |url=http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xf8qnt_interview-biographie-de-elizabeth-t_news |title=Interview biographie de Elizabeth Teissier |author=Thierry Ardisson|author-link=Thierry Ardisson |work=Tout le monde en parle |publisher=France 2/Dailymotion |date=10 November 2001 |accessdate=2 April 2015|language=fr}}{{rp|at=13:25}}

= GMOs =

In 2007, AFIS started a petition against the moratorium of genetically modified maize in France.{{cite web|url=http://www.lexpress.fr/actualite/societe/environnement/des-scientifiques-s-en-prennent-aux-anti-ogm_468677.html|title=Des scientifiques s'en prennent aux anti-OGM |work=L'Éxpress |date=14 December 2007 |accessdate=2 April 2015|language=fr}}{{cite web|url=http://www.pseudo-sciences.org/IMG/pdf/rap_activ2008.pdf |title=Rapport d'activité, assemblée générale 17 mai 2008 |author=Michel Naud |page=11|work=Website AFIS |date=2008 |accessdate=2 April 2015|language=fr}}{{cite web |url=http://nonaumoratoire.free.fr/ |title=Non au gel (moratoire) de la culture du maïs OGM résistant à la pyrale |work=Website petition against GMO ban |publisher=AFIS |date=7 December 2007 |accessdate=2 April 2015|language=fr}} It published numerous articles on GMOs.{{cite web|url=http://www.pseudo-sciences.org/spip.php?rubrique38 |title=OGM – Afis|work=Website AFIS |publisher=AFIS |date=October 2007 |accessdate=2 April 2015|language=fr}} It also lobbied in the Senate during the discussion of the law on GMOs in 2008.{{cite web|url=http://www.mediapart.fr/journal/france/010408/comment-le-senat-et-les-lobbies-ont-reecrit-le-projet-de-loi-ogm?page_article=2|title=Comment le Sénat et les lobbies ont réécrit le projet de loi OGM|work=Mediapart |date=1 April 2008 |accessdate=2 April 2015|language=fr}}{{cite web|url=http://www.agrobiosciences.org/article.php3?id_article=2265|title=Biotechnologies & Agriculture durable, un post-Grenelle de l'environnement|work=agrobiosciences.org |date=January 2008 |accessdate=|language=fr}} In March 2008, this position of the association led a member of AFIS' Scientific Council, Marcel-Francis Kahn, emeritus professor in medicine at Paris Diderot University, to resign on the grounds that "the AFIS – without having consulted our opinion – made a 180° turn to a genuine pro-GMO lobby".{{cite web |url=http://www.combat-monsanto.org/spip.php?article114 |title=Le Dr Kahn dénonce les liens de l'AFIS avec Monsanto |work=Website Combat Monsanto |publisher=Combat Monsanto |date=4 February 2008 |accessdate=2 April 2015|language=fr}} He also alleged a connection between two members, Marcel Kuntz and Louis-Marie Houdebine, and "Monsanto or its affiliates". However, Kahn was unable to produce "real evidence" to back up these accusations."When questioned, Marcel-Francis Kahn willingly confirmed that he is "against the campaign of unconditional defence of GMOs that the AFIS has conducted for the past two years", and that he opines that "there are probably ties between these two researchers and Monsanto and its affiliates". But the doctor immediately added that he was not aware of any "specific facts", and that he had "no evidence" to support his claims." {{cite web|url=http://www.arretsurimages.net/contenu.php?id=684 |work=arretsurimages.net|title=OGM : Marie-Monique Robin contre Monsanto |date=25 April 2008 |accessdate=|language=fr}} Meanwhile, the AFIS maintains its "total independence from any industrial group".{{cite web |url=http://www.pseudo-sciences.org/spip.php?article2080 |title=Elle court, elle court la rumeur... |work=Website AFIS |publisher=AFIS |date=11 March 2013 |accessdate=2 April 2015|language=fr}}

= Global warming =

After the publication of the report on global warming, including giving a voice to climate change deniers such as Vincent Courtillot and Benoît Rittaud,{{cite web|url=http://www.pseudo-sciences.org/spip.php?article1451 |title=Et le Soleil dans tout cela ? |author1=Vincent Courtillot |author2=Jean-Louis Le Mouël |name-list-style=amp |work=Website AFIS |publisher=AFIS |date=July 2010 |accessdate=2 April 2015|language=fr}}{{cite web|url=http://www.pseudo-sciences.org/spip.php?article1455 |title=Un point de vue sceptique sur la thèse " carbocentriste " |author1=Stéphane Adrover |author2=Benoît Rittaud |name-list-style=amp |work=Website AFIS |publisher=AFIS |date=July 2010 |accessdate=2 April 2015|language=fr}} the association received criticism from climatologists and the Union rationaliste.{{cite news |url=http://www.lemonde.fr/sciences/article/2012/09/20/le-rationalisme-au-risque-du-biais-anti-ecolo_1763271_1650684.html |title=Le rationalisme, au risque du biais "anti-écolo" |author=Stéphane Foucart |work=Le Monde |date=20 September 2012 |accessdate=2 April 2015|language=fr}} Sylvestre Huet, science journalist at Libération, expressed his disappointment with the "mediocre" coverage of the topic in a critique of the association.{{cite web|url=http://www.pseudo-sciences.org/spip.php?article1609 |title=Réchauffement climatique : dialogue avec Sylvestre Huet |author1=Sylvestre Huet |author2=Michel Naud |name-list-style=amp |work=Website AFIS |publisher=AFIS |date=July 2010 |accessdate=2 April 2015|language=fr}} AFIS has repeatedly stated{{Cite web |title=Le livre "Les gardiens de la raison" : fausses affirmations, cherry-picking, insinuations... |url=https://www.afis.org/Le-livre-Les-gardiens-de-la-raison-fausses-affirmations-cherry-picking}} that such accusations are baseless and purely defamatory, coming from people who use guilt by association as their main argument against people who question their own ideological biases. François-Marie Bréon, who was president of AFIS for 5 years, is a climatologist with CEA and has been a member of IPCC.

Board and

= Presidents =

File:Jean Bricmont Paris 2010.jpg, president 2001–2006]]

  • Michel Rouzé (1969–1999)
  • Jean-Claude Pecker (1999–2001)
  • Jean Bricmont (2001–2006)
  • Michel Naud (2006–2011)
  • Louis-Marie Houdebine (2011–2014)
  • Anne Perrin (2014–2018)
  • Roger Lepeix (2018–2019),
  • Jean-Paul Krivine (2019–2020),
  • François-Marie Bréon (2020–2024)
  • Jean-Jacques Ingremeau, since 2024 {{Cite web|url=https://www.pseudo-sciences.org/Qui-sommes-nous|title = Qui sommes-nous ? / Afis Science – Association française pour l'information scientifique}}

= Scientific supervisory committee =

= Editorial staff ''Science et pseudo-sciences'' and website =

  • Jean-Paul Krivine (editor-in-chief).
  • Bruno Przetakiewicz (webmaster)

= Transparency =

In 2008, after the work of the Prometheus Foundation on the transparency barometer of NGOs, the AFIS wanted to participate in a process of transparency by publicising the composition of the board council, the finances and activities reports.{{cite web|url=http://www.pseudo-sciences.org/spip.php?article868 |title=Gouvernance et transparence |work=Website AFIS |publisher=AFIS |date=28 May 2011 |accessdate=2 April 2015|language=fr}}

References

{{Reflist|30em}}

External links

  • [http://www.pseudo-sciences.org/ Official national website]
  • [http://afis44.free.fr/ Website of the AFIS committee for Loire-Atlantique]
  • [https://web.archive.org/web/20150406210542/http://www.afislr.org/ Website of the AFIS committee for Languedoc-Roussillon]

{{Skeptic organizations}}

{{Authority control}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Association francaise pour l'information scientifique}}

Category:1968 establishments in France

Category:Organizations based in Paris

Category:Skeptic organizations in France