Bʼaga languages
{{Short description|Language family of the Ethiopia–Sudan border region}}
{{distinguish|Baga languages}}
{{Infobox language family
|name=Bʼaga
|altname=Gumuz
|region=border of Ethiopia and Sudan
|ethnicity=Gumuz
|familycolor=Nilo-Saharan
|fam2=Komuz?
|child1=Northern Gumuz
|child2=Yaso?
|child3=Southern Gumuz
|child4=Daatsʼiin
|child5=Kadallu
|glotto=gumu1250
|glottorefname=Gumuz
}}
The Bʼaga languages,The letter {{angbr|Bʼ}} is an implosive {{IPAblink|ɓ}}. The name comes from ɓaga, the word for 'people' in the Gumuz languages and Daatsʼiin also known as Gumuz,'Gumuz' is increasingly restricted to the Gumuz languages proper: Northern Gumuz, Yaso Gumuz and Southern Gumuz. form a small language family spoken along the border of Ethiopia and Sudan. They have been tentatively classified as closest to the Koman languages within the Nilo-Saharan language family.Gerrit Dimmendaal, Colleen Ahland & Angelika Jakobi (2019) Linguistic features and typologies in languages commonly referred to as 'Nilo-Saharan', Cambridge Handbook of African Linguistics, p. 6–7{{Cite book|title=The Languages and Linguistics of Africa|last=Güldemann|first=Tom|editor-last=Güldemann|editor-first=Tom|publisher=De Gruyter Mouton|chapter=Historical linguistics and genealogical language classification in Africa|year=2018|isbn=978-3-11-042606-9|doi=10.1515/9783110421668-002|location=Berlin|pages=58–444|series=The World of Linguistics series|volume=11|s2cid=133888593 }}
Languages
There are four to five Bʼaga languages. Grammatical forms are distinct between Northern Gumuz and Southern Gumuz.Ahland, Colleen Anne. 2004. "Linguistic variation within Gumuz: a study of the relationship between historical change and intelligibility." M.A. thesis. University of Texas at Arlington. Yaso is at least a divergent dialect, perhaps distinct enough to count as a separate language. Daatsʼiin, discovered in 2013, is closest to Southern Gumuz, while Kadallu in Sudan is attested by only two short word lists.
A comparative word list of Daatsʼiin, Northern Gumuz, and Southern Gumuz is available in Ahland & Kelly (2014).Ahland, Colleen and Eliza Kelly. 2014. [https://www.academia.edu/16371000/Daats%CA%BCi_in-Gumuz_Comparative_Word_list Daatsʼíin-Gumuz Comparative Word list]''.
The internal classification appears to be as follows:{{cite journal | url=https://www.academia.edu/104666399 | title=In defence of Nilo --Saharan Saharan | journal=Nisa | date=January 2023 | last1=Blench | first1=Roger }}
{{tree list}}
- Bʼaga (Gumuzic)
- Dasʼin
- Gumuz
- Guba
- Wenbera
- Agelo Meti
- Sira Abay
- Eastern Gumuz
- Yaso
- North Gumuz
- Metemma
- Mandura
- North Dibatʼe
{{tree list/end}}
Classification
Dimmendaal (2008) notes that mounting grammatical evidence has made the Nilo-Saharan proposal as a whole more sound since Greenberg proposed it in 1963, but that such evidence has not been forthcoming for Songhay, Koman, and Bʼaga/Gumuz: "very few of the more widespread nominal and verbal morphological markers of Nilo-Saharan are attested in the Coman languages plus Gumuz ... Their genetic status remains debatable, mainly due to lack of more extensive data." (2008:843) And later, "In summarizing the current state of knowledge, ... the following language families or phyla can be identified — ... Mande, Songhai, Ubangian, Kadu, and the Coman languages plus Gumuz." (2008:844)
This "Coman plus Gumuz" is what Greenberg (1963) had subsumed under Koman and what Bender (1989) had called Komuz, a broader family consisting of Gumuz and the Koman languages. However, Bender (2000) separated Gumuz as at least a distinct branch of Nilo-Saharan, and suggested that it might even be a language isolate. Dimmendaal (2000), who tentatively included Koman within Nilo-Saharan, excluded Gumuz as an isolate, as it did not share the tripartite singulative–collective–plurative number system characteristic of the rest of the Nilo-Saharan language families. Ahland (2010, 2012), however, reports that with better attestation, Gumuz does indeed appear to be Nilo-Saharan, and perhaps closest to Koman. It has grammatical forms that resemble what might be expected from an ancestral proto-Nilo-Saharan language. Gumuz may thus help elucidate the family, which is extremely diverse and has been difficult to substantiate.
Dimmendaal, Ahland & Jakobi (2019) summarize earlier work that the evidence "suggests that Gumuz and Koman may indeed form two subgroups within a broader 'Komuz' family" and that "there is some evidence that these two language families may indeed be part of a broader Nilo-Saharan phylum, albeit outliers in the family".
See also
- Gumuz word lists (Wiktionary)
Notes
{{Reflist}}
References
- Ahland, Colleen Anne. "The Classification of Gumuz and Koman Languages",[https://web.archive.org/web/20120316221945/http://25images.ish-lyon.cnrs.fr/player/player.php?id=72&id_sequence=433&quality=hd] presented at the Language Isolates in Africa workshop, Lyons, December 4, 2010
- Lionel Bender, 2000. "Nilo-Saharan". In Bernd Heine and Derek Nurse (eds.), African Languages: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
- Dimmendaal, Gerrit J., 2000. "Number marking and noun categorization in Nilo- Saharan languages". Anthrolopological Linguistics 42:214–261.
- Gerrit Dimmendaal, 2008. "Language Ecology and Linguistic Diversity on the African Continent", Language and Linguistics Compass 2/5:842.
Further reading
- [https://web.archive.org/web/20120331181257/http://25images.ish-lyon.cnrs.fr/player/player.php?id=72&id_sequence=433 video of Colleen Ahland speaking on the classification of Koman and Gumuz]
External links
- [http://starling.rinet.ru/cgi-bin/response.cgi?root=new100&morpho=0&basename=new100\kmz\gum&limit=-1 Gumuz basic lexicon at the Global Lexicostatistical Database]
{{Nilo-Saharan families}}
{{Languages of Ethiopia}}