Benjamin Ricketson Tucker ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|t|ʌ|k|ər}}; April 17, 1854 – June 22, 1939) was an American individualist anarchist and self-identified socialist.Chartier, Gary. Anarchy and Legal Order. Cambridge University Press: New York. 2013. pp. 397. "Similarly, Benjamin Tucker, who explicitly identified himself as a socialist.." Tucker was the editor and publisher of the American individualist anarchist periodical Liberty (1881–1908). Tucker described his form of anarchism as "consistent Manchesterism" and "unterrified Jeffersonianism".McCarthy, Daniel (January 1, 2010) [http://www.amconmag.com/article/2010/jan/01/00044/ A Fistful of Dynamite] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110518172208/http://amconmag.com/article/2010/jan/01/00044/ |date=2011-05-18 }}, The American Conservative.

Tucker looked upon anarchism as a part of the broader socialist movement. Tucker harshly opposed state socialism and was a supporter of free-market socialismChartier, Gary; Johnson, Charles W. Markets Not Capitalism: Individualist Anarchism Against Bosses, Inequality, Corporate Power, and Structural Poverty. Brooklyn: Minor Compositions/Autonomedia. (2011). pp 10. “…In ‘State Socialism and Anarchism,’ Benjamin Tucker explains why a market-oriented variety of anarchism can be understood as part of the socialist tradition…” and libertarian socialismChartier, Gary; Johnson, Charles W. Markets Not Capitalism: Individualist Anarchism Against Bosses, Inequality, Corporate Power, and Structural Poverty. Brooklyn: Minor Compositions/Autonomedia. (2011). pp 33. “…’There are two Socialisms…One is dictatorial, the other libertarian.” which he termed anarchist or anarchistic socialism.Chartier, Gary. Anarchy and Legal Order. Cambridge University Press: New York. 2013. pp. 399. He connected the classical economics of Adam Smith and the Ricardian socialists as well as that of Josiah Warren, Karl Marx and Pierre-Joseph Proudhon to socialism.Chartier, Gary. Anarchy and Legal Order. Cambridge University Press: New York. 2013. pp. 401. Some modern commentators have described Tucker as an anarcho-capitalist,{{Cite book |last1=Freeden |first1=Michael |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IZo2AAAAQBAJ&pg=PA388 |title=The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies |last2=Sargent |first2=Lyman Tower |last3=Stears |first3=Marc |date=2013-08-15 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-958597-7 |location=Oxford |pages=388 |language=en}}{{Cite book |last=Curran |first=G. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nzwWDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA21 |title=21st Century Dissent: Anarchism, Anti-Globalization and Environmentalism |date=2006-10-31 |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-0-230-80084-7 |pages=21 |language=en}} although this has been disputed by others.McKay, Iain. An Anarchist FAQ. AK Press. Oakland. 2008. pp 23, 526.Chartier, Gary. Anarchy and Legal Order. Cambridge University Press: New York. 2013. pp. 402-403. During his lifetime, Tucker opposed capitalismChartier, Gary. Anarchy and Legal Order. Cambridge University Press: New York. 2013. pp. 403. and considered himself a socialist due to his belief in the labor theory of value and disputed many of the dictionary definitions of the term which he believed were inaccurate.Chartier, Gary. Anarchy and Legal Order. Cambridge University Press: New York. 2013. pp. 400 fn 32.

Biography

File:BenjaminTuckerYoung.jpg

Tucker made his editorial debut in anarchist circles in 1876, when Ezra Heywood published Tucker's English translation of Pierre-Joseph Proudhon's classic work What is Property? In 1877, he published his first original journal Radical Review, but it ran for only four issues. From August 1881 to April 1908, Tucker published Liberty, a major individualist-anarchist periodical.{{cite journal|last=McElroy|first=Wendy|author-link=Wendy McElroy|title=Benjamin Tucker, Liberty, and Individualist Anarchism|journal=The Independent Review|date=Winter 1998|volume=II|issue=3|page=421|url=http://www.independent.org/pdf/tir/tir_02_3_mcelroy.pdf|access-date=2013-06-25|archive-date=2019-01-23|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190123223843/http://www.independent.org/pdf/tir/tir_02_3_mcelroy.pdf|url-status=dead}}

The periodical was instrumental in developing and formalizing the individualist anarchist philosophy through publishing essays and serving as a format for debate. Beside Tucker, contributors also included Lysander Spooner, Gertrude Kelly, Auberon Herbert, Dyer Lum, Joshua K. Ingalls, John Henry Mackay, Victor Yarros, Wordsworth Donisthorpe, James L. Walker, J. William Lloyd, Florence Finch Kelly, Voltairine de Cleyre, Steven T. Byington, John Beverley Robinson, Jo Labadie, Lillian Harman and Henry Appleton. Included in its masthead is a quote from Proudhon saying that liberty is "Not the Daughter But the Mother of Order".

File:Benjamin R Tucker and family.jpg

In 1939, Tucker died in the company of his family in Monaco and carried his beliefs to his deathbed.{{cite book|author=Paul Avrich|title=Anarchist Voices|publisher=Princeton University Press|year=1996|isbn=0-691-04494-5|chapter=Oriole Tucker Riché|page=11|title-link=Anarchist Voices}}

Towards the end of Tucker's life, anarchist Victor Yarros described him as a "forceful and clear writer, but a poor speaker" who considered writing for bourgeois newspapers to be "the worst form of prostitution".{{sfn|Yarros|1936|p=472}}

Political views

Tucker's influences include Ricardo Mella.Diez, Xavier. (2007). El anarquismo individualista en España (1923–1938). Virus. p. 92. See [https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/iconoclasta-for-creative-individualist-anarchism-el-individualismo-eclectico El Individualismo ecléctico] in The Anarchist Library]. "[W]ithin the strictly anarchist world we find some theorists like Ricardo Mella, who, due to his knowledge of the English language, knows deeply the work of [Benjamin] Tucker and that of the north American individualists, especially by reading regularly the British magazine Freedom and the north American ones The Alarm (Chicago) and the tuckerian Liberty (Boston). [...] Uncomfortable within the polemics between collectivists and libertarian communists, the Galician anarchist tries to integrate the different ideological currents under the proposal of Tarrida del Mármol of an anarchism without adjectives".

= Anarchism =

Tucker said that he became an anarchist at the age of eighteen.Symes, Lillian and Clement, Travers. Rebel America: The Story of Social Revolt in the United States. Harper & Brothers Publishers. 1934. p. 156. In the anarchist periodical Liberty, he published the original work of Stephen Pearl Andrews, Joshua K. Ingalls, Lysander Spooner, Auberon Herbert, Dyer Lum, Victor Yarros and Lillian Harman (daughter of free love anarchist Moses Harman) as well as his own writing.

According to Frank Brooks, an historian of American individualist anarchism, it is easy to misunderstand Tucker's claim to socialism. Before Marxists established a hegemony over definitions of socialism, "the term socialism was a broad concept". Tucker as well as most of the writers and readers of Liberty understood socialism to refer to one or more of various theories aimed at solving the labor problem through radical changes in the capitalist economy. Descriptions of the problem, explanations of its causes and proposed solutions (abolition of private property and support of cooperatives or public ownership) varied among socialist philosophies.Brooks, Frank H. (1994). The Individualist Anarchists: An Anthology of Liberty (1881–1908). Piscataway: Transaction Publishers. p. 75. {{ISBN|9781412837385}}.

Not all modern economists believe Marxists established a hegemony over definitions of socialism.Bestor, Arthur E. (June 1948). "The Evolution of the Socialist Vocabulary". Journal of the History of Ideas. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 9 (3): 259–302. {{doi|10.2307/2707371}}. {{JSTOR|2707371}}.

Tucker said socialism was the claim that "labor should be put in possession of its own" while holding that what he respectively termed state socialism and anarchistic socialism had in common was the labor theory of value.Brown, Susan Love. 1997. "The Free Market as Salvation from Government". In Meanings of the Market: The Free Market in Western Culture. Berg Publishers. p. 107.

Instead of asserting that common ownership was the key to eroding differences of economic power and appealing to social solidarity, as did many social anarchists, Tucker's individualist anarchism advocated distribution of property in an undistorted natural free market as a mediator of egoistic impulses and a source of social stability rooted in a free-market socialist system.Freeden, Michael (1996). Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford University Press. p. 276.

Tucker first favored a natural rights philosophy in which an individual had a right to own the fruits of his labor, but then abandoned it in favor of egoist anarchism (influenced by Max Stirner) in which he believed that only the right of might exists until overridden by contract. According to Charles A. Madison, Tucker promoted full individual liberty and disdained communism in any form, believing that even a stateless communist society must encroach upon the liberty of individuals, insisting instead on the voluntary nature of all association and rejecting majority rule, organized religion and the institution of marriage due to their compulsory nature.Madison, Charles A. "Anarchism in the United States". Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol 6, No 1, January 1945, [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2707055?read-now=1&seq=11#page_scan_tab_contents p. 56].

Tucker connected his libertarian socialist economic views which included his opposition to non-labor income in the form of profit, interest and rent with those of Adam Smith, Josiah Warren, Proudhon and Marx while arguing against American anti-socialists who declared socialism as imported.Brooks, Frank H. (1994). The Individualist Anarchists: An Anthology of Liberty (1881–1908). Piscataway: Transaction Publishers. p. 79. {{ISBN|9781412837385}}.

== Anarchist society ==

Tucker disapproved of government ownership because to him state control was the most complete and most obnoxious form of monopoly, "a tyrant living by theft ... wasteful, careless, clumsy, and short-sighted". Tucker maintained that all forms of authoritarian activities imply the resort to force and nothing good or lasting was ever accomplished by compulsion. Thus, he refused to condone the overthrow of the state by violent means, arguing that abolishing government would likely result in physical conflicts over land and a reaction to restore the old regime. Hence, Tucker preached widespread education and ultimately a passive resistance that was to take forms such as refusal to pay taxes, the evasion of jury duty and military service and the non-observance of compulsion. Once society reached this state, individual liberty for all would prevail as a matter of course.

Tucker envisioned an individualist anarchist society with "each man reaping the fruits of his labour and no man able to live in idleness on an income from capital ... become[ing] a great hive of Anarchistic workers, prosperous and free individuals [combining] to carry on their production and distribution on the cost principle"The Individualist Anarchists, p. 276. rather than a bureaucratic organization of workers organized into rank and file unions. However, he did hold a genuine appreciation for labor unions (which he called trades-union socialism) and saw it as "an intelligent and self-governing socialism", and praised their "substitution of industrial socialism for usurping legislative mobism".The Individualist Anarchists, pp. 283–284.

According to Peter Marshall, "the egalitarian implications of traditional individualist anarchists" such as Tucker and Lysander Spooner have been overlooked.Marshall, Peter (1992). Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism. London: HarperCollins. pp. 564–565. {{ISBN|978-0-00-217855-6}}.

Tucker rejected the legislative programs of labor unions, laws imposing a short day, minimum wage laws, forcing businesses to provide insurance to employees and compulsory pension systems.

Tucker was opposed to compulsion and vehemently opposed reform movements with paternalistic goals such as state aid. He did not have a utopian vision of anarchy in which individuals would refrain from coercing others.{{cite journal|first=Victor|last=Yarros|title=Philosophical Anarchism: Its Rise, Decline, and Eclipse|year=1936|journal=The American Journal of Sociology|volume=41|issue=4|pages=470–483|doi=10.1086/217188|s2cid=145311911|author-link=Victor Yarros|jstor=2768957}}

= Monopolies =

Tucker argued that the poor condition of American workers resulted from four legal monopolies based in the authoritarianism of the state:

Tucker believed that his contemporary millionaires received their wealth through the exploitation of monopolies.{{sfn|Yarros|1936|p=475}}

For several decades, his focus became the state's economic control of how trade could take place and what currency counted as legitimate. He saw interest and profit as a form of exploitation, made possible by the banking monopoly, in turn maintained through coercion and invasion. Tucker called any such interest and profit usury and saw it as the basis of the oppression of the workers. In his words, "interest is theft, Rent Robbery, and Profit Only Another Name for Plunder".Martin Blatt, Benjamin R. Tucker and the Champions of Liberty. Coughlin, Hamilton and Sullivan (eds.), p. 29.

Tucker opposed protectionism, believing that tariffs caused high prices by preventing national producers from having to compete with foreign competitors. He believed that free trade would help keep prices low and therefore would assist laborers in receiving what he called their "natural wage". Tucker objected to the exploitation of individuals and explained that only under anarchism will man be truly free, saying: "When interest, rent, and profit disappear under the influence of free money, free land, and free trade, it will make no difference whether men work for themselves, or are employed, or employ others. In any case they can get nothing but that wage for their labor which free competition determines".

= Later embrace of egoism =

File:Liberty OldPeriodical.jpg Liberty published by Tucker reflected the latter embrace of egoist anarchism in the 1880s, causing a conflict between egoists like Tucker and Spoonerian natural lawyers]]

Tucker came to hold the position that no rights exist until they are created by contract. This led him to controversial positions such as claiming that infants had no rights and were the property of their parents because they did not have the ability to contract. He said that a person, who physically tries to stop a mother from throwing her "baby into the fire", should be punished for violating her property rights. For example, he said that children would shed their status as property when they became old enough to contract "to buy or sell a house", noting that the precocity varies by age and would be determined by a jury in the case of a complaint.McElroy, Wendy (2003). The Debates of Liberty. Lexington Books. pp. 77–79.

Criticisms

Anarcho-communist Albert Meltzer criticizes Tucker's school of individualist anarchism as not anarchism, reasoning that the private police which those individualists support "to break strikes so as to guarantee the employer's 'freedom'" constitutes a government.{{Cite web |url=http://www.spunk.org/texts/writers/meltzer/sp001500.html#INTRO |title=Metlzer, Albert. Anarchism: For and Against, AK Press |access-date=25 August 2006 |archive-date=3 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200403094849/http://www.spunk.org/texts/writers/meltzer/sp001500.html#INTRO |url-status=live|quote= [...]; the school of Benjamin Tucker -- by virtue of their individualism -- accepted the need for police to break strikes so as to guarantee the employer's 'freedom'. All this school of so-called Individualists accept, at one time or another, the necessity of the police force, hence for Government, and the definition of anarchism is no Government.}} Sidney E. Parker, then still an individualist anarchist, harshly derides Meltzer as being mentally obtuse and Meltzer's accusation as "malicious"; Parker argues that Meltzer misconstrues Tucker, who stated that, only in a hypothetical scenario after authoritarian laws had been abolished, would Tucker volunteer to repress and kill aggressive striking workers; yet as long as such laws remain Tucker would support the workers' actions.{{cite book|last= Tucker|first= Benjamin|year= 1926|title= Individual Liberty|chapter= III - Trade and Industry [–] Strikes and Force|page= 259-260|url= https://cdn.mises.org/Individual%20Liberty_3.pdf|quote= Let Carnegie, Dana & Co. first see to it that every law in violation of equal liberty is removed from the statute-books. if, after that, any laborers shall interfere with the rights of their employers, or shall use force upon inoffensive “scabs,” or shall attack their employers’ watchmen, whether these be Pinkerton detectives, sheriff’s deputies, or the State militia, I pledge myself that, as an Anarchist and in consequence of my Anarchistic faith, I will be among the first to volunteer as a member of a force to repress these disturbers of order and, if necessary, sweep them from the earth. But while these invasive laws remain, I must view every forcible conflict that arises as the consequence of an original violation of liberty on the part of the employing classes, and, if any sweeping is done, may the laborers hold the broom!}}{{Cite journal|url=https://www.unionofegoists.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/ParkerArchives-MinusOne-No23.pdf|page= 2|journal= Minus One [–] An Individualist Anarchist Review|issue= 23|last= Parker|first= Sidney, E.|title= Individualism, Anarchism and the Police|year= 1968|access-date= 3 February 2025 |url-status=live}}

Iain McKay et al. criticize specifically Tucker's support, even within an anarchy, for wage labour, which they consider hierarchical, exploitative, and conducive to private defense agencies' statism.{{cite book|date= 22 February 2024|title= An Anarchist FAQ|version= 15.6|chapter= G.4.1. Is wage labour consistent with anarchist principles?|chapter-url= https://anarchistfaq.org/afaq/sectionG.html#secg41|editor-last= McKay|editor-first= Iain}}

References

External links

[http://fair-use.org/benjamin-tucker/instead-of-a-book/ Instead of a Book, by a Man Too Busy to Write One] (1893, 1897)
[https://archive.org/details/benjamin-tucker-liberty/1881-1908_BenjaminTucker_Liberty_01-01/mode/1up Liberty] A complete online archive of Tucker's journal Liberty (1881–1908)
[http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_Archives/bright/tucker/ Several works by Tucker at Anarchy Archives]
[http://www.panarchy.org/tucker/state.socialism.html State Socialism and Anarchism. How far they agree and wherein they differ] (1886)
[http://www.panarchy.org/tucker/taxation.html Liberty and Taxation] from Liberty
[https://mises.org/books/individual_liberty_tucker.pdf Individual Liberty] (1926), a collection of articles
[http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_Archives/bright/tucker/ Benjamin Tucker] at Anarchy Archives
[https://web.archive.org/web/20051024160827/http://www.zetetics.com/mac/tir1.htm Benjamin Tucker, Liberty, and Individualist Anarchism] by Wendy McElroy
[http://classicalliberalism.blogspot.com/2005_04_01_classicalliberalism_archive.html Benjamin Ricketson Tucker] from Classical Liberalism
[https://www.mises.org/journals/jls/1_4/1_4_4.pdf Benjamin Tucker and His Periodical, Liberty] by Carl Watner
[https://www.mises.org/fullstory.aspx?control=697 Memories of Benjamin Tucker] by J. William Lloyd (1935)
[http://uncletaz.com/liberty/oriole.html An Interview With Oriole Tucker] by Paul Abrich in which Tucker's daughter reveals biographical information
[http://uncletaz.com/liberty/ Benjamin R Tucker & the Champions of Liberty – A Centenary Anthology], edited by Michael E. Coughlin, Charles H. Hamilton and Mark A. Sullivan
{{Gutenberg author|id=6683}}
{{Internet Archive author|sname=Benjamin Ricketson Tucker|sopt=tight}}
{{Librivox author|id=6500}}
[https://anarchistnews.org/content/brief-overview-benjamin-tucker%E2%80%99s-individualist-anarchism A Brief Overview of Benjamin Tucker's Individualist Anarchism] (2020) by Nicholas Evans