Blackmail

{{Short description|Coercion based on threat of revealing information}}

{{Other uses}}

{{Distinguish|Bankmail}}

{{Use dmy dates|date=January 2021}}

{{Criminal law}}

Blackmail is a criminal act of coercion using a threat.

As a criminal offense, blackmail is defined in various ways in common law jurisdictions. In the United States, blackmail is generally defined as a crime of information, involving a threat to do something that would cause a person to suffer embarrassment or financial loss.[https://www.justia.com/criminal/offenses/white-collar-crimes/blackmail/ Blackmail Law: Justicia] By contrast, in the Commonwealth its definition is wider: for example the laws of England and Wales and Northern Ireland state that:

{{blockquote|A person is guilty of blackmail if, with a view to gain for himself or another or with intent to cause loss to another, he makes any unwarranted demand with menaces...[https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/60/section/21 Section 21(1) Theft Act 1968][https://www.legislation.gov.uk/apni/1969/16/section/20 Section 20(1) Theft Act (Northern Ireland) 1969]}}

In popular culture, 'blackmail' involves a threat to reveal or publicize either substantially true or false information about a person or people unless certain demands are met. It is often damaging information, and it may be revealed to family members or associates rather than to the general public.

Acts of blackmail can also involve using threats of physical, mental or emotional harm, or of criminal prosecution, against the victim or someone close to the victim.{{cite book | title = Merriam-Webster's dictionary of law |publisher= Merriam-Webster|year=1996|page=[https://archive.org/details/merriamwebstersd0000merr/page/53 53]|access-date=23 May 2011| isbn = 978-0-87779-604-6| url=https://archive.org/details/merriamwebstersd0000merr| url-access = registration }}{{cite book | title = The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 4th edition |year=2010|publisher=Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.}} It is normally carried out for personal gain, most commonly of position, money, or property.{{cite web|title=Blackmail|work=Merriam-Webster|access-date=23 May 2011|url=http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/blackmail|archive-date=21 October 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171021072817/https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/blackmail|url-status=live}}{{cite book | title = Burton's Legal Thesaurus|publisher=McGraw-Hill Professional|year=2006|page=233|access-date=23 May 2011| isbn =978-0-07-147262-3| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=9OGU6qOu_3YC&pg=PA233}}{{cite book | title = The encyclopedia of American law enforcement|publisher=Infobase Publishing|year=2007|page=78|access-date=23 May 2011|isbn =978-0-8160-6290-4| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=PPu3GVnde-QC&pg=PA78}}

Blackmail may also be considered a form of extortion and may be covered in the same statutory provision as extortion.[http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0800-0899/0836/Sections/0836.05.html Florida Statutes § 836.05 (2024)], from Florida Legislature Although the two are generally synonymous, extortion is the taking of personal property by threat of future harm.{{cite book|author1=Frank Schmalleger |author2=Daniel E. Hall |author3=John J. Dolatowski |title=Criminal Law Today|year=2009|publisher=Prentice Hall|isbn=978-0-13-504261-8|pages=271–272|edition=4th}} Blackmail is the use of threat to prevent another from engaging in a lawful occupation and writing libelous letters or letters that provoke a breach of the peace, as well as use of intimidation for purposes of collecting an unpaid debt.

In many jurisdictions, blackmail is a statutory offense, often criminal, carrying punitive sanctions for convicted perpetrators. Blackmail is the name of a statutory offense in the United States, England and Wales, and Australia,{{Cite web|url=http://www.thelaw.tas.gov.au/tocview/index.w3p;cond=ALL;doc_id=69%252B%252B1924%252BJS1%2540GS241%2540EN%252B20160127140000;histon=;prompt=;rec=;term=blackmail|title=Legislation View Page|website=thelaw.tas.gov.au|access-date=2016-09-18|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160919150550/http://www.thelaw.tas.gov.au/tocview/index.w3p;cond=ALL;doc_id=69%252B%252B1924%252BJS1%2540GS241%2540EN%252B20160127140000;histon=;prompt=;rec=;term=blackmail|archive-date=19 September 2016|url-status=dead}} and has been used as a convenient way of referring to certain other offenses, but was not a term used in English law until 1968.Griew, Edward. The Theft Acts 1968 & 1978, Sweet & Maxwell: London. Fifth Edition, paperback, {{ISBN|0-421-35310-4}}, paragraph 12-01 at page 183

Blackmail was originally a term from the Scottish Borders meaning payments rendered in exchange for protection from thieves and marauders.{{cite book | title = West's encyclopedia of American law, Volume 2|publisher=West Pub. Co.|year=1998|pages=569 pages|access-date=23 May 2011|isbn =978-0-314-20155-3 | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=7-lGAAAAMAAJ}}{{Cite web|url=https://www.dsl.ac.uk/entry/snd/black_mail|title=Dictionary of the Scots Language:: SND :: black mail|access-date=19 June 2020|archive-date=15 August 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200815171422/https://www.dsl.ac.uk/entry/snd/black_mail|url-status=live}} The "mail" part of blackmail derives from Middle English {{lang|enm|male}} meaning "rent or tribute".{{cite web | author = Maeve Maddox | title = The Difference Between Extortion and Blackmail | date = 10 May 2011 | access-date = 18 July 2011 | url = http://www.dailywritingtips.com/extortion-and-blackmail/ | archive-date = 13 July 2011 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110713181956/http://www.dailywritingtips.com/extortion-and-blackmail/ | url-status = live }} This tribute (male or reditus) was paid in goods or labour ("nigri"); hence reditus nigri, or "blackmail".

Etymology

File:Capon-Minerbo Blackmail Note.jpg]]

{{More citations needed section|date=March 2023}}

The word blackmail is variously derived from the word for mailing (in modern terms, protection racket) paid by English and Scottish border dwellers to Border Reivers in return for immunity from raids and other harassment. The "mail" part of blackmail derives from Middle English {{Lang|enm|male}}, "rent, tribute". This tribute was paid in goods or labour (reditus nigri, or "blackmail"); the opposite is blanche firmes or reditus albi, or "white rent" (denoting payment by silver). An alternative version is that rents in the Scottish Borders were often paid in produce of the land, called "greenmail"{{citation needed|date=March 2023}} ('green rent'), suggesting "blackmail" as a counterpart paid perforce to the reivers. Alternatively, Mackay{{Obsolete source|date=March 2023}} derives it from two Scottish Gaelic words {{Lang|gd|blathaich}} pronounced (the th silent) bla-ich (to protect) and {{Lang|gd|mal}} (tribute, payment), cf. buttock mail. He notes that the practice was common in the Scottish Highlands as well as the Borders.{{cite book |last1=Mackay |first1=Charles |last2=Ramsay |first2=Allan |last3=May |first3=G. |title=A dictionary of Lowland Scotch, with an introductory chapter on the poetry, humour, and literary history of the Scottish language and an appendix of Scottish proverbs |date=1888 |publisher=Whittaker |location=London |pages=10–12 |chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/adictionarylowl03mackgoog/page/10 |chapter=Black-mail}} In the Irish language, the term {{Lang|ga|cíos dubh}}, meaning "black rent", was used for similar exactions.

Objections to criminalization

Some scholars have argued that blackmail should not be a crime.{{harvp|Lindgren|1984|p=670}}: "Most crimes do not need theories to explain why the behavior is criminal. The wrongdoing is self-evident. But blackmail is unique among major crimes: no one has yet figured out why it ought to be illegal."Block, Walter, "[http://www.walterblock.com/wp-content/uploads/publications/block_blackmail-as-a-victimless-crime-1999.pdf Blackmail as a Victimless Crime] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170808204001/http://www.walterblock.com/wp-content/uploads/publications/block_blackmail-as-a-victimless-crime-1999.pdf |date=8 August 2017 }}," with Robert McGee, Bracton Law Journal, Vol. 31, pp. 24–28 (1999)Block, Walter, "[http://www.walterblock.com/wp-content/uploads/publications/block_blackmailing-for-mutual-good-reply-to-hardin-2000.pdf Blackmailing for Mutual Good: A Reply to Russell Hardin] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110319213431/http://www.walterblock.com/wp-content/uploads/publications/block_blackmailing-for-mutual-good-reply-to-hardin-2000.pdf |date=19 March 2011 }}," Vermont Law Review, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 121–141 (1999){{citation|title=The Second Paradox of Blackmail|journal=Business Ethics Quarterly|author=Walter Block, N. Stephan Kinsella and Hans-Hermann Hoppe|s2cid=5684396|volume=10|number=3|date=Jul 2000|pages=593–622|jstor=3857894|doi=10.2307/3857894}} Objections to the criminalization of blackmail often rest on what legal scholars call "the paradox of blackmail": it takes two separate actions that, in many cases, people are legally and morally entitled to do, and criminalizes them if done together. One American legal scholar uses the example of a person who threatens to expose a criminal act unless he is paid money. The person has committed the crime of blackmail, even though he separately has the legal right both to threaten to expose a crime and to request money from a person.{{sfnp|Lindgren|1984|pp=670–71}}

See also

{{Wiktionary}}

{{div col}}

{{div col end}}

;In film

Notes

{{Reflist}}

References

  • Baker, Dennis J., Glanville Williams Textbook of Criminal Law. Sweet & Maxwell: London. (2005) {{ISBN|978-0-414-04613-9}}.
  • Criminal Law Revision Committee. 8th Report. Theft and Related Offences. Cmnd. 2977
  • Griew, Edward. Theft Acts 1968 & 1978, Sweet & Maxwell: London. {{ISBN|978-0-421-19960-6}}
  • {{cite journal | first = James | last = Lindgren | title = Unraveling the Paradox of Blackmail | journal = Columbia Law Review | volume = 84 | issue = 3 | year = 1984 | pages = 670–717 | doi = 10.2307/1122502 | jstor = 1122502 }}
  • Ormerod, David. Smith and Hogan Criminal Law, LexisNexis: London. (2005) {{ISBN|978-0-406-97730-4}}
  • Smith, J. C. Law of Theft, LexisNexis: London. (1997) {{ISBN|978-0-406-89545-5}}