Bloch's higher Chow group

In algebraic geometry, Bloch's higher Chow groups, a generalization of Chow group, is a precursor and a basic example of motivic cohomology (for smooth varieties). It was introduced by Spencer Bloch {{harv|Bloch|1986}} and the basic theory has been developed by Bloch and Marc Levine.

In more precise terms, a theorem of Voevodsky{{Cite book|url=http://www.claymath.org/library/monographs/cmim02.pdf|title=Lecture Notes on Motivic Cohomology|publisher=Clay Math Monographs|pages=159}} implies: for a smooth scheme X over a field and integers p, q, there is a natural isomorphism

:\operatorname{H}^p(X; \mathbb{Z}(q)) \simeq \operatorname{CH}^q(X, 2q - p)

between motivic cohomology groups and higher Chow groups.

Motivation

One of the motivations for higher Chow groups comes from homotopy theory. In particular, if \alpha,\beta \in Z_*(X) are algebraic cycles in X which are rationally equivalent via a cycle \gamma \in Z_*(X\times \Delta^1), then \gamma can be thought of as a path between \alpha and \beta, and the higher Chow groups are meant to encode the information of higher homotopy coherence. For example,

\text{CH}^*(X,0)
can be thought of as the homotopy classes of cycles while
\text{CH}^*(X,1)
can be thought of as the homotopy classes of homotopies of cycles.

Definition

Let X be a quasi-projective algebraic scheme over a field (“algebraic” means separated and of finite type).

For each integer q \ge 0, define

:\Delta^q = \operatorname{Spec}(\mathbb{Z}[t_0, \dots, t_q]/(t_0 + \dots + t_q - 1)),

which is an algebraic analog of a standard q-simplex. For each sequence 0 \le i_1 < i_2 < \cdots < i_r \le q, the closed subscheme t_{i_1} = t_{i_2} = \cdots = t_{i_r} = 0, which is isomorphic to \Delta^{q-r}, is called a face of \Delta^q.

For each i, there is the embedding

:\partial_{q, i}: \Delta^{q-1} \overset{\sim}\to \{ t_i = 0 \} \subset \Delta^q.

We write Z_i(X) for the group of algebraic i-cycles on X and z_r(X, q) \subset Z_{r+q}(X \times \Delta^q) for the subgroup generated by closed subvarieties that intersect properly with X \times F for each face F of \Delta^q.

Since \partial_{X, q, i} = \operatorname{id}_X \times \partial_{q, i}: X \times \Delta^{q-1} \hookrightarrow X \times \Delta^q is an effective Cartier divisor, there is the Gysin homomorphism:

:\partial_{X, q, i}^*: z_r(X, q) \to z_r(X, q-1),

that (by definition) maps a subvariety V to the intersection (X \times \{ t_i = 0 \}) \cap V.

Define the boundary operator d_q = \sum_{i=0}^q (-1)^i \partial_{X, q, i}^* which yields the chain complex

:\cdots \to z_r(X, q) \overset{d_q}\to z_r(X, q-1) \overset{d_{q-1}}\to \cdots \overset{d_1}\to z_r(X, 0).

Finally, the q-th higher Chow group of X is defined as the q-th homology of the above complex:

:\operatorname{CH}_r(X, q) := \operatorname{H}_q(z_r(X, \cdot)).

(More simply, since z_r(X, \cdot) is naturally a simplicial abelian group, in view of the Dold–Kan correspondence, higher Chow groups can also be defined as homotopy groups \operatorname{CH}_r(X, q) := \pi_q z_r(X, \cdot).)

For example, if V \subset X \times \Delta^1Here, we identify \Delta^1 with a subscheme of \mathbb{P}^1 and then, without loss of generality, assume one vertex is the origin 0 and the other is ∞. is a closed subvariety such that the intersections V(0), V(\infty) with the faces 0, \infty are proper, then

d_1(V) = V(0) - V(\infty) and this means, by Proposition 1.6. in Fulton’s intersection theory, that the image of d_1 is precisely the group of cycles rationally equivalent to zero; that is,

:\operatorname{CH}_r(X, 0) = the r-th Chow group of X.

Properties

= Functoriality =

Proper maps f:X\to Y are covariant between the higher chow groups while flat maps are contravariant. Also, whenever Y is smooth, any map to Y is contravariant.

= Homotopy invariance =

If E \to X is an algebraic vector bundle, then there is the homotopy equivalence

\text{CH}^*(X,n) \cong \text{CH}^*(E,n)

= Localization =

Given a closed equidimensional subscheme Y \subset X there is a localization long exact sequence

\begin{align}

\cdots \\

\text{CH}^{*-d}(Y,2) \to \text{CH}^{*}(X,2) \to \text{CH}^{*}(U,2) \to & \\

\text{CH}^{*-d}(Y,1) \to \text{CH}^{*}(X,1) \to \text{CH}^{*}(U,1) \to & \\

\text{CH}^{*-d}(Y,0) \to \text{CH}^{*}(X,0) \to \text{CH}^{*}(U,0) \to & \text{ }0

\end{align}

where U = X-Y. In particular, this shows the higher chow groups naturally extend the exact sequence of chow groups.

Localization theorem

{{harv|Bloch|1994}} showed that, given an open subset U \subset X, for Y = X - U,

:z(X, \cdot)/z(Y, \cdot) \to z(U, \cdot)

is a homotopy equivalence. In particular, if Y has pure codimension, then it yields the long exact sequence for higher Chow groups (called the localization sequence).

References

{{reflist}}

  • {{cite journal | last1=Bloch | first1=Spencer | title=Algebraic cycles and higher K-theory | journal=Advances in Mathematics | volume=61 | date=September 1986 | pages=267–304 | doi=10.1016/0001-8708(86)90081-2 | doi-access=free}}
  • {{cite journal | last1=Bloch | first1=Spencer | title=The moving lemma for higher Chow groups | journal=Journal of Algebraic Geometry | volume=3 | pages=537–568 | date=1994}}
  • Peter Haine, [http://math.mit.edu/~phaine/files/Motivic_Overview.pdf An Overview of Motivic Cohomology]
  • Vladmir Voevodsky, “Motivic cohomology groups are isomorphic to higher Chow groups in any characteristic,” International Mathematics Research Notices 7 (2002), 351–355.

Category:Algebraic geometry