Bridget Bishop

{{Infobox person

| name = Bridget Bishop

| other names = Wasselbe, Wasselby, Waselby, Wasselbee, Wesselbee, Magnus, Magnes, Hayfer; Goody Oliver, Goody Bishop, Bridget Playfer

| image = File:Bridget Bishop.jpg

| alt = Bridget Bishop, as depicted in a lithograph

| caption = Bishop, as depicted in a lithograph

| birth_name = Bridget Magnus

| birth_date = {{circa}} 1632

| birth_place = Norwich, England

| death_date = 10 June 1692 (aged c. 60)

| death_place = Salem, Colony of Massachusetts

| death_cause = Execution by hanging

| occupation =

| criminal_charge = Witchcraft (overturned), conspiracy with the Devil (rehabilitated)

| criminal_penalty = Death

| criminal_status = Executed (10 June 1692)
Exonerated (31 October 2001)

}}

Bridget Bishop (née Magnus; {{circa}} 1632 – 10 June 1692) was a midwife and the first person executed for witchcraft during the Salem witch trials in 1692. Nineteen were hanged, and one, Giles Corey, was pressed to death. Altogether, about 200 people were tried.

Family life

Bridget's maiden name was Magnus. Her sister Mercy, her father John, and her mother Rebecca adopted the last name Playfer, Bridget's paternal grandmother's maiden name. She was married three or possibly four times.{{cn|date=November 2021}}

She married her first husband, Samuel Wesselby on 13 April 1660, at St. Mary-in-the-Marsh, Norwich, Norfolk, England.Anderson, Robert Charles. "Bridget (Mangus) (Playfer) (Wasselbe) (Oliver) Bishop", The American Genealogist (October 1989), 64: 207. [https://books.google.com/books?id=QfwnAQAAMAAJ&q=wasselbeeThe American Genealogist] She had two sons and one daughter from her first marriage: John, Benjamin"England Deaths and Burials, 1538–1991" (Benjamin Waselby), Middlesex, England; Burial Date: 26 Sep 1664. and Mary."Massachusetts Births and Christenings, 1639–1915", Boston, Suffolk, Massachusetts; 10 January 1665. Her first husband died in 1666.{{pn|date=June 2022}}

Her second marriage, on 26 July 1666,Vital Records of the Town of Salem. Salem, MA: Essex Institute. 1924. was to Thomas Oliver, a widower and prominent businessman, listed in early records as a calendar. They had one child, a daughter, Chrestian Oliver (sometimes spelled Christian), born 8 May 1667.Vital Records of the Town of Salem, Volume 1, Births, Salem, MA: Essex Institute. 1916.{{pn|date=June 2022}} She was earlier accused of bewitching Thomas Oliver to death, but was acquitted for lack of evidence.{{cn|date=November 2021}}

Her third marriage c. 1687 was to Edward Bishop, a prosperous sawyer, whose family lived in Beverly.{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YNYyMV_huGAC|title=Salem Story: Reading the Witch Trials of 1692|last=Rosenthal|first=Bernard|date=29 September 1995|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0-521-55820-4|language=en}}{{pn|date=June 2022}} Her third husband, Edward Bishop, is also one of the founders of the First Church of Beverly. He was 44 at the time of the trials.Woodward, Elliot (1969). Records of Salem witchcraft : copied from the original documents. New York: Da capo Press.{{pn|date=June 2022}}

Bridget ran two taverns alongside Edward.{{pn|date=June 2022}}

Nature of allegations

Bridget Bishop was examined due to her accusation of suspicion of "sundry acts of witchcraft".{{pn|date=June 2022}} Bishop was accused of bewitching five young women, Abigail Williams, Ann Putnam, Jr., Mercy Lewis, Mary Walcott, and Elizabeth Hubbard, on the date of her examination by the authorities, 19 April 1692.

Bishop's trial lasted eight days, officially starting the Salem Witchcraft Trials.{{pn|date=June 2022}} A record was given of her trial by Cotton Mather in "Wonders of the Invisible World." In his book, Mather recorded that several people testified against Bishop, stating that the shape of Bishop would pinch, choke or bite them. The shape also threatened to drown one victim if she did not write her name in a certain book. According to Mather, during the trial, any time Bishop would look upon one of her accusers, they would be immediately struck down and only her touch would revive them.

More allegations were made during the trial including that of a woman saying that the apparition of Bishop tore her coat, and upon further examination her coat was found to be torn in the exact spot. Mather mentions that the truth of these many accusations carried too much suspicion, however.{{cite book|last=Mather|first=Cotton|title=The Wonders of the Invisible World: Being an Account of the Tryals of Several Witches Lately Executed in New-England|url=https://archive.org/details/wondersinvisibl01mathgoog|access-date=8 June 2018|year=1862|publisher=John Russell Smith|pages=[https://archive.org/details/wondersinvisibl01mathgoog/page/n151 129]–130}}

Ezekiel Cheevers and John Putnam made the complaint against Bridget Bishop. Bishop was charged for committing witchcraft upon five women, Ann Putnam, Mercy Lewis, Abigail Williams, Mary Walcot, and Elis Hubert. These women claimed Bridget Bishop to be the witch who hurt them.Boyer, Paul (1993). Salem-village witchcraft : a documentary record of local conflict in colonial New England. Boston: Northeastern University Press.{{pn|date=June 2022}}{{pn|date=June 2022}} Ann Putnam stated that Bishop called the devil her God, while other people such as Richard Coman accused Bishop of taking hold of their throats and ripping Coman and his wife out of bed.Woods, William Howards (1974). A casebook of witchcraft : reports, depositions, confessions, trials, and executions for witchcraft during a period of three hundred years. New York: Putnam.{{pn|date=June 2022}}{{pn|date=June 2022}} Other girls accused her of harming them with just a quick glance. Even Bishop's own husband claimed she praised the devil.

William Stacy, a middle aged man in Salem Town, testified that Bishop had previously made statements to him that other people in the town considered her to be a witch. He confronted her with the allegation that she was using witchcraft to torment him, which she denied. Another local man, Samuel Shattuck, accused Bishop of bewitching his child and also of striking his son with a spade.

He also testified that Bishop asked him to dye lace, which apparently was too small to be used on anything but a poppet, a doll used in spell-casting. John and William Bly, father and son, testified about finding poppets in Bishop's house and also about their cat that appeared to be bewitched, or poisoned, after a dispute with Bishop. Other victims of Bishop, as recorded by Mather, include Deliverance Hobbs, John Cook, Samuel Gray, and John Louder.{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EMDabpjdotYC|title=Witch-Hunting in Seventeenth-Century New England: A Documentary History 1638–1693, Second Edition|last=Hall|first=David D.|date=4 February 2005|publisher=Duke University Press|isbn=0-8223-3613-8|language=en}}{{pn|date=June 2022}}{{pn|date=June 2022}}

During her sentencing, a jury of women found a third nipple upon Bishop (then considered a sure sign of witchcraft), yet upon a second examination the nipple was not found. In the end Mather states that the greatest thing that condemned Bishop was the gross amount of lying she committed in court. According to Mather, "there was little occasion to prove the witchcraft, it being evident and notorious to all beholders."

Bishop was sentenced to death and hanged.{{Cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/eventsthatchange00john_2|url-access=registration|title=Events that Changed America Through the Seventeenth Century|last1=Findling|first1=John E.|last2=Thackeray|first2=Frank W.|date=1 January 2000|publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group|isbn=978-0-313-29083-1|language=en}}{{pn|date=June 2022}}{{pn|date=June 2022}}{{Cite book|title=The Satan Seller|last=Warnke|first=Mike|publisher=Logos International|year=1972|isbn=0-912106-79-4|pages=[https://archive.org/details/satanseller00warn/page/91 91]|quote="A witch with a long family tree. An ancestor of hers by the same name was hanged there June 10, 1692, but don't sweat it, Mike, they don't do that anymore."|url=https://archive.org/details/satanseller00warn/page/91}} She was recorded to be the first woman to die from hanging in the colony.

Traditional historical interpretation

{{Quote|text="'Goodwife Bishop her Neighb'r wife of Edw: Bishop Jun'r might not be permitted to receive the Lords Supper in our church till she had given her the said Trask satisfaction for some offences that were against her .viz because the said Bishop did entertaine people in her house at unseasonable hours in the night to keep drinking and playing at shovel-board whereby discord did arise in other families & young people were in danger to bee corrupted & that the s'd Trask these things & had once gon into the house & fynding some at shovel-board had taken the of peices [sic] thay played with & thrown them into the fyre & had reprooved the said Bishop for promoting such disorders, But received no satisfaction from her about it"|author=John Hawthorn and Jonath Corwin|source=Bridget Bishop Executed, June 10, 1692: The Examination of Bridget Byshop at Salem Village 19. Apr. 1692 {{Cite web|url=http://archive.org/details/storyofbattlenew00arth|title=The story of the battle of New Orleans|date=26 December 1915|publisher=New Orleans, La., Louisiana historical society|via=Internet Archive}}}}

Recent historical interpretation

One interpretation of the historical record suggests that she was a resident of Salem Town and thus not the tavern owner. Perhaps she did not know her accusers. This would be supported in her deposition in Salem Village before the authorities stating, "I never saw these persons before, nor I never was in this place before."{{cite web |url=http://etext.virginia.edu/etcbin/toccer-new2?id=BoySal1.sgm&images=images/modeng&data=/texts/english/modeng/oldsalem&tag=public&part=29&division=div2 |title=The Salem witchcraft papers, Volume 1 : verbatim transcripts of the legal documents of the Salem witchcraft outbreak of 1692/edited by Paul Boyer and Stephen Nissenbaum |publisher=Etext.virginia.edu |access-date=2 June 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141222133126/http://etext.virginia.edu/etcbin/toccer-new2?id=BoySal1.sgm&images=images%2Fmodeng&data=%2Ftexts%2Fenglish%2Fmodeng%2Foldsalem&tag=public&part=29&division=div2 |archive-date=22 December 2014 }} The indictments against her clearly note that she was from "Salem"{{cite web|url=http://etext.virginia.edu/etcbin/toccer-new2?id=BoySal1.sgm&images=images/modeng&data=/texts/english/modeng/oldsalem&tag=public&part=32&division=div2 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20120712053424/http://etext.virginia.edu/etcbin/toccer-new2?id=BoySal1.sgm&images=images/modeng&data=/texts/english/modeng/oldsalem&tag=public&part=32&division=div2 |url-status=dead |archive-date=12 July 2012 |title=The Salem witchcraft papers, Volume 1 : verbatim transcripts of the legal documents of the Salem witchcraft outbreak of 1692/edited by Paul Boyer and Stephen Nissenbaum |publisher=Etext.virginia.edu |access-date=2 June 2011 }} which meant Salem Town, as other indictments against residents of Salem Village specified their locations as such.See the [http://etext.virginia.edu/etcbin/toccer-new2?id=BoySal2.sgm&images=images/modeng&data=/texts/english/modeng/oldsalem&tag=public&part=29&division=div2 indictment against Sarah Good], a resident of Salem Village{{dead link|date=November 2016 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}

She was often confused with Sarah Bishop, one of the other accused during the Salem trial.{{Cite book|chapter-url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/salem-story/june-10-1692/8C649858DE6C4B5FD493F54E2CB1E9D9|doi = 10.1017/CBO9780511519352.005|chapter = June 10, 1692|title = Salem Story|series = Cambridge Studies in American Literature and Culture|year = 1993|pages = 67–85|publisher = Cambridge University Press|isbn = 978-0-521-44061-5}} While men were still being accused of witchcraft, it was mostly women being indicted during this time period. They were often quickly accused and sentenced to death within days. Bridget Bishop had already been accused and deemed innocent a whole decade following up to the witchcraft hysteria.Stevenson, Keira (2017). Bridget Bishop. [Place of publication not identified]. {{ISBN|1-4298-0535-8}}. OCLC 994473310.{{pn|date=June 2022}}{{pn|date=June 2022}}