Broadrick v. Oklahoma

{{Use mdy dates|date=September 2023}}

{{Use American English|date=September 2018}}

{{Infobox SCOTUS case

| Litigants = Broadrick v. Oklahoma

| ArgueDate = March 26

| ArgueYear = 1973

| DecideDate = June 25

| DecideYear = 1973

| FullName =

| USVol = 413

| USPage = 601

| ParallelCitations = 93 S. Ct. 2908; 37 L. Ed. 2d 830

| Docket =

| OralArgument =

| OralReargument =

| OpinionAnnouncement =

| Prior = 338 F. Supp. [https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/338/711/2182061/ 711] (W.D. Okla. 1972)

| Subsequent =

| Holding = The Oklahoma statute is not overly broad; the State of Oklahoma has the power to regulate partisan political activities

| SCOTUS =

| Majority = White

| JoinMajority = Burger, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist

| Concurrence =

| JoinConcurrence =

| Concurrence2 =

| JoinConcurrence2 =

| Concurrence/Dissent =

| JoinConcurrence/Dissent =

| Dissent = Brennan

| JoinDissent = Stewart, Marshall

| Dissent2 = Douglas

| JoinDissent2 =

| LawsApplied = First Amendment to the United States Constitution

}}

Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601 (1973), is a United States Supreme Court decision upholding an Oklahoma statute which prohibited state employees from engaging in partisan political activities. Broadrick is often cited to enunciate the test for a facial overbreadth challenge that "the overbreadth of a statute must not only be real, but substantial as well, judged in relation to the statute's plainly legitimate sweep."