C. V. Karthikeyan

{{Short description|Indian judge}}

{{BLP sources|date=May 2021}}

{{Use dmy dates|date=February 2023}}

{{Use Indian English|date=February 2023}}

{{Infobox person

| name = C. V. Karthikeyan

| image =

| alt =

| caption = C. V. Karthikeyan, Justice, High Court of Madras

| birth_name = Karthikeyan

| birth_date = {{Birth year and age|1964}}

| birth_place = Chennai, India

| occupation = {{Hlist|||Judge}}

| known_for = Member, TNSJA

| title = {{Unbulleted list||Member of TNSJA of Madras High Court}}

| boards = {{Unbulleted list||Member, TNSJA}}

| spouse = (married )

| children =

| parents = {{Unbulleted list|C. V. Simharaja Sastri|Smt. Saraswathi S Satri}}

| website = {{URL|https://www.hcmadras.tn.nic.in/cvkj.html}}

| signature =

| signature_alt =

}}

Honorable Thiru. C. V. Karthikeyan{{Cite web|title=Madras High Court {{!}} Profile of Judges|url=http://www.hcmadras.tn.nic.in/cvkj.html|access-date=2021-05-19|website=www.hcmadras.tn.nic.in}} is a sitting Judge of the Madras High Court. He is one of the Members of the Board of Governors of the Tamil Nadu State Judicial Academy.

Justice C. V. Karthikeyan was appointed Additional Judge, High Court of Madras on 6 October 2016.{{Cite web|title=TNSJA {{!}} Board {{!}} Profiles|url=http://www.tnsja.tn.gov.in/aboutus_profile.html|access-date=2021-05-19|website=www.tnsja.tn.gov.in}}

As judge of High Court

Justice Karthikeyan was appointed Additional Judge, High Court of Madras{{Cite web|title=Judges named for vacation court|url=https://in.news.yahoo.com/judges-named-vacation-court-154721266.html|access-date=2021-05-20|website=in.news.yahoo.com|language=en-IN}} on 16 November 2016. He is one of the Members of the Board of Governors of the TNSJA (Tamil Nadu State Judicial Academy).{{Cite web|title=TNSJA {{!}} Board|url=http://www.tnsja.tn.gov.in/aboutus_board.html|access-date=2021-05-19|website=www.tnsja.tn.gov.in}}

Important cases

Some important cases are reported in journals like All India Reporter.{{Cite web|title=All India Reporter|url=https://www.aironline.in/visitorFullContent.html|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210602213901/https://www.aironline.in/visitorFullContent.html |archive-date=2021-06-02 }}{{Cite book|last=Taxsutra|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xEnpDwAAQBAJ&dq=%22C.+V.+Karthikeyan%22+-wikipedia&pg=PA178|title=Top 100 Income Tax Rulings Of 2019|date=2020-01-23|publisher=Wolters kluwer india Pvt Ltd|isbn=978-93-89859-04-1|language=en}}

= AIADMK Case =

Justice Karthikeyan had passed orders to submit the accounts of the political party AIADMK.{{Cite web|title=AIADMK|url=https://www.firstpost.com/tag/justice-cv-karthikeyan|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210519071737/https://www.firstpost.com/tag/justice-cv-karthikeyan |archive-date=2021-05-19 }}

= Patanjali's Case =

File:Patanjali_Ayurveda.jpg

Justice C.V. Karthikeyan held there was no due cause for Patanjali Ayurved Ltd. and Divya Yog Trust to name their tablets as Coronil.{{Cite web|title=Pathanjali|website=The Hindu|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/hc-comes-down-heavily-on-patanjali-ayurved-for-exploiting-peoples-fear-of-covid-19/article32286166.ece|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200829054209/https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/hc-comes-down-heavily-on-patanjali-ayurved-for-exploiting-peoples-fear-of-covid-19/article32286166.ece |archive-date=2020-08-29 }} When the case was ordered by Justice C. V. Karthikeyan, the same was appealed by the affected party.{{Cite news|last=S|first=Mohamed Imranullah|date=2020-08-06|title=Pay ₹10 lakh for exploiting fear of COVID-19: Madras HC to Patanjali|language=en-IN|work=The Hindu|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/hc-comes-down-heavily-on-patanjali-ayurved-for-exploiting-peoples-fear-of-covid-19/article32286166.ece|access-date=2021-05-20|issn=0971-751X}}{{Cite news|agency=Press Trust of India|date=2020-07-17|title=Madras High Court restrains Patanjali from using trademark 'Coronil'|work=Business Standard India|url=https://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/madras-hc-restrains-patanjali-from-using-trademark-coronil-here-s-why-120071701744_1.html|access-date=2021-05-20}}

= Defamation Case =

Justice C. V. Karthikeyan of the Madras High Court ordered{{Cite web|title=Madras HC restrains Youtuber Maridhas from posting any videos against private Tamil news channel|url=https://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/chennai/2020/jul/30/madras-hc-restrains-youtuber-maridhas-from-posting-any-videos-against-private-tamil-news-channel-2176549.html|access-date=2021-05-20|website=The New Indian Express}} notice to the Youtuber Maridhas answers on the plea filed by M Gunasekaran of TV 18 Broadcast limited.{{Cite web|title=Defamation|url=https://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/chennai/2020/jul/30/madras-hc-restrains-youtuber-maridhas-from-posting-any-videos-against-private-tamil-news-channel-2176549.html|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200731013239/https://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/chennai/2020/jul/30/madras-hc-restrains-youtuber-maridhas-from-posting-any-videos-against-private-tamil-news-channel-2176549.html |archive-date=2020-07-31 }}

= TNERC Case =

In yet another case, Justice C. V. Karthikeyan had ordered the batch of petitioners to approach the Regulatory Authority for the Electricity Board, if the Board was not following the directions for collecting the charges during pandemic.{{Cite news|author=Staff Reporter|date=2020-05-26|title=HC disposes of petitions filed by spinning mills|language=en-IN|work=The Hindu|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Madurai/hc-disposes-of-petitions-filed-by-spinning-mills/article31681023.ece|access-date=2021-05-20|issn=0971-751X}}

= Bike Taxi Case =

in an interim order on an appeal moved by Rapido, a bike taxi service provider, Justice Vineeth Kothari and Justice C. V. Karthikeyan stayed the operation of a communication of Tamil Nadu police. The communication was addressed to Google LIC, Apple India and Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (CRET-In) directing them to remove the 'Rapido Bike' app from their platforms.{{Cite web|title=Justice C V Karthikeyan: Latest News, Videos and Photos of Justice C V Karthikeyan {{!}} Times of India|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/topic/Justice-C-V-Karthikeyan|access-date=2021-05-20|website=The Times of India}}

= CGST and Input Tax Case =

In a case relating to the Goods and Services Tax Act, a Bench consisting of Justice C.V. Karthikeyan, ordered on the issue relating to whether under Section 50 of the CGST Act, the interest on delayed filing of the returns arises automatically or not?{{Cite web|title=Case Law|url=http://labourlawadvisor.com/upload/Judgement/0178f22b774643a99d99e0c7a2b29596.pdf|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210520120444/http://labourlawadvisor.com/upload/Judgement/0178f22b774643a99d99e0c7a2b29596.pdf |archive-date=2021-05-20 }}

= Puducherry Controversy Case =

Justice C. V. Karthikeyan had dismissed Puducherry Chief Minister's writ petition filed against the Lieutenant Governor Kiran Bedi's decision to issue cash instead of goods in fair price shops.{{Cite web|title=Puducherry controversy case|url=https://www.aninews.in/news/national/general-news/hc-dismisses-puducherry-cms-writ-petition-filed-against-kiran-bedis-decision20200221183424/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200920045515/https://www.aninews.in/news/national/general-news/hc-dismisses-puducherry-cms-writ-petition-filed-against-kiran-bedis-decision20200221183424/ |archive-date=2020-09-20 }}

References