Callaway Nuclear Generating Station

{{Short description|Nuclear power plant located in Callaway County, Missouri}}

{{Infobox power station

| name = Callaway Nuclear Generating Station

| name_official = Callaway Plant, Callaway Energy Center

| image = Callaway_Nuclear_Plant.JPG

| image_size =

| image_caption = Containment building (center) and cooling tower (right) at Callaway Plant (NRC picture).

| image_alt =

| coordinates = {{coord|38|45|42|N|91|46|48|W|type:landmark_region:US-MO |display=inline,title}}

| country = United States

| location = Auxvasse Township, Callaway County, near Steedman, Missouri

| status = O

| construction_began = September 1, 1975

| commissioned = December 19, 1984

| decommissioned =

| cost = $5.919 billion (2007 USD){{cite web|title=EIA - State Nuclear Profiles|url=https://www.eia.gov/nuclear/state/archive/2010/missouri/|website=www.eia.gov|access-date=3 October 2017|language=en}}

| owner = Ameren Missouri

| operator = Ameren Missouri

| np_reactor_type = PWR

| np_reactor_supplier = Westinghouse

| np_fuel_type =

| np_fuel_supplier =

| ps_cogeneration =

| ps_cooling_source = Missouri River

| ps_cooling_towers = 1 × Natural Draft

| ps_units_operational = 1 × 1215 MW

| ps_units_manu_model = WH 4-loop (SNUPPS)

| ps_units_uc =

| ps_units_planned =

| ps_units_cancelled = 1 × 1120 MW
1 × 1600 MW US EPR

| ps_units_decommissioned=

| ps_thermal_capacity = 1 × 3565 MWth

| ps_heating_capacity =

| ps_electrical_capacity = 1215

| ps_electrical_cap_fac = 78.34% (2017)
87.70% (lifetime)

| ps_storage_capacity =

| ps_annual_generation = 8338 GWh (2017)

| website = [https://www.ameren.com/missouri/callaway Callaway Energy Center]

| extra =

}}

The Callaway Plant is a nuclear power plant located in Callaway County, Missouri. The plant is Missouri's only nuclear power plant and is close to Fulton, Missouri.{{cite web|title=Callaway, Unit 1, Current Facility Operating License NPF-30, Tech Specs, Revised 09/26/2017|url=https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0531/ML053110040.pdf|publisher=Nuclear Regulatory Commission|access-date=7 May 2018}} The {{convert|2767|acre}} site began operations on December 19, 1984. It generates electricity from one 1,190-megawatt Westinghouse four-loop pressurized water reactor and a General Electric turbine-generator. The Ameren Corporation owns and operates the plant through its subsidiary Ameren Missouri. It is one of several Westinghouse reactors designs called the "Standard Nuclear Unit Power Plant System," or SNUPPS.{{cite web | url=https://www.ans.org/news/article-1682/snupps-nuclear-plant-construction-at-the-cutting-edge-1972/ | title=SNUPPS - Nuclear Plant Construction at the Cutting Edge, 1972 }}

The plant produces 1,279 electrical megawatts (MWe) of net power.{{cite web |title=Callaway Plant Profile |url=https://www.ameren.com/callaway/ADC_PlantProfile.asp |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090411063443/http://www.ameren.com/callaway/ADC_PlantProfile.asp |archive-date=2009-04-11}} As of 2019, Callaway has completed five "breaker-to-breaker" runs — operating from one refueling to the next without ever being out of service. It is one of only 26 U.S. reactors to achieve such a feat according to Ameren.{{Cite web |title=Nuclear Energy {{!}} Ameren Missouri |url=https://www.ameren.com/missouri/company/environment-and-sustainability/nuclear |access-date=2023-09-28 |website=www.ameren.com |language=en}}

History

On November 19, 2005, its workers finished replacing all four steam generators in 63 days, 13 hours, a world record for a four-loop plant.{{cite web |date=2005-11-21 |title=Callaway Nuclear Plant Returns to Service Following Refueling and Maintenance; Sets World Record for Steam Generator Replacement |url=http://ameren.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=43&item=182 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110714064755/http://ameren.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=43&item=182 |archive-date=2011-07-14 |access-date=2008-07-29 |publisher=Ameren}}

In 2014, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission tests found contaminated ground water near the site.{{Cite web |last=Slavit |first=Mark |date=2014-08-05 |title=Callaway nuclear plant well water samples have radioactivity |url=http://krcgtv.com/news/neighborhood/callaway-nuclear-plant-well-water-samples-have-radioactivity |access-date=2019-03-27 |website=KRCG}}

The plant experienced three unplanned shutdowns in 2020. On December 24, 2020, an electric fault on the non-safety main generator caused an extensive outage requiring the replacement of significant components. The components were replaced, inspected, and tested during subsequent months.{{Cite web |date=2021-03-04 |title=Callaway Energy Center still at zero power |url=https://www.newstribune.com/news/2021/mar/04/Callaway-Energy-Center-still-at-zero-power/ |access-date=2023-01-07 |website=News Tribune |language=en}}{{Cite web |date=May 11, 2021 |title=CALLAWAY PLANT – INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT |url=https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML2113/ML21131A220.pdf |access-date=2023-01-07}} According to NRC inspection reports, on August 2, 2021, the reactor was restarted. Two days later on August 4, 2021, the main turbine generator was synchronized with the electrical grid and on August 8, the plant reached rated thermal power.{{Cite web |date=November 8, 2021 |title=CALLAWAY PLANT – INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 05000483/2021003 |url=https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML2130/ML21306A347.pdf |access-date=2023-01-07}}{{Cite web |last=Directors |first=Clarion Energy Content |date=2021-08-10 |title=Ameren Missouri's 1.19-GW Callaway nuclear plant back in operation after generator rewind |url=https://www.power-eng.com/om/ameren-missouris-1-19-gw-callaway-nuclear-plant-back-in-operation-after-generator-rewind/ |access-date=2023-01-07 |website=Power Engineering |language=en-US}}

According to Ameren, Callaway accounted for 23% of the utility's generation mix in 2022.{{Cite web |date=26 September 2023 |title=Ameren Missouri - Integrated Resource Plan |url=https://www.ameren.com/-/media/missouri-site/files/environment/irp/2023/ch1.ashx |access-date=28 September 2023 |website=Ameren Missouri}}

= Proposed Unit 2 and cancellation =

On July 28, 2008, Ameren Missouri applied to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for a Combined Construction and Operating License (COL) to build a 1,600-MW Areva Evolutionary Power Reactor.{{cite web |author=Dan Yurman |date=2008-07-28 |title=Ameren files for 2nd reactor with NRC |url=http://djysrv.blogspot.com/2008/07/ameren-files-for-2nd-reactor-with-nrc.html |access-date=2008-07-29 |work=Idaho Samizdat: Nuke Notes}} Ameren sought to construct this second reactor in order to meet their projected increase in demand for electricity over the next decade.{{cite web |date=2008-07-28 |title=Ameren Missouri Submits Combined Construction and Operating License Application for a Second Nuclear Generating Unit |url=http://ameren.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=43&item=512 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090412021659/http://ameren.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=43&item=512 |archive-date=2009-04-12 |access-date=2008-07-29 |publisher=Ameren}}

In April 2009, the proposal was cancelled. One stumbling block was a law that forbids utilities to charge customers for the interest accrued on a construction loan before a new plant produces electricity. The new nuclear reactor would have cost at least $6 billion.[http://primebuzz.kcstar.com/?q=node/18179 Nuke plant is, well, nuked. Not gonna happen]Terry Ganey. [http://www.columbiatribune.com/news/2009/apr/23/amerenue-pulls-plug-callaway-2/ AmerenUE pulls plug on project] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120713074254/http://www.columbiatribune.com/news/2009/apr/23/amerenue-pulls-plug-callaway-2/|date=2012-07-13}} Columbia Daily Tribune, April 23, 2009.

In April 2012, Ameren Missouri and Westinghouse Electric Company announced their intent to seek federal funding for a new generation of nuclear reactors to be installed at the Callaway site. The U.S. Department of Energy could provide up to $452 million in research and development funds to Westinghouse. The new reactors would be smaller and, the companies claimed, safer in design than any currently operating. Ameren Missouri was to apply to license up five of the 225-megawatt reactors at the Callaway site, more than doubling its current electrical output.{{cite news |date=2012-04-19 |title=Federal aid sought to build nuclear reactors in Missouri |newspaper=The Kansas City Star |url=http://www.kansascity.com/2012/04/19/3565561/federal-aid-sought-to-build-nuclear.html |access-date=2012-04-20}}

In August 2015, a month after Ameren had announced plans to build solar energy plants in Missouri,{{Cite web |last=Barker |first=Jacob |title=Ameren seeks to build massive solar array along I-70 |url=https://www.stltoday.com/business/local/ameren-seeks-to-build-massive-solar-array-along-i/article_c76cae45-f9d7-52c6-ac30-8fd4d42a6c64.html |access-date=2019-09-22 |website=stltoday.com |language=en}} all plans to expand nuclear-powered electricity generation at the site were scrapped.{{Cite web |title=Latest News | S&P Global Platts |url=http://www.platts.com/latest-news/electric-power/louisville-kentucky/ameren-decision-to-scrap-plans-for-new-missouri-21898870}}

Facilities

= Cooling tower =

File:Callaway Nuclear Generating Station (49963537367) (cropped).jpg

The cooling tower at Callaway is {{convert|553|ft}} tall. It is 430 feet wide at the base, and is constructed from reinforced concrete. It cools about {{convert|585000|gal}} of water per minute when the plant is operating at full capacity; about {{convert|15000|gal}} of water per minute are lost out the top from evaporation.{{cite web |title=Callaway Facts and Figures |url=https://www.ameren.com/callaway/ADC_FactsandFigures.asp |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090411235450/http://www.ameren.com/callaway/ADC_FactsandFigures.asp |archive-date=2009-04-11}} Another {{convert|5000|gal}} of water are sent to the Missouri River as "blowdown" to flush solids from the cooling tower basin. All water lost through evaporation or blowdown is replaced with water from the river, located five miles from the plant. The temperature of the water going into the cooling tower is {{convert|125|°F}}, and the tower cools it to {{convert|95|°F}}. The tower is designed such that if it were to somehow topple over completely intact, it would not damage any of the critical plant structures.{{Citation needed|date=May 2012}}

Risks

= Surrounding population =

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission defines two emergency planning zones around nuclear power plants: a plume exposure pathway zone with a radius of {{convert|10|mi}}, concerned primarily with exposure to, and inhalation of, airborne radioactive contamination; and an ingestion pathway zone of about {{convert|50|mi}}, concerned primarily with ingestion of food and liquid contaminated by radioactivity.{{cite web|url=https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/emerg-plan-prep-nuc-power.html|title=Backgrounder on Emergency Preparedness at Nuclear Power Plants|publisher=Nuclear Regulatory Commission|access-date=2019-12-22}}

The 2010 population within {{convert|10|mi}} of Callaway was 10,092, an increase of 3.8 percent in a decade, according to an analysis of U.S. Census data for msnbc.com. The 2010 population within {{convert|50|mi}} was 546,292, an increase of 15.0 percent since 2000. Cities within 50 miles include Fulton (11 miles to city center), Jefferson City (26 miles to city center), and Columbia (32 miles to city center).{{Cite web|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna42555888|title=Nuclear neighbors: Population rises near US reactors|last=msnbc.com|first=Bill Dedman Investigative reporter|date=2011-04-14|website=msnbc.com|language=en|access-date=2019-03-27}}

= Seismic risk =

In August 2010, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's estimated that the annual chance that an earthquake might damage the core at Callaway was 1 in 500,000,{{Cite web |date=2011-03-16 |title=What are the odds? US nuke plants ranked by quake risk |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna42103936 |access-date=2024-08-16 |website=NBC News |language=en}}{{Cite web |title=Archived copy |url=http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/Sections/NEWS/quake%20nrc%20risk%20estimates.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170525170632/http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/Sections/NEWS/quake%20nrc%20risk%20estimates.pdf |archive-date=2017-05-25 |access-date=2011-04-19}} the lowest probability of any U.S. reactor.

Electricity production

class="wikitable"

|+Generation (MWh) of Callaway Nuclear Generating Station{{Cite web |title=Electricity Data Browser |url=https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/browser/#/plant/6153/?freq=M&pin= |access-date=2023-01-07 |website=www.eia.gov}}

!Year

!Jan

!Feb

!Mar

!Apr

!May

!Jun

!Jul

!Aug

!Sep

!Oct

!Nov

!Dec

!Annual (Total)

2001

|864,162

|778,452

|698,802

|112,310

|170,080

|818,314

|841,436

|843,774

|823,728

|858,914

|832,611

|741,657

!8,384,240

2002

|847,236

|334,598

|844,638

|828,117

|823,474

|816,017

|838,569

|840,751

|819,190

|588,220

|67,577

|741,242

!8,389,629

2003

|872,905

|784,805

|584,814

|773,625

|863,342

|831,288

|851,080

|851,040

|829,346

|749,941

|835,235

|872,168

!9,699,589

2004

|818,598

|377,137

|869,077

|228,218

|-11,505

|410,640

|860,440

|859,831

|835,856

|868,542

|839,923

|873,936

!7,830,693

2005

|800,781

|787,769

|699,479

|773,972

|864,248

|757,093

|852,463

|853,734

|436,542

|-5,959

|292,891

|917,564

!8,030,577

2006

|916,311

|831,307

|917,371

|879,982

|430,989

|766,219

|888,413

|891,120

|878,572

|911,654

|885,967

|918,755

!10,116,660

2007

|921,372

|832,148

|773,355

|17,380

|592,863

|866,741

|894,646

|888,978

|869,464

|906,068

|888,687

|920,253

!9,371,955

2008

|919,838

|861,555

|897,258

|880,210

|904,505

|861,545

|878,976

|889,454

|869,370

|281,840

|579,384

|554,694

!9,378,629

2009

|928,441

|535,798

|826,689

|796,254

|909,950

|836,422

|898,752

|899,588

|878,322

|918,753

|891,471

|926,676

!10,247,116

2010

|927,876

|836,896

|918,163

|464,014

|-15,004

|490,633

|889,828

|890,830

|872,584

|908,084

|889,371

|922,758

!8,996,033

2011

|897,729

|830,541

|913,563

|882,535

|905,823

|865,617

|885,426

|891,052

|856,251

|405,064

|115,685

|922,037

!9,371,323

2012

|921,614

|861,869

|911,230

|875,067

|901,235

|867,320

|887,705

|896,292

|874,142

|911,923

|889,995

|919,937

!10,718,329

2013

|922,003

|833,927

|894,008

|173,068

|34,149

|869,706

|719,609

|320,343

|872,034

|912,338

|892,149

|923,769

!8,367,103

2014

|924,177

|834,469

|919,722

|883,867

|903,051

|864,887

|891,422

|889,432

|871,396

|287,811

|210,125

|795,997

!9,276,356

2015

|911,205

|752,567

|915,541

|881,151

|903,267

|863,518

|784,224

|838,780

|870,449

|912,558

|887,442

|919,380

!10,440,082

2016

|922,994

|862,506

|879,028

|18,165

|538,222

|865,798

|888,624

|893,101

|848,513

|905,695

|883,658

|923,875

!9,430,179

2017

|908,108

|827,888

|870,773

|881,507

|906,309

|785,120

|889,975

|897,148

|864,495

|155,902

|-11,834

|328,736

!8,304,127

2018

|919,276

|828,913

|904,403

|884,652

|893,872

|859,057

|887,365

|887,687

|863,309

|906,833

|893,292

|926,620

!10,655,279

2019

|911,445

|813,601

|912,224

|-6,761

|320,245

|865,191

|888,716

|902,124

|855,023

|913,456

|892,828

|921,771

!9,189,863

2020

|937,229

|844,721

|885,725

|777,262

|907,007

|862,345

|887,515

|892,758

|748,775

|0

|0

|-1,217

!7,742,120

2021

|-29,677

|0

|0

|0

|0

|0

|0

|742,905

|868,611

|905,856

|889,061

|915,677

!4,292,433

2022

|800,111

|831,706

|916,291

|79,882

|11,462

|854,993

|889,796

|892,284

|872,105

|913,732

|891,085

|921,322

!7,062,362

2023

|923,026

|832,359

|917,636

|788,763

|629,535

|869,209

|890,611

|891,884

|837,217

|0

|679,782

|919,722

!9,179,744

2024

|924,535

|652,086

|920,500

|883,381

|904,397

|864,887

|890,370

|893,974

|871,405

|909,559

|887,341

|923,349

!10,525,784

2025

|917,559

|839,632

|818,442

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

|

!--

See also

{{Portal|United States|Energy|Nuclear technology}}

References

{{Reflist|33em}}