Cannon v. United States

{{See also|Angus M. Cannon#Polygamy_prosecution}}

{{Use mdy dates|date=September 2023}}

{{Infobox SCOTUS case

|Litigants=Cannon v. United States

|ArgueDate=November 20, 23

|ArgueYear=1885

|DecideDate=December 14

|DecideYear=1885

|FullName=Cannon v. United States

|USVol=116

|USPage=55

|ParallelCitations=6 S. Ct. 278; 29 L. Ed. 561

|Prior=

|Subsequent=

|Holding=Compacts for sexual non-intercourse, easily made and easily broken, when the prior marriage relations continue to exist, with the occupation of the same house and table and the keeping up of the same family unity, is not a lawful substitute for the monogamous family which alone the statute tolerates.

|Majority= Blatchford

|JoinMajority= Waite, Bradley, Harlan, Woods, Mathews and Gray

|Concurrence=

|JoinConcurrence=

|Concurrence2=

|JoinConcurrence2=

|Concurrence/Dissent=

|JoinConcurrence/Dissent=

|Dissent= Miller

|JoinDissent= Fields

|Dissent2=

|JoinDissent2=

|LawsApplied=

}}

Cannon v. United States, 116 U.S. 55 (1885), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held compacts for sexual non-intercourse, easily made and easily broken, when the prior marriage relations continue to exist, with the occupation of the same house and table and the keeping up of the same family unity, is not a lawful substitute for the monogamous family which alone the statute tolerates.{{ussc|name=Cannon v. United States|volume=116|page=55 |year=1885}}