Category talk:CS1 errors: unsupported parameter
Commonly encountered unsupported parameters and how to fix them
There are 11,000+ articles in this category, as of 8 October 2013. This is a list of commonly-encountered parameters and how to fix them, to expand on the contents of the help text. If the "bot-fixable" list turns into a substantial list, we may be able to feed it to a bot and fix a bunch of these articles automatically.
Feel free to edit this list. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:34, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
=Bot-fixable parameters=
All bot edits suggested here should be manually checked and corrected by human editors after the bot has passed through the category.
|translator
– Fix by changing|translator
to|others
and adding "Translated by" in front of the translators name or ", translator" after the translator's name.|pagees
– Change parameter name to|pages
.|auther
– Change parameter name to|author
.|middle
– Copy contents of|middle
and paste after the contents of|first
, with a space after the contents of|first
. Remove the|middle
parameter entirely.|quotes = yes
– Remove. This is not a supported parameter. Someone was trying to make the citation do something that it doesn't do. This appears almost exclusively incite journal
templates, for some reason. (It is a valid parameter in {{tl|Infobox Doctor Who episode}}, so don't just go stripping it from every article, please Mr. Bot.)|other
– Replace with|others
.- Correct all common misspellings listed at Module:Citation/CS1/Suggestions.
=Non-bot-fixable parameters=
|unused_data
– This common parameter was added by a bot that cleaned up "unnamed parameters" before these CS1 errors existed. You have to look at the data to determine if it should be removed or if a parameter name should be added to it.- Lots of one-time misspellings and other typos that are not common enough to put in the list of common misspellings, e.g.
|volumbe
(volume),|firstn
(first1, first2, etc.),|first[1]
(first1, first2, etc.),|editorn-first
(editor1-first, etc.). |editorial
– This is the Spanish word for "publisher". If it makes sense, change the parameter name to|publisher
.- Also,
|título
istitle
and|fechaacceso
isaccessdate
. (a bunch of stuff that looks like the all or part of a web address)
– This happens when there is a "|" in the|url
parameter followed by an "=". To fix, replace each "|" in the URL with "%7c". Check the url to see if it is valid. You may also need to add "url=" in front of the "http://" part of the URL.|note
– This is not a valid parameter. Notes can be removed and pasted between the closing}}
and the closing
, though this is not ideal.|translator
replace withothers
and add "(trans.)" after the name.|curly=yes/no
remove (deprecated). This used to add curly quotes to a cite.|construction
replace withcontribution
orchapter
|first print
replace withorigyear
|channel
replace withpublication-place
|pii
replace withid
. See Publisher Item Identifier- Sometimes citations will have both
|page
and|pages
. The first is the page cited and the second is the total pages in the work. Remove the second.
::Re this last item, the second value is often the ending page, like |page=215 | pages=226
when what is meant is |pages=215–226
. I do not know why people do this, but in this case, do not always remove the second parameter. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:46, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
"isbn status"
I've just cleaned up Purebred (dog). There were about 6 instances of an "Unused data" called "isbn status", contents "May be invalid, please double check". In all cases there was no problem with the isbn. This stuff was [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Purebred_%28dog%29&diff=241278979&oldid=240233543 added in 2008] by "Citation Bot". I wonder whether that bot's work could be undone by another bot, if their warnings are as useless as this article suggests, or perhaps tidied away into a valid field to suppress the red notes? PamD 10:56, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
:I suspect that {{U|Trappist the monk}} could add this removal to the handy AWB script that is doing such good work on this category. I found and removed about ten or fifteen of these yesterday. They appear to be identical to one another and therefore easy to remove. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:06, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Suppress more pages from list?
Is there a way to suppress additional types of pages being added to this category? Reading through all the ones that shouldn't be here to find the ones that should is a waste of time, there were 173 pages that didn't require attention and about 6 that did. Suggested additions:
{{Col-begin}}
{{Col-break}}
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/
- Wikipedia:Articles for creation/
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/
- Wikipedia:Autofixing cites
- Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/
- Wikipedia:Bot requests/
- Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/
- Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Citation discussion
- Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/
- Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/
{{Col-break}}
- Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/
- Wikipedia:Featured article review/
- Wikipedia:Files for deletion/
- Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard/
- Wikipedia:General sanctions/Climate change probation/Requests for enforcement/
- Wikipedia:Help desk/
- Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard/
- Wikipedia:Reference desk/
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/
{{Col-break}}
- Wikipedia:Requested templates/
- Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/
- Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/
- Wikipedia:Village pump
- Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-06-07/Citations
- Wikipedia:_____/Sandbox
- Wikipedia:_____/sandbox
- Template:_____/Sandbox
- Template:_____/sandbox
- Template:_____/testcases
- Template:_____/regression tests
{{col-end}}
Alternatively/in addition, could a tag template be developed to add to pages to exclude them from the category?—D'Ranged 1 talk 16:49, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
:I recommend bringing this up at Help talk:Citation Style 1. Many more people read that page than this one, and this discussion applies to all of the error subcategory, not just this category. I will have an idea to contribute when the discussion gets there. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:09, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
::{{U|Jonesey95}} Per your recommendation, I have moved this discussion to Help talk:Citation Style 1#Suppress more pages from Category: Pages with citations using unsupported parameters?. Thanks!—D'Ranged 1 talk 07:13, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
DEFAULTSORT
This category seems to ignore
. For example, right now, it lists Dave Kasper under "D" even though that article includes the markup
. —Anomalocaris (talk) 19:58, 29 July 2020 (UTC)