Church invisible
{{Short description|Christian theological concept}}
{{About-distinguish|a Christian concept of a church of the elect|invisible churches}}
The church invisible, invisible church, mystical church or church mystical, is a Christian theological concept of an "invisible" Christian Church of the elect who are known only to God, in contrast to the "visible church"—that is, the institutional body on earth which preaches the gospel and administers the sacraments. Every member of the invisible church is "saved", while the visible church contains all individuals who are saved though also having some who are "unsaved".{{cite book |last1=Weaver |first1=Jonathan |title=Christian Theology: A Concise and Practical View of the Cardinal Doctrines and Institutions of Christianity |date=1900 |publisher=United Brethren Publishing House |page=245 |language=English |quote=There are distinctions between the general invisible church and the general visible church, which it is not necessary to carry out to the last analysis. In a sense, they are both visible. All who are members of the general invisible church are members of the general visible church. But all who are members of the general visible church are not members of the general invisible church. A clear and distinct difference between the visible and invisible church may be stated thus: (1) The general invisible church includes all out of every kindred and tongue and people and nation who are truly saved. No one denomination has in its communion all who belong to the invisible church. (2) The visible church includes all who are recognized as members of a Christian church. No one denomination can justly claim to be the general visible church.}} According to this view, Bible passages such as {{bibleverse||Matthew|7:21-27|NKJV}}, {{bibleverse||Matthew|13:24-30|NKJV}}, and {{bibleverse||Matthew|24:29-51|NKJV}} speak about this distinction.
{{anchor|Overview}}Views on the relation with the church visible
=Distinction between two churches=
The first known and recorded person in church history to introduce a view of an invisible and a visible church is Clement of Alexandria.{{Cite book |last=Bongmba |first=Elias Kifon |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xXznDwAAQBAJ&dq=invisible+church+Clement&pg=PT393 |title=The Routledge Handbook of African Theology |date=2020-05-25 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-351-60744-5 |language=en}}{{Cite book |last=Hovorun |first=Cyril |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BcWhCgAAQBAJ&dq=invisible+church+Clement&pg=PT42 |title=Meta-Ecclesiology: Chronicles on Church Awareness |date=2015-08-18 |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-1-137-54393-6 |language=en}} Some have also argued that Jovinian and Vigilantius held an invisible church view.{{Cite book |last=Neander |first=August |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DC0PAAAAYAAJ&dq=Jovinian+invisible+church&pg=PA275 |title=General History of the Christian Religion and Church |date=1849 |publisher=Crocker & Brewster |language=en}}{{Cite book |last=Dorner |first=Isaac August |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4mdCAAAAIAAJ&dq=Jovinian+invisible+church&pg=PA348 |title=A System of Christian Doctrine |date=1890 |publisher=T. & T. Clark |language=en}}{{Cite book |last=M ́Clintock |first=John Strong, James |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=g7rdDwAAQBAJ&dq=Jovinian+invisible+church&pg=PA326 |title=Cyclopaedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature: Volume II |date=2020-04-17 |publisher=BoD – Books on Demand |isbn=978-3-8460-5024-8 |language=en}}{{Cite book |last=Evans |first=Warren Felt |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lT-GDQAAQBAJ&dq=Jovinian+invisible+church&pg=PA69 |title=The Spiritual Journals of Warren Felt Evans: From Methodism to Mind Cure |date=2016-12-19 |publisher=Indiana University Press |isbn=978-0-253-02255-4 |language=en}}
The concept was advocated by St Augustine of Hippo as part of his refutation of the Donatist sect, though he, as other Church Fathers before him, saw the invisible Church and visible Church as one and the same thing, unlike the later Protestant reformers who did not identify the Catholic Church as the true church.{{cite book
|author=Justo L. Gonzalez
|title=A History of Christian Thought: Volume 2 (From Augustine to the eve of the Reformation)
|publisher=Abingdon Press
|date=1970–1975}} He was strongly influenced by the Platonist belief that true reality is invisible and that, if the visible reflects the invisible, it does so only partially and imperfectly (see theory of forms).[https://books.google.com/books?id=JeXFXXHBgnoC Wallace M. Alston, The Church of the Living God: A Reformed Perspective] (Westminster John Knox Press, 2002 {{ISBN|978-0-664-22553-7}}), p. 53 Others question whether Augustine really held to some form of an "invisible true Church" concept.[http://www.orthodoxinfo.com/inquirers/non-orthodox_ch7.pdf Patrick Barnes, The Non-Orthodox: The Orthodox Teaching on Christians Outside of the Church]
The concept was insisted upon during the Protestant reformation as a way of distinguishing between the "visible" Roman Catholic Church, which according to the Reformers was corrupt, and those within it who truly believe, as well as true believers within their own denominations. John Calvin described the church invisible as "that which is actually in God's presence, into which no persons are received but those who are children of God by grace of adoption and true members of Christ by sanctification of the Holy Spirit... [The invisible church] includes not only the saints presently living on earth, but all the elect from the beginning of the world." He continues in contrasting this church with the church scattered throughout the world. "In this church there is a very large mixture of hypocrites, who have nothing of Christ but the name and outward appearance..." (Institutes 4.1.7) Richard Hooker distinguished "between the mystical Church and the visible Church", the former of which is "known only to God."{{cite book |last1=Avis |first1=Paul D. L. |title=Anglicanism and the Christian Church: Theological Resources in Historical Perspective |date=15 August 2002 |publisher=A&C Black |isbn=978-0-567-08745-4 |page=35 |language=English}}
John Wycliffe, who was a precursor to the reformation, also believed in an invisible church made of the predestinated elect.{{Cite web|title=John Wycliffe {{!}} Biography, Bible, Beliefs, Reformation, Legacy, Death, & Facts|url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/John-Wycliffe|access-date=2021-10-30|website=Encyclopedia Britannica|language=en}} Another precursor of the reformation, Johann Ruchrat von Wesel believed in a distinction between the visible and invisible church.{{Cite web|title=Philip Schaff: History of the Christian Church, Volume VI: The Middle Ages. A.D. 1294-1517 - Christian Classics Ethereal Library|url=https://ccel.org/ccel/schaff/hcc6/hcc6.iii.x.iv.html|access-date=2021-11-14|website=ccel.org}}
Pietism later took this a step further, with its formulation of ecclesiolae in ecclesia ("little churches within the church").
=Non-distinction=
Roman Catholic theology, reacting against the protestant concept of an invisible Church, emphasized the visible aspect of the Church founded by Christ, but in the twentieth century placed more stress on the interior life of the Church as a supernatural organism, identifying the Church, as in the encyclical Mystici corporis Christi of Pope Pius XII, with the Mystical Body of Christ.{{Cite book|last1=Hardon|first1=John|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cQPgxUewa_IC|title=Catholic Dictionary: An Abridged and Updated Edition of Modern Catholic Dictionary|last2=Hardon|first2=John A.|date=2013|publisher=Image|isbn=978-0-307-88634-7|language=en}} In Catholic doctrine, the one true Church is the visible society founded by Christ, namely, the Catholic Church under the global jurisdiction of the bishop of Rome.
{{Essay-like|date=September 2022}}
This encyclical rejected two extreme views of the Church:Heribert Mühlen, Una Mystica Persona, München, 1967, p. 51
- A rationalistic or purely sociological understanding of the Church, according to which it is merely a human organization with structures and activities, is mistaken. The visible Church and its structures do exist but the Church is more, as it is guided by the Holy Spirit:
Although the juridical principles, on which the Church rests and is established, derive from the divine constitution given to it by Christ and contribute to the attaining of its supernatural end, nevertheless that which lifts the Society of Christians far above the whole natural order is the Spirit of our Redeemer who penetrates and fills every part of the Church.Pius XII, Mystici corporis Christi, 63
- An exclusively mystical understanding of the Church is mistaken as well, because a mystical "Christ in us" union would deify its members and mean that the acts of Christians are simultaneously the acts of Christ. The theological concept una mystica persona (one mystical person) refers not to an individual relation but to the unity of Christ with the Church and the unity of its members with him in her. This is where we can find direct contrast to Christian philosophy like the preachings of Rev.Jesse Lee Peterson, yet the personification is similar. There is another view, that contrasts these two school-of-thought, and that is from Albert Eduard Meier, as he includes Electric Theory in his teachings, similar to Creationism. S Tromp, Caput influit sensum et motum, Gregorianum, 1958, pp. 353-366
Eastern Orthodox theologian Vladimir Lossky too characterizes as a "Nestorian ecclesiology" that which would "divide the Church into distinct beings: on the one hand a heavenly and invisible Church, alone true and absolute; on the other, the earthly Church (or rather 'the churches'), imperfect and relative".[https://books.google.com/books?id=dxqvWwPSCSwC&dq=Lossky+%22Nestorian+ecclesiology%22&pg=PA186 Vladimir Lossky, The Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church] (St Vladimir's Seminary Press, 1976 {{ISBN|0-913836-31-1}}) p. 186
See also
References
{{Reflist}}
External links
{{wikiquote}}
- [http://www.graceredondo.com/originofuniversalinvisiblechurch?phpMyAdmin=2ac492c8dfbt51bc2fc8 Origin and Development of the "Universal Invisible Church" Concept] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110711120814/http://www.graceredondo.com/originofuniversalinvisiblechurch?phpMyAdmin=2ac492c8dfbt51bc2fc8 |date=2011-07-11 }}
- [http://www.prounione.urbe.it/dia-int/r-rc/doc/i_r-rc_2-3.html Reformed/Roman Catholic International Dialogue, Towards a Common Understanding of the Church, 125-129]
- [http://www.christians.eu/visible-church/ Can the "Invisible Church" Be Traced Back to Specific Bible Passages?]
{{Lutheran Church}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Invisible Church}}