Climate Change: Global Risks, Challenges and Decisions
{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2018}}
Climate Change: Global Risks, Challenges and Decisions was a conference on Climate Change held at the Bella Center by the University of Copenhagen. The event was organised with the assistance of other universities in the International Alliance of Research Universities. The stated aim of the conference was to provide "a summary of existing scientific knowledge two years after the last IPCC report."{{cite web|url=http://climatecongress.ku.dk/about/|title=About the Congress|access-date=2009-03-09|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://arquivo.pt/wayback/20091005100313/http://climatecongress.ku.dk/about/|archive-date=2009-10-05|df=}} The conference took place on 10–12 March 2009.
File:Ian Chubb.jpg at the opening session of the conference]]
Notable speakers
The conference advertised the following notable speakers:
- Dr. Rajendra K. Pachauri, Chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
- Professor Nicholas Stern, author of the prominent Stern report.
- Professor Daniel Kammen, Professor of Energy at the University of California, Berkeley and climate advisor to the Obama Administration.
- Connie Hedegaard, Danish Ministry of Climate and Energy.
- Anders Fogh Rasmussen, Danish Prime Minister{{cite web|url=http://climatecongress.ku.dk/speakers/|title=Plenary Speakers|access-date=2009-03-09|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://archive.today/20120712223125/http://climatecongress.ku.dk/speakers/|archive-date=2012-07-12|df=}}
- José Manuel Barroso, 11th President of the European Commission (did not speak)
- Ian Chubb, president of Australian National University{{Cite web |title= Webcasts from plenary sessions |url= http://climatecongress.ku.dk/presentations/webcasts/ |access-date= 19 June 2013 |url-status= dead |archive-url= https://arquivo.pt/wayback/20091005104723/http://climatecongress.ku.dk/presentations/webcasts/ |archive-date= 5 October 2009 |df= }}
Political significance
The conference occurred approximately 9 months prior to the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference talks (COP15), also in Copenhagen. The Danish government will submit the results of the scientific congress to decision makers at COP15, with the stated intention of scientifically informing the political COP15 negotiations.{{cite web|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/carbon-cuts-only-give-5050-chance-of-saving-planet-1640154.html|title=Carbon cuts 'only give 50/50 chance of saving planet'|last=McCarthy|first=Michael|date=9 March 2009|work=The Independent|accessdate=2009-03-10}}
Key messages
Plenary speakers frequently likened global warming to playing Russian roulette. The "Congress' Scientific Writing Team" summarised the findings of the science in six preliminary messages.{{cite web|url=http://climatecongress.ku.dk/newsroom/congress_key_messages/|title=Key Messages from the Congress|date=12 March 2009|publisher=Climate Congress|access-date=2009-03-12|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090316181631/http://climatecongress.ku.dk/newsroom/congress_key_messages/|archive-date=16 March 2009|df=}}
=Climatic trends=
Recent observations confirm that, given high rates of observed emissions, the worst-case IPCC scenario trajectories (or even worse) are being realised. For many key parameters, the climate system is already moving beyond the patterns of natural variability within which our society and economy have developed and thrived. These parameters include global mean surface temperature, sea-level rise, ocean and ice sheet dynamics, ocean acidification, and extreme climatic events. There is a significant risk that many of the trends will accelerate, leading to an increasing risk of abrupt or irreversible climatic shifts.
=Social disruption=
The research community is providing much more information to support discussions on dangerous climate change. Recent observations show that societies are highly vulnerable to even modest levels of climate change, with poor nations and communities particularly at risk. Temperature rises above 2°C will be very difficult for contemporary societies to cope with, and will increase the level of climate disruption through the rest of the century.
=Long-term strategy=
Rapid, sustained, and effective mitigation based on coordinated global and regional action is required to avoid dangerous climate change regardless of how it is defined. Weaker targets for 2020 increase the risk of crossing tipping points and make the task of meeting 2050 targets more difficult. Delay in initiating effective mitigation actions increases significantly the long-term social and economic costs of both adaptation and mitigation.
=Equity dimensions=
Climate change is having, and will have, strongly differential effects on people within and between countries and regions, on this generation and future generations, and on human societies and the natural world. An effective, well-funded adaptation safety net is required for those people least capable of coping with climate change impacts, and a common but differentiated mitigation strategy is needed to protect the poor and most vulnerable.
=Inaction is inexcusable=
There is no excuse for inaction. We already have many tools and approaches - economic, technological, behavioural, management - to deal effectively with the climate change challenge. But they must be vigorously and widely implemented to achieve the societal transformation required to decarbonise economies. A wide range of benefits will flow from a concerted effort to alter our energy economy now, including sustainable energy job growth, reductions in the health and economic costs of climate change, and the restoration of ecosystems and revitalisation of ecosystem services.
=Meeting the challenge=
To achieve the societal transformation required to meet the climate change challenge, we must overcome a number of significant constraints and seize critical opportunities. These include reducing inertia in social and economic systems; building on a growing public desire for governments to act on climate change; removing implicit and explicit subsidies; reducing the influence of vested interests that increase emissions and reduce resilience; enabling the shifts from ineffective governance and weak institutions to innovative leadership in government, the private sector and civil society; and engaging society in the transition to norms and practices that foster sustainability.
Scientific findings
Katherine Richardson, from the University of Copenhagen introduced the conference's climate science findings by saying there was "little, if any, good news". Notably however, one paper suggested that the Greenland ice sheet may remain at temperatures far higher than those envisaged by the IPCC, when more advanced modelling techniques were used.{{Cite journal | last1 = Bamher | first1 = J. | last2 = Steig | first2 = E. | last3 = Dahl-Jensen | first3 = D. | author-link3 = Dorthe Dahl-Jensen | title = What is the tipping point for the Greenland Ice Sheet? | journal = IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science | volume = 6 | issue = 6 | pages = 062007 | year = 2009 | doi = 10.1088/1755-1307/6/6/062007|bibcode = 2009E&ES....6f2007B | doi-access = free }}
Initial press briefings focused on the increases to the estimates for potential sea level rise expected as a result of global warming, with the session led by Stefan Rahmstorf. Eric Rignot, Professor of Earth system science at the University of California, Irvine, said "As a result of the acceleration of outlet glaciers over large regions, the ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica are already contributing more and faster to sea level rise than anticipated. If this trend continues, we are likely to witness sea level rise one metre or more by year 2100."{{cite news|title=Rising sea levels set to have major impacts around the world|work=Press briefing|publisher=Climate change: Global risks, challenges and decisions}}
Media coverage
Coverage of the conference was extensive, with the BBC leading its reportage with the sea level rise findings.{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7935159.stm|title=Sea rise 'to exceed projections'|last=Shukman |first=David |date= 10 March 2009|publisher=BBC News|accessdate=2009-03-10}} The Guardian focused on the news that the Greenland ice sheet is expected to be stable at higher temperatures than those envisaged by the IPCC,{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2009/mar/10/greenland-ice-sheet-climate-change|title=Greenland ice tipping point 'further off than thought'|last=Adam|first=David|work=The Guardian|accessdate=2009-03-10 | location=London | date=2009-03-10}} with additional coverage focusing on the projected die-back of the Amazon rainforest,{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2009/mar/11/amazon-global-warming-trees|title=Amazon could shrink by 85% due to climate change, scientists say|last=Adam|first=David|date=11 March 2009|work=The Guardian|accessdate=2009-03-11 | location=London}} a story also run in The Times.{{cite news|url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article5888846.ece|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100529142045/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article5888846.ece|url-status=dead|archive-date=29 May 2010|title=85 per cent of Amazonian rainforest at risk of destruction, researchers warn|last=Smith|first=Lewis|date=March 12, 2009|accessdate=2009-03-12 | location=London | work=The Times}}
The conference acts as a focal point for media coverage of climate science, and significant coverage has been given to announcements made prior to the conference by scientists [https://www.un.org/wcm/content/site/chronicle/lang/en/home/archive/Issues2009/pid/5067]. The Times reported notable climate scientist Professor Kevin Anderson as saying "We all hope that Copenhagen will succeed but I think it will fail. We won't come up with a global agreement,....I think we will negotiate, there will be a few fudges and there will be a very weak daughter of Kyoto. I doubt it will be significantly based on the science of climate change."{{cite news|url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article5870729.ece|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100529142144/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article5870729.ece|url-status=dead|archive-date=29 May 2010|title=Hopes of climate change accord 'are sinking'|last=Smith|first=Lewis|date=March 9, 2009|work=The Times|accessdate=2009-03-09 | location=London}}
The Observer reported Dr. David Vaughan, of the British Antarctic Survey as saying "Populations are shifting to the coast, which means that more and more people are going to be threatened by sea-level rises." and "It is becoming increasingly apparent from our studies of Greenland and Antarctica that changes to sea ice are being transmitted into the hearts of the land-ice sheets in a remarkably short time,"{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/science/2009/mar/08/climate-change-flooding|title=Scientists to issue stark warning over dramatic new sea level figures|last=McKie|first=Rob|date=8 March 2009|work=The Observer|accessdate=2009-03-09 | location=London}}
Controversy
One of the more controversial aspects of the conference was the inclusion of a panel on geo-engineering. Over 80 civil society groups released a statement against geo-engineering to coincide with that panel. The Statement, which originated at the World Social Forum meeting in Belém in January 2009, asserts that "Ocean fertilization and other unjust and high risk geo-engineering schemes are the wrong answer to the challenge of global climate change."{{cite web|url=http://www.etcgroup.org/en/materials/publications.html?pub_id=727|title=The better world we seek is not Geo-engineered! A Civil Society Statement against Ocean Fertilization|date=March 10, 2009|work=ETC Group Website|accessdate=2009-03-11}}{{dead link|date=January 2018 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}
Seed magazine criticised both the credentials of the International Alliance of Research Universities, and the drafting process for the conference's key messages.{{cite web|url=http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/what_was_the_copenhagen_climate_change_conference_really_about/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090317071208/http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/what_was_the_copenhagen_climate_change_conference_really_about|url-status=unfit|archive-date=March 17, 2009|title=at_was_the_copenhagen_climate_change_conference_really_about/|last=HULME |first=MIKE |date=March 13, 2009|work=Seed Magazine|accessdate=2009-07-05}}
Fringe sessions
The conference included fringe sessions, which were co-located but not part of the official timetable, including one on modelling runaway climate change.
Co-sponsoring institutions
The following institutions are co-sponsoring the event: University of California, Berkeley, Yale, Cambridge University, Oxford University, University of Tokyo, Peking University, Australian National University, National University of Singapore and the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology.
See also
Notes
References
{{Reflist|2}}
{{global warming}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Climate Change: Global Risks, Challenges And Decisions}}
Category:2009 in the environment