Coinbase, Inc. v. Suski

{{Use mdy dates|date=January 2025}}

{{Infobox SCOTUS case

| Litigants = Coinbase, Inc. v. Suski

| ArgueDate = February 28

| ArgueYear = 2024

| DecideDate = May 23

| DecideYear = 2024

| FullName =

| USVol = 602

| USPage = ___

| ParallelCitations =

| Docket = 23-3

| OralArgument = https://www.oyez.org/cases/2023/23-3

| OpinionAnnouncement = https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/602/23-3

| Prior =

| Subsequent =

| Holding = Where one contract between parties sends disputes to arbitration and another contract sends disputes to courts, a court must decide which contract governs.

| Majority = Jackson

| JoinMajority = unanimous

| Concurrence/Dissent = Gorsuch

| LawsApplied =

}}

Coinbase, Inc. v. Suski, 602 U.S. ___ (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that where one contract between parties sends disputes to arbitration and another contract sends disputes to courts, a court must decide which contract governs.{{ussc|name=Coinbase, Inc. v. Suski|volume=602|page=___|year=1989}}{{Cite web |date=2024-05-28 |title=Courts rather than arbitrators to decide whether Dogecoin dispute goes to arbitration |url=https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/05/courts-rather-than-arbitrators-to-decide-whether-dogecoin-dispute-goes-to-arbitration/ |access-date=2024-10-16 |website=SCOTUSblog |language=en-US}}