Content creation

{{see also|Social media influencer}}

Content creation is the process of producing and sharing various forms of content such as text, images, audio, and video, designed to engage and inform a specific audience. It plays a crucial role in digital marketing, branding, and online communication. Content can be created for a range of platforms, including social media, websites, blogs, and multimedia channels. Whether it’s through written articles, compelling photography, or engaging videos, content creation helps businesses build a connection with their audience, increase visibility, and drive traffic. As mentioned in [https://www.goviralglobal.com/content-creation GOVIRAL GLOBAL]'s Ultimate Guide to Content Creation, "Content creation isn’t just a buzzword—it’s the engine that powers business growth, personal branding, and audience engagement."{{cite web

|title=The Ultimate Guide to Content Creation: Photography, Videography, and Everything In Between

|url=https://www.goviralglobal.com/post/the-ultimate-guide-to-content-creation-photography-videography-and-everything-in-between

|website=GOVIRAL GLOBAL

|author=GOVIRAL GLOBAL

|date=27 April 2025

}}

The process typically involves identifying the target audience, brainstorming ideas, creating the content, and distributing it across various channels. Effective content creation not only involves creativity but also strategy. It requires a keen understanding of audience preferences, current trends, and the platforms used to consume the content. When done right, content creation can help establish authority, promote products or services, and ultimately grow a brand’s presence online.

News organizations, especially those with a large and global reach like The New York Times, NPR, and CNN, consistently create some of the most shared content on the Web, especially in relation to current events. In the words of a 2011 report from the Oxford School for the Study of Journalism and the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, "Mainstream media is the lifeblood of topical social media conversations in the UK."{{cite web|last=Newman|first=Nic|title=Mainstream media and the distribution of news in the age of social discovery|url=https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/file/admin/documents/Publications/Working_Papers/Mainstream_media_and_the_distribution_of_news_.pdf|publisher=Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism|access-date=20 March 2014|date=September 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131229074000/https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/fileadmin/documents/Publications/Working_Papers/Mainstream_media_and_the_distribution_of_news_.pdf|archive-date=29 December 2013}} While the rise of digital media has disrupted traditional news outlets, many have adapted and have begun to produce content that is designed to function on the web and be shared on social media. The social media site Twitter is a major distributor and aggregator of breaking news from various sources, and the function and value of Twitter in the distribution of news is a frequent topic of discussion and research in journalism.{{cite journal|last=Farhi|first=Paul|title=The Twitter explosion|journal=American Journalism Review|date=April–May 2009|url=http://ajrarchive.org/article.asp?id=4756|access-date=20 March 2014}} User-generated content, social media blogging and citizen journalism have changed the nature of news content in recent years.{{cite web|last=Newman|first=Nic|title=The rise of social media and its impact on mainstream journalism|url=https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/file/admin/documents/Publications/The_rise_of_social_media_and_its_impact_on_mainstream_journalism.pdf|publisher=Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism|access-date=25 March 2014|date=September 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131103065633/https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/fileadmin/documents/Publications/The_rise_of_social_media_and_its_impact_on_mainstream_journalism.pdf|archive-date=3 November 2013}} The company Narrative Science is now using artificial intelligence to produce news articles and interpret data.{{cite news|last=Lohr|first=Steve|title=In case you wondered, a real human wrote this column|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/11/business/computer-generated-articles-are-gaining-traction.html?pagewanted=all|access-date=25 March 2014|newspaper=The New York Times|date=10 September 2011|quote=The company's software takes data, like that from sports statistics, company financial reports and housing starts and sales, and turns it into articles.}}

Academic institutions, such as colleges and universities, create content in the form of books, journal articles, white papers, and some forms of digital scholarship, such as blogs that are group edited by academics, class wikis, or video lectures that support a massive open online course (MOOC). Through an open data initiative, institutions may make raw data supporting their experiments or conclusions available on the Web. Academic content may be gathered and made accessible to other academics or the public through publications, databases, libraries, and digital libraries. Academic content may be closed source or open access (OA). Closed-source content is only available to authorized users or subscribers. For example, an important journal or a scholarly database may be a closed source, available only to students and faculty through the institution's library. Open-access articles are open to the public, with the publication and distribution costs shouldered by the institution publishing the content.

Corporate content includes advertising and public relations content, as well as other types of content produced for profit, including white papers and sponsored research. Advertising can also include auto-generated content, with blocks of content generated by programs or bots for search engine optimization.{{cite web|title=Automatically generated content|url=https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/2721306?hl=en|work=Google Webmaster Tools|access-date=25 March 2014}} Companies also create annual reports which are part of their company's workings and a detailed review of their financial year. This gives the stakeholders of the company insight into the company's current and future prospects and direction.{{cite journal |last1=Chen |first1=Shuping |last2=Miao |first2=Bin |last3=Shevlin |first3=Terry |title=A New Measure of Disclosure Quality: The Level of Disaggregation of Accounting Data in Annual Reports |journal=Journal of Accounting Research |date=2015 |volume=53 |issue=5 |pages=1017–1054 |doi=10.1111/1475-679X.12094}}

Cultural works, like music, movies, literature, and art, are also major forms of content. Examples include traditionally published books and e-books as well as self-published books, digital art, fanfiction, and fan art. Independent artists, including authors and musicians, have found commercial success by making their work available on the Internet.{{cite journal|last=Pfhal|first=Michael|title=Giving away music to make money: Independent musicians on the Internet|journal=First Monday|date=1 August 2001|volume=6|issue=6|url=http://firstmonday.org/article/view/880/789#author|access-date=25 March 2014|quote=No one has felt the impact of music on the Internet more than the independent musician.|archive-date=9 October 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181009211622/http://firstmonday.org/article/view/880/789#author}}

Through digitization, sunshine laws, open records laws and data collection, governments may make statistical, legal or regulatory information available on the Internet. National libraries and state archives turn historical documents, public records, and unique relics into online databases and exhibits. This has raised significant privacy issues.{{cite news|title=Easy access to public records raises privacy issues|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/13/national/13DOCU.html|access-date=25 March 2014|newspaper=The New York Times|date=13 October 2002}} In 2012, The Journal News, a New York state paper, sparked an outcry when it published an interactive map of the state's gun owner locations using legally obtained public records.{{cite news|last=Maas|first=KC|title=Newspaper sparks outrage for publishing names, addresses of gun permit holders|url=http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/25/us/new-york-gun-permit-map/|access-date=25 March 2014|publisher=CNN|date=27 December 2012|author2=Josh Levs}} Governments also create online or digital propaganda or misinformation to support domestic and international goals. This can include astroturfing, or using media to create a false impression of mainstream belief or opinion.{{cite news|last=Fielding|first=Nick|title=Revealed: US spy operation that manipulates social media|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2011/mar/17/us-spy-operation-social-networks|access-date=25 March 2014|newspaper=The Guardian|date=17 March 2011|author2=Ian Cobain}}

Governments can also use open content, such as public records and open data, in service of public health, educational and scientific goals, such as crowdsourcing solutions to complex policy problems.{{cite journal |last=Brabham |first=Daren C. |title=Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects |url=http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic793411.files/Wk%2012_Nov%2019th/Brabham_2009_Crowdsourcing%20Public%20Participation.pdf |journal=Planning Theory |volume=8 |issue=242 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200327163227/http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic793411.files/Wk%2012_Nov%2019th/Brabham_2009_Crowdsourcing%20Public%20Participation.pdf |archive-date=27 March 2020 |access-date=25 March 2014 |quote=The [crowdsourcing] model holds enormous promise for... governmental functions, and the model is already being tested in the screening of applications to the US Patent and Trademark Office with much success.}} In 2013, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) joined the asteroid mining company Planetary Resources to crowdsource the hunt for near-Earth objects.{{cite news|last=Fazekas|first=Andrew|title=NASA needs your help finding killer asteroids|url=http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/06/130620-nasa-asteroids-space-science-crowdsourcing/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130624014530/http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/06/130620-nasa-asteroids-space-science-crowdsourcing/|archive-date=24 June 2013|access-date=25 March 2014|newspaper=National Geographic|date=20 June 2013}} Describing NASA's crowdsourcing work in an interview, technology transfer executive David Locke spoke of the "untapped cognitive surplus that exists in the world" which could be used to help develop NASA technology.{{cite news|last=Davenport|first=Reid|title=NASA ups ante on crowdsourcing patents|url=http://fcw.com/articles/2014/02/19/nasa-ups-ante-on-crowdsourcing-patents.aspx|access-date=25 March 2014|newspaper=FCW|date=17 February 2014|archive-date=18 October 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171018184024/https://fcw.com/articles/2014/02/19/nasa-ups-ante-on-crowdsourcing-patents.aspx}} In addition to making governments more participatory, open records and open data have the potential to make governments more transparent and less corrupt.{{cite journal|last=Bertot|first=John C.|author2=Paul T. Jaeger|author3=Justin M. Grimes|title=Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies|journal=Government Information Quarterly|year=2010|volume=27|issue=3|pages=264–271|url=http://m.dorkatron.com/docs/CIS720/CPP%20Secondary%20Exam/eGovernance%20-%20Bertot%20Jaeger%20Grimes.pdf|access-date=25 March 2014|doi=10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001|archive-date=17 May 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180517033259/http://m.dorkatron.com/docs/CIS720/CPP%20Secondary%20Exam/eGovernance%20-%20Bertot%20Jaeger%20Grimes.pdf}}

The introduction of Web 2.0 made it possible for content consumers to be more involved in the generation and sharing of content. With the advent of digital media, the amount of user generated content, as well as the age and class range of users, has increased. 8% of Internet users are very active in content creation and consumption.{{cite web|last=Horrigan|first=John|title=A Typology of Information and Communication Technology Users|url=http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2007/A-Typology-of-Information-and-Communication-Technology-Users/Summary-of-Findings.aspx|publisher=Pew Internet and American Life Study|date=May 2007|access-date=2 August 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140112191018/http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2007/A-Typology-of-Information-and-Communication-Technology-Users/Summary-of-Findings.aspx|archive-date=12 January 2014}} Worldwide, about one in four Internet users are significant content creators,{{Cite web|url=https://larixstudio.com/content-creation-foto-video-foto-360/|title=Content creator|date=7 November 2016|website=Larix Studio|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171018184025/https://larixstudio.com/content-creation-foto-video-foto-360/|archive-date=18 October 2017}} and users in emerging markets lead the world in engagement.{{cite web|last=Sverdlov|first=Gina|title=Global social technographics update 2011|url=http://blogs.forrester.com/gina_sverdlov/12-01-04-global_social_technographics_update_2011_us_and_eu_mature_emerging_markets_show_lots_of_activity|publisher=Forrester|date=January 2012|access-date=2 August 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130523105344/http://blogs.forrester.com/gina_sverdlov/12-01-04-global_social_technographics_update_2011_us_and_eu_mature_emerging_markets_show_lots_of_activity|archive-date=23 May 2013}} Research has also found that young adults of a higher socioeconomic background tend to create more content than those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds.{{Cite journal|last1=Hargittai|first1=Eszter|last2=Walejko|first2=Gina|title=THE PARTICIPATION DIVIDE: Content creation and sharing in the digital age|journal=Information, Communication & Society|volume=11|issue=2|author3=Gina Walejko|page=20|year=2008|doi=10.1080/13691180801946150|s2cid=4650775}} 69% of American and European internet users are "spectators", who consume—but do not create—online and digital media. The ratio of content creators to the amount of content they generate is sometimes referred to as the 1% rule, a rule of thumb that suggests that only 1% of a forum's users create nearly all of its content. Motivations for creating new content may include the desire to gain new knowledge, the possibility of publicity, or simple altruism.{{cite journal|last=Cedergren|first=Magnus|title=Open Content and Value Creation|url=http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1071/991|journal=First Monday|volume=8|issue=8|access-date=21 March 2014|doi=10.5210/fm.v8i8.1071|year=2003 |doi-access= free|url-access=subscription}} Users may also create new content in order to bring about social reforms. However, researchers caution that in order to be effective, context must be considered, a diverse array of people must be included, and all users must participate throughout the process.{{Cite journal|last=Tacchi|first=Jo|title=Participatory Content Creation: Voice, Communication, and Development|jstor=27752096|journal=Development in Practice|author2=Jerry Watkins |author3=Kosala Keerthirathne |year=2009|volume=19|issue=4–5|pages=573–584|doi=10.1080/09614520902866389|s2cid=129109973|url=https://eprints.qut.edu.au/17628/1/17628.pdf}}

According to a 2011 study, minorities create content in order to connect with their communities online. African-American users have been found to create content as a means of self-expression that was not previously available. Media portrayals of minorities are sometimes inaccurate and stereotypical which affects the general perception of these minorities.{{Cite journal|title = Representations of Race in Reality TV: Watch and Discuss|last = Orbe|first = Mark|date = 2008|volume=25|issue=4|journal = Watch and Discuss. Critical Studies in Media Communication}} African-Americans respond to their portrayals digitally through the use of social media such as Twitter and Tumblr. The creation of Black Twitter has allowed a community to share their problems and ideas.{{Cite journal|title = Race And Online Content Creation|author=Teresa Correa |author2=Sun Ho Jeong|date = 2011|journal = Information, Communication & Society |volume=14|issue=5 |pages=638–659|doi = 10.1080/1369118x.2010.514355|s2cid = 142853028}}

Younger users now have greater access to content, content creating applications, and the ability to publish to different types of media, such as Facebook, Blogger, Instagram, DeviantArt, or Tumblr.{{cite book |author=Ola Erstad |editor=Kirsten Drotner |editor2=Kim Christian Schrøder |title=Digital content creation: perceptions, practices, & perspectives|year=2010|publisher=Peter Lang|location=New York|isbn=978-1-4331-0695-8|pages=61–62|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uGgTHLa4jT8C&pg=PA61 |chapter=Content in Motion: Remixing and Learning with Digital Media}} As of 2005, around 21 million teens used the internet and 57%, or 12 million teens, consider themselves content creators.{{Cite web|title = Part 1. Teens as Content Creators|url = http://www.pewinternet.org/2005/11/02/part-1-teens-as-content-creators/|website = Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech|access-date = 2016-02-04|last1 = Am|first2 = a|last2 = Lenhart|first3 = Mary|last3 = Madden|date = 2 November 2005}} This proportion of media creation and sharing is higher than that of adults. With the advent of the Internet, teens have had more access to tools for sharing and creating content. Increase in accessibility to technology, especially due to lower prices, has led to an increase in accessibility of content creation tools as well for teens.{{Cite book|title = Networked Creators: A BIT of Networked|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=XQlgBwAAQBAJ|publisher = MIT Press|date = 2015-03-16|isbn = 978-0-262-32766-4|language = en|first1 = Lee|last1 = Rainie|first2 = Barry|last2 = Wellman}} Some teens use this to become content creators through online platforms like YouTube, while others use it to connect to friends through social networking sites.{{Cite web|title = Teens creating content|url = http://www.pewinternet.org/2007/12/19/teens-creating-content/|website = Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech|access-date = 2016-02-04|last1 = Am|first2 = a|last2 = Lenhart|first3 = Mary|last3 = Madden|first4 = Aaron|last4 = Smith|last5 = Alex|first6 = ra|last6 = Macgill|date = 19 December 2007}}

The rise of anonymous and user-generated content presents both opportunities and challenges to Web users. Blogging, self-publishing and other forms of content creation give more people access to larger audiences. However, this can also perpetuate rumors and lead to misinformation. It can make it more difficult for users to find content that meets their information needs.

The feature of user-generated content and personalized recommendation algorithms of digital media also gives a rise to confirmation bias. Users may tend to seek out information that confirms their existing beliefs and ignore information that contradicts them. This can lead to one-sided, unbalanced content that does not present a complete picture of an issue.

The quality of digital contents varies from traditional academic or published writing. Digital media writing is often more engaging and accessible to a broader audience than academic writing, which is usually intended for a specialized audience. Digital media writers often use a conversational tone, personal anecdotes, and multimedia elements like images and videos to enhance the reader's experience. For example, the veteran populist anti-EU campaigner Farage's tweets in 2017–2018 used a lot of colloquial expressions and catchphrases to resonate the "common sense" with audiences.{{Cite journal |last=Breeze |first=Ruth |date=December 2020 |title=Exploring populist styles of political discourse in Twitter |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/weng.12496 |journal=World Englishes |language=en |volume=39 |issue=4 |pages=550–567 |doi=10.1111/weng.12496 |s2cid=219447754 |issn=0883-2919|url-access=subscription }}

At the same time, digital media is also necessary for professional (academic) communicators to reach an audience,{{Cite web |last=Bullinger |first=Cory |date=September 30, 2017 |title=AFTER A DECADE OF SOCIAL MEDIA: ABSTAINERS AND EX-USERS |url=https://wac.colostate.edu/docs/books/social/chapter4.pdf}} as well as with connecting to scholars in their areas of expertise.{{Cite web |last=Buck |first=Amber |date=September 30, 2017 |title=GRAD SCHOOL 2.0: PERFORMING PROFESSIONALISM ON SOCIAL MEDIA |url=https://wac.colostate.edu/docs/books/social/chapter9.pdf}}

The quality of digital contents is also influenced by capitalism and market-driven consumerism.{{Cite web |last=Beck |first=Estee |date=September 30, 2017 |title=SUSTAINING CRITICAL LITERACIES IN THE DIGITAL INFORMATION AGE: THE RHETORIC OF SHARING, PROSUMERISM, AND DIGITAL ALGORITHMIC SURVEILLANCE |url=https://wac.colostate.edu/docs/books/social/chapter2.pdf}} Writers may have commercial interests that influence the content they produce. For example, a writer who is paid to promote a particular product or service may write articles that are biased in favor of that product or service, even if it is not the best option for the reader.

Digital content is difficult to organize and categorize. Websites, forums, and publishers all have different standards for metadata, or information about the content, such as its author and date of creation. The perpetuation of different standards of metadata can create problems of accessibility and discoverability.

Digital writing and content creation has evolved significantly. This has led to various ethical issues, including privacy, individual rights, and representation.{{Cite web |last=Kristine L. |first=Blair |date=2020 |title=Social Media Ethics and the Rhetorical Tradition |url=https://compositionstudiesjournal.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/br_blair.pdf}} A focus on cultural identity has helped increase accessibility, empowerment, and social justice in digital media, but might also prevent users from freely communicating and expressing.

{{See also|Copyright}}

The ownership, origin, and right to share digital content can be difficult to establish. User-generated content presents challenges to traditional content creators (professional writers, artists, filmmakers, musicians, choreographers, etc.) with regard to the expansion of unlicensed and unauthorized derivative works, piracy and plagiarism. Also, the enforcement of copyright laws, such as the Digital Millennium Copyright Act in the U.S., makes it less likely that works will fall into the public domain.

Misinformation is a growing concern in content creation, especially on social media platforms where information spreads rapidly. Several reviews and a meta-analysis have drawn consistent conclusions about how misinformation circulates online and how platform structures may contribute to its spread. Research suggests that social media platforms are especially vulnerable to false information, including fake news, disinformation, and manipulated media, due to their algorithmic designs and engagement-driven models.{{Cite journal |last=Aïmeur |first=Esma |last2=Amri |first2=Sabrine |last3=Brassard |first3=Gilles |date=2023-02-09 |title=Fake news, disinformation and misinformation in social media: a review |url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13278-023-01028-5 |journal=Social Network Analysis and Mining |language=en |volume=13 |issue=1 |pages=30 |doi=10.1007/s13278-023-01028-5 |issn=1869-5469 |pmc=9910783 |pmid=36789378}} These algorithms prioritize viral content, which may incentivize creators to use attention-grabbing tactics such as deepfakes, clickbait, or controversial framing.

Other studies point to emotional appeal, cognitive biases, and features like filter bubbles and echo chambers as key factors in reinforcing misinformation.{{Cite journal |last=Muhammed T |first=Sadiq |last2=Mathew |first2=Saji K. |date=2022-05-01 |title=The disaster of misinformation: a review of research in social media |url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41060-022-00311-6 |journal=International Journal of Data Science and Analytics |language=en |volume=13 |issue=4 |pages=271–285 |doi=10.1007/s41060-022-00311-6 |issn=2364-4168 |pmc=8853081 |pmid=35194559}} In these environments, users are repeatedly exposed to similar viewpoints, making them less likely to encounter contradicting information and more prone to accepting misinformation. A large-scale meta-analysis has also found that psychological factors such as low cognitive reflection, weaker numeracy skills, and a reliance on intuition make individuals more susceptible to online misinformation.{{Cite journal |last=Sultan |first=Mubashir |last2=Tump |first2=Alan N. |last3=Ehmann |first3=Nina |last4=Lorenz-Spreen |first4=Philipp |last5=Hertwig |first5=Ralph |last6=Gollwitzer |first6=Anton |last7=Kurvers |first7=Ralf H. J. M. |date=2024-11-19 |title=Susceptibility to online misinformation: A systematic meta-analysis of demographic and psychological factors |url=https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2409329121 |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |volume=121 |issue=47 |pages=e2409329121 |doi=10.1073/pnas.2409329121 |pmc=11588074 |pmid=39531500}} Recommended interventions include critical thinking education and media literacy programs aimed at reducing users’ vulnerability to misleading content. Misinformation not only affects audiences but also shapes the behavior of content creators, who operate within systems that reward visibility over accuracy.

Content platforms have developed various policies to reduce misinformation and harmful content. YouTube removes videos that may cause real-world harm, such as those promoting medical falsehoods or election misinformation, and promotes content from authoritative sources in its recommendations.{{Cite web |title=YouTube Misinformation Policies - How YouTube Works |url=https://www.youtube.com/howyoutubeworks/our-commitments/fighting-misinformation/#misinformation-policies |access-date=2025-04-06 |website=YouTube Misinformation Policies - How YouTube Works |language=en}} Meta enforces community standards that call for the removal of content promoting harm, including false health claims and incitement to violence. It has also partnered with third-party fact-checkers to review flagged material.{{Cite web |date=March 14, 2025 |title=Misinformation. Meta Transparency Center. |url=https://transparency.meta.com/policies/community-standards/misinformation/ |website=Meta}} However, as of early 2025, Meta ended its political fact-checking efforts, raising concerns about the unchecked spread of misinformation during election periods.{{Cite web |date=2025-02-04 |title=Meta Ends Fact-Checking, Raising Risks of Disinformation to Democracy |url=https://blog.ucs.org/liza-gordon-rogers/meta-ends-fact-checking-raising-risks-of-disinformation-to-democracy/ |access-date=2025-04-06 |website=The Equation |language=en-US}} TikTok uses both automated systems and human moderators to enforce its content rules, focusing on prevention by labeling unverified content, limiting its reach, and warning users before they share it.{{Cite web |title=Combating harmful misinformation|url=https://www.tiktok.com/transparency/en-us/combating-misinformation/ |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20250322043334/https://www.tiktok.com/transparency/en-us/combating-misinformation/ |archive-date=2025-03-22 |access-date=2025-04-06 |website=www.tiktok.com |language=}}{{better source needed|date=April 2025}}

These moderation policies directly affect how content is created, shared, and monetized. Enforcement systems, such as account warnings, suspensions, and bans, can impact a creator’s visibility and earnings. Scholars have noted that these restrictions may lead creators to self-censor or shift their messaging to avoid penalties.{{Cite web |title=Perspective: Tackling Misinformation on YouTube |url=https://blog.youtube/inside-youtube/tackling-misinfo/ |access-date=2025-04-06 |website=blog.youtube |language=en-us}} While platforms often promote the effectiveness of their moderation strategies, independent evaluations of enforcement practices remain limited. Researchers have called for greater transparency and third-party oversight to assess how platform policies shape both content creation and public discourse.{{Cite journal |last=Suzor |first=Nicolas P. |last2=West |first2=Sarah Myers |last3=Quodling |first3=Andrew |last4=York |first4=Jillian |date=2019-03-27 |title=What Do We Mean When We Talk About Transparency? Toward Meaningful Transparency in Commercial Content Moderation |url=https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/9736 |journal=International Journal of Communication |language=en |volume=13 |issue=0 |pages=18 |issn=1932-8036}}

Each platform enforces its misinformation policies through different systems. YouTube uses a three-strike model that begins with warnings and can escalate to demonetization or removal from the YouTube Partner Program, limiting creators’ ability to earn revenue. TikTok implements a tiered approach that includes warnings, temporary feature restrictions, and permanent account bans for repeated or severe violations. Meta continues to remove content related to harmful misinformation such as false health claims and incitement, but no longer fact-checks political content, reducing oversight in that category.

These enforcement mechanisms have significant consequences for content creators. Researchers have noted a lack of transparency around how policies are enforced, with limited public data available about takedown frequency, appeal success rates, or algorithmic decision-making. This makes it difficult for creators, researchers, and policymakers to evaluate the fairness and consistency of enforcement. Some scholars suggest that increased transparency, public reporting, and independent audits would improve accountability and help balance content moderation with freedom of expression.

{{Main|2011 Egyptian revolution}}

Content creation serves as a useful form of protest on social media platforms. The 2011 Egyptian revolution was one example of content creation being used to network protestors globally for the common cause of protesting the "authoritarian regimes in the Middle East and North Africa throughout 2011".{{Cite book|title = Networked: The New Social Operating System|last1 = Rainie|first1 = Lee|publisher = The MIT Press|year = 2012|isbn = 978-0-262-01719-0|first2 = Barry|last2 = Wellman}} The protests took place in multiple cities in Egypt, and quickly evolved from peaceful protest into open conflict. Social media outlets allowed protestors from different regions to network with each other and raise awareness of the widespread corruption in Egypt's government, as well as helping coordinate their response. Youth activists promoting the rebellion were able to formulate a Facebook group, "Progressive Youth of Tunisia".

{{See also|Black Lives Matter|Me Too movement}}

Examples of recent social media protest through online content include the global widespread use of the hashtags #MeToo, used to raise awareness against sexual abuse, and #BlackLivesMatter, which focused on police brutality against black people.

• {{annotated link|Content intelligence}}.
• {{annotated link|Content marketing}}.
• {{annotated link|Copyright}}.
• {{annotated link|Creative commons}}
• {{annotated link|Creative economy (economic system)}}
• {{annotated link|Creativity}}
• {{annotated link|Creator economy}}
• {{annotated link|Cultural technology}}
• {{annotated link|FAIR data}}
• {{annotated link|Crowdsourcing}}
• {{annotated link|Open content}}
• {{annotated link|Open-source intelligence}}.

{{Reflist}}

Category:Digital media

Category:Advertising

Category:Social media