Convergence in measure

{{Short description|Concepts in probability mathematics}}

{{Distinguish|Convergence of measures}}

Convergence in measure is either of two distinct mathematical concepts both of which generalize

the concept of convergence in probability.

Definitions

Let f, f_n\ (n \in \mathbb N): X \to \mathbb R be measurable functions on a measure space (X, \Sigma, \mu). The sequence f_n is said to {{visible anchor|converge globally in measure|Global convergence in measure}} to f if for every \varepsilon > 0,

\lim_{n\to\infty} \mu(\{x \in X: |f(x)-f_n(x)|\geq \varepsilon\}) = 0,

and to {{visible anchor|converge locally in measure|Local convergence in measure}} to f if for every \varepsilon>0 and every F \in \Sigma with

\mu (F) < \infty,

\lim_{n\to\infty} \mu(\{x \in F: |f(x)-f_n(x)|\geq \varepsilon\}) = 0.

On a finite measure space, both notions are equivalent. Otherwise, convergence in measure can refer to either global convergence in measure{{cite book |last1=Bogachev |first1=Vladimir Igorevich |title=Measure theory |date=2007 |publisher=Springer |location=Berlin New York |isbn=978-3-540-34514-5}}{{rp|2.2.3}} or local convergence in measure, depending on the author.

Properties

Throughout, f and f_n (n\in\N) are measurable functions X\to\R.

  • Global convergence in measure implies local convergence in measure. The converse, however, is false; i.e., local convergence in measure is strictly weaker than global convergence in measure, in general.
  • If, however, \mu (X)<\infty or, more generally, if f and all the f_n vanish outside some set of finite measure, then the distinction between local and global convergence in measure disappears.
  • If \mu is σ-finite and (fn) converges (locally or globally) to f in measure, there is a subsequence converging to f almost everywhere.{{rp|2.2.5}} The assumption of σ-finiteness is not necessary in the case of global convergence in measure.
  • If \mu is \sigma-finite, (f_n) converges to f locally in measure if and only if every subsequence has in turn a subsequence that converges to f almost everywhere.
  • In particular, if (f_n) converges to f almost everywhere, then (f_n) converges to f locally in measure. The converse is false.
  • Fatou's lemma and the monotone convergence theorem hold if almost everywhere convergence is replaced by (local or global) convergence in measure.
  • If \mu is \sigma-finite, Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem also holds if almost everywhere convergence is replaced by (local or global) convergence in measure.{{rp|2.8.6}}
  • If X=[a,b]\subseteq\R and μ is Lebesgue measure, there are sequences (g_n) of step functions and (h_n) of continuous functions converging globally in measure to f.
  • If f and f_n are in Lp(μ) for some p>0 and (f_n) converges to f in the p-norm, then (f_n) converges to f globally in measure. The converse is false.
  • If f_n converges to f in measure and g_n converges to g in measure then f_n+g_n converges to f+g in measure. Additionally, if the measure space is finite, f_n g_n also converges to fg.

Counterexamples

Let X = \Reals, \mu be Lebesgue measure, and f the constant function with value zero.

  • The sequence f_n = \chi_{[n,\infty)} converges to f locally in measure, but does not converge to f globally in measure.
  • The sequence

::f_n = \chi_{\left[\frac{j}{2^k},\frac{j+1}{2^k}\right]},

:where k = \lfloor \log_2 n\rfloor and j=n-2^k, the first five terms of which are

::\chi_{\left[0,1\right]}, \;\chi_{\left[0,\frac12\right]},\;\chi_{\left[\frac12,1\right]},\;\chi_{\left[0,\frac14\right]},\;\chi_{\left[\frac14,\frac12\right]},

:converges to 0 globally in measure; but for no x does f_n(x) converge to zero. Hence (f_n) fails to converge to f almost everywhere.{{rp|2.2.4}}

  • The sequence

::f_n = n\chi_{\left[0,\frac1n\right]}

:converges to f almost everywhere and globally in measure, but not in the p-norm for any p \geq 1.

Topology

There is a topology, called the topology of (local) convergence in measure, on the collection of measurable functions from X such that local convergence in measure corresponds to convergence on that topology.

This topology is defined by the family of pseudometrics

\{\rho_F : F \in \Sigma,\ \mu (F) < \infty\},

where

\rho_F(f,g) = \int_F \min\{|f-g|,1\}\, d\mu.

In general, one may restrict oneself to some subfamily of sets F (instead of all possible subsets of finite measure). It suffices that for each G\subset X of finite measure and \varepsilon > 0 there exists F in the family such that \mu(G\setminus F)<\varepsilon. When \mu(X) < \infty , we may consider only one metric \rho_X, so the topology of convergence in finite measure is metrizable. If \mu is an arbitrary measure finite or not, then

d(f,g) := \inf\limits_{\delta>0} \mu(\{|f-g|\geq\delta\}) + \delta

still defines a metric that generates the global convergence in measure.Vladimir I. Bogachev, Measure Theory Vol. I, Springer Science & Business Media, 2007

Because this topology is generated by a family of pseudometrics, it is uniformizable.

Working with uniform structures instead of topologies allows us to formulate uniform properties such as

Cauchyness.

See also

References

{{reflist}}

  • D.H. Fremlin, 2000. [https://web.archive.org/web/20101101220236/http://www.essex.ac.uk/maths/people/fremlin/mt.htm Measure Theory]. Torres Fremlin.
  • H.L. Royden, 1988. Real Analysis. Prentice Hall.
  • G. B. Folland 1999, Section 2.4. Real Analysis. John Wiley & Sons.

{{Measure theory}}

{{Lp spaces}}

Category:Measure theory

Measure, Convergence in

Category:Lp spaces