Crest factor

{{Short description|Peak divided by the Root mean square (RMS) of the waveform}}

Crest factor is a parameter of a waveform, such as alternating current or sound, showing the ratio of peak values to the effective value. In other words, crest factor indicates how extreme the peaks are in a waveform. Crest factor 1 indicates no peaks, such as direct current or a square wave. Higher crest factors indicate peaks, for example sound waves tend to have high crest factors.

Crest factor is the peak amplitude of the waveform divided by the RMS value of the waveform.

The peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) is the peak amplitude squared (giving the peak power) divided by the RMS value squared (giving the average power).{{cite web |title=Wireless 101: Peak to average power ratio (PAPR) |url=http://www.eetimes.com/design/microwave-rf-design/4017754/Wireless-101-Peak-to-average-power-ratio-PAPR-}} It is the square of the crest factor.

When expressed in decibels, crest factor and PAPR are equivalent, due to the way decibels are calculated for power ratios vs amplitude ratios.

Crest factor and PAPR are therefore dimensionless quantities. While the crest factor is defined as a positive real number, in commercial products it is also commonly stated as the ratio of two whole numbers, e.g., 2:1. The PAPR is most used in signal processing applications. As it is a power ratio, it is normally expressed in decibels (dB). The crest factor of the test signal is a fairly important issue in loudspeaker testing standards; in this context it is usually expressed in dB.[https://jblpro.com/en/site_elements/speaker-power-requirements-faq JBL Speaker Power Requirements], which is applying the IEC standard 268-5, itself more recently renamed to 60268-5AES2-2012 standard, Annex B (Informative) Crest Factor, pp. 17-20 in the 2013-02-11 printing"Dr. Pro-Audio", [http://www.doctorproaudio.com/doctor/temas/powerhandling.htm Power handling], summarizes the various speaker standards

The minimum possible crest factor is 1, 1:1 or 0 dB.

Examples

This table provides values for some normalized waveforms. All peak magnitudes have been normalized to 1.

class="wikitable" style="text-align:center;"

! Wave type

! Waveform

! RMS value

! Crest factor

! PAPR (dB)

DC110.0 dB
Sine wave100px{1 \over \sqrt{2}} \approx 0.707{{cite web|title=RMS and Average Values for Typical Waveforms |url=http://www.nessengr.com/techdata/rms/rms.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100123085330/http://www.nessengr.com/techdata/rms/rms.html |archive-date=2010-01-23 |url-status=dead }}\sqrt{2} \approx 1.4143.01 dB
Full-wave rectified sine100px{1 \over \sqrt{2}} \approx 0.707\sqrt{2} \approx 1.4143.01 dB
Half-wave rectified sine100px{1 \over 2 } = 0.52 \,6.02 dB
Triangle wave100px{1 \over \sqrt{3}} \approx 0.577\sqrt{3} \approx 1.7324.77 dB
Square wave100px110 dB
PWM signal
V(t) ≥ 0.0 V
100px\sqrt{ \frac{t_1}{T}}\sqrt{\frac{T}{t_1}}20\log\mathord\left(\frac{T}{t_1}\right) dB
QPSK111.761 dB{{Cite book|url=http://kilyos.ee.bilkent.edu.tr/~signal/defevent/papers/cr1037.pdf|title=POWER RATIO DEFINITIONS AND ANALYSIS IN SINGLE CARRIER MODULATIONS|last1=Palicot|first1=Jacques|last2=Louët|first2=Yves|publisher=IETR/Supélec - Campus de Rennes|pages=2}}
8PSK3.3 dB{{Cite web | url=http://www.readbag.com/ece-ucsb-yuegroup-teaching-ece594bb-lectures-steer-rf-chapter1 | title=Read steer_rf_chapter1.pdf | access-date=2014-12-11 | archive-date=2016-03-22 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160322185955/http://www.readbag.com/ece-ucsb-yuegroup-teaching-ece594bb-lectures-steer-rf-chapter1 | url-status=dead }}
Phase-shift keying#π/4-QPSK3.0 dB
OQPSK3.3 dB
8VSB6.5–8.1 dB{{cite web |url=http://broadcastengineering.com/mag/broadcasting_transitioning_transmitters_cofdm/ |title=Transitioning transmitters to COFDM |access-date=2009-06-17 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090821020320/http://broadcastengineering.com/mag/broadcasting_transitioning_transmitters_cofdm/ |archive-date=2009-08-21 }}
64QAM\sqrt{ \frac{3}{7} }\sqrt{ \frac{7}{3} } \approx 1.5283.7 dB{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tSwKZxtx82gC|title=Mobile Lightweight Wireless Systems: Second International ICST Conference, Mobilight 2010, May 10-12, 2010, Barcelona, Spain, Revised Selected Papers|author1=R. Wolf|author2=F. Ellinger|author3=R.Eickhoff|author4=Massimiliano Laddomada|author5=Oliver Hoffmann|date=14 July 2011|publisher=Springer|isbn=978-3-642-16643-3|editor=Periklis Chatzimisios|page=164|access-date=13 December 2012}}
\infty-QAM{1 \over \sqrt{3}} \approx 0.577\sqrt{3} \approx 1.7324.8 dB
WCDMA downlink carrier10.6 dB
OFDM4~12 dB
GMSK110 dB
Gaussian noise\sigma[http://www.ti.com/lit/ml/sloa082/sloa082.pdf Op Amp Noise Theory and Applications] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141130224524/http://www.ti.com/lit/ml/sloa082/sloa082.pdf |date=2014-11-30 }} - 10.2.1 rms versus P-P Noise[http://users.ece.gatech.edu/mleach/ece6416/Labs/exp01.pdf Chapter 1 First-Order Low-Pass Filtered Noise] - "The standard deviation of a Gaussian noise voltage is the root-mean-square or rms value of the voltage."\infty[http://noisewave.com/faq.pdf Noise: Frequently Asked Questions] - "Noise theoretically has an unbounded distribution so that it should have an infinite crest factor"Telecommunications Measurements, Analysis, and Instrumentation, Kamilo Feher, section 7.2.3 Finite Crest Factor Noise\infty dB
Periodic chirp{1 \over \sqrt{2}} \approx 0.707\sqrt{2} \approx 1.4143.01 dB

Notes:

  1. Crest factors specified for QPSK, QAM, WCDMA are typical factors needed for reliable communication, not the theoretical crest factors which can be larger.

Crest factor reduction

Many modulation techniques have been specifically designed to have constant envelope modulation, i.e., the minimum possible crest factor of 1:1.

In general, modulation techniques that have smaller crest factors usually transmit more bits per second than modulation techniques that have higher crest factors. This is because:

  1. any given linear amplifier has some "peak output power"—some maximum possible instantaneous peak amplitude it can support and still stay in the linear range;
  2. the average power of the signal is the peak output power divided by the crest factor;
  3. the number of bits per second transmitted (on average) is proportional to the average power transmitted (Shannon–Hartley theorem).

Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) is a very promising modulation technique; perhaps its biggest problem is its high crest factor.[http://www.apc.org/en/spectrum/pubs/crest-factor-reduction-ofdmwimax-network "Crest Factor Reduction of an OFDM/WiMAX Network"].

[http://www.ubicc.org/files/pdf/UBICC_Eltholth_cf_115.pdf "Low Crest Factor Modulation Techniques for Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM)"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170829193818/http://www.ubicc.org/files/pdf/UBICC_Eltholth_cf_115.pdf |date=2017-08-29 }}. Many crest factor reduction techniques (CFR) have been proposed for OFDM.R. Neil Braithwaite.

[http://wwwen.zte.com.cn/endata/magazine/ztecommunications/2011Year/no4/articles/201202/t20120202_283037.html "Crest Factor Reduction for OFDM Using Selective Subcarrier Degradation"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180806221454/http://wwwen.zte.com.cn/endata/magazine/ztecommunications/2011Year/no4/articles/201202/t20120202_283037.html |date=2018-08-06 }}.K. T. Wong, B. Wang & J.-C. Chen,

[http://www.eie.polyu.edu.hk/~enktwong/ktw/WongKT_EL0111.pdf "OFDM PAPR Reduction by Switching Null Subcarriers & Data-Subcarriers," Electronics Letters, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 62-63 January, 2011] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150923234513/http://www.eie.polyu.edu.hk/~enktwong/ktw/WongKT_EL0111.pdf |date=2015-09-23 }}.S.C. Thompson,

[https://web.archive.org/web/20080706134849/http://zeidler.ucsd.edu/students/thesis_sthompson.pdf "Constant Envelope OFDM Phase Modulation," PhD Dissertation, UC San Diego, 2005].

The reduction in crest factor results in a system that can either transmit more bits per second with the same hardware, or transmit the same bits per second with lower-power hardware (and therefore lower electricity costsNick Wells.

[http://www.atsc.org/cms/pdf/pt2/Wells_ATSC_paper_on_T2.pdf "DVB-T2 in relation to the DVB-x2 Family of Standards"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130526003113/http://www.atsc.org/cms/pdf/pt2/Wells_ATSC_paper_on_T2.pdf |date=2013-05-26 }}

quote: "techniques which can reduce the PAPR, ... could result in a significant saving in electricity costs."

and less expensive hardware), or both.

Over the years, numerous model-driven approaches have been proposed to reduce the PAPR in communication systems. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in exploring data-driven models for PAPR reduction as part of ongoing research in end-to-end communication networks. These data-driven models offer innovative solutions and new avenues of exploration to address the challenges posed by high PAPR effectively. By leveraging data-driven techniques, researchers aim to enhance the performance and efficiency of communication networks by optimizing power utilization.

{{cite conference |last1=Huleihel |first1=Yara |last2=Ben-Dror|first2=Eilam |last3=Permuter |first3=Haim H. |title=Low PAPR Waveform Design for OFDM Systems Based on Convolutional Autoencoder |conference=2020 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Networks and Telecommunications Systems (ANTS) |date=2020 |pages=1–6.}}

{{buzzword|date=August 2023}}

=Crest factor reduction methods=

Various methods for crest factor reduction exist, such as peak windowing, noise shaping, pulse injection and peak cancellation.

Applications

  • Electrical engineering — for describing the quality of an AC power waveform
  • Vibration analysis — for estimating the amount of impact wear in a bearing{{Cite web |url=http://www.dliengineering.com/downloads/crest%20factor.pdf |title=What Is The "Crest Factor" And Why Is It Used? |access-date=2006-03-07 |archive-date=2011-09-27 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110927001050/http://www.dliengineering.com/downloads/crest%20factor.pdf |url-status=dead }}
  • Radio and audio electronics — for estimating the headroom required in a signal chain[http://rfdesign.com/mag/radio_crest_factor_analysis/ Crest factor analysis for complex signal processing] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060427062603/http://rfdesign.com/mag/radio_crest_factor_analysis/ |date=2006-04-27 }}[http://www.rfconsult.uk/papr/ PAPR simulation for 64QAM]
  • Music has a widely varying crest factor. Typical values for a processed mix are around 4–8 (which corresponds to {{nowrap|12–18 dB}} of headroom, usually involving audio level compression), and 8–10 for an unprocessed recording {{nowrap|(18–20 dB).}}[http://www.aes.org/par/c/#cps Crest factor definition] — AES Pro Audio Reference{{Cite web |url=http://www.digido.com/level-practices-part-1.html |title=Level Practices in Digital Audio |access-date=2009-10-11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090618130742/http://www.digido.com/level-practices-part-1.html |archive-date=2009-06-18 |url-status=dead }}[http://www.mackie.com/pdf/CMRefGuide/Tips_Ch4.pdf#page=2 Gain Structure — Setting the System Levels] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070928044203/http://www.mackie.com/pdf/CMRefGuide/Tips_Ch4.pdf#page=2 |date=2007-09-28 }}, Mackie Mixer Tips[http://digitalcontentproducer.com/mag/avinstall_setting_sound_system/index.html Setting sound system level controls: The most expensive system set up wrong never performs as well as an inexpensive system set up correctly.]
  • Physiology — for analysing the sound of snoring[http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0967-3334/20/2/306 Palatal snoring identified by acoustic crest factor analysis]

See also

References

{{Reflist}}

=General=

{{FS1037C MS188}}