Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. Lee

{{Use mdy dates|date=January 2025}}

{{Infobox SCOTUS case

|Litigants=Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. Lee

|ArgueDate=

|ArgueYear=

|DecideDate=June 20

|DecideYear=2016

|FullName=Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. Lee

|USVol=579

|USPage=___

|Docket=15-446

|ParallelCitations=

|Prior=

|Subsequent=

|Holding=The Patent Office's inter partes review process is constitutional.

|Majority=

|JoinMajority=

|Concurrence=

|JoinConcurrence=

|Concurrence2=

|JoinConcurrence2=

|Concurrence/Dissent=

|JoinConcurrence/Dissent=

|Dissent=

|JoinDissent=

|Dissent2=

|JoinDissent2=

|LawsApplied=Leahy–Smith America Invents Act

}}

Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. Lee, 579 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Patent Office's inter partes review process is constitutional.{{ussc|name=Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. Lee|docket=15-446|volume=579|year=2016}} Under the Leahy–Smith America Invents Act, the review process is unreviewable by courts. In upholding that, the Supreme Court did not decide whether issues with constitutional dimensions could be made unreviewable.{{Cite web |date=2016-06-20 |title=Opinion analysis: Justices validate PTO rules for inter partes review |url=https://www.scotusblog.com/2016/06/opinion-analysis-justices-validate-pto-rules-for-inter-partes-review/ |access-date=2024-10-27 |website=SCOTUSblog |language=en-US}}