Dakotans for Health
{{Use mdy dates|date=October 2024}}File:DakotansforhealthLogo.SouthDakota2024.png
Dakotans for Health is a grassroots organization founded by former 2014 South Dakota Democratic Senate Candidate Rick Weiland.
File:Dakotansforhealth.abortionrights.amendmentG.southdakota2024.jpg
2024 abortion rights campaign
Dakotans for Health is leading the campaign in 2024 to restore Roe v. Wade rights in the state.{{cite web |title=Abortion rights backers optimistic about petition drive following mid-term elections |author=Lee Strubinger |website=South Dakota Public Broadcasting |url=https://www.sdpb.org/politics/2022-11-18/abortion-rights-backers-optimistic-about-petition-drive-following-mid-term-elections |date=2022-11-18 |access-date=2024-10-02}} The initiated constitutional amendment would end South Dakota’s abortion ban, restoring reproductive rights and allowing voters to decide the future of healthcare freedom in the state.{{cite web |title=Is proposed abortion amendment 'far more extreme' than Roe v. Wade? |author=Stu Whitney |website=South Dakota News Watch |url=https://www.sdnewswatch.org/south-dakota-abortion-measure-roe-wade/ |date=2023-06-08 |access-date=2024-10-02}} The measure, known as the “Freedom Amendment G,” was officially certified by the South Dakota Secretary of State on May 16 and will appear on the November 2024 ballot.{{cite web |title=Freedom Amendment Ballot Measure to Restore Roe v Wade Rights Certified for 2024 Ballot with 85% Validity by South Dakota Secretary of State |url=https://www.dakotans4health.com/post/freedom-amendment-ballot-measure-to-restore-roe-v-wade-rights-certified-for-2024-ballot-with-85-va |website=Dakotans for Health |date=2024-05-16 |access-date=2024-10-02}}
= Opposition from anti-abortion forces =
Dakotans for Health faced significant resistance during their campaign to qualify Amendment G for the 2024 ballot. The “Decline to Sign” campaign, led by anti-abortion politicians State Representative John Hansen and Leslee Unruh, targeted Dakotans for Health and its petition circulators during the signature-collecting phase.{{cite web |title=Hour of Reflection at SD Capitol marks Roe's fall |author=Bob Mercer |website=Capitol News Bureau |url=https://www.keloland.com/capitol-news-bureau/hour-of-reflection-at-sd-capitol-marks-roes-fall/ |date=January 29, 2023 |access-date=October 2, 2024}}
= Dakotans for Health v. Leah Anderson =
The group has filed and won two federal lawsuits against local governments trying to prevent them from collecting signatures at key petitioning locations. One case involved Minnehaha County Auditor Leah Anderson, who attempted to stop the group from gathering signatures at the Minnehaha County Administration building in Sioux Falls by setting up unconstitutional "freed speech zones". According to ProPublica, Anderson previously served as director for the Alpha Center, an anti abortion non-profit located in Sioux Falls, SD. {{cite web |title=Alpha Center |website=ProPublica |date=May 9, 2013 |url=https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/363347022 |access-date=2024-10-02}} Dakotans for Health successfully challenged the decision, allowing them to continue their petition drive at the location. {{cite web |title=Grassroots organization Dakotans for Health reaches settlement with Minnehaha County |author=Stu Whitney |website=Argus Leader |url=https://www.argusleader.com/story/news/local/2023/11/22/dakotans-for-health-reaches-settlement-with-minnehaha-county/71676448007/ |date=2023-11-22 |access-date=2024-10-02}}
= Dakotans for Health v. Lawrence County Commission =
Dakotans for Health filed a lawsuit against the Lawrence County Commission, challenging their attempts to restrict petition circulators on county campuses. The grassroots organization argued that the restrictions violated their constitutional rights. Dakotans for Health won the lawsuit in federal court.{{cite web |title=Counties hit with $74,000 in plaintiffs' attorney fees for trying to restrict petition circulators |author=Joshua Haiar |website=South Dakota Searchlight |url=https://www.sdsearchlight.com/articles/counties-hit-with-74000-in-plaintiffs-attorney-fees-for-trying-to-restrict-petition-circulators/ |date=2024-07-11 |access-date=2024-10-02}}
= Signature withdrawal law and tactics against abortion rights petition =
In March 2024, State Representative Jon Hansen, who also serves as Vice President of South Dakota Right to Life, sponsored and passed a signature withdrawal law. This law was largely believed to have been designed to target the abortion rights ballot measure.{{cite web |title=A new front opens over South Dakota ballot initiatives: withdrawing signatures from petitions |author=Jack Dura |website=Associated Press |url=https://apnews.com/article/south-dakota-ballot-initiatives-signatures-abortion-7e4b215ce12264cd53b407b72754c21a |date=2024-03-15 |access-date=2024-10-02}}
= Petition Integrity Committee’s harassment and deceptive tactics =
Shortly after Dakotans for Health filed their ballot measure with the Secretary of State, another group call the Petition Integrity Committee, formed by State Representative Jon Hansen, was criticized by the South Dakota Secretary of State for making calls to signers of the abortion rights amendment. The group misrepresented themselves as agents of the Secretary of State’s office in an attempt to convince signers to withdraw their signatures.{{cite web |title=Anti-abortion group is behind calls labeled a 'scam' by state election official |author=Makenzie Huber |website=South Dakota Searchlight |url=https://southdakotasearchlight.com/2024/05/14/anti-abortion-group-is-behind-calls-labeled-a-scam-by-state-election-official/ |date=2024-05-14 |access-date=2024-10-02}} According to the Dakotans for Health website, there were no signatures withdrawn from the Secretary of State's random sample.{{cite web |title=Life Defense Fund Misfire: Effort to Deny South Dakotans Right to Vote on Reproductive Freedom |website=Dakotans for Health |url=https://www.dakotans4health.com/post/life-defense-fund-misfire-effort-to-deny-south-dakotans-right-to-vote-on-reproductive-freedom |date=2024-06-18 |access-date=2024-10-02}}
= Ongoing legal challenges with anti-abortion forces =
More recently, Jon Hansen and Leslee Unruh’s "Life Defense Fund" filed a lawsuit to remove Dakotans for Health’s abortion rights amendment from the 2024 ballot. However, they were unsuccessful, and the measure is set to appear before South Dakota voters in November 2024. Despite this setback, Hansen and Unruh continue to pursue legal action in an effort to prevent the amendment from being voted on.{{cite web |title=Opponents to SD abortion measure argue Secretary of State could make votes 'null and void' |author=Dominik Dausch |website=Sioux Falls Argus Leader |url=https://www.argusleader.com/story/news/politics/2024/08/13/opponents-sd-abortion-measure-argue-secretary-of-state-could-make-votes-null-void/70556153007/ |date=2024-08-13 |access-date=2024-10-02}}
2024 campaign to repeal South Dakota's state tax on food
Dakotans for Health is also sponsoring an initiated measure to repeal South Dakota’s state tax on food. Certified on May 1, 2024.{{cite web |title=Grocery tax repeal validated for the ballot |author=Searchlight Staff |website=South Dakota Searchlight |url=https://southdakotasearchlight.com/quick-reads/grocery-tax-repeal-validated-for-the-ballot/ |date=2024-05-13 |access-date=2024-10-02}} This measure would eliminate the state’s tax on groceries, providing financial relief to families across the state.{{cite web |title=Q&A: South Dakota's food tax repeal measure |author=Stu Whitney |website=South Dakota News Watch |url=https://www.sdnewswatch.org/stories/qa-south-dakota-food-tax-repeal-measure-im-28/ |date=2024-09-23 |access-date=2024-10-02}} The South Dakota AFL-CIO is co-sponsoring the measure.{{cite web |title=IM 28: Repeal the Tax on the Food We Eat |website=Dakotans for Health |url=https://www.dakotans4health.com/grocery-tax-repeal |access-date=2024-10-02}} If passed, IM28 would repeal the state's share of the tax on the food South Dakotans purchase. According to the South Dakota Legislative Research Council and Attorney General, municipalities would still get to continue to collect taxes of food.{{cite web |title=IM 28: Real Tax Relief for South Dakota Families |author=Rick Weiland |website=Dakotans for Health |url=https://www.dakotans4health.com/post/im-28-real-tax-relief-for-south-dakota-families |date=2024-09-13 |access-date=2024-10-02}}
References
{{Reflist}}