Double plural
{{Short description|Form of plurality}}
{{distinguish|Reduplicated plural}}
{{Expand Dutch|Stapelmeervoud|October 2024}}
A double plural is a plural form to which an extra suffix has been added, mainly because the original plural suffix (or other variation) had become unproductive and therefore irregular. So the form as a whole was no longer seen as a plural, an instance of morphological leveling. For example, if "geese" (the plural) became the word for "goose" (the singular) in a future version of English, a word geeses might become the licit plural form.{{Cite web |last=Nordquist |first=Richard |title=Double Plurals in English |url=https://www.thoughtco.com/double-plural-grammar-1690409 |access-date=October 28, 2024 |website=ThoughtCo.}} Likewise, "peoples" in English currently means "nations or ethnic groups" but is sometimes used informally as a plural of "person" (eg, "these peoples standing here").
Examples
=English and Dutch=
Examples of this can be seen in the history of English and Dutch. Historically, the general English plural markers were not only -s or -en but also (in certain specific declensions) -ra and -ru (which is still rather general today in German under the form -er). The ancient plural of child was "cildra/cildru", to which an -en suffix was later added when the -ra and -ru became unused.{{Cite web |last=Moylan |first=Peter |title=Double Plural |url=http://www.pmoylan.org/pages/articles/language/Double_plurals.html |access-date=October 28, 2024 |website=Peter & Lynne's place}} The Dutch plural form kind-er-en and the corresponding Zeelandic form kind-er-s are also double plurals which were formed in the same way as the English double plurals, while for example German and Limburgian have (historically conservative) single plurals such as Kind-er.
Breeches is an example involving an old plural that did not use a suffix. It was formerly breech which came from Old English brec which was the plural of broc.
References
{{Wiktionary|double plural}}
{{reflist}}
Further reading
{{Refbegin}}
- {{Cite journal |last=Alexiadou |first=Artemis |year=2024 |title=Double plural marking in language mixing and the building blocks of nominals |url=https://www.glossa-journal.org/article/id/11585/ |journal=Glossa |volume=9 |doi=10.16995/glossa.11585|doi-access=free }}
{{refend}}
Category:Historical linguistics
{{historical-linguistics-stub}}
{{ling-morph-stub}}