Draft:MediSafe controversy

{{Short description|2025 Hong Kong student AI controversy}}

{{Draft topics|internet-culture|software|technology}}

{{AfC topic|soc}}

{{AfC submission|||ts=20250625090841|u=Rettubtunaepym|ns=118}}

{{AFC submission|ts=20250625154000}}

{{AFC submission|d|v|ns=118|decliner=Greenman|declinets=20250625084840|ts=20250624121100}}

{{AFC submission|d|ai|u=Rettubtunaepym|ns=118|decliner=Rambley|declinets=20250624152205|ts=20250624152109}}

{{AFC submission|d|nn|ns=118|decliner=Jannatulbaqi|declinets=20250624143839|small=yes|ts=20250624121100}}

{{AFC comment|1=Multiple sourcing errors need to be fixed. Greenman (talk) 08:48, 25 June 2025 (UTC)}}

{{AFC submission|ts=20250625154000}}

MediSafe controversy refers to a public debate that emerged in Hong Kong in June 2025 after questions arose about the originality and data practices of a student-built artificial intelligence (AI) platform called MediSafe. The project was developed by Clarisse Poon Hei Shun, a Form Four student at St. Paul's Co-educational College, and had won several innovation awards in 2024 and 2025. Online discussion and media coverage later raised concerns about the project’s authorship and use of patient data, prompting official investigations.

Background

= Project =

MediSafe is a web-based app designed to flag potential prescription errors by cross-checking medications against patient details such as allergies, chronic conditions, and liver or kidney function. According to award materials, the system uses large language models, SQL, and vector databases.

= Awards =

The platform received the following recognitions:

Allegations

= Whistleblower concerns =

On 13 June 2025, Hailey Cheng Hei Lam, a student at City University of Hong Kong and participant in the Google Summer of Code, posted concerns on Threads. She questioned whether such a complex AI system could have been built solely by a secondary school student and cited earlier statements suggesting the use of data from over 100 patients.

Cheng later said she received anonymous threats after making the post. Her comments triggered a wider discussion online about originality in student research, the role of external help, and how sensitive data is handled in youth-led tech projects.

= Questions over data use =

Several news outlets reported public concerns about whether real patient data had been used in the project. According to statements quoted by Ming Pao and HK01, the organisers and Poon’s family said only simulated data and publicly available drug databases were used.

A privacy-focused publication, Meta Connects, discussed the situation in light of Hong Kong’s data protection laws, raising issues around patient consent, potential cross-border data transfer, and whether external service providers were involved.

Responses and investigations

= Reactions from those involved =

Poon later stated she was working with competition organisers to clarify the situation and found some of the online attention discouraging. {{citation needed}}

Dr Poon Tung Ping told the press that only simulated data had been used and that the award process had followed proper verification.

St. Paul’s Co-educational College confirmed it was reviewing the matter internally.

= Official and institutional responses =

The Digital Policy Office said it had requested a full investigation by Hong Kong Education City and the Hong Kong ICT Awards’ Quality Assurance Panel.

On 20 June, the Hong Kong Academy for Gifted Education and the Hong Kong New Generation Cultural Association issued a joint statement saying that the student had complied with competition rules. They also said no real patient data had been used and that company involvement came only after the competitions ended.

The Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data confirmed it had received a complaint and was reviewing the matter.

Media coverage and public response

The controversy was widely covered in both English and Chinese-language media. SCMP explored the timeline of MediSafe’s development and highlighted discrepancies between its public narrative and archived versions of related websites.

The Standard reported on government involvement and noted public doubts about the project’s origin.

Other local outlets, including Ming Pao, HK01, and on.cc, examined possible issues of academic outsourcing and privacy violations.

On 24 June, HK01 reported that the jury of the International Exhibition of Inventions Geneva reviewed the case and decided to keep the award, stating the submission met its criteria.

Timeline

Name clarification

This article refers to the student-developed MediSafe platform from Hong Kong. It is unrelated to:

  • Medisafe, a U.S.-based medication adherence app
  • PT Medisafe Technologies, a Canadian medical glove manufacturer
  • Medisafe Distribution Inc., a Canadian healthcare supplier

See also

References

{{reflist|refs=

{{cite web |title=Who created AI app MediSafe? Hong Kong student and US software firm stake claims |url=https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/society/article/3315236 |website=SCMP |date=20 June 2025 |access-date=24 June 2025}}

{{cite web |title=2024 Student Innovation Grand Award – MediSafe |url=https://www.hkictawards.hk/past-winner/2024-student-innovation-award-grand-award/ |website=HKICTAwards |access-date=24 June 2025}}

{{cite web |title=Silver Medal – Geneva Inventions Exhibition |url=https://exhibition.inventions-geneva.ch/en/inventions/67cb072667c5747ad82944ed |website=Geneva Inventions |access-date=24 June 2025}}

{{cite web |title=Youth Tech Pioneer of the Year Award |url=https://topick.hket.com/article/3881295 |website=Hong Kong Economic Times |access-date=24 June 2025}}

{{cite web |title=AI‑Powered Medication Management System |url=https://www.aihealthstudio.com/blog/ai-powered-medication-management-system |website=AI Health Studio (archived) |access-date=24 June 2025 |archive-date=16 June 2025 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250616132825/https://www.aihealthstudio.com/blog/ai-powered-medication-management-system}}

{{cite web |title=中學生AI平台MediSafe獲獎惹爭議 |url=https://news.mingpao.com/pns/港聞/article/20250620/s00002/1750269551932 |website=Ming Pao |date=20 June 2025 |access-date=24 June 2025}}

{{cite web |title=中四生MediSafe疑涉請槍 私隱疑慮 |url=https://www.hk01.com/article/1117423 |website=HK01 |date=17 June 2025 |access-date=24 June 2025}}

{{cite web |title=中學生研AI醫療輔助平台獲創科獎被指「請槍」 數字辦將全面調查 |url=https://www.hk01.com/社會新聞/60248622 |website=HK01 |date=18 June 2025 |access-date=24 June 2025}}

{{cite web |title=Hong Kong: Privacy Storm Brewing Over Student’s AI Project |url=https://metaconnects.asia/articles/medisafe-case-raises-questions |website=Meta Connects |date=19 June 2025 |access-date=24 June 2025}}

{{cite web |title=中學生創科獎爭議 父:採模擬病人資料無侵私隱 |url=https://news.mingpao.com/pns/港聞/article/20250619/s00002/1750269510586 |website=Ming Pao |access-date=24 June 2025}}

{{cite web |title=「藥倍安心」爭議︱名校中學生奪獎AI軟件 惹請槍疑雲 數字辦:已要求全面徹查 |url=https://www.stheadline.com/edu-news/3465656 |website=Headline Daily |access-date=24 June 2025}}

{{cite web |title=兩機構調查「藥倍安心」爭議事件 證不涉「請槍」及私隱問題 |url=https://www.dotdotnews.com/a/202506/21/AP685630b9e4b0a242bf058270.html |website=DotDotNews |access-date=24 June 2025}}

{{cite web |title=HK student's award-winning AI software under scrutiny for academic integrity violations |url=https://www.thestandard.com.hk/section-news/section/11/246912 |website=The Standard |date=18 June 2025 |access-date=24 June 2025}}

{{cite web |title=兩機構查MediSafe:無請槍無用病人資料 |url=https://hk.on.cc/hk/bkn/cnt/news/20250620/bkn-20250620113012347-0620_00822_001.html |website=on.cc |date=20 June 2025 |access-date=24 June 2025}}

{{cite web |title=日內瓦展覽團:MediSafe符比賽準則 銀獎續保留 |url=https://www.hk01.com/article/1121432 |website=HK01 |date=24 June 2025 |access-date=24 June 2025}}

}}