Draft:Michael Armour

{{AFC submission|d|prof|u=Hodipoes|ns=118|decliner=Cabrils|declinets=20250626051557|ts=20250623020715}}

{{AFC submission|d|ai|u=121.79.252.149|ns=118|decliner=Jlwoodwa|declinets=20250622224538|small=yes|ts=20250622224143}}

{{AFC comment|1=Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, WP:NPROF) but presently it is not clear that it does.

As other reviewers have noted, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable. Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published {{strong|secondary sources}} that are {{strong|reliable}}, intellectually independent of each other, and {{strong|independent of the subject}}. To properly create such a draft page, please see the articles ‘Your First Article’, ‘Referencing for Beginners’ and ‘Easier Referencing for Beginners’.

Please note that many of the references would appear to be from sources that are NOT considered {{strong|reliable}} for establishing notability and should be removed (including blogs, company websites, press releases, Twitter, YouTube, Instagram, Spotify etc).

Please note that many of the references are not formatted correctly (see Introduction to referencing with VisualEditor and Wikipedia’s Manual of Style for help).

Also, if you have any connection to the subject, including being the subject (see WP:AUTOBIO) or being paid, you have a conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link).

Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements, then please make the necessary amendments before resubmitting the page. It would help our volunteer reviewers by identifying, on the draft's talk page, the WP:THREE best sources that establish notability of the subject.

It would also be helpful if you could please identify with specificity, exactly which criteria you believe the page meets (eg "I think the page now meets WP:NPROF criteria #3, because XXXXX").

Once you have implemented these suggestions, you may also wish to leave a note for me on my talk page and I would be happy to reassess. Cabrils (talk) 05:15, 26 June 2025 (UTC)}}

{{AFC comment|1=Please address the issues stated by the last reviewer that declined this draft, also fix the selected works formatting, references, Infobox and generally rewrite. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 02:55, 23 June 2025 (UTC)}}

----

{{Short description|Leading women's health researcher in Australasia}}

{{Draft topics|biography|oceania|politics-and-government}}

{{AfC topic|blp}}

{{Infobox scientist

| name = Mike Armour

| image =

| image_size =

| alt =

| caption =

| birth_name =

| birth_date =

| birth_place =

| death_date =

| death_place =

| resting_place =

| nationality = New Zealand

| fields = Reproductive health, Women's health

| workplaces = Western Sydney University, Medical Research Institute of New Zealand

| alma_mater = University of Auckland

| thesis_title =

| thesis_url =

| thesis_year = 2016

| doctoral_advisor =

| academic_advisors =

| doctoral_students =

| notable_students =

| known_for = Endometriosis, Dysmenorrhea, Menstrual health literacy, Complementary medicine

| awards =

| website =

| footnotes =

| influences =

| influenced =

}}

Michael Armour is an Associate Professor in reproductive health and the Director of Research at the NICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University.{{Cite web |last=Western Sydney University |title=Mike Armour |url=https://www.westernsydney.edu.au/nicm/about_us/people/researchers/mike_armour}} He is a prominent researcher in women's health, focused on endometriosis, dysmenorrhea, menstrual health literacy, and use of complementary and alternative medicine.

{{Infobox scientist

| name = Michael Armour

| image = Michael_Armour_NICM.jpg

| caption = Michael Armour at NICM Health Research Institute

...

}}