Draft:Rick Beerhorst

{{AFC submission|d|blank|u=Thenfactor|ns=118|decliner=ToadetteEdit|declinets=20250323165548|ts=20250318205059}}

{{AFC submission|d|blank|u=Thenfactor|ns=118|decliner=Spiderone|declinets=20250209124729|small=yes|ts=20241217131136}}

{{AFC submission|d|v|u=Thenfactor|ns=118|decliner=Timtrent|declinets=20241130223842|small=yes|ts=20241128143933}}

{{AFC submission|d|bio|u=Thenfactor|ns=118|decliner=JSFarman|declinets=20241124191635|reason2=adv|small=yes|ts=20241108224356}}

{{AFC submission|d|v|u=Thenfactor|ns=118|decliner=Hoary|declinets=20241107061022|reason2=adv|small=yes|ts=20241106143425}}

{{AFC submission|d|bio|u=Thenfactor|ns=118|decliner=Jannatulbaqi|declinets=20241106085347|reason2=nn|small=yes|ts=20241105222353}}

{{AFC submission|d|test|u=Thenfactor|ns=118|decliner=KylieTastic|declinets=20241105182647|small=yes|ts=20241105182132}}

{{AFC comment|1=Article blanked by creator Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:47, 9 February 2025 (UTC)}}

{{AFC comment|1=It is not going to be deleted. However, if it remains abandoned, unedited, for 6 months it will go away on its own 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:02, 8 February 2025 (UTC)}}

{{AFC comment|1="d artist.[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][8][12][13]" is one prime example of WP:CITEKILL. Instead we need one excellent reference per fact asserted. If you are sure it is beneficial, two, and at an absolute maximum, three. Three is not a target, it's a limit. Aim for one. A fact you assert, once verified in a reliable source, is verified. More is gilding the lily. Please choose the very best in each case of multiple referencing for a single point and either drop or repurpose the remainder.

We can't review this until we know which references you have chosen. So please get busy and cut out the XCITEKILL 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:38, 30 November 2024 (UTC)}}

{{AFC comment|1=Almost none of the 51 references used go towards notability (or are suitable for verification). They need to be via independent, reliable sources, and -- to establish notability -- provide extensive coverage specifically about Rick Beerhorst. The draft also needs to be neutral.

Please read about writing articles as well as the links included in the decline notices, and do not resubmit the draft until you are more fluent in Wikipedia guidelines. JSFarman (talk) 19:16, 24 November 2024 (UTC)}}

{{AFC comment|1=If one reliable source, of course independent of Beerhorst, says that he's "internationally renowned" [usually spelt without a ⟨k⟩], then this one source is all you need. If sources are not reliable, or aren't independent of him, or don't say that he's "internationally renowned", then the more that are cited, the worse. See Wikipedia:Citation overkill. Hoary (talk) 22:35, 9 November 2024 (UTC)}}

{{AFC comment|1=Draft:Richard Beerhorst, about the same person, was previously rejected, and then deleted as mere advertising. Luckily for the creator of "Draft:Rick Beerhorst", this differs from "Draft:Richard Beerhorst" -- but both reek of promotionalism. Hoary (talk) 06:18, 7 November 2024 (UTC)}}

{{AFC comment|1=Even the short first paragraph demonstrates that this is flagrantly promotional flimflam, equipped with bogus "references". (See my comment on Draft talk:Rick Beerhorst.)

Please do not think of resubmitting this until you've spent at least a week (i) checking that every reference says what it's presented as saying, and (ii) deleting anything that is not reliably referenced. Sources must be disinterested. Hoary (talk) 06:10, 7 November 2024 (UTC)}}

{{AFC comment|1=Multiple copies - please sort before resubmitting KylieTastic (talk) 18:26, 5 November 2024 (UTC)}}

----