Draft talk:PAR Technology

Hi there - for full disclosure I'm currently a PAR employee.

I originally submitted a Deletion review for PAR Technology's page. It was deleted in early 2018, PAR got a new CEO in late 2018, the company has changed meaningfully over the last few years. So, I'd believed it fit the guideline: "if significant new information has come to light since a deletion that would justify recreating the deleted page;". Here is the link to the discussion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2024_June_13

That thread recommended AfC so, I submitted a draft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:PAR_Technology

The initial draft was declined, however I am still in conversations with the reviewer on their talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:HitroMilanese

I'd like for this not to be a CSD please because it's still actively being worked on

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... it has fair sources. (your reason here) --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:20, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi there - I wanted to give some background and context to this latest submission! I had done a ton of work in researching for reliable, verifiable sources as asked. I have a good few articles that go into a good level of depth (with independent analysis) about the company and its founder, particularly the article from The Buffalo News ("Buffalonian's Firm Finally Got A Break – From McDonald's Corp") and another on The Post-Standard ("TECHNOLOGY IS PAR FOR THE COURSE"). Based on these (and other sources I referenced), I believe that this company should pass the notability tests. Thank you for reading! LeLiPAR (talk) 21:48, 6 January 2025 (UTC)