Druzhba pipeline

On 18 December 1958, the 10th session of the Council for Mutual Economic Assistance (Comecon), held in Prague, adopted a decision and an agreement was signed on construction of a trunk crude oil pipeline from the USSR into Poland, Czechoslovakia, GDR and Hungary.

{{cite journal

|url=http://www.osa.ceu.hu/files/holdings/300/8/3/text/122-1-92.shtml

|title=The Comecon Pipeline. Background Research

|publisher=RFE/RL

|date=1960-09-06

|access-date=2008-01-02

|url-status=dead

|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090530043932/http://www.osaarchivum.org/files/holdings/300/8/3/text/122-1-92.shtml

|archive-date=2009-05-30}}

The construction of the initially proposed {{convert|5327|km}} long pipeline commenced in 1960.{{cite journal

|url=http://pipelinesinternational.com/news/druzhba_pipeline/008045/

|title=Druzhba Pipeline

|journal=Pipelines International

|year=2009

|access-date=2009-11-19

|archive-date=2009-09-27

|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090927135650/http://pipelinesinternational.com/news/druzhba_pipeline/008045/

|url-status=dead

}} Each country was to supply all necessary construction materials, machinery and equipment. Czechoslovakia received first oil in 1962, Hungary in September 1963, Poland in November 1963, and the GDR in December 1963. The whole pipeline was put into operation in October 1964. The first oil pumped through the Druzhba pipeline originated from the oil fields in Tatarstan and Samara (Kuybyshev) Oblast. In the 1970s, the Druzhba pipeline system was further enlarged with the construction of geographically parallel lines.{{cite web

|url=http://www.transneft.ru/about/story/

|title=История

|trans-title=History

|publisher=Transneft

|language=ru

|access-date=2016-12-17

|archive-date=2017-02-22

|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170222021301/http://transneft.ru/about/story

|url-status=live

}}

Following the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, the northern route to Germany was closed with Germany ceasing to buy oil in January 2023 and Russia ceasing to supply oil to Poland in February 2023.{{cite news |title=Russia Halts Pipeline Oil Supplies To Poland, Polish Refiner Says |newspaper=Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty |url=https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-halts-oil-supplies-poland/32288025.html |date=25 February 2023 |agency=Reuters }}{{cite web |title=Germany's Schwedt refinery losing out in race from Russian oil |website=Reuters |url=https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/germanys-schwedt-refinery-losing-out-race-russian-oil-2023-03-07/ |date=7 March 2023}} From December 2023, following agreements, Germany began importing 1.2 million tons of oil per year from Kazakhstan using the northern pipeline.{{cite web |title=Kazakhstan to supply 150,000 tonnes of oil to Germany via Druzhba pipeline in Dec |url=https://www.azernews.az/region/218634.html |date=8 December 2023}}

In July 2024, the government of Ukraine stopped the transportation of Lukoil oil through the Druzhba pipeline to Slovakia and Hungary.[https://www.voanews.com/a/hungary-s-foreign-minister-accuses-eu-of-disrupting-oil-supplies-from-russia-/7755792.html Voiceof America: Hungary's foreign minister accuses EU of disrupting oil supplies from Russia], July 2024[https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/eu-declines-hungarys-request-talks-with-ukraine-over-oil-sanctions-2024-08-23/ Reuters: EU declines Hungary's request for talks with Ukraine over oil sanctions], August 23, 2024

The pipeline begins at Almetyevsk in Tatarstan, where it collects oil from western Siberia, the Urals, and the Caspian Sea. It runs to Mazyr in southern Belarus, where it splits into a northern and southern branch. The northern branch crosses the remainder of Belarus across Poland to Schwedt in Germany. It supplies refineries in Płock and in Schwedt. The northern branch is also connected by the Płock–Gdańsk pipeline with the Naftoport terminal in Gdańsk, which is used for oil re-exports.{{cite news

|url=http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/01/08/business/web.0108oil.php

|title=Belarus blocks Russian oil deliveries to Germany, Poland and Ukraine

|newspaper=International Herald Tribune

|date=2007-01-08

|access-date=2008-01-02

|archive-date=2007-09-07

|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070907033007/http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/01/08/business/web.0108oil.php

|url-status=live

}} In Schwedt, the Druzhba pipeline is connected with the MVL pipeline to Rostock and Spergau.

The southern branch runs south through Ukraine. In Brody, the Druzhba pipeline is connected with the Odesa-Brody pipeline, which is currently used to ship oil from the Druzhba pipeline to the Black Sea. In Uzhhorod, the pipeline splits into lines to Slovakia (Druzhba-1 — original Druzhba route) and to Hungary (Druzhba-2). The line through Slovakia is divided once again near Bratislava: one branch leading in a northwest direction to the Czech Republic and the other going southward to Hungary. The Druzhba-1 pipeline branches off toward Hungary in Banská Bystrica Region (Slovakia) near the river of Ipeľ, crosses the Hungarian border at Drégelypalánk and leads to Százhalombatta (not depicted on the map at the beginning of the page). In Hungary, the Druzhba-1 pipeline supplies the Duna refinery while Druzhba-2 supplies Duna and Tisza refineries.{{cite book

|url=http://www.iea.org/textbase/nppdf/free/2000/hungary2003.pdf

|title=Energy Policies of IEA Countries - Hungary

|publisher=Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

|author=International Energy Agency

|author-link=International Energy Agency

|year=2003

|isbn=92-64-17096-0

|pages=67–70

|access-date=2008-01-03

|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090530071432/http://www.iea.org/textbase/nppdf/free/2000/hungary2003.pdf

|archive-date=2009-05-30

|url-status=dead

}}

The ORLEN Lietuva in Lithuania and Ventspils oil terminal in Latvia are connected to the main pipeline by the branch pipeline from the Unecha junction in Bryansk Oblast (not shown on the map). This branch ceased operation in 2006 and is not likely to become operational again any time soon.

The part of the Druzhba pipeline system which runs via Belarus is {{convert|2910|km|mi|-1}} long. The length of the pipeline in Ukraine is {{convert|1490|km|mi|-1}}, in Poland {{convert|670|km|mi|-1}}, in Hungary {{convert|130|km|mi|-1}}, in Lithuania {{convert|332|km|mi|0}}, in Latvia {{convert|420|km|mi|0}}, and in Slovakia and in the Czech Republic together around {{convert|400|km|mi|-1}}.

{{cite news

|url=http://www.transneft.ru/press/Default.asp?LANG=EN&ATYPE=9&PG=5&ID=767

|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071016094134/http://www.transneft.ru/press/Default.asp?LANG=EN&ATYPE=9&PG=5&ID=767

|url-status=dead

|archive-date=2007-10-16

|title=Druzhba never gets old

|author= Anatoly Dozhin

|agency= Transneft

|publisher=Rossijskaya Gazeta

|date=2002-12-05

|access-date=2007-12-29

}} The pipeline crosses 45 major rivers as well as 200 railways and highways.

The pipes for the project were manufactured in the Soviet Union and Poland, while fittings were manufactured in Czechoslovakia. The GDR was responsible for pumps, and Hungary for automation and communication equipment. The construction cost nearly 400 million rubles and nearly 730,000 tons of pipe was laid throughout the path of the pipeline. The Druzhba pipeline currently has a capacity of {{convert|1.2|to|1.4|Moilbbl/d}}. Work is currently underway to increase this in the section between Belarus and Poland. The pipe diameter of the pipeline varies from {{convert|420|to|1020|mm|in}}. It uses 20 pumping stations.

The Russian part of the pipeline is operated by the oil company Transneft through its subsidiary OAO MN Druzhba. The operator in Belarus is Gomeltransneft Druzhba, in Ukraine UkrTransNafta, in Poland PERN Przyjazn SA, in Slovakia Transpetrol AS, in the Czech Republic Mero, and in Hungary MOL.

{{main|Baltic Pipeline System-II}}

The Baltic Pipeline System-2 (BPS-2) is a pipeline from the Unecha junction of the Druzhba pipeline near the Russia–Belarus border to the Ust-Luga oil terminal at the eastern part of the Gulf of Finland with a {{convert|172|km|mi}} long branch line to Kirishi oil refinery.

{{cite news

|url=http://www.jamestown.org/programs/edm/single/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=32762&tx_ttnews%5BbackPid%5D=171&no_cache=1

|title=Russia to redirect massive oil volumes from Druzhba to Baltic pipeline

|last1=Socor

|first1=Vladimir

|author-link1=Vladimir Socor

|work=Eurasia Daily Monitor

|publisher=The Jamestown Foundation

|date=2007-05-24

|access-date=2016-02-13

|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160213123426/http://www.jamestown.org/programs/edm/single/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=32762&tx_ttnews%5BbackPid%5D=171&no_cache=1

|archive-date=2016-02-13

|url-status=dead

}} The throughput capacity of BPS-2 is 50 million tonnes of oil annually.

{{cite news

|url=http://www.neurope.eu/articles/74317.php

|title=BPS-2 to redirect oil volumes from Druzhba pipeline

|first=Kostis

|last=Geropoulos

|publisher=New Europe

|date=2007-05-26

|access-date=2007-12-29

|url-status=dead

|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071016151733/http://www.neurope.eu/articles/74317.php

|archive-date=2007-10-16

}} The construction of the BPS-2 started on 10 June 2009.

{{cite news

|url=http://www.euractiv.com/en/energy/russia-builds-baltic-oil-pipeline-bypass-belarus/article-183101?Ref=RSS

|title=Russia builds Baltic oil pipeline to bypass Belarus

|publisher=EurActiv

|date=2009-06-11

|access-date=2009-06-30

|url-status=dead

|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090619075747/http://www.euractiv.com/en/energy/russia-builds-baltic-oil-pipeline-bypass-belarus/article-183101?Ref=RSS

|archive-date=2009-06-19

}}

The BPS-2 was completed in 2011 and began to function in late March 2012.{{cite news

|url = http://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/ceweekly/2012-04-18/czech-concerns-over-future-druzhba-oil-pipeline

|title = Czech concerns over the future of the Druzhba oil pipeline

|first1 = Jakub

|last1 = Groszkowski

|publisher = Centre for Eastern Studies

|newspaper = CE Weekly

|date = 2012-04-18

|access-date = 2012-04-20

|archive-date = 2012-05-11

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120511122408/http://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/ceweekly/2012-04-18/czech-concerns-over-future-druzhba-oil-pipeline

|url-status = live

}}

; {{More citations needed|section|date=July 2024}}

; Druzhba Adria

The Druzhba–Adria Pipeline Integration Project was a proposal that was considered in the 2000s to extend the pipeline to pass through Hungary and Croatia to reach the Adriatic Sea at the deep-water port of Omišalj. In the first phase, the Croatian portion of the Adria pipeline would be reconstructed from the Sisak pumping station to Omišalj harbour. The Croatian company JANAF was responsible for the design of the initial project phase, to reverse the phases of the Adria pipeline (which currently carries oil from the port inland) on the Sisak-Omišalj portion.

It was also proposed to connect Druzhba Adria with the planned Pan-European Pipeline.{{cite news

| url = http://www.upstreamonline.com/incoming/article132430.ece

| title = Zagreb floats new pipe plan

| newspaper = Upstream Online

| publisher = NHST Media Group

| date = 2007-04-30

| access-date = 2008-05-31

| archive-date = 2009-05-30

| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20090530121701/http://www.upstreamonline.com/incoming/article132430.ece

| url-status = live

}}

The proposal was touted by the Croatian president Stipe Mesić, but it also garnered a lot of negative press due to complaints from the environmentalist groups such as Eko Kvarner, and was eventually abandoned.

; Schwechat–Bratislava Oil Pipeline

The Schwechat–Bratislava two-way oil pipeline project was proposed in 2003. It would allow to supply the OMV owned Schwechat Refinery from the Druzhba pipeline.{{cite news

|url=http://www.visegrad.info/?q=sk/node/42

|title=Issues surrounding the privatisation of the petrochemical industry in the V4 countries

|publisher=Visegrad.info

|date=2003-10-01

|access-date=2008-01-02

|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160314232220/http://www.visegrad.info/?q=sk%2Fnode%2F42

|archive-date=2016-03-14

|url-status=dead

}}

{{main|Russia–Ukraine gas disputes}}

For the last several{{which|date=November 2022}} years, Russia and Ukraine have been tied up in transit fee disputes as the major pipelines supplying Europe with Russian oil and gas run through Ukraine. The continuous disputes were primarily based on transit of natural gas.

On December 28, 2009, referring to Russia's announcement, Slovakian government said Russia issued warnings that it would stop oil supplies to Slovakia, Hungary and the Czech Republic over a transit fees dispute with Ukraine.

{{cite news

|date = 2009-12-28

|url = http://www.france24.com/en/20091228-russia-warns-oil-supply-cut-off-through-ukraine-says-slovakia-petrol-europe

|title = Russia warns of oil supply cut-off through Ukraine, says Slovakia

|work = France 24

|access-date = 2009-12-29

|url-status = dead

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20100101074415/http://www.france24.com/en/20091228-russia-warns-oil-supply-cut-off-through-ukraine-says-slovakia-petrol-europe

|archive-date = 2010-01-01

}}

However, the next day, Ukraine's Naftogas issued a statement confirming that Russia agreed to a 30 percent increase in the transit fees through Ukraine. The alleged rise in the tariff will be from $7.8 to $9.50 (or €6.6) per tonne of oil for transiting Ukraine in 2010, and this was implemented due to the decision from Russia to raise prices of the energy resources. Additionally, unlike previous payments, new payments will be made in Euros, as this was one of Ukraine's demands. Also, Ukraine needs substantial investments to update the network on its territory as the pipeline has aged. Russia and Ukraine also agreed on the volume of oil to be transported through Ukraine in 2010. The overall amount of oil to be transported to Slovakia, the Czech Republic and Hungary through Ukraine in 2010 will be 15 million tonnes, a decrease from 17.1 million tonnes in 2008.

{{cite news

|date = 2009-12-28

|url = http://www.france24.com/en/20091229-russia-ukraine-agreement-oil-transit-naftogaz-raise-tariffs-30-percent

|title = Russia agrees to higher oil transit fees with Ukraine's Naftogaz

|work = France 24

|access-date = 2009-12-29

|url-status = dead

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20100123093311/http://www.france24.com/en/20091229-russia-ukraine-agreement-oil-transit-naftogaz-raise-tariffs-30-percent

|archive-date = 2010-01-23

}}

{{update after|2011}}

The delivery of oil was halted on 20 April 2019 due to high concentrations of organic chloride found in the pipeline. These chemical compounds contaminated the pipeline and equipment in Russia and Europe causing an economic impact of billions of dollars. Investigation into the scandal is ongoing with individuals being detained in Russia suspected of having stolen oil and pouring in organochloride to the pipeline to cover up the theft.{{cite news

|date = 2019-05-10

|url = https://www.forbes.com/sites/arielcohen/2019/05/10/russia-loses-billions-in-druzhba-oil-pipeline-contamination-crisis/

|title = Russia Loses Billions in Druzhba Oil Pipeline Contamination Crisis

|work = Forbes

|access-date = 2019-05-11

|archive-date = 2019-05-10

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190510174540/https://www.forbes.com/sites/arielcohen/2019/05/10/russia-loses-billions-in-druzhba-oil-pipeline-contamination-crisis/

|url-status = live

}}{{cite news

|date = 2019-05-08

|url = https://meduza.io/en/feature/2019/05/08/who-contaminated-the-petroleum-supply-in-the-druzhba-pipeline-and-caused-russian-oil-exports-to-be-unusable-for-weeks-meduza-investigates

|title = Who contaminated the petroleum supply in the Druzhba pipeline and caused Russian oil exports to be unusable for weeks? 'Meduza' investigates.

|work = Meduza

|access-date = 2019-05-11

|archive-date = 2019-05-09

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190509174634/https://meduza.io/en/feature/2019/05/08/who-contaminated-the-petroleum-supply-in-the-druzhba-pipeline-and-caused-russian-oil-exports-to-be-unusable-for-weeks-meduza-investigates

|url-status = live

}}

Disputes over payment for contaminated oil were ongoing a month later.{{cite news

|date = 2019-05-20

|url = https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-oil-exclusive/exclusive-western-buyers-freeze-russian-payments-over-dirty-oil-outage-idUSKCN1SQ13C

|title = Exclusive: Western buyers freeze payments for contaminated oil in extended Russian outage

|work = Reuters

|access-date = 2019-05-20

|archive-date = 2019-05-20

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190520121900/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-oil-exclusive/exclusive-western-buyers-freeze-russian-payments-over-dirty-oil-outage-idUSKCN1SQ13C

|url-status = live

}}

By late May, a month after the contamination was discovered, Russia agreed to take back some of the 8-9m tons of contaminated oil remaining in the pipeline.{{cite news

|date = 2019-05-24

|url = https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-oil-reverse-exclusive/exclusive-russia-to-take-back-dirty-oil-back-from-belarus-sources-idUSKCN1SU0UP?il=0

|title = Exclusive: Russia to take back dirty oil back from Belarus - sources

|work = Reuters

|access-date = 2019-05-24

|archive-date = 2019-05-24

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190524123505/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-oil-reverse-exclusive/exclusive-russia-to-take-back-dirty-oil-back-from-belarus-sources-idUSKCN1SU0UP?il=0

|url-status = live

}}

{{cite news

|date = 2019-05-23

|url = https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-oil-transneft-quality/russia-removed-2-million-tonnes-of-tainted-druzhba-oil-using-rail-sea-storage-sources-idUSKCN1ST1TX

|title = Russia removed 2 million tonnes of tainted Druzhba oil using rail, sea, storage: sources

|work = Reuters

|access-date = 2019-05-24

|archive-date = 2019-05-24

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190524014150/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-oil-transneft-quality/russia-removed-2-million-tonnes-of-tainted-druzhba-oil-using-rail-sea-storage-sources-idUSKCN1ST1TX

|url-status = live

}}

Estimates of overall contaminated stock, including that still in the pipeline and other stock pumped to tankers or to storage range from 20-40m tons as of end May. This stock will all require dilution before it can be refined.{{cite news

|date = 2019-05-24

|url = https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-24/russia-s-dirty-oil-crisis-is-worse-than-almost-anyone-predicted

|title = Russia's Dirty Oil Crisis Is Worse Than Almost Anyone Predicted

|work = Bloomberg

|access-date = 2019-05-24

|archive-date = 2019-05-25

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190525015929/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-24/russia-s-dirty-oil-crisis-is-worse-than-almost-anyone-predicted

|url-status = live

}}

In mid-September 2019, almost five months after the contamination was noticed, the Polish pipeline operator confirmed their section of the pipeline had been cleared of contamination and was operating normally. 450,000 tons of contaminated oil had been moved to storage.{{cite news

|date = 2019-09-18

|url = https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-oil-poland/poland-clears-tainted-oil-from-pipelines-450000-t-remains-in-storage-ria-idUSKBN1W31KH

|title = Poland clears tainted oil from pipelines, 450,000 T remains in storage: RIA

|work = RIA/Reuters

|access-date = 2019-09-20

|archive-date = 2019-09-19

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190919162541/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-oil-poland/poland-clears-tainted-oil-from-pipelines-450000-t-remains-in-storage-ria-idUSKBN1W31KH

|url-status = live

}}

Also in September 2019, oil companies BP and Total were trying to sell 2.3m barrels (over 300,000 tons) of tainted oil that they had received earlier from the pipeline.{{cite news

|date = 2019-09-13

|url = https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-oil-poland/poland-clears-tainted-oil-from-pipelines-450000-t-remains-in-storage-ria-idUSKBN1W31KH

|title = France's Total tenders to sell 1.3 million barrels of tainted oil

|work = RIA/Reuters

|access-date = 2019-09-20

|archive-date = 2019-09-19

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190919162541/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-oil-poland/poland-clears-tainted-oil-from-pipelines-450000-t-remains-in-storage-ria-idUSKBN1W31KH

|url-status = live

}}

In February 2020, Belarus threatened to take oil from the Druzhba pipeline if Russia did not supply it with the required volumes of crude oil. As of February 2022, Russian oil supplies to Belarus had not been agreed to for 2020 and shipments had dwindled to 500,000 tonnes, down from a previously planned{{when|date=November 2022}} 2 million tonnes.{{cite news| url = https://www.reuters.com/article/belarus-oil-lukashenko/update-1-belarus-threatens-to-take-oil-from-russian-transit-pipeline-belta-idUSL8N2AE4SW| title = Belarus to Russia: We'll siphon off your transit oil to Europe if necessary| website = Reuters| date = 14 February 2020| access-date = 2020-02-19| archive-date = 2020-02-14| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200214222331/https://www.reuters.com/article/belarus-oil-lukashenko/update-1-belarus-threatens-to-take-oil-from-russian-transit-pipeline-belta-idUSL8N2AE4SW| url-status = live}} Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko said Moscow hinted at an energy supply deal in exchange for Belarus merging with Russia, which caused talks to collapse.{{cite news| url = https://www.reuters.com/article/us-belarus-oil-russia-lukashenko/russia-hints-at-belarus-joining-it-in-a-unified-state-in-exchange-for-oil-deal-lukashenko-idUSKBN20815V| title = Russia hints at Belarus joining it in a unified state in exchange for oil deal: Lukashenko| website = Reuters| date = 14 February 2020| access-date = 2020-02-19| archive-date = 2020-02-18| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200218030549/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-belarus-oil-russia-lukashenko/russia-hints-at-belarus-joining-it-in-a-unified-state-in-exchange-for-oil-deal-lukashenko-idUSKBN20815V| url-status = live}}{{cite web| url = https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2020/02/14/world/europe/ap-eu-russia-belarus.html| title = Page No Longer Available - The New York Times| website = The New York Times| access-date = 2020-02-19| archive-date = 2020-02-15| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200215214717/https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2020/02/14/world/europe/ap-eu-russia-belarus.html| url-status = live}}{{update after|2022|11|16}}

In 2023, apparent classified U.S. intelligence documents released in the 2022–2023 Pentagon document leaks included a note of a conversation between the President of Ukraine and Deputy Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko in which Volodymyr Zelensky suggested blowing up the Druzhba pipeline to hit Hungarian industry, as Orbán's government was too friendly towards the Kremlin during the Russo-Ukrainian War.{{Cite web |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/05/13/zelensky-ukraine-war-leaked-documents/ |title=Zelensky, in private, plots bold attacks inside Russia, leak shows |website=washingtonpost}} A Hungarian government official stated that this proposed sabotage by Zelensky prompted Hungary to block funding of the European Peace Facility.{{Cite web |url=https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2023/05/17/hungary-blocks-next-tranche-of-eu-tool-to-provide-military-support-to-ukraine |title=Hungary blocks next tranche of EU tool to provide military support to Ukraine |website=euronews.com|date=17 May 2023 }}

{{Portal|Czech Republic|Russia|Engineering|Transport|Economy|Energy}}

• Yamal–Europe pipeline
• Urengoy–Pomary–Uzhhorod pipeline
• Russia–Ukraine gas disputes
• Russia–Belarus energy dispute
• Baku–Tbilisi–Ceyhan pipeline - the next longest oil pipeline after Druzhba

{{Reflist|2}}

• [https://web.archive.org/web/20070927202545/http://www.transneft.ru/Projects/Default.asp?LANG=EN&ID=231 Druzhba-Adria Pipeline Integration Project], Transneft website

{{coord missing|Russia}}

{{Pipeline Systems of Russia}}

{{Authority control}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Druzhba Pipeline}}

Category:1960 establishments in Europe

Category:Oil pipelines in Russia

Category:Oil pipelines in Ukraine

Category:Oil pipelines in Belarus

Category:Oil pipelines in Poland

Category:Oil pipelines in Slovakia

Category:Oil pipelines in the Czech Republic

Category:Oil pipelines in Hungary

Category:Oil pipelines in the Soviet Union

Category:Oil pipelines in Germany

Category:Buildings and structures built in the Soviet Union

Category:Transneft

Category:Eastern Bloc

Category:Comecon

Category:Foreign relations of the Soviet Union

Category:Czechoslovakia–Soviet Union relations

Category:East Germany–Soviet Union relations

Category:Germany–Soviet Union relations

Category:Hungary–Soviet Union relations

Category:Poland–Soviet Union relations