Dud
{{Short description|Ammunition or explosive that fails to fire or detonate}}
{{Wiktionary}}
{{other uses}}
{{refimprove|date=March 2013}}
{{multiple image
| width =
| image1 = Dud Shell, Argonne Forest, ca. 1918 (6001502407) (cropped).jpg
| caption1 = Dud shell lodged in a tree, Argonne Forest, First World War
| image2 = WWI English dud bomb (cropped).JPG
| caption2 = British dud during World War I
| total_width = 360
}}
A dud is in general something that fails to function in the way it is intended to.{{Cite OED|dud|id=1145117759}} In a military context the word is often used to refer to an ammunition round or explosive that fails to fire or detonate as expected. Poorly designed devices (for example, improvised explosive devices (IEDs), shoddy workmanship at the munitions factory, over-complicated fuses, and small devices), have higher chances of being duds.{{citation needed|date = March 2013}} During the Continuation War 1941-1944, Finns estimated up to 20% to 30% of all Soviet shells would be duds.
Duds are still dangerous, and can explode if handled. They must be deactivated and disposed of carefully. In war-torn areas, many curious children have been injured or killed from tampering with such devices.
The variation absolute dud describes a nuclear weapon that fails to explode.[https://web.archive.org/web/20010624203544/http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/doddict/data/a/00013.html DOD Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms] (A nuclear weapon which does explode, but does not achieve its expected power, is termed a fizzle.)
Etymology
The term descends from the Middle English dudde, originally meaning worn-out or ragged clothing, and is a cognate of duds (i.e., "clothing") and dowdy. Eventually dud became a general pejorative for something useless, including ammunition. The word's use is attested from 1355.
See also
{{Wiktionary|dud|duds}}
References
{{reflist}}