Duluth model

The feminist theory underlying the Duluth model is that men use violence within relationships to exercise abusive power and control. The curriculum "is designed to be used within a community using its institutions to diminish the power of batterers over their victims and to explore with each abusive man the intent and source of his violence and the possibilities for change through seeking a different kind of relationship with women”.{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pBjZSdZ1LsEC | title=Education Groups for Men Who Batter: The Duluth Model | isbn=9780826179913 | last1=Pence | first1=Ellen | last2=Paymar | first2=Michael | date=6 April 1993 | publisher=Springer }} This is illustrated by the "Power and Control Wheel," a graphic typically displayed as a poster in participating locations.{{cite web |url=http://www.theduluthmodel.org/pdf/PowerandControl.pdf |title=Power and Control chart |website= www.theduluthmodel.org|access-date=2020-03-22}}{{cite book|author=Janice Haaken|title=Hard Knocks: Domestic Violence and the Psychology of Storytelling|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Ix-MAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA23|year=2010|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-1-135-15734-0|page=23}} According to the Duluth model, "women and children are vulnerable to violence because of their unequal social, economic, and political status in society."{{cite web|title=The Duluth Model|publisher=Minnesota Program Development, Inc.|url=http://duluth-model.org/home.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080828063405/http://duluth-model.org/home.html/|archive-date=28 August 2008}} Treatment of abusive men is focused on re-education, as "we do not see men’s violence against women as stemming from individual pathology, but rather from a socially reinforced sense of entitlement."{{cite web |url=http://www.theduluthmodel.org/pdf/CounteringConfusion.pdf |title=Countering Confusion|website= www.theduluthmodel.org|access-date=2020-03-22}}

The program's philosophy is intended to help batterers work to change their attitudes and personal behavior so they would learn to be nonviolent in any relationship. The Domestic Abuse Intervention Project was the first multi-agency program designed to address the issue of domestic violence. This experimental program, conducted in Duluth in 1981, coordinated the actions of a variety of agencies dealing with domestic conflict. The Duluth model curriculum was developed by a "small group of activists in the battered women’s movement",{{cite book|author1=Ellen Pence|author2=Michael Paymar|title=Education Groups for Men Who Batter: The Duluth Model|year=1993|publisher=Springer Publishing Company|isbn=978-0-8261-7990-6|page=xiii}} with five battered women and four men as subjects. The program has become a model for programs in other jurisdictions seeking to deal more effectively with domestic violence.{{Cite web|url=https://www.theduluthmodel.org/about-us/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110728094345/http://www.theduluthmodel.org/history.php|url-status=dead|title=About Us|archive-date=28 July 2011}}

An early U.S. government sponsored study found that batterers who complete programs based on the Duluth Model are less likely to repeat acts of domestic violence than those who do not complete any batterers' intervention program. A 2003 study conducted by the U.S. National Institute of Justice found the Duluth Model to have "little or no effect".https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/195079.pdf {{Bare URL PDF|date=March 2022}} This study had considerable shortfalls, and the National Institute of Justice said in its introduction that "response rates were low, many people dropped out of the program, and victims could not be found for subsequent interviews. The tests used to measure batterers' attitudes toward domestic violence and their likelihood to engage in future abuse were of questionable validity."{{Cite journal |last=Gondolf |first=Edward W. |date=2007-11-01 |title=Theoretical and research support for the Duluth Model: A reply to dutton and corvo |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359178907000341 |journal=Aggression and Violent Behavior |language=en |volume=12 |issue=6 |pages=644–657 |doi=10.1016/j.avb.2007.03.001 |issn=1359-1789|url-access=subscription }}

A 2003 longitudinal, four-year evaluation by E. W. Gondolf, covering four cities, shows clear deescalation of reassault and other abuse, with 80% of men reaching sustained non-violence.{{Cite journal |last=Gondolf |first=Edward W |date=2004-09-01 |title=Evaluating batterer counseling programs: A difficult task showing some effects and implications |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359178903000508 |journal=Aggression and Violent Behavior |language=en |volume=9 |issue=6 |pages=605–631 |doi=10.1016/j.avb.2003.06.001 |issn=1359-1789|url-access=subscription }} A 2005 study led by Larry Bennett, a professor of social work at the University of Illinois at Chicago and an expert on batterer intervention programs, found that of the 30 batterer intervention programs in Cook County, Illinois, 15 percent of batterers who completed the programs were rearrested for domestic violence, compared with 37 percent of those who dropped out of the programs. Bennett said the studies are largely meaningless because they lacked a proper control group. He added that participants who complete domestic violence programs are likely to be more motivated than others to improve behavior and would be less inclined to offend again.

A 2011 review of the effectiveness of batterers intervention programs (BIP), primarily the Duluth model, found that "there is no solid empirical evidence for either the effectiveness or relative superiority of any of the current group interventions," and that "the more rigorous the methodology of evaluation studies, the less encouraging their findings."{{cite web |url= http://fisafoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/BIPsEffectiveness.pdf|title=The Effectiveness of Batterer Intervention Programs |date= 2011|website=fisafoundation.org|access-date=2020-03-22}} That is, as BIPs in general, and Duluth model programs in particular are subject to increasingly rigorous review, their success rate approaches zero. A 2014 news report reported zero percent recidivism within five years for a batterers intervention program based on Nonviolent Communication, and contrasted this with a recidivism rate of 40 percent within five years for a batterers intervention program based on the Duluth model as reported by the Domestic Abuse Intervention Project.{{cite news|title=Batterers' intervention recidivism rates lowest known to date|url=http://www.mtdemocrat.com/news/batterers-intervention-recidivism-rates-lowest-known-to-date/|access-date=21 September 2017|newspaper=Mountain Democrat (Placerville, CA)|date=30 April 2014}}

Criticism of the Duluth Model has centered on the program's sexist insistence that men are perpetrators who are violent because they have been socialized in a patriarchy that condones male violence, and that women are victims who are violent only in self-defense.{{cite web|url=http://scholarship.law.umt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2027&context=mlr|title=Beyond Duluth: A Broad Spectrum of Treatment for a Broad Spectrum Domestic Violence|last=Rizza|first=Johnna|website=scholarship.law.umt.edu|access-date=2020-03-22|archive-date=29 June 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200629131815/https://scholarship.law.umt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2027&context=mlr|url-status=dead}} Some critics argue that "programs based on the Duluth Model may ignore research linking domestic violence to substance abuse and psychological problems, such as attachment disorders, traced to childhood abuse or neglect, or the absence of a history of adequate socialization and training."Fisher, Andy, Rick Goodwin and Mark Patton. 2009. [https://web.archive.org/web/20191214221023/https://www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/inquiries/cornwall/en/report/research_papers/Party_RP/4_Men_and_Healing-Dec_24_2008.pdf “Men & Healing: Theory, Research, and Practice in Working with Male Survivors of Childhood Sexual Abuse.”] The Men's Project, Funded by the Cornwall Public Inquiry

Others criticize the Duluth Model as being overly confrontational rather than therapeutic, focusing solely on changing the abuser's actions and attitudes rather than dealing with underlying emotional and psychological issues. Donald Dutton, a psychology professor at the University of British Columbia who has studied abusive personalities, states: "The Duluth Model was developed by people who didn't understand anything about therapy."{{cite web | last= Twohey | first = Megan | title = How Can Domestic Violence Be Stopped? | publisher = Chicago Tribune | url = http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-abusers-02-jan02,0,1147422.story?page=2 | date = 2 January 2009 | access-date = 28 January 2009}} Dutton also observes that "lesbian battering is more frequent than heterosexual battering".{{Cite journal|last=Dutton|first=Donald G.|date=February 1994|title=Patriarchy and Wife Assault: The Ecological Fallacy|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/15503361|journal=Violence and Victims|volume=9|issue=2|pages=167–182|doi=10.1891/0886-6708.9.2.167|issn=0886-6708|pmid=7696196|s2cid=35155731}} Philip W. Cook comments that in the case of homosexual domestic violence, the patriarchy is absent: there is no male dominance of women in same-sex relationships, and in fact female on female abuse is reported more than twice as frequently as male on male abuse.{{Cite book |last=Cook |first=Philip W. |date=2009 |title=Abused Men: The Hidden Side of Domestic Violence |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wpudCuNgNPcC&pg=PA36 |location=Santa Barbara, California |publisher=ABC-CLIO |pages=36–39 |isbn=9780313356186}} Furthermore, some critics argue that the model ignores the reality that women can be the perpetrators of domestic violence in heterosexual relationships. Its proponents counter that the Duluth model is effective and makes best use of scarce resources.Michael Paymar and Graham Barnes, "[http://www.bwjp.org/files/bwjp/files/Countering_Confusion_Duluth_Model.pdf Countering Confusion About the Duluth Model] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150319081107/http://www.bwjp.org/files/bwjp/files/Countering_Confusion_Duluth_Model.pdf |date=19 March 2015 }}", Battered Women’s Justice Project, Minneapolis, Minnesota Ellen Pence herself writes:

{{Blockquote|By determining that the need or desire for power was the motivating force behind battering, we created a conceptual framework that, in fact, did not fit the lived experience of many of the men and women we were working with. The DAIP staff ... remained undaunted by the difference in our theory and the actual experiences of those we were working with ... It was the cases themselves that created the chink in each of our theoretical suits of armor. Speaking for myself, I found that many of the men I interviewed did not seem to articulate a desire for power over their partner. Although I relentlessly took every opportunity to point out to men in the groups that they were so motivated and merely in denial, the fact that few men ever articulated such a desire went unnoticed by me and many of my coworkers. Eventually, we realized that we were finding what we had already predetermined to find.{{cite book|last=Pence|first=Ellen|chapter=Some Thoughts on Philosophy|title=Coordinating Community Responses to Domestic Violence: Lessons from Duluth and Beyond|chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/coordinatingcomm00mela|chapter-url-access=registration|location=Thousand Oaks, CA.|publisher=Sage|date=1999|pages=[https://archive.org/details/coordinatingcomm00mela/page/29 29–30]|editor1-first=Melanie|editor1-last=Shepherd|editor2-last=Pence|editor2-first=Ellen}}}}

The Duluth model is featured in the documentary Power and Control: Domestic Violence in America with commentary from its authors, as well as its main critics, such as Dutton.{{cite web|title=Power and Control Film|url=http://www.powerandcontrolfilm.com/|work=Power and Control: Domestic Violence in America|access-date=31 March 2011}}

• Abusive power and control
• Outline of domestic violence
• Rape shield law
• Relationship counseling
• Relationship education
• Violence Against Women Act

{{Reflist}}

• {{Cite book|author1=Ellen Pence|author2=Michael Paymar|title=Education Groups for Men Who Batter: The Duluth Model|year=1993|publisher=Springer Publishing Company|isbn=978-0-8261-7990-6}}
• {{Cite book|author=Donald G Dutton|title=Rethinking Domestic Violence|year=2006|publisher=UBC Press|isbn=978-0-7748-5987-5}}; [https://web.archive.org/web/20140803110524/http://www.cjsonline.ca/pdf/domesticviol.pdf review] by Walter S. DeKeseredy in Canadian Journal of Sociology Online November – December 2007
• [https://web.archive.org/web/20060902182807/http://www.lfcc.on.ca/muslim_wheel_of_domestic_violence.html Muslim Wheel of Domestic Violence]—A variation of the Duluth Power and Control Wheel

• [http://www.theduluthmodel.org/ Official Site]
• [http://www.powerandcontrolfilm.com/ Power and Control: Domestic Violence in America]—a documentary film and web site focusing on the Duluth Model. Founders Ellen Pence and Michael Paymar are interviewed in the film, with excerpts and transcripts on the web

http://www.theduluthmodel.org/training/wheels.html

{{DEFAULTSORT:Duluth Model}}

Category:Domestic violence-related organizations in the United States

Category:Duluth, Minnesota

Category:Feminism and society

Category:Non-profit organizations based in Minnesota

Category:Psychological abuse