Dun v. Lumbermen's Credit Ass'n

{{one source|date=April 2018}}

{{Use mdy dates|date=September 2023}}

{{Infobox SCOTUS case

|Litigants=Dun v. Lumbermen's Credit Ass'n

|ArgueDate=January 31

|ArgueYear=1908

|DecideDate=February 24

|DecideYear=1908

|FullName=Dun v. Lumbermen's Credit Association

|USVol=209

|USPage=20

|ParallelCitations=28 S. Ct. 335; 52 L. Ed. 663

|Prior=

|Subsequent=

|Holding=The existence of some copyright-infringing information in a rote reference work does not entitle the original author to seek an injunction against the printing the later article when the later article's contents demonstrate significant original work.

|Majority=Moody

|JoinMajority=a unanimous court

|LawsApplied=

}}

Dun v. Lumbermen's Credit Ass'n, 209 U.S. 20 (1908), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held the existence of some copyright-infringing information in a rote reference work does not entitle the original author to seek an injunction against the printing the later article when the later article's contents demonstrate significant original work.{{ussc|name=Dun v. Lumbermen's Credit Ass'n|volume=209|page=20|pin=|year=1908}}.