Dyson Airblade

Instead of using a wide jet of heated air, Dyson Airblade uses a thin layer of unheated air travelling at around {{convert|400|mph|m/s km/h|abbr=on}} as a squeegee to remove water, rather than using heat to evaporate the water.{{cite web | url = https://www.engadget.com/2006/10/03/dysons-airblade-dries-hands-with-400mph-blast-of-air/| title = Dyson's Airblade dries hands with 400MPH blast of air | date = 3 October 2006 | access-date = 5 January 2008}} The Dyson Airblade is claimed by its manufacturer to dry hands in 10 seconds and to use less electricity than conventional hand dryers.

The first commercially available high-speed, horizontal-wiping air dryer was the Mitsubishi Jet Towel, developed since 1991 and introduced in 1993.{{Cite web|title=Milestones - Jet Towel™ Hand Dryer Europe|url=http://www.jettowel-europe.com/technology/milestones|access-date=2021-11-28|website=www.jettowel-europe.com}} It has been available in the United States since 2005.{{cite web|author=Mitsubishi Jet Towel |url=http://www.fastlec.co.uk/blog/?p=19 |title=Mitsubishi Jet Towel |publisher=Fastlec |date=27 November 2009 |access-date=10 April 2011}} There are several technical differences among electric hand dryers, such as airspeed, water containment, energy efficiency, use of heat, type of filter, motor lifespan, and power usage.[https://gizmodo.com/299082/mitsubishi-jet-towel-vs-dyson-airblade-pre+game-trash-talk-and-tale-of-the-tape Mitsubishi Jet Towel vs. Dyson Airblade Pre-Game Trash Talk and Tale of the Tape]

The same technology is used by Dyson in the Air Multiplier fan to create a cooling air stream for personal comfort.

The Dyson Airblade is 69% more energy-efficient than conventional hand-dryers and 97% more cost effective than paper towels.{{Cite web|url=https://www.dysoncanada.ca/en-CA/hand-dryers/calculator/calcs.aspx|title=Dyson Calculations|website=dysoncanada.ca|language=en-CA|access-date=8 June 2018}} The Airblade is cheaper to operate because it does not require hot air which greatly increases electricity consumption. The Airblade is also cheaper to operate due to decreased drying times. The Airblade V can dry off hands in 12 seconds, versus 25 for a traditional hand dryer.{{Cite web|url=https://www.dysoncanada.ca/medialibrary/Commercial_V5/Downloads/ProductBrochure/V-quiet/84375_DYS_AB_CA_256A_RANGE-BROCHURE_REFRESH_CA-ENG_NOCROPS.pdf|title=Dyson Airblade V Product brochure|page=6}}

A comparative test found that both paper towels and the Airblade dried hands quickly, achieving around 90% dryness in about ten seconds, supporting Dyson's claim of approximately ten seconds of drying time. A conventional warm air dryer took about forty-seven seconds.

File:DysonAirblade.jpg

In the United States, Dyson worked with the NSF to become the only certified hand dryer under Protocol P335 for Hygienic Commercial Hand Dryers.{{cite web|url=http://www.nsf.org/Certified/Protocols/Listings.asp?Company=3E300&Standard=P335 |title=NSF PROTOCOL P335 Hygienic Commercial Hand Dryers |publisher=Nsf.org |date= |access-date=10 April 2011}}{{cite web |url=http://www.nsf.org/business/engineering_and_research/NSF_P335_Q&A.pdf |title=Questions & Answers about the new NSF Protocol P335' |access-date=10 April 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101126104827/http://nsf.org/business/engineering_and_research/NSF_P335_Q%26A.pdf |archive-date=26 November 2010 }} The Royal Society of Public Health has given the Dyson Airblade hand dryer its first hygiene accreditation.{{Cite web|url=https://www.rsph.org.uk/about-us/news/dyson-airblade-tm-hand-dryer-first-to-gain-new-hygiene-accreditation.html|title=Dyson Airblade TM hand dryer first to gain new hygiene accreditation|last=RSPH|website=rsph.org.uk|access-date=8 June 2018}}

A paper was presented at the 17th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Munich, Germany in 2007 by the University of Bradford and Dyson showing that for a set drying time of 10 seconds, the Airblade led to significantly less bacterial transfer than with the other driers (p < 0.05). When the latter were used for longer (30–35 s) the trend was for the Airblade to still perform better; however, these results did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05). In addition, the study showed that rubbing hands whilst using the driers counteracted the reduction in overall bacterial numbers at all anatomical sites.

{{citation

|last1=Snelling

|first1=AM

|last2=Saville

|first2=T

|last3=Stevens

|first3=DG

|last4=Beggs

|first4=CB

|title=Evaluation of a new ultra-rapid hand drier in relation to hand hygiene

|url=http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/eccmid17/abstract.asp?id=57508

|date=2 April 2007

|publisher=17th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases

|access-date=30 September 2014

|url-status=dead

|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141006072946/http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/eccmid17/abstract.asp?id=57508

|archive-date=6 October 2014

}}

Hygiene associated with the product has been questioned in research by the University of Westminster Trade Group, London and sponsored by the paper towel industry the European Tissue Symposium, which suggests that use increases the amount of bacteria on the fingertips by about 42%; paper towels reduced the number of bacteria by 50 to 75%, while warm air dryers increased bacteria by 194%. The report found that "the manufacturer’s claim that the tested JAD [Airblade] is 'the most hygienic hand dryer' is confirmed ... assuming that the term 'hand dryer' refers to electric devices only because its performance in terms of the numbers of all types of bacteria remaining on the hands of users compared to paper towels was significantly worse."[http://www.europeantissue.com/pdfs/090402-2008%20WUS%20Westminster%20University%20hygiene%20study,%20nov2008.pdf A comparative study of three different hand drying methods: paper towel, warm air dryer, jet air dryer’] by Keith Redway and Shameem Fawdar of the School of Biosciences, University of Westminster London

File:White Dyson Airblade, Ahrenshoop (DSC04789).jpg

File:Airblade Vs at McDonalds.jpg

File:Apple-Store-Marunouchi---2023-04_24.jpg

In early 2013, three new models of the Dyson Airblade were introduced: the Airblade Mk. 2, the Airblade V, and the Airblade Tap. The Mk. 2 uses a similar design as the original model, but has increased jet air speed from {{convert|400|-|430|mph|m/s km/h|abbr=on}}, and new soundproofing makes the new model quieter than the old one. The Airblade V is a hands-under hand dryer that complies with the Americans With Disabilities Act.

The Airblade Tap is a non-contact bathroom tap that both washes and dries hands. It eliminates the need to move to a separate area to dry hands, and therefore eliminates any water dripped on the floor.{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-21323365 |title=Dyson launches all-in-one hand-drying Airblade water tap |work=BBC News |date=4 February 2013 |access-date=26 April 2019}}{{cite web|title=Dyson Airblade Tap hand dryer|url=http://www.dysonairblade.co.uk/hand-dryers/airblade-tap/airblade-tap.aspx|website=Dyson airblade|access-date=28 March 2015}} All three hand dryers use a new Digital Slim Motor, the Dyson V4.

{{see also|Dyson (company)#Excel Dryer}}

On 5 December 2012, a lawsuit by competitor Excel Dryer was filed against Dyson, claiming that Dyson's advertising comparing the Airblade to the Excel Dryer Xlerator were deceptive.[http://www.docstoc.com/docs/137817219/xcelerator-v-dyson Case 3:12-cv-30211-MAP - Docstoc] Dyson's advertisements stated the Xlerator produces twice as much carbon dioxide, is worse for the environment, and costs more to operate than the Airblade. Excel Dryer charged that Dyson was falsifying its comparisons by submitting a 20-second dry time for the Xlerator to the Materials Systems Laboratory at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, rather than Excel Dryer's tested 12-second dry time, thus inflating energy consumption figures in the Airblade's favor.

In 2014, a paper was published in the Journal of Hospital Infection (2014;88:199-206), showing that high-speed hand dryers such as the Dyson Airblade can spread large numbers of a harmless test bacteria through the air in the vicinity. The Dyson company challenged the study with its own criticism of the methods and conclusions.{{cite news|last1=Melville|first1=Nancy A.|title=Hand Dryers Blow Bacteria Into Air, Spread Germs|url=http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/836223#vp_2|access-date=21 January 2017|work=medscape.com|publisher=WebMD LLC|date=9 December 2014}}

{{Reflist|30em}}

{{commons category}}

• {{Official website|http://www.dysonairblade.com}}
• [http://www.vimeo.com/9756431 Video illustrating the circular flow of air of a Dyson Airblade.]

Airblade

Category:Hygiene