Edward V

{{Short description|King of England in 1483}}

{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2022}}

{{Use British English|date=October 2012}}

{{Infobox royalty

| name = Edward V

| image = King-edward-v.jpg

| caption = Depiction of Edward as Prince of Wales in the Dictes and Sayings of the Philosophers, 1477

| succession = King of England

| moretext = (more...)

| reign = 9 April 1483 – 25 June 1483{{Cite book |last=Alison |first=Weir |title=Britain's Royal Family: the Complete Genealogy |year=2008 |isbn=978-0-0995-3973-5 |page=143 |publisher=Vintage Books |author-link=Alison Weir}}

| predecessor = Edward IV

| regent = {{Nowrap|Richard, Duke of Gloucester}}

| reg-type = {{Nowrap|Lord Protector}}

| successor = Richard III

| house = York

| father = Edward IV of England

| mother = Elizabeth Woodville

| module = {{Infobox person

| embed= yes

| birth_date = 2 November 1470

| birth_place = Westminster, London, England

| disappeared_date = {{Disappeared date and age|1483|7||1470|11|2|df=y}}

| disappeared_place = Tower of London, England

}}

}}

Edward V (2 November 1470 – {{Circa|mid-1483}}){{Cite book |last=Walker |first=R. F. |title=A New Dictionary of British History |date=1963 |publisher=St. Martin's Press |editor-last=Steinberg |editor-first=S. H. |edition=1963 |location=New York |page=286 |chapter=Princes in the Tower |oclc=398024 |ol=OL5886803M |editor-last2=Other |display-editors=1}} was King of England from 9 April to 25 June 1483. He succeeded his father, Edward IV, upon the latter's death. Edward V was never crowned, and his brief reign was dominated by the influence of his uncle and Lord Protector, the Duke of Gloucester, who deposed him to reign as King Richard III; this was confirmed by the Titulus Regius, an Act of Parliament which denounced any further claims through Edward IV's heirs by delegitimising Edward V and all of his siblings. This was later repealed by Henry VII, who subsequently married Elizabeth of York, Edward V's eldest sister.

Edward V and his younger brother, Richard of Shrewsbury, are known as the Princes in the Tower. They disappeared after being sent to heavily guarded royal lodgings in the Tower of London. Responsibility for their disappearance (and presumed deaths) is widely attributed to Richard III, who sent them to the Tower, but the lack of conclusive evidence and conflicting contemporary accounts allow for other possibilities.

Early life

Edward was born on 2 November 1470 at Cheyneygates, the medieval house of the Abbot of Westminster, adjoining Westminster Abbey. His mother, Elizabeth Woodville, had sought sanctuary there from Lancastrian supporters who had deposed his father, the Yorkist king Edward IV, during the course of the Wars of the Roses. Edward was created Prince of Wales in June 1471, following his father's restoration to the throne, and in 1473 was established at Ludlow Castle on the Welsh Marches as nominal president of a newly created Council of Wales and the Marches. In 1479, his father conferred the earldom of Pembroke on him; it became merged into the crown on his succession.{{Cite EB1911|wstitle=Pembroke, Earls of|volume=21|page=79}}

Prince Edward was placed under the supervision of the queen's brother Anthony Woodville, 2nd Earl Rivers, a noted scholar. In a letter to Rivers, Edward IV set down precise conditions for the upbringing of his son and the management of the prince's household.Letter from Edward IV to Earl Rivers and the Bishop of Rochester (1473), in [https://books.google.com/books?id=cks8AAAAIAAJ Readings in English Social History (Cambridge University Press, 1921)], pp. 205–8. He was to "arise every morning at a convenient hour, according to his age". His day would begin with matins and then Mass, which he was to receive uninterrupted. After breakfast, the business of educating the prince began with "virtuous learning". Dinner was served from ten in the morning, and then he was to be read "noble stories ... of virtue, honour, cunning, wisdom, and of deeds of worship" but "of nothing that should move or stir him to vice". Perhaps aware of his own vices, the king was keen to safeguard his son's morals, and instructed Rivers to ensure that no one in the prince's household was a habitual "swearer, brawler, backbiter, common hazarder, adulterer, [or user of] words of ribaldry". After further study, in the afternoon the prince was to engage in sporting activities suitable for his class, before evensong. Supper was served from four, and curtains were to be drawn at eight. Following this, the prince's attendants were to "enforce themselves to make him merry and joyous towards his bed". They would then watch over him as he slept.

Dominic Mancini reported of the young Edward V:

{{Blockquote|In word and deed he gave so many proofs of his liberal education, of polite nay rather scholarly, attainments far beyond his age; ... his special knowledge of literature ... enabled him to discourse elegantly, to understand fully, and to declaim most excellently from any work whether in verse or prose that came into his hands, unless it were from the more abstruse authors. He had such dignity in his whole person, and in his face such charm, that however much they might gaze, he never wearied the eyes of beholders.Dominic Mancini, The Usurpation of Richard III (1483), in [https://books.google.com/books?id=jRsLUVOCqbkC A. R. Myers (ed.), English Historical Documents 1327–1485 (Routledge, 1996)], pp. 330–3.}}

As with several of his other children, Edward IV planned a prestigious European marriage for his eldest son, and in 1480 concluded an alliance with Francis II, Duke of Brittany, whereby Prince Edward was betrothed to the duke's four-year-old daughter and heiress to the duchy, Anne. The two were to be married upon their majority, with their eldest son inheriting England and their second son Brittany.

Reign

File:King Edward V from NPG.jpg

It was at Ludlow that the 12-year-old Edward received the news, on Monday 14 April 1483, of his father's sudden death five days before. Edward IV's will, which has not survived, nominated his trusted brother Richard, Duke of Gloucester, as Protector during the minority of his son. The new king left Ludlow on 24 April, with Richard leaving York a day earlier, planning to meet at Northampton and travel to London together. However, when Richard reached Northampton, Edward and his party had already travelled onward to Stony Stratford, Buckinghamshire.[http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=62618 'Parishes : Stony Stratford'], Victoria History of the Counties of England, A History of the County of Buckingham: Volume 4 (1927), pp. 476–482. Retrieved 16 January 2012. The Earl Rivers travelled back to Northampton to meet Richard and Buckingham, who had now arrived. On the night of 29 April Richard dined with Rivers and Edward's half-brother, Richard Grey, but the following morning Rivers, Grey and the king's chamberlain, Thomas Vaughan, were arrested and sent north.{{Cite web |title=History of Croyland Abbey, Third Continuation |url=http://www.r3.org/bookcase/croyland/croy7.html |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120728102136/http://www.r3.org/bookcase/croyland/croy7.html |archive-date=28 July 2012 |access-date=17 August 2012 |publisher=R3.org}} Despite Richard's assurances, all three were subsequently executed. Dominic Mancini, an Italian who visited England in the 1480s, reports that Edward protested, but the remainder of his entourage was dismissed and Richard escorted him to London. On 19 May 1483, the new king took up residence in the Tower of London; on 16 June, his younger brother Richard of Shrewsbury, Duke of York joined him there.

The Privy Council had at first hoped for a speedy coronation, to avoid the need for a protectorate. This had previously happened with Richard II, who had become king at the age of ten. Another precedent was Henry VI, whose protectorate (which started when he inherited the crown aged 9 months) had ended with his coronation aged seven. Richard, however, repeatedly postponed the coronation.{{Sfnp|Pollard|1991}}

On 22 June, Ralph Shaa preached a sermon declaring that Edward IV had already been contracted to marry Lady Eleanor Butler when he married Elizabeth Woodville, thereby rendering his marriage to Elizabeth invalid and their children together illegitimate.{{Sfnp|Pollard|1991}} The children of Richard's older brother George, Duke of Clarence, were barred from the throne by their father's attainder, and therefore, on 25 June, an assembly of Lords and Commons declared Richard to be the lawful king. This was later confirmed by the act of parliament, Titulus Regius. The following day he acceded to the throne as King Richard III.

Disappearance

{{Main|Princes in the Tower}}

File:DelarocheKingEdward.jpg. The theme of innocent children awaiting an uncertain fate was a popular one amongst 19th-century painters. Louvre, Paris]]

Dominic Mancini recorded that after Richard III seized the throne, Edward and his brother Richard were taken into the "inner apartments of the Tower" and then were seen less and less until the end of the summer to the autumn of 1483, when they disappeared from public view altogether. During this period Mancini records that Edward was regularly visited by a doctor, who reported that Edward, "like a victim prepared for sacrifice, sought remission of his sins by daily confession and penance, because he believed that death was facing him.""The Usurpation of Richard the Third", Dominicus Mancinus ad Angelum Catonem de occupatione regni Anglie per Riccardum Tercium libellus; Translated to English by C. A. J. Armstrong (London, 1936) The Latin reference to {{Lang|la|Argentinus medicus}} had previously been translated as "a doctor from Strasbourg", because the Latin name for the city of Strasbourg, {{Lang|la|Argentoratum}}, was still current at the time; however, D. E. Rhodes suggests it may actually refer to "Doctor Argentine", whom Rhodes identifies as John Argentine, an English physician who would later serve as provost of King's College, Cambridge, and as doctor to Arthur, Prince of Wales, eldest son of King Henry VII of England (Henry Tudor).{{Cite journal |last=Rhodes |first=D. E. |date=April 1962 |title=The Princes in the Tower and Their Doctor |journal=The English Historical Review |publisher=Oxford University Press |volume=77 |issue=303 |pages=304–306 |doi=10.1093/ehr/lxxvii.ccciii.304}}

The princes' fate after their disappearance remains unknown, but the most widely accepted theory is that they were murdered on the orders of their uncle, King Richard.Horrox, Rosemary. "[http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/8521 Edward V of England]". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford University Press. Retrieved 25 August 2013. {{Subscription required}} Thomas More (1478-1535) wrote that they were smothered to death with their pillows, and his account forms the basis of William Shakespeare's play Richard III, in which Tyrrell murders the princes on Richard's orders. In the absence of hard evidence a number of other theories have been put forward, of which the most widely discussed are that they were murdered on the orders of Henry Stafford, 2nd Duke of Buckingham, or by Henry Tudor. However, A. J. Pollard points out that these theories are less plausible than the straightforward one that they were murdered by their uncle{{Sfnp|Pollard|1991|pp=124, 132}} who in any case controlled access to them and was therefore regarded as responsible for their welfare.{{Sfnp|Pollard|1991|p=137}} In the period before the boys' disappearance, Edward was regularly being visited by a doctor; historian David Baldwin extrapolates that contemporaries may have believed Edward had died of an illness (or as the result of attempts to cure him).David Baldwin, [https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/0/23574430 What happened to the Princes in the Tower?], BBC History: 2013 An alternative theory is that Perkin Warbeck, a pretender to the throne, was indeed Richard, Duke of York, as he claimed, having escaped to Flanders after his uncle's defeat at Bosworth to be raised by his aunt, Margaret, Duchess of Burgundy.

In 1486 Edward IV's daughter Elizabeth, sister of Edward V, married Henry VII, thereby uniting the Houses of York and Lancaster. In 1516, Dame Margaret Capel bequeathed a chain that had belonged to Edward V to her son Giles Capel.Susan E. James, Women's Voices in Tudor Wills, 1485–1603: Authority, Influence and Material (Ashgate, 2015), p. 88. This is one of the few known references to the personal possessions of the Princes in the Tower.Tim Thornton, "Sir William Capell and A Royal Chain: The Afterlives (and Death) of King Edward V", History: The Journal of the Historical Association, 109:308 (2024), pp. 445–480. {{doi|10.1111/1468-229X.13430}}

In 2021, researchers from "The Missing Princes Project"{{Cite web |title=Philippa Langley |url=https://revealingrichardiii.com/langley.html |access-date=2023-11-28 |website=revealingrichardiii.com}} claimed to have found evidence that Edward may have lived out his days in the rural Devon village of Coldridge. They linked the 13-year-old prince with a man named John Evans, who arrived in the village around 1484, and was immediately given an official position and the title of Lord of the Manor.{{Cite web |last=Smith |first=Louie |date=2021-12-29 |title=Extraordinary discovery shows Richard III 'didn't murder Princes in tower' |url=https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/richard-iii-didnt-murder-princes-25809860 |access-date=2023-11-28 |website=The Mirror |language=en}} Researcher John Dike noted Yorkist symbols and stained glass windows depicting Edward V in a Coldridge chapel commissioned by Evans and built around 1511, unusual for the location.{{Cite news |last=Gardner |first=Bill |date=2021-12-28 |title=Exclusive: Richard III may not have killed young princes in the Tower of London, researchers say |language=en-GB |work=The Telegraph |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/12/28/richard-iii-may-not-have-killed-young-princes-tower-london-new/ |access-date=2023-11-28 |issn=0307-1235}}

Bones belonging to two children were discovered in 1674 by workmen rebuilding a stairway in the Tower. On the orders of King Charles II, these were subsequently placed in Westminster Abbey, in an urn bearing the names of Edward and Richard.Steane, John, The Archaeology of the Medieval English Monarchy (Routledge, 1993), p. 65 The bones were re-examined in 1933, at which time it was discovered the skeletons were incomplete and had been interred with animal bones. It has never been proven that the bones belonged to the princes, and it is possible that they were buried before the reconstruction of that part of the Tower of London.{{Sfnp|Weir|1992}} Permission for a subsequent examination has been refused.

In 1789, workmen carrying out repairs in St George's Chapel, Windsor Castle, rediscovered and accidentally broke into the vault of Edward IV and Elizabeth Woodville. Adjoining this was another vault, which was found to contain the coffins of two children. This tomb was inscribed with the names of two of Edward IV's children who had predeceased him: George, Duke of Bedford, and Mary. However, the remains of these two children were later found elsewhere in the chapel, leaving the occupants of the children's coffins within the tomb unknown.1. Chapter Records XXIII to XXVI, The Chapter Library, St. George's Chapel, Windsor (Permission required) 2. William St. John Hope, Windsor Castle: An Architectural History, pages 418–419. (1913). 3. Vetusta Monumenta, Volume III, page 4 (1789).

=Missing Princes Project=

In 2022, Philippa Langley led "The Missing Princes Project" to discover the fate of the Princes in the Tower.{{cite web | newspaper=The Daily Telegraph | url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/12/29/historys-greatest-whodunnit-would-ruined-solved/ |first=Daisy |last=Dunne |date=29 December 2021 | accessdate=23 January 2023 | title=History's greatest whodunnit would be ruined if we solved it, Philippa Langley team findings |quote=A team led by Philippa Langley, who found the skeleton of King Richard III under a car park in 2012, have uncovered what they believe to be clues to the survival of Edward V in the Devon village of Coldridge....}}{{cite web | website=The Past | url=https://the-past.com/comment/what-really-happened-to-the-princes-in-the-tower/ |title=From the Princes in the Tower to Northumbria's Golden Age | first=Chris | last=Catling | date=22 November 2022 | accessdate=20 January 2023}}{{cite web|url=https://www.revealingrichardiii.com/langley.html |title=Missing Princes Project |accessdate=20 January 2023|publisher=Philippa Langley|date=2021}} The project began in 2015, following the reburial of Richard III in Leicester and was formally launched in July the following year.{{cite book |last=Langley |first=Philippa |year=2023 |title=The Princes in the Tower: Solving History's Greatest Cold Case |location=Cheltenham |publisher=The History Press |isbn=9781803995410 |page=26 }} In 2023 she claimed to have discovered new evidence that disproved the theory that Richard III was responsible for the deaths of the princes. Along with Rob Rinder, she hosted a Channel 4 programme called Princes in the Tower: The New Evidence, in which she revealed her own theories and new archival discoveries.{{cite web|url=https://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/news/leicester-news/historian-says-richard-iii-not-8914515|title=Historian says Richard III did not kill Princes in the Tower in 'landmark' Channel 4 show|date=17 November 2023|author=Lee Garrett|website=Leicester Mercury|access-date=24 November 2023}}The Princes in the Tower: The New Evidence Channel 4 Saturday 18 November. Retrieved 20 May 2024. https://www.channel4.com/programmes/the-princes-in-the-tower-the-new-evidence The Princes in the Tower PBS 22 November 2023. Retrieved 20 May 2024. https://www.pbs.org/wnet/secrets/preview-the-princes-in-the-tower-ybnnnv/7943/ Although praising Langley's discoveries, The Spectator's reviewer called the programme "a calculated insult to the viewer";{{cite web|url=https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/a-calculated-insult-to-the-viewer-channel-4s-the-princes-in-the-tower-the-new-evidence-reviewed/|title=A calculated insult to the viewer: Channel 4's The Princes in the Tower – The New Evidence reviewed|author=James Delingpole|website=The Spectator|date=22 November 2023 |access-date=24 November 2023}} The Times called it "compelling" and awarded the documentary its "Critics Choice."The Times, Review, Saturday 18 November 2023, p.20. Image only, see: [WIKI LANGLEY PRINCES DOC_ THETIMES CRITICS CHOICE_18 NOV 2023.jpg] The programme achieved a large audience{{Cite web |title=The Princes in the Tower: The New Evidence |url=https://www.brinkworth.tv/shows/the-princes-in-the-tower-the-new-evidence/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240420170709/https://www.brinkworth.tv/shows/the-princes-in-the-tower-the-new-evidence/ |archive-date=20 April 2024 |access-date=20 May 2024 |website=Brinkworth Productions}} with Richard III and the Princes in the Tower trending on Twitter / X. The Richard III Society issued a press release stating:

{{blockquote|The disappearance of the princes has always been described as a great unsolved mystery. Why? Because there was no evidence of their fate. Their murder was never more than conjecture, but it was put about by the authorities and – for safety’s sake – only the brave dared to think differently. From now on, history must take account of this new breakthrough evidence. No longer can anyone confidently claim the princes were killed by Richard III.{{cite press release |author= |title=Princes in the Tower – History is Being Rewritten |publisher=Richard III Society |date=16 November 2023 |url=https://r3.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/231116_Richard_III_Society_Prince_in_the_Tower_Press_Release-1.pdf |access-date=28 July 2024 }}}}

Three leading members of the Dutch Research Group who had assisted in the project subsequently distanced themselves from Langley's documentary and book, arguing that the documents they had discovered "are in our own opinion open to various interpretations and do not constitute irrefutable proof" for the survival of the princes.{{cite magazine |first1=Zoë |last1=Maula |first2=Jean |last2=Roefstra |first3=William |last3=Wiss |title=Dutch statement on The Missing Princes Project |magazine=The Ricardian Bulletin |date=June 2024 |page=4 }} Langley responded that her conclusions were based on "the totality of evidence thus assembled and the outcomes of a modern police missing person investigation methodology ... (and not through a traditional historical research method)".{{cite magazine |first=Philippa |last=Langley |title=A reply from Philippa Langley |magazine=The Ricardian Bulletin |date=June 2024 |page=4 }} Historian Michael Hicks said that the new documents "do add to knowledge of the Tudor impostors, but they fall short of proof that either Edward V or Richard Duke of York survived beyond their disappearance in the autumn of 1483".{{cite magazine |first=Michael |last=Hicks |author-link=Michael Hicks (historian) |title=More proof needed on Princes |magazine=The Ricardian Bulletin |date=June 2024 |pages=4–5 }}{{cite journal |first=Michael |last=Hicks |author-link=Michael Hicks (historian) |title=Historic doubts about the survival of the Princes in the Tower after 1485 |journal=Historical Research |volume=97 |issue=277 |year=2024 |pages=437–442 |doi=10.1093/hisres/htae009 }}

Epitaph

File:Grab Edward V.jpg, in Westminster Abbey]]

As outlined above, on the orders of Charles II, the presumed bones of Edward V and his brother Richard were interred in Westminster Abbey; Edward was thus buried in the place of his birth. The white marble sarcophagus was designed by Sir Christopher Wren and made by Joshua Marshall. The sarcophagus can be found in the north aisle of the Henry VII Chapel, near Elizabeth I's tomb.Edward V & Richard Duke of York https://www.westminster-abbey.org/abbey-commemorations/royals/edward-v-richard-duke-of-york

The Latin inscription on the urn can be translated as follows:

{{Blockquote|Here lie the relics of Edward V, King of England, and Richard, Duke of York. These brothers being confined in the Tower of London, and there stifled with pillows, were privately and meanly buried, by the order of their perfidious uncle Richard the Usurper; their bones, long enquired after and wished for, after 191 years in the rubbish of the stairs (those lately leading to the Chapel of the White Tower) were on the 17th day of July AD 1674 by undoubted proofs discovered, being buried deep in that place. Charles II, a most compassionate king, pitying their severe fate, ordered these unhappy princes to be laid amongst the monuments of their predecessors, AD 1678, in the 30th year of his reign.westminster-abbey.org}}

The original Latin text is as follows (original all in capitals):Google Images

{{Blockquote|{{Lang|la|H.S S Reliquiæ Edwardi Vti Regis Angliæ et Richardi Ducis Eboracensis

Hos, fratres germanos, Turre Londinˢⁱ conclusos iniectisq[ue] culcitris suffocatos, abdite et inhoneste tumulari iussit patruus Richardus perfidus Regni prædo. Ossa desideratorum, diu et multum quæsita, post annos CXC&I~ scalarum in ruderibus (scalæ istæ ad Sacellum Turris Albæ nuper ducebant) alte defossa, indiciis certissimis sunt reperta XVII die Iulii Aº Dⁿⁱ MDCLXXIIII

Carolus II Rex clementissimus acerbam sortem miseratus inter avita monumenta principibus infelicissimis iusta persolvit. anno domⁱ 1678 annoq[ue] regni sui 30}}}}

Genealogy

{{Ahnentafel

|align=center

|collapsed=yes

|boxstyle_1=background-color: #fcc;

|boxstyle_2=background-color: #fb9;

|boxstyle_3=background-color: #ffc;

|boxstyle_4=background-color: #bfc;

|1=1. Edward V of England

|2=2. Edward IV of England

|3=3. Elizabeth Woodville

|4=4. Richard of York, 3rd Duke of York{{Cite book |last=Penn |first=Thomas |title=The Brothers York |date=2019 |publisher=Allen Lane |isbn=978-1-84614-690-9 |page=8}}

|5=5. Cecily Neville

|6=6. Richard Woodville, 1st Earl Rivers{{cite book |last=Baldwin |first=David |title=Elizabeth Woodville: mother of the princes in the tower |publisher=Sutton Pub |location=Stroud, Gloucestershire |year=2002 |isbn=978-0-7509-2774-1 }}

|7=7. Jacquetta of Luxembourg

|8=8. Richard of Conisburgh, 3rd Earl of Cambridge{{Cite book |last=Richardson |first=Douglas |year=2011 |title=Magna Carta Ancestry |volume=IV |edition=2nd |editor=Kimball G. Everingham |place=Salt Lake City |isbn=978-1-4609-9270-8 |author-link=Douglas Richardson |pages=403–11}}

|9=9. Anne Mortimer

|10=10. Ralph Neville, 1st Earl of Westmorland{{Cite book |last=Richardson |first=Douglas |year=2011 |title=Magna Carta Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families |editor-first=Kimball G. |editor-last=Everingham |location=Salt Lake City |edition=2nd |volume=III |isbn=978-1-4499-6639-3 |page=246}}

|11=11. Joan Beaufort

|12=12. Richard Woodville{{Citation |url=https://dcms.lds.org/delivery/DeliveryManagerServlet?dps_pid=IE3729993 |access-date=10 December 2024 |pages=16–19 |article=Rivers |title=The Complete Peerage |editor=Geoffrey H. White |volume=XI |publisher=The St Catherine Press |location=London |year=1949}}

|13=13. Joan Bittlesgate

|14=14. Peter I, Count of Saint-Pol

|15=15. Margaret of Baux

}}

{{Wars of the Roses family tree}}

Portrayals in fiction

Edward appears as a character in the play Richard III by William Shakespeare. Edward appears alive in only one scene of the play (Act 3 Scene 1), during which he and his brother are portrayed as bright, precocious children who see through their uncle's ambitions. Edward in particular is portrayed as wiser than his years (something his uncle notes) and ambitious about his kingship. Edward and his brother's deaths are described in the play, but occur offstage. Their ghosts return in one more scene (Act 5 Scene 3) to haunt their uncle's dreams and promise success to his rival, Richmond (i.e. King Henry VII). In film and television adaptations of this play, Edward V has been portrayed by the following actors:

Edward V is also featured as a mute role in another of Shakespeare's plays, Henry VI, Part 3, where he appears as a newborn baby in the final scene. His father Edward IV addresses his own brothers thus: "Clarence, and Gloster,{{sic}} love my lovely queen, And kiss your princely nephew, brothers both." Gloster, the future Richard III, is at the close of this play already encompassing his nephew's demise, as he mutters in an aside, "To say the truth, so Judas kiss'd his master, And cried – All hail! when as he meant – all harm."Henry VI, Part 3, Act 5, Scene VII, Lines 26–27, 33–34.

Edward appears in The White Queen, a 2009 historical novel by Philippa Gregory and in the subsequent 2013 TV miniseries The White Queen; in the latter, he is played by Sonny Ashbourne Serkis.{{Cite web |date=29 June 2009 |title=The White Queen |url=http://www.publishersweekly.com/9781416563686 |access-date=8 October 2014 |website=Publishers Weekly}}{{Cite web |title=The White Queen Cast |url=https://www.tvgeek.com/title/the-white-queen/cast |access-date=2022-06-07 |publisher=tvgeek}}

Heraldry

As heir apparent, Edward bore the royal arms (quarterly France and England) differenced by a label of three points argent. During his brief reign, he used the royal arms undifferenced, supported by a lion and a hart as had his father.{{Cite book |last=Charles Boutell |title=Heraldry, Historical and Popular, Volume 1 |date=1864}} His livery badges were the traditional Yorkist symbols of the fetterlocked falcon and the rose argent.{{Cite book |first1=John |last1=Burke |first2=Bernard |last2=Burke |title=A General Armory of England, Scotland, and Ireland |date=1842}}

File:Arms_of_the_Prince_of_Wales_(Modern).svg|Coat of arms as heir apparent (1471–1483)

File:Coat_of_Arms_of_Edward_V_of_England_(1483).svg|Coat of arms as King Edward V (1483)

File:Falcon_and_Fetterlock_Badge_of_Edward_IV.svg|Falcon and fetterlock

File:White_Rose_Badge_of_York.svg|White rose of York

See also

Sources

= References =

{{Reflist}}

= Works cited =

  • {{Cite book |last=Pollard |first=A. J. |title=Richard III and the Princes in the Tower |publisher=Alan Sutton Publishing |year=1991 |isbn=0-8629-9660-0 |author-link=A. J. Pollard}}
  • {{Cite book |last=Weir |first=Alison |title=The Princes in the Tower |date=1992 |publisher=The Bodley Head |isbn=0-3703-1792-0 |author-link=Alison Weir}}

Further reading

  • {{Cite book |last=Ashley |first=Mike |title=British Kings & Queens |date=2002 |publisher=Carroll & Graf |isbn=0-7867-1104-3 |pages=[https://archive.org/details/briefhistoryofbr0000ashl_f1a2/page/217 217]–219 |ol=8141172M}}
  • {{Cite book |last=Hicks |first=Michael |title=Edward V: The Prince in the Tower |date=2003 |publisher=The History Press |isbn=0-7524-1996-X |author-link=Michael Hicks (historian)}}
  • {{Cite book |last=Kendall |first=Paul Murray |title=Richard III |date=1955 |publisher=W. W. Norton & Co. |isbn=0-3930-0785-5 |ol=7450809M}}
  • Daily Telegraph, 28 December 2021, page 3. "Richard III may not have killed young princes in the Tower of London, researchers say".