Elementary charge

{{see also|2019 revision of the SI}}

{{Infobox unit

| bgcolour =

| name = Elementary charge

| image =

| caption =

| standard = Atomic units

| quantity = electric charge

| symbol = e

| namedafter =

| units1 = coulombs

| inunits1 = {{physconst|e|unit=no}}

| units2 = $\backslash sqrt\{\backslash varepsilon\_0\backslash hbar\; c\}${{br}}(natural units)

| inunits2 = 0.30282212088

| units3 = statC

| inunits3 = ≘ {{val|4.80320425|(10)|e=-10}}

}}

In some natural unit systems, such as the system of atomic units, e functions as the unit of electric charge. The use of elementary charge as a unit was promoted by George Johnstone Stoney in 1874 for the first system of natural units, called Stoney units.

{{cite journal

|author=G. J. Stoney

|year=1894

|title=Of the "Electron," or Atom of Electricity

|url=http://www.chemteam.info/Chem-History/Stoney-1894.html

|journal=Philosophical Magazine

|series=5 |volume=38 |pages=418–420

|doi=10.1080/14786449408620653

}} Later, he proposed the name electron for this unit. At the time, the particle we now call the electron was not yet discovered and the difference between the particle electron and the unit of charge electron was still blurred. Later, the name electron was assigned to the particle and the unit of charge e lost its name. However, the unit of energy electronvolt (eV) is a remnant of the fact that the elementary charge was once called electron.

In other natural unit systems, the unit of charge is defined as $\backslash sqrt\{\backslash varepsilon\_0\backslash hbar\; c\},$ with the result that

$$e\; =\; \backslash sqrt\{4\backslash pi\backslash alpha\}\backslash sqrt\{\backslash varepsilon\_0\; \backslash hbar\; c\}\; \backslash approx\; 0.30282212088\; \backslash sqrt\{\backslash varepsilon\_0\; \backslash hbar\; c\},$$

where {{mvar|α}} is the fine-structure constant, {{mvar|c}} is the speed of light, {{math|ε₀}} is the electric constant, and {{mvar|ħ}} is the reduced Planck constant.

{{See also|Partial charge}}

Charge quantization is the principle that the charge of any object is an integer multiple of the elementary charge. Thus, an object's charge can be exactly 0 e, or exactly 1 e, −1 e, 2 e, etc., but not {{sfrac|1|2}} e, or −3.8 e, etc. (There may be exceptions to this statement, depending on how "object" is defined; see below.)

This is the reason for the terminology "elementary charge": it is meant to imply that it is an indivisible unit of charge.

There are two known sorts of exceptions to the indivisibility of the elementary charge: quarks and quasiparticles.

• Quarks, first posited in the 1960s, have quantized charge, but the charge is quantized into multiples of {{nowrap|{{sfrac|1|3}} e}}. However, quarks cannot be isolated; they exist only in groupings, and stable groupings of quarks (such as a proton, which consists of three quarks) all have charges that are integer multiples of e. For this reason, either 1 e or {{nowrap|{{sfrac|1|3}} e}} can be justifiably considered to be "the quantum of charge", depending on the context. This charge commensurability, "charge quantization", has partially motivated grand unified theories.
• Quasiparticles are not particles as such, but rather an emergent entity in a complex material system that behaves like a particle. In 1982 Robert Laughlin explained the fractional quantum Hall effect by postulating the existence of fractionally charged quasiparticles. This theory is now widely accepted, but this is not considered to be a violation of the principle of charge quantization, since quasiparticles are not elementary particles.

All known elementary particles, including quarks, have charges that are integer multiples of {{sfrac|1|3}} e. Therefore, the "quantum of charge" is {{sfrac|1|3}} e. In this case, one says that the "elementary charge" is three times as large as the "quantum of charge".

On the other hand, all isolatable particles have charges that are integer multiples of e. (Quarks cannot be isolated: they exist only in collective states like protons that have total charges that are integer multiples of e.) Therefore, the "quantum of charge" is e, with the proviso that quarks are not to be included. In this case, "elementary charge" would be synonymous with the "quantum of charge".

In fact, both terminologies are used.Q is for Quantum, by John R. Gribbin, Mary Gribbin, Jonathan Gribbin, page 296, [https://books.google.com/books?id=zBsDkgI1uQsC&pg=RA1-PA296 Web link] For this reason, phrases like "the quantum of charge" or "the indivisible unit of charge" can be ambiguous unless further specification is given. On the other hand, the term "elementary charge" is unambiguous: it refers to a quantity of charge equal to that of a proton.

Paul Dirac argued in 1931 that if magnetic monopoles exist, then electric charge must be quantized; however, it is unknown whether magnetic monopoles actually exist.{{cite journal|doi=10.1146/annurev.ns.34.120184.002333|doi-access=free|title=Magnetic Monopoles|year=1984|last1=Preskill|first1=J.|journal=Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science|volume=34|issue=1|pages=461–530|bibcode=1984ARNPS..34..461P}}{{cite news |title=Three Surprising Facts About the Physics of Magnets |url=https://www.space.com/42685-physics-of-magnets-surprising-facts.html |access-date=17 July 2019 |work=Space.com |date=2018 |language=en}} It is currently unknown why isolatable particles are restricted to integer charges; much of the string theory landscape appears to admit fractional charges.{{cite journal |last1=Schellekens |first1=A. N. |title=Life at the interface of particle physics and string theory |journal=Reviews of Modern Physics |date=2 October 2013 |volume=85 |issue=4 |pages=1491–1540 |doi=10.1103/RevModPhys.85.1491|arxiv=1306.5083 |bibcode=2013RvMP...85.1491S |s2cid=118418446 }}{{cite journal |last1=Perl |first1=Martin L. |last2=Lee |first2=Eric R. |last3=Loomba |first3=Dinesh |title=Searches for Fractionally Charged Particles |journal=Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science |date=November 2009 |volume=59 |issue=1 |pages=47–65 |doi=10.1146/annurev-nucl-121908-122035| doi-access=free|bibcode=2009ARNPS..59...47P }}

{{see also|Anomaly (physics)#Anomaly cancellation}}

The elementary charge is exactly defined since 20 May 2019 by the International System of Units. Prior to this change, the elementary charge was a measured quantity whose magnitude was determined experimentally. This section summarizes these historical experimental measurements.

If the Avogadro constant N_A and the Faraday constant F are independently known, the value of the elementary charge can be deduced using the formula

$$e\; =\; \backslash frac\{F\}\{N\_\backslash text\{A\}\}.$$

(In other words, the charge of one mole of electrons, divided by the number of electrons in a mole, equals the charge of a single electron.)

This method is not how the most accurate values are measured today. Nevertheless, it is a legitimate and still quite accurate method, and experimental methodologies are described below.

The value of the Avogadro constant N_A was first approximated by Johann Josef Loschmidt who, in 1865, estimated the average diameter of the molecules in air by a method that is equivalent to calculating the number of particles in a given volume of gas.{{cite journal | first = J. | last = Loschmidt | author-link = Johann Josef Loschmidt | title = Zur Grösse der Luftmoleküle | journal = Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften Wien | volume = 52 | issue = 2 | pages = 395–413 | year =1865}} [http://dbhs.wvusd.k12.ca.us/webdocs/Chem-History/Loschmidt-1865.html English translation] {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060207130125/http://dbhs.wvusd.k12.ca.us/webdocs/Chem-History/Loschmidt-1865.html |date=February 7, 2006 }}. Today the value of N_A can be measured at very high accuracy by taking an extremely pure crystal (often silicon), measuring how far apart the atoms are spaced using X-ray diffraction or another method, and accurately measuring the density of the crystal. From this information, one can deduce the mass (m) of a single atom; and since the molar mass (M) is known, the number of atoms in a mole can be calculated: {{nowrap|1=N_A = M/m}}.

The value of F can be measured directly using Faraday's laws of electrolysis. Faraday's laws of electrolysis are quantitative relationships based on the electrochemical researches published by Michael Faraday in 1834.{{cite journal | author = Ehl, Rosemary Gene |author2=Ihde, Aaron |author-link2=Aaron J. Ihde |title = Faraday's Electrochemical Laws and the Determination of Equivalent Weights | journal = Journal of Chemical Education | year = 1954 | volume = 31 | issue = May | pages = 226–232 | doi = 10.1021/ed031p226 |bibcode = 1954JChEd..31..226E }} In an electrolysis experiment, there is a one-to-one correspondence between the electrons passing through the anode-to-cathode wire and the ions that plate onto or off of the anode or cathode. Measuring the mass change of the anode or cathode, and the total charge passing through the wire (which can be measured as the time-integral of electric current), and also taking into account the molar mass of the ions, one can deduce F.{{physconst|e|ref=only}}

The limit to the precision of the method is the measurement of F: the best experimental value has a relative uncertainty of 1.6 ppm, about thirty times higher than other modern methods of measuring or calculating the elementary charge.{{cite journal |author-first1=Peter J. |author-last1=Mohr |author-first2=Barry N. |author-last2=Taylor |title=CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 1998 |journal=Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data |volume=28 |issue=6 |pages=1713–1852 |bibcode=1999JPCRD..28.1713M |doi=10.1063/1.556049 |year=1999 |url=https://www.nist.gov/pml/div684/fcdc/upload/rmp1998-2.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171001122752/https://www.nist.gov/sites/default/files/documents/pml/div684/fcdc/rmp1998-2.pdf|archive-date=2017-10-01}}

{{main|Oil-drop experiment}}

A famous method for measuring e is Millikan's oil-drop experiment. A small drop of oil in an electric field would move at a rate that balanced the forces of gravity, viscosity (of traveling through the air), and electric force. The forces due to gravity and viscosity could be calculated based on the size and velocity of the oil drop, so electric force could be deduced. Since electric force, in turn, is the product of the electric charge and the known electric field, the electric charge of the oil drop could be accurately computed. By measuring the charges of many different oil drops, it can be seen that the charges are all integer multiples of a single small charge, namely e.

The necessity of measuring the size of the oil droplets can be eliminated by using tiny plastic spheres of a uniform size. The force due to viscosity can be eliminated by adjusting the strength of the electric field so that the sphere hovers motionless.

{{main|Shot noise}}

Any electric current will be associated with noise from a variety of sources, one of which is shot noise. Shot noise exists because a current is not a smooth continual flow; instead, a current is made up of discrete electrons that pass by one at a time. By carefully analyzing the noise of a current, the charge of an electron can be calculated. This method, first proposed by Walter H. Schottky, can determine a value of e of which the accuracy is limited to a few percent.{{Cite journal |last1=Beenakker |first1=Carlo |last2=Schönenberger |first2=Christian |author-link2=Christian Schönenberger |year=2006 |title=Quantum Shot Noise |journal=Physics Today |volume=56 |issue=5 |pages=37–42 |arxiv=cond-mat/0605025 |doi=10.1063/1.1583532 |s2cid=119339791}} However, it was used in the first direct observation of Laughlin quasiparticles, implicated in the fractional quantum Hall effect.{{Cite journal | journal = Nature | volume = 389 | issue = 162–164 | year = 1997 | doi = 10.1038/38241 | title = Direct observation of a fractional charge | first1 = R. | last1 = de-Picciotto | first2 = M. | last2 = Reznikov | first3 = M. | last3 = Heiblum | first4 = V. | last4 = Umansky | first5 = G. | last5 = Bunin | first6 = D. | last6 = Mahalu | pages = 162 |bibcode = 1997Natur.389..162D | arxiv = cond-mat/9707289 | s2cid = 4310360 }}

Another accurate method for measuring the elementary charge is by inferring it from measurements of two effects in quantum mechanics: The Josephson effect, voltage oscillations that arise in certain superconducting structures; and the quantum Hall effect, a quantum effect of electrons at low temperatures, strong magnetic fields, and confinement into two dimensions. The Josephson constant is

$$K\_\backslash text\{J\}\; =\; \backslash frac\{2e\}\{h\},$$

where h is the Planck constant. It can be measured directly using the Josephson effect.

The von Klitzing constant is

$$R\_\backslash text\{K\}\; =\; \backslash frac\{h\}\{e^2\}.$$

It can be measured directly using the quantum Hall effect.

From these two constants, the elementary charge can be deduced:

$$e\; =\; \backslash frac\{2\}\{R\_\backslash text\{K\}\; K\_\backslash text\{J\}\}.$$

The relation used by CODATA to determine elementary charge was:

$$e^2\; =\; \backslash frac\{2h\; \backslash alpha\}\{\backslash mu\_0\; c\}\; =\; 2h\; \backslash alpha\; \backslash varepsilon\_0\; c,$$

where h is the Planck constant, α is the fine-structure constant, μ₀ is the magnetic constant, ε₀ is the electric constant, and c is the speed of light. Presently this equation reflects a relation between ε₀ and α, while all others are fixed values. Thus the relative standard uncertainties of both will be same.

• Committee on Data of the International Science Council

{{notelist}}

{{reflist}}

• Fundamentals of Physics, 7th Ed., Halliday, Robert Resnick, and Jearl Walker. Wiley, 2005

{{Portal bar|Science}}

Category:Physical constants

Category:Units of electrical charge

es:Carga eléctrica#Carga eléctrica elemental