Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Fikre

{{Use mdy dates|date=January 2025}}

{{Infobox SCOTUS case

| Litigants = Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Fikre

| ArgueDate =

| ArgueYear =

| DecideDate = March 19

| DecideYear = 2024

| FullName =

| USVol = 601

| USPage = ___

| Docket = 22-1178

| ParallelCitations =

| Prior =

| Subsequent =

| Holding = A complaint about being put on the No Fly List is not moot simply because the government later took the plaintiff off the List. To show mootness, the government must disclose the conduct that landed the plaintiff on the No Fly List and ensure that they will not be placed back on the List for engaging in the same or similar conduct in the future.

| Majority = Gorsuch

| JoinMajority = unanimous

| Concurrence = Alito

| JoinConcurrence = Kavanaugh

| LawsApplied =

}}

Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Fikre, {{ussc|volume=601|year=2024|el=no}}, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that a complaint about being put on the No Fly List is not moot simply because the government later took the plaintiff off the List. To show mootness, the government must disclose the conduct that landed the plaintiff on the No Fly List and ensure that they will not be placed back on the List for engaging in the same or similar conduct in the future.{{ussc|name=Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Fikre|docket=22-1178|volume=601|year=2024}}.{{Cite web |date=2024-03-19 |title=Supreme Court rules No Fly List dispute can go forward |url=https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/03/supreme-court-rules-no-fly-list-dispute-can-go-forward/ |access-date=2024-12-15 |website=SCOTUSblog |language=en-US}}