Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery
{{Infobox law firm
| name = Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery LLP
| headquarters = Chicago, Illinois, U.S.
| num_offices = 5
| num_attorneys = 50
| practice_areas = Intellectual Property
| date_founded = 1859
| homepage = [http://www.fitcheven.com www.fitcheven.com]
| logo =
}}
Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery LLP, (known as Fitch Even), is a premium law firm that specializes in intellectual property (IP) and technology-related law. The firm originated in Chicago, Illinois in 1859, and now has offices throughout the United States and an international client base. {{Citation needed|date=September 2007}}{{Cite web |title=Law Firm's Linkedin Page |url=https://www.linkedin.com/company/fitch-even-tabin-&-flannery/about/ |access-date=2025-04-30 |website=LinkedIn |language=en-US}} Most of the firm's attorneys are registered U.S. patent attorneys (i.e., authorized to practice before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and in at least one state in the U.S.) and have backgrounds in high technology or the chemical and life sciences.[http://www.martindale.com/law_firm/918017-lawyers?PRV=OGO Lexis Nexis, Martindale-Hubbell] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927210424/http://www.martindale.com/law_firm/918017-lawyers?PRV=OGO |date=2007-09-27 }} Retrieved on July 5, 2007
Practice
Fitch Even's litigation practice involves all areas of IP including patent, trade secret, trademark, copyright, unfair competition, and related commercial disputes. The firm served as counsel in the landmark patent case Arrhythmia v. Corazonix that dealt with the issue of patentable subject matter before the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals.[http://swiss.csail.mit.edu/6805/articles/int-prop/arrythmia.txt Arrhythmia Research Technology, Inc., v. Corazonix Corp, 958 F.2d 1053.] Retrieved on July 5, 2007{{Cite web|url=http://digital-law-online.info/cases/22PQ2D1033.htm|title=Arrhythmia Research v. Corazonix}} The firm successfully argued that a software-based mathematical method used in monitoring a patient's heart was patentable subject matter.[http://swiss.csail.mit.edu/6805/articles/int-prop/arrythmia.txt Ibid.] Retrieved on July 5, 2007 The Federal Circuit relied on Arrhythmia in a subsequent case, State Street Bank v. Signature Financial Group, that expanded patentable subject matter to include business methods.[https://www.law.cornell.edu/patent/comments/96_1327.htm State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, 149 F.3d 1368.] Cornell Law. Retrieved on July 5, 2007 {{Or|date=September 2007}}
The firm also prepares and prosecutes foreign and domestic patent applications, as well as trademark and copyright applications. On average, more than 300 patents per year are issued by the U.S. Patent Office with Fitch Even listed as the legal representative.[http://www.iptoday.com/pdf/2007/3/Top%20Patent%20Firms-Mar2007.pdf Top Patent Firms, IP Today.] Three-year average (2004-2006), pg. 3. Retrieved on July 5, 2007 The firm also filed over 470 trademark applications in 2006.[http://www.gtlaw.com/pub/media/2007/TrademarkInsider2006Annual.pdf Annual Report 2006, Trademark Insider.] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070928061942/http://www.gtlaw.com/pub/media/2007/TrademarkInsider2006Annual.pdf |date=2007-09-28 }} Fitch Even was ranked 33 among U.S. law firms for highest number of trademark applications filed, pg. 4. Retrieved on July 5, 2007
Offices
Notes
{{reflist}}
External links
- [http://www.fitcheven.com/ Official Firm Website]
- [http://www.martindale.com/Fitch-Even-Tabin-Flannery/law-firm-111501.htm Profile] from LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell
{{DEFAULTSORT:Fitch, Even, Tabin and Flannery}}
Category:Biopharmaceutical law firms
Category:Intellectual property law firms
Category:Law firms based in Chicago