Follow-on Forces Attack
{{Expand German|Follow-on-Forces-Attack|date=January 2023}}
Follow-on Forces Attack is a NATO doctrine that dates to the early 1980s and brought the Alliance to exploit the microchip revolution. The eight-point programme was proposed by SACEUR General Bernard W. Rogers.{{cite news |title=Technologies for NATO's Follow-on Forces Attack Concept: A Special Report of OTA's Assessment on Improving NATO's Defense Response |url=https://ota.fas.org/reports/8630.pdf |publisher=Congress of the U.S., Office of Technology Assessment |date=July 1986}}{{cite news |title=New technology for NATO: implementing Follow-On Forces Attack |url=https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc39886/ |publisher=United States Congress, Office of Technology Assessment |date=June 1987}} It played a key role in NATO's Conceptual Military Framework and in the conventional leg of NATO's triad of deterrent forces.{{cite news |last1=Diver |first1=Michael J. |title=NATO's Follow-On Forces Attack (FOFA) Concept: Past, Present and Future |url=https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA224090.pdf |work=ADA224090 |issue=CARLISLE BARRACKS PA |publisher=ARMY WAR COLLEGE |date=1 July 1990}}
Synopsis
SACEUR Rogers was troubled by NATO's inadequate conventional military forces when faced with a Warsaw Pact that dominated his on a numeric basis, and ceteris paribus, he would need to resort to the nuclear option. To improve NATO's conventional defence capability, Rogers proposed a novel idea he labelled the "Follow-on Forces Attack" (FOFA) Concept, which theorized to counter a Warsaw Pact invasion by making deep conventional attacks the enemy's second and third echelon forces to prevent them from reaching NATO's defensive positions.{{cite news |title=1979-1989: "DUAL TRACK" DECADE - NEW WEAPONS, NEW TALKS |url=https://shape.nato.int/page214610458 |access-date=30 January 2023 |publisher=Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe}}
FOFA was adopted by NATO in November 1984. The defects which were identified for remedy were:{{cite news |last1=TOMES |first1=ROBERT |title=THE COLD WAR OFFSET STRATEGY: ASSAULT BREAKER AND THE BEGINNING OF THE RSTA REVOLUTION |url=https://warontherocks.com/2014/11/the-cold-war-offset-strategy-assault-breaker-and-the-beginning-of-the-rsta-revolution/ |publisher=METAMORPHIC MEDIA |date=20 November 2014}}
- Lack of suitable ground-launched missiles
- Inability to operate aircraft at night and in bad weather
- Inability to acquire and target moving vehicles at night and through clouds
- Inability to dynamically identify and target armored vehicles moving in and out of urban or other areas (reacquiring lost target tracks)
- Lack of effective integration of corps, division, and battalion capabilities to support maneuver forces across division control lines
- Defeating enemy air defenses, including shoulder-fired missiles
- Ever-increasing demands to increase the depth of sensors, targeting, and deep strike systems
- Requirements for unmanned aerial vehicles
Rogers saw the technological basis for change lying in the microchip, which created new possibilities for high-speed, real-time data processing, as well as in micro-electronic sensor technology, notable for important applications in reconnaissance and target acquisition.Chapter, "The Role of New Technologies and Follow-on Forces Attack in NATO Strategy" author Fen Osler Hampson. Book Defending Europe published 1985 by Routledge
Operationally, the FOFA concept was simply to interdict Soviet follow-on-forces located 24, 48, and 72 hours removed from NATO defensive positions. The problem was: to coordinate deep battle and air interdiction efforts out to 150 kilometers behind the line of contact, or roughly 72 hours away from it; and to plan for airborne deep strike missions 300 kilometers into the enemy's rear; and developing technology and doctrine to enable commanders quickly to adapt air strikes and fire missions. FOFA was the first "systems-of-systems" architecture. As of 2015 nearly 100 FOFA systems were integrated into the mix available to battle commanders.
References
{{reflist}}