Formally smooth map
In algebraic geometry and commutative algebra, a ring homomorphism is called formally smooth (from French: Formellement lisse) if it satisfies the following infinitesimal lifting property:
Suppose B is given the structure of an A-algebra via the map f. Given a commutative A-algebra, C, and a nilpotent ideal , any A-algebra homomorphism may be lifted to an A-algebra map . If moreover any such lifting is unique, then f is said to be formally étale.{{EGA|book=4-1| pages = 5–259}}{{EGA|book=4-4| pages = 5–361}}
Formally smooth maps were defined by Alexander Grothendieck in Éléments de géométrie algébrique IV.
For finitely presented morphisms, formal smoothness is equivalent to usual notion of smoothness.
Examples
= Smooth morphisms =
All smooth morphisms are equivalent to morphisms locally of finite presentation which are formally smooth. Hence formal smoothness is a slight generalization of smooth morphisms.{{Cite web|url=https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/02H6|title=Lemma 37.11.7 (02H6): Infinitesimal lifting criterion—The Stacks project|website=stacks.math.columbia.edu|access-date=2020-04-07}}
= Non-example =
One method for detecting formal smoothness of a scheme is using infinitesimal lifting criterion. For example, using the truncation morphism the infinitesimal lifting criterion can be described using the commutative square
where . For example, ifandthen consider the tangent vector at the origin given by the ring morphismsendingNote because , this is a valid morphism of commutative rings. Then, since a lifting of this morphism tois of the formand , there cannot be an infinitesimal lift since this is non-zero, hence is not formally smooth. This also proves this morphism is not smooth from the equivalence between formally smooth morphisms locally of finite presentation and smooth morphisms.
See also
References
{{Reflist}}
External links
- Formally smooth with smooth fibers, but not smooth https://mathoverflow.net/q/333596
- Formally smooth but not smooth https://mathoverflow.net/q/195