Free Law Project

{{short description|Free legal research tools and database}}

{{use American English|date=November 2022}}

{{use mdy dates|date=November 2022}}

{{Infobox organization

| name = Free Law Project

| abbreviation = FLP

| formation = 2013-09-24

| founders = Michael Lissner, Brian Carver

| founding_location = Emeryville, CA

| type = 501(c)(3)

| tax_id = 46-3342480

| registration_id = C3594588

| status = Charity

| headquarters = Oakland, CA

| services = CourtListener, RECAP, Bots.law

| leader_title = Executive Director

| leader_name = Michael Lissner

| board_of_directors = Michael Lissner, Brian Carver, Ansel Halliburton

| website = {{official URL}}

| image = Free-law-project logo.png

| image_size =

| alt = Free Law Project Logo showing the scales of justice and the main initiatives of the organization, CourtListener, RECAP, and Bots.law

| caption = Free Law Project Logo

}}

Free Law Project is a United States federal 501(c)(3) Oakland-based{{cite news |newspaper=The Los Angeles Times

|url=https://www.latimes.com/california/newsletter/2021-10-05/anchor-orange-county-oil-spill-essential-california

|title=Crime and Courts

|author=Justin Rau |date=October 5, 2021 |access-date=November 21, 2022}} nonprofit that provides free access to primary legal materials, develops legal research tools, and supports academic research on legal corpora.{{cite web |url=https://free.law

|title=Free Law Project |access-date=2016-06-21}} Free Law Project has several initiatives that collect and share legal information, including the largest

collection of American oral argument audio,{{cite web

|url=https://free.law/2016/06/08/a-year-of-oral-args

|title=Milestone: CourtListener has 365 Days of Continuous Oral Argument Listening

|access-date=2016-06-21 |date=2016-06-08}} daily collection of new legal opinions from 200 United States courts and administrative bodies, the RECAP Project, which collects documents from PACER, and user-generated Supreme Court citation visualizations. Their data helped The Wall Street Journal expose 138 cases of conflict of interest cases regarding violations by federal judges.{{cite news |newspaper=The Wall Street Journal

|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-the-journal-found-judges-violations-of-law-on-conflicts-11632833775

|title=How the Journal Found Judges' Violations of Law on Conflicts

|author=Coulter Jones |author2=James V. Grimaldi |author3=Joe Palazzolo

|date=September 28, 2021 |access-date=November 24, 2022}}{{cite news |newspaper=The Wall Street Journal

|url=https://www.wsj.com/podcasts/the-journal/the-federal-law-that-138-judges-have-broken/9ef532f9-7f94-4193-8b4f-62b49f3e524c

|title=The Federal Law That 138 Judges Have Broken

|quote=this guy out in Oakland .. works for this nonprofit called the Free Law Project .. project going on for several years, to obtain from the administrative office of the courts, every financial disclosure for every federal judge, and digitize it.

|author=Kate Linebaugh |date=October 1, 2021 |access-date=November 25, 2021}}

Free Law Project was founded in 2013 by Michael Lissner and Brian Carver.{{cite news |newspaper=The Daily Californian

|url=https://www.dailycal.org/2013/09/29/free-law-project-provides-access-to-legal-materials-and-research-for-public

|title=Free Law Project provides access to legal materials and research for public

|quote=The Free Law Project, a new California nonprofit, launched Tuesday and will provide free and easy access to legal material and research for anyone to download.

|author=Taylor A. Vega |date=September 29, 2013 |access-date=November 25, 2022}}

Initiatives

Free Law Project has a number of initiatives, including:

  • CourtListener.com,{{cite Q|Q117745639}} which provides a searchable and API-accessible website with court dockets, 900,000 minutes of oral argument recordings, more than eight thousand judges, and more than three million opinions. All of the opinions on Court Listener are interlinked by a citator, and the graph of citations is available via an API.
  • RECAP Project,{{cite Q|Q7276289}} which allows users to automatically search for free copies of documents during a search in the fee-based online US legal database PACER, creating a free alternative database at the Internet Archive and Court Listener.
  • Judge and Appointer Database, which provides biographical and electoral information about more than 16,000 American judges and appointors. {{cite web |url=https://free.law/projects/judge-db |title=Judge and Disclosure Database |website=Free Law Project |access-date=2024-03-14 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240122120123/https://free.law/projects/judge-db |archive-date=2024-01-22 |quote=The database contains information about more than sixteen thousand state and federal judges, making it a treasure trove for those wishing to do judicial analytics.}}
  • Database of Reporters, which provides information about more than 400 legal reporters.
  • Courts-DB, which provides information about more than 700 US courts.{{cite web |url=https://free.law/2020/03/10/courts-db-a-new-open-database/ |title=Announcing a New Open Database of Court Information, IDs, and Parsers |date=March 10, 2020 |access-date=2021-03-17}} All of Free Law Project's work is open source and available online.

RECAP

RECAP{{cite web

|url=https://www.recapthelaw.org/2010/04/19/recap-documents-now-more-searchable-via-internet-archive

|title=RECAP Documents Now More Searchable Via Internet Archive |work=RECAP The Law |date=2013

|publisher=Center for Information Technology Policy|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160601170043/https://www.recapthelaw.org/2010/04/19/recap-documents-now-more-searchable-via-internet-archive/#menu

|archive-date=June 1, 2016 |access-date=May 31, 2013}} is software which allows users to automatically search for free copies of documents during a search in the fee-based online U.S. federal court document database PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records), and to help build up a free alternative database. It was created in 2009 by a team from Princeton University's Center for Information Technology Policy and Harvard University's Berkman Center. It is now maintained as part of the Free Law Project. The name "RECAP" derives from "PACER", spelled backward.{{cite news

|publisher=CNET

|last=McCullagh |first=Declan |author-link=Declan McCullagh

|title=Plug-in opens up federal courts, with your help

|url=https://www.cnet.com/news/plug-in-opens-up-federal-courts-with-your-help

|accessdate=May 16, 2017 |date=August 14, 2009 |language=en}}

RECAP is available as a Mozilla Firefox add-on, Google Chrome extension, and Safari extension.{{cite web

|url=https://free.law/recap |title=RECAP Project — Turning PACER Around Since 2009

|author=Free Law Project}} For each PACER document, the software will first check if it has already been uploaded by another user. If no free version exists and the user purchases the document from PACER, it will automatically upload a copy to the RECAP server, thereby building the database.{{cite news |work=The Guardian

|first=Bobbie |last=Johnson

|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2009/nov/11/recap-us-courtrooms

|title=Recap: cracking open US courtrooms

|date=11 November 2009 |location=London}} The original RECAP implementation uploaded documents to the Internet Archive; as of late 2017, the Free Law Project version now uploads documents to the Free Law Project, with a promise to mirror that data to the Internet Archive on a quarterly basis.{{cite web|url=https://free.law/2017/11/13/the-next-version-of-recap-is-now-live/#content|title=The Next Version of RECAP is Now Live|last=Lissner|first=Michae l|date=November 13, 2017|access-date=March 5, 2018|archive-date=March 6, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180306202428/https://free.law/2017/11/13/the-next-version-of-recap-is-now-live/#content|url-status=dead}}

PACER continued charging per page fees after the introduction of RECAP.{{cite news |last=Singel |first=Ryan |date=October 5, 2009 |title=FBI Investigated Coder for Liberating Paywalled Court Records |url=https://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/10/swartz-fbi |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230515021116/https://www.wired.com/2009/10/swartz-fbi/ |archive-date=May 15, 2023 |access-date=January 12, 2013 |magazine=Wired |publisher=Condé Nast}}

Prior to the creation of RECAP, activist Aaron Swartz set up an automatic download from an official library entry point to PACER.

Swartz downloaded 2.7 million documents, all public domain, representing less than 1 percent of the documents in PACER.{{cite web

|last=Lee |first=Timothy B.

|title=The inside story of Aaron Swartz's campaign to liberate court filings

|work=Ars Technica |date=February 8, 2013

|url=https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/02/the-inside-story-of-aaron-swartzs-campaign-to-liberate-court-filings

|access-date=May 31, 2013}} These public domain documents were later uploaded to RECAP and made available to the public for free.

However, the automated downloading triggered a government investigation. No criminal charges were filed because PACER had provided lawful access, the documents copied were in the public domain, and the case was closed.

Some courts have acknowledged RECAP's free distribution of documents. A small handful of PACER users receive fee-exempt access (fee waivers are granted on a district-by-district basis), and a condition of the fee waiver generally requires that fee exempt users not further distribute documents they receive under the waiver, pursuant to Judicial Conference policy.{{cite web |url=https://free.law/2017/04/13/pacer-fee-history/ |title=A Complete Chronology of PACER Fees and Policies |last=Lissner |first=Michael |date=April 13, 2017 |access-date=March 5, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180306202448/https://free.law/2017/04/13/a-complete-chronology-of-pacer-fees-and-policies/ |archive-date=2018-03-06 |url-status=live}} Some courts such as the District Court for the District of Massachusetts display a prominent reminder on its ECF page: "fee exempt PACER users must refrain from the use of RECAP".{{cite web |url=https://ecf.mad.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/ShowIndex.pl |title=Welcome to the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts |website=United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts |publisher=Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts |access-date=February 14, 2024}}

CourtListener

CourtListener{{cite news |newspaper=The New York Times

|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/01/magazine/i-read-court-documents-for-fun-hear-me-out.html

|title=I Read Court Documents for Fun. Hear Me Out.

|author=Tarpley Hitt |date=December 1, 2020 |access-date=November 25, 2022}} is an open source software project to archive and host court documents.

See also

References

{{Reflist}}