Friends with Benefits (film)

Jamie Rellis, an executive headhunter in New York City, recruits Dylan Francis Harper Jr., a Los Angeles art director, to interview for a position with GQ magazine. Initially skeptical, he accepts the job after a night exploring the city with her. Dylan moves to New York, signing a one-year contract that earns Jamie a commission, and they become close platonic friends. One night, after agreeing that sex should not require emotional attachment, they have purely casual sex. After several trysts together, Jamie decides to start dating again, and she and Dylan return to simply being friends.

Jamie meets Parker, an oncologist for children. After five dates, they consummate their relationship as per her five-date rule, only for him to break up with her in the morning. When Jamie's free-spirited mother, Lorna, abandons their Fourth of July weekend plans, Dylan persuades Jamie to travel with him to Los Angeles. There, she meets his sister Annie, nephew Sammy, and his father, who suffers from the early stages of dementia. Though Jamie and Dylan assure his family that they are merely friends, they spend an intimate night together, having sex again.

The next day, Jamie overhears Dylan telling Annie that she is too "damaged" for him to date. Hurt, she flies home and ignores Dylan's attempts to reach her. He finds her on the roof of a skyscraper—a place she showed him the day they met—where she reveals that she overheard everything he said, and ends their friendship. Some time later, Jamie discovers that Dylan may be leaving GQ for another job before his contract ends, which would affect her commission. She confronts him, leading to another argument.

Jamie spends time with her mother, while Dylan meets his father at Newark Liberty International Airport. In a moment of Alzheimer's-induced confusion, his father mistakes a passerby for a woman from his past. Regaining his lucidity, he explains that he met "the love of my life" before marrying Dylan's mother, but let her go. Dylan's father urges him not to do the same, and to therefore reconcile with Jamie.

Realizing his true feelings for Jamie, Dylan calls Lorna to set up an excuse for Jamie to go to Grand Central Station, where he surprises her with a flash mob dancing to "Jump" and "Closing Time". After confessing his feelings to her and sharing a passionate kiss, Dylan suggests they go on their first real date. They go across the street to the Pershing Square café and are unable to keep their hands off each other.

In a post-credits scene, Dylan and Jamie watch outtakes from the fictional romantic comedy seen throughout the film.

• Justin Timberlake as Dylan Harper
• Mila Kunis as Jamie Rellis
• Patricia Clarkson as Lorna, Jamie's mother
• Jenna Elfman as Annie, Dylan's sister
• Bryan Greenberg as Parker
• Nolan Gould as Sam, Annie's son and Dylan's nephew
• Richard Jenkins as Mr. Harper
• Woody Harrelson as Tommy Bollinger
• Emma Stone as Kayla
• Andy Samberg as Quincy
• Shaun White as himself
• Courtney Henggeler as Flight attendant
• Tiya Sircar as Hostess
• Jason Segel as Brice (uncredited)
• Rashida Jones as Madison (uncredited)

Credits adapted from AllMovie and The Guardian.{{cite web|title=Friends with Benefits (2011) |url=https://www.allmovie.com/movie/friends-with-benefits-v529802/cast-crew |publisher=AllMovie |access-date=August 29, 2015 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131219092223/http://www.allmovie.com/movie/friends-with-benefits-v529802/cast-crew |archive-date=December 19, 2013 }}{{cite news|last1=Heritage |first1=Stuart |title=Friends With Benefits recap: unsexy bestie sex |url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/2013/oct/05/friends-with-benefits-recap-sex |access-date=September 11, 2015 |work=The Guardian |date=October 5, 2013 |url-status= live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151221083631/http://www.theguardian.com/film/2013/oct/05/friends-with-benefits-recap-sex |archive-date=December 21, 2015 }}

File:Southwest corner of Central Park, looking east, NYC.jpg, including Central Park (pictured).]]

In April 2010, Justin Timberlake became the first to sign on to the project.{{cite web|title=Justin Timberlake Gets Between Sheets On Comedy In Menage A Trois Title Battle |url=https://deadline.com/2010/04/justin-timberlake-gets-between-sheets-on-comedy-in-menage-a-trois-title-battle-30772/ |website=Deadline Hollywood |access-date=August 29, 2015 |date=April 6, 2010 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150921051625/http://deadline.com/2010/04/justin-timberlake-gets-between-sheets-on-comedy-in-menage-a-trois-title-battle-30772/ |archive-date=September 21, 2015 }} He was soon followed by Mila Kunis when she landed the female lead opposite him. Approximately two months later, Variety magazine announced that an ensemble cast consisting of Emma Stone, Patricia Clarkson, Richard Jenkins, Woody Harrelson, Andy Samberg and Jenna Elfman were set to join them in the film.{{cite web|url=https://variety.com/2010/film/news/a-rod-goes-from-big-leagues-to-bigscreen-1118021649/ |title=A Rod goes from the Big Leagues to the big screen |work=Variety |last=Siegel |first=Tatiana |date=July 13, 2010 |access-date=July 13, 2010 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131004214849/http://variety.com/2010/film/news/a-rod-goes-from-big-leagues-to-bigscreen-1118021649/ |archive-date=October 4, 2013 }} Three days after principal filming began, Bryan Greenberg completed the cast.{{cite web|url=http://www.popsugar.com/Pictures-Justin-Timberlake-Mila-Kunis-Bryan-Greenberg-Filming-Friends-Benefits-9275863 |title=Justin and Mila welcome Bryan |publisher=PopSugar |date=July 23, 2010 |access-date=July 23, 2010 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100724050236/http://www.popsugar.com/Pictures-Justin-Timberlake-Mila-Kunis-Bryan-Greenberg-Filming-Friends-Benefits-9275863 |archive-date=July 24, 2010 }} The film features cameo appearances from Shaun White, Jason Segel, and Rashida Jones.{{cite web|url=http://www.ifc.com/fix/2010/09/will-gluck-easy-a/2 |title=Will Gluck Makes Comedy Look "Easy," Eh? |publisher=IFC |date=September 14, 2010 |access-date=September 14, 2010 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121021200856/http://www.ifc.com/fix/2010/09/will-gluck-easy-a/2 |archive-date=October 21, 2012 }} Production locations were set up as early as July 13, and principal filmography commenced on July 20, 2010, in the Midtown Manhattan section of New York City.{{cite news|last1=Gardner |first1=Elysa |title=Mila Kunis maps out a singular path to stardom |url=http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/life/people/2011-07-18-mila-kunis-friends-with-benefits_n.htm |access-date=August 29, 2015 |work=USA Today |date=July 19, 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303202724/http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/life/people/2011-07-18-mila-kunis-friends-with-benefits_n.htm |archive-date=March 3, 2016 }} Filming continued in Central Park and other sections of New York City from July to early August before the production relocated to Los Angeles, California.{{cite web|url=http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/movies/friends-benefits-director-gluck-rejoices-coming-home-film-latest-article-1.161052 |title='Friends with Benefits' director Will Gluck rejoices in coming home to film his latest |first=Ethan |last=Sacks |work=New York Daily News |date=July 16, 2011 |access-date=October 22, 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150505073313/http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/movies/friends-benefits-director-gluck-rejoices-coming-home-film-latest-article-1.161052 |archive-date=May 5, 2015 }}

Paramount Pictures dropped its original protest against the film after their director, Ivan Reitman, re-titled his film, No Strings Attached. Screen Gems then moved forward with the title Friends with Benefits. At the same time, NBC was developing a sitcom with the same title, but the movie production company stated that due to its production schedule, they didn't expect an issue to arise.{{cite magazine|url=http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2010/05/21/friends-with-benefits-title-cleared |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100524061135/http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2010/05/21/friends-with-benefits-title-cleared/ |url-status=dead |archive-date=May 24, 2010 |title=Friends with Benefits Title Cleared |magazine=Entertainment Weekly |last=Sperling |first=Nicole |date=May 21, 2010 |access-date=June 12, 2010 }} Screen Gems chose to accelerate production fearing that they would lose their title to the competing Paramount project. Director Will Gluck spoke about the frustration of comparing the two films, stating: "I wish there was more space between them. The thing that's irking me now is people are saying we're remaking No Strings Attached. We're not remaking it. The two movies were being made at the same time."{{cite news|url=https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/la-xpm-2011-jul-19-la-et-will-gluck-20110719-story.html |title=Will Gluck experiences the benefits of success |work=Los Angeles Times |last=Sperling |first=Nicole |date=July 19, 2011 |access-date=July 19, 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121105212147/http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jul/19/entertainment/la-et-will-gluck-20110719 |archive-date=November 5, 2012 }} Gluck, in an interview with The New Zealand Herald, said that both films are different.{{cite web |url=http://www.nzherald.co.nz/movies/news/article.cfm?c_id=200&objectid=10751564|title=Friends With Benefits: Fooling around with romance

|work=The New Zealand Herald|last=Manelis|first= Michele |date=September 14, 2011 |access-date=September 14, 2011}} Similar sentiments were expressed by Kunis, stating, "It's just two different movies. There's only ... so many stories you can tell in the world. This is just one of the many."{{cite web |url=https://www.azcentral.com/thingstodo/movies/articles/2011/07/19/20110719justin-timberlake-mila-kunis-comedy-has-benefits.html|title=Q&A: Justin Timberlake, Mila Kunis: Comedy has 'Benefits'|work=The Arizona Republic |last=Goodykoontz|first= Bill |date=July 19, 2011 |access-date=July 30, 2011}}

The first theatrical trailer of Friends with Benefits was released on March 16, 2011.{{cite web|last1=Reynolds |first1=Simon |title=World Exclusive: 'Friends With Benefits' trailer |url=http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/movies/at-the-movies/a309364/world-exclusive-friends-with-benefits-trailer.html |publisher=Digital Spy |access-date=August 29, 2015 |date=March 16, 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924063002/http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/movies/at-the-movies/a309364/world-exclusive-friends-with-benefits-trailer.html |archive-date=September 24, 2015 }} The trailer had a subsequent release on YouTube and attracted over a million views in 48 hours, becoming the second most-watched video of the day and the most-viewed video in the film category.{{cite news|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/friends-with-benefits-preview-gets-over-a-million-views-in-48-hours-viral-video-spotlight-2270698.html |title='Friends with Benefits' preview gets over a million views in 48 hours: viral video spotlight |work=The Independent |date=April 20, 2011 |access-date=April 20, 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110711142711/http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/friends-with-benefits-preview-gets-over-a-million-views-in-48-hours-viral-video-spotlight-2270698.html |archive-date=July 11, 2011 }} Promotion for Friends with Benefits subsequently grew, including promotional videos from Facebook and Twitter. Timberlake and Kunis also landed on the cover of Elle in support of the film.{{cite web|url=https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/06/mila-kunis-and-justin-tim_n_891305.html |title=Mila Kunis And Justin Timberlake Debut 'Friends With Benefits' PSA |date=July 6, 2011 |access-date=July 7, 2011 |work=The Huffington Post |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110709175009/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/06/mila-kunis-and-justin-tim_n_891305.html |archive-date=July 9, 2011 }}{{cite web|url=http://www.elle.com/culture/celebrities/g2596/lust-in-translation-justin-timberlake-mila-kunis-567648/ |title=Lust In Translation: Justin Timberlake and Mila Kunis |date=July 7, 2011 |access-date=July 7, 2011 |work=Elle |first=Millea |last=Holly |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150112235033/http://www.elle.com/culture/celebrities/g2596/lust-in-translation-justin-timberlake-mila-kunis-567648/ |archive-date=January 12, 2015 }}

Will Gluck stated that the concept of the story began with the idea that he wanted to work with Kunis and Timberlake, explaining that he rewrote the script for the two actors. Following those changes, Gluck expressed that he wanted to attract a more adult audience and that he "wanted to do more of an adult movie about sex, too, and about relationships".{{cite web |url=http://news.moviefone.com/2010/09/18/easy-a-will-gluck-interview |title=Easy A Director Will Gluck on Teen Sex and '80s Fantasy Boyfriends |publisher=Moviefone |first=Yamato |last=Jen |date=September 18, 2010 |access-date=September 18, 2010 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130716183112/http://news.moviefone.com/2010/09/18/easy-a-will-gluck-interview |archive-date=July 16, 2013 }} He went on to compare the storyline of Friends with Benefits to the relationship in films between Katharine Hepburn and Spencer Tracy.{{cite news|last1=Hassan |first1=Genevieve |title=Friends With Benefits: a new generation of rom-com |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-14787785 |access-date=August 30, 2015 |work=BBC News |date=September 9, 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924045135/http://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-14787785 |archive-date=September 24, 2015 }}

{{quote box|width=25em|align=right|quote=As a viewer, I don't want to walk into a movie called Friends with Benefits and see the PG-13 version. For me, you can't have a movie like that without embracing what the title is.|source=—Justin Timberlake}}

In an interview with Movieline, Gluck further discussed the film's plot saying that Friends with Benefits would relate largely with a younger generation. He added: "They comment about these romantic comedies throughout the movie, and as they go through their storyline, they realize that they're in a romantic comedy story — as two regular people who aren't in a movie would comment on. They're very cognizant that they're in this story ... but they end up embracing the fact that they're going through a romantic comedy moment."{{cite web|url=http://movieline.com/2010/08/19/will-gluck-interview-easy-a/ |title=Easy A Director Will Gluck |publisher=Movieline |first=Buchanan |last=Kyle |date=August 19, 2010 |access-date=August 22, 2010 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120902232642/http://movieline.com/2010/08/19/will-gluck-interview-easy-a/ |archive-date=September 2, 2012 }} In an interview with the Los Angeles Times, Timberlake explained that he and Gluck held authorship of humor and tone in regard to Friends with Benefits.{{cite web|url=http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/movies/2010/12/justin-timberlake.html |title=Justin Timberlake: I'm obviously not the best actor in the world |work=Los Angeles Times |last=Lee |first=Chris |date=December 9, 2010 |access-date=December 10, 2010 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101213031202/http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/movies/2010/12/justin-timberlake.html |archive-date=December 13, 2010 }} Timberlake and Kunis workshopped the script for more than a month before the movie went into production. Gluck would meet with the actors with 20 pages of script in front of him and the three would beat it up, changing lines, and defending each character's perspective.{{cite web|url=http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/movies/2011/07/justin-timberlake-on-friends-with-benefits-director-will-gluck-we-will-make-plenty-of-movies-togethe.html |title=Justin Timberlake sees more Will Gluck in his future |work=Los Angeles Times |last=Sperling |first=Nicole |date=July 25, 2011 |access-date=July 25, 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120716022526/http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/movies/2011/07/justin-timberlake-on-friends-with-benefits-director-will-gluck-we-will-make-plenty-of-movies-togethe.html |archive-date=July 16, 2012 }}

In June 2011, it was announced that Madison Gate Records would be distributing the album which featured 15 songs. The album for Friends with Benefits was released on July 19, 2011.{{cite web|title=Friends With Benefits (Original Soundtrack) |date=July 18, 2011 |url=https://music.apple.com/us/album/friends-benefits-original/444635869 |publisher=iTunes Store |access-date=September 2, 2015 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150610002539/https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/friends-benefits-original/id444635869 |archive-date=June 10, 2015 }}

{{Track listing

| total_length = 52:39

| title1 = Magic Carpet Ride (Philip Steir Remix)

| note1 = Steppenwolf

| length1 = 3:29

| title2 = L.O.V.

| note2 = Fitz and the Tantrums

| length2 = 3:41

| title3 = Booty Call

| note3 = G. Love & Special Sauce

| length3 = 3:28

| title4 = New York, New York (FWB Remix)

| note4 = Ray Quinn featuring Ultra Love

| length4 = 2:20

| title5 = Boys Don't Cry

| note5 = Grant-Lee Phillips

| length5 = 3:47

| title6 = Such a Colorful World

| note6 = Max & Simon

| length6 = 2:14

| title7 = Satellite

| note7 = Peter Conway

| length7 = 3:45

| title8 = Let a Woman Be a Woman (And a Man Be a Man)

| note8 = Dyke & the Blazers

| length8 = 3:12

| title9 = At the Window

| note9 = Double 0 Zero

| length9 = 3:50

| title10 = Love's Gonna Getcha

| note10 = Tal & Acacia

| length10 = 3:05

| title11 = Jump

| note11 = Kris Kross

| length11 = 3:17

| title12 = This Too Shall Pass

| note12 = Rogue Wave

| length12 = 6:13

| title13 = Tightrope

| note13 = Janelle Monáe

| length13 = 4:25

| title14 = Take a Bow

| note14 = Greg Laswell

| length14 = 3:59

| title15 = Closing Time

| note15 = Semisonic

| length15 = 4:34

}}

Friends with Benefits was released on DVD and Blu-ray Disc in the United States on December 2, 2011, and in the United Kingdom on February 6, 2012.{{cite magazine|last1=Young |first1=John |title=Check out Justin Timberlake and Mila Kunis in 'Friends With Benefits' blooper reel — Exclusive video |url=https://www.ew.com/article/2011/09/26/friends-with-benefits-blooper-outtakes |access-date=September 2, 2015 |magazine=Entertainment Weekly |date=September 26, 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924113612/http://www.ew.com/article/2011/09/26/friends-with-benefits-blooper-outtakes |archive-date=September 24, 2015 }}

On Rotten Tomatoes, Friends with Benefits has an approval rating of 69% based on 170 reviews with an average rating of 6.20/10. The site's critical consensus reads, "Friends with Benefits adds nothing new to its well-worn rom-com formula, but the chemistry between Justin Timberlake and Mila Kunis is almost enough to carry the movie by itself."{{cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/friends_with_benefits/|title=Friends with Benefits (2011)|website=Rotten Tomatoes|publisher=Fandango Media|access-date=August 26, 2023}} On Metacritic, the film has a weighted average score of 63 out of 100 based on 37 critics, indicating "generally favorable" reviews.{{cite web|url=https://www.metacritic.com/movie/friends-with-benefits |title=Friends with Benefits: Reviews |publisher=Metacritic |access-date=July 22, 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110702215557/http://www.metacritic.com/movie/friends-with-benefits |archive-date=July 2, 2011 }} Audiences polled by CinemaScore gave the film an average grade of "B+" on an A+ to F scale.{{cite web |url= https://www.cinemascore.com/publicsearch/index/title/ |title= Cinemascore |url-status= dead |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20181220122629/https://www.cinemascore.com/publicsearch/index/title/ |archive-date= December 20, 2018 |access-date= August 31, 2019 }}

{{quote box

| width = 30em

| border = 1px

| align= right

| quote = The look, thanks to director of photography Michael Grady, and the conversations on sex and commitment are open and open-ended. Important issues about the inherent clash between changing mores and traditional values get noodled over a bit. The sex talk is graphic, the sex itself is explicit and energetic, and Jamie and Dylan have a kind of sweetness that makes you want to root for them. Ironically, the problem is that Friends with Benefits doesn't go far enough when it comes to the substantial stuff. As Freud famously said—even romantic comedies need to take their sex seriously or there will be no satisfaction.

| source =—Betsey Sharkey of the Los Angeles Times

}}

Manohla Dargis of The New York Times praised Friends with Benefits for its "breezy, speedy and funny comedy" and complimented the chemistry between the lead actors.{{cite web|url=https://movies.nytimes.com/2011/07/22/movies/justin-timberlake-in-friends-with-benefits-review.html |title=It's Just Sex. We're Just Friends. You Know the Rules. Etc., Etc. |work=The New York Times |last=Dargis |first=Manohla |author-link=Manohla Dargis |date=July 22, 2011 |access-date=July 22, 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110723220044/http://movies.nytimes.com/2011/07/22/movies/justin-timberlake-in-friends-with-benefits-review.html |archive-date=July 23, 2011 }} Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times gave the film three stars, and remarked about the film, "What not every rom-com has, however, is good dialogue, well-delivered at a fast clip." He added, "Kunis fast-talks her way through the opening scenes as if she's channeling Juno, and Timberlake easily keeps up. At some fundamental level, I simply enjoyed watching them."{{cite news|url=https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/friends-with-benefits-2011 |title=Friends with Benefits |work=Chicago Sun-Times |first=Ebert |last=Roger |date=July 20, 2011 |access-date=July 22, 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130602095138/http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/friends-with-benefits-2011 |archive-date=June 2, 2013 }} Peter Debruge of Variety found the plot to be predictable and benign; however, he complimented the cast, calling Kunis "a natural with comedy", while Timberlake "exudes the kind of star wattage that put Will Smith on top."{{cite web|url=https://variety.com/2011/film/reviews/friends-with-benefits-1117945660/ |title=Friends with Benefits |work=Variety |first=Debruge |last=Peter |date=July 18, 2011 |access-date=July 22, 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130726025647/http://variety.com/2011/film/reviews/friends-with-benefits-1117945660/ |archive-date=July 26, 2013 }} Likewise, Salon{{'s}} Andrew O'Hehir asserted that despite a disappointing conclusion to the film, it was nonetheless a "rewarding summer diversion."{{cite web |url=http://www.salon.com/2011/07/22/friends_with_benefits_3/ |title="Friends With Benefits": Justin and Mila in the other, other sex–pals movie |first=Andrew |last=O'Hehir |work=Salon |date=July 21, 2011 |access-date=October 22, 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111018160638/http://www.salon.com/2011/07/22/friends_with_benefits_3/ |archive-date=October 18, 2011 }} The Guardian writer Peter Bradshaw reacted negatively to the film, expressing that there "was no benefit to watching it." Bradshaw gave the film a one-out-of-five-star rating.{{cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/2011/sep/08/friends-with-benefits-review |title=Friends With Benefits – review |first=Peter |last=Bradshaw |work=The Guardian |date=September 8, 2011 |access-date=October 22, 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20151119195757/http://www.theguardian.com/film/2011/sep/08/friends-with-benefits-review |archive-date= November 19, 2015 }}

The Daily Telegraph{{'s}} Sukhdev Sandhu felt that Timberlake held his own when working with Kunis. Concluding his review, Sandhu presented Friends with Benefits a three out of five stars.{{cite web|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/filmreviews/8750724/Friends-With-Benefits-review.html |title=Friends With Benefits, review |first=Sukhdev |last=Sandhu |work=The Daily Telegraph |date=September 8, 2011 |access-date=October 22, 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111102010427/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/filmreviews/8750724/Friends-With-Benefits-review.html |archive-date=November 2, 2011 }} Betsey Sharkey of the Los Angeles Times praised the acting in the film, opining that "it [brought] a lot of natural life to the party."{{cite web|url=https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-xpm-2011-jul-22-la-et-friends-with-benefits-20110722-story.html |title=Movie review: 'Friends With Benefits' |first=Betsey |last=Sharkey |work=Los Angeles Times |date=July 22, 2011 |access-date=October 22, 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120113154552/http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jul/22/entertainment/la-et-friends-with-benefits-20110722 |archive-date=January 13, 2012 }} Michael Rechtshaffen of The Hollywood Reporter gave the film a positive review, stating that there was "palpable chemistry" between Timberlake and Kunis.{{cite news|last=Rechtshaffen |first=Michael |date=July 18, 2011 |title=Friends With Benefits: Film Review |url=https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movie/friends-benefits/review/212111 |work=The Hollywood Reporter |access-date=October 22, 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150306041941/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movie/friends-benefits/review/212111 |archive-date=March 6, 2015 }} Entertainment Weekly writer Owen Gleiberman gave Friends with Benefits a 'B−' grade, exclaiming that while he enjoyed much of the film, he felt that it was inconsistent.{{cite magazine|url=https://www.ew.com/article/2011/07/27/friends-benefits |title=Friends With Benefits |first=Owen |last=Gleiberman |magazine=Entertainment Weekly |date=July 27, 2011 |access-date=October 22, 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150306040752/http://www.ew.com/article/2011/07/27/friends-benefits |archive-date=March 6, 2015 }}

{{quote box|width=25em|align=left|quote=Kunis's easy authority grounds the movie, while Timberlake tapdances delightfully around the edges. His voice and his manner are light, there's barely a hair on the guy's chest, yet his confidence and wit are sexy in a way entirely befitting a smart urban romance.|source=—Ty Burr, of the Boston Globe}}

Mary Pols of Time applauded the film, and wrote that despite the plot being predictable, the film was "elevated by energetic dialogue, the sexual chemistry between the leads and the fact that the miscommunication that keeps bliss at bay ... is plausible."{{cite magazine|url=https://entertainment.time.com/2011/07/21/friends-with-benefits-review/ |title=Friends with Benefits: Soft Porn, Meet Snarky Charm |magazine=Time |last=Pols |first=Mary |date=July 21, 2011 |access-date=October 22, 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120117180746/http://entertainment.time.com/2011/07/21/friends-with-benefits-review/ |archive-date=January 17, 2012 }} Giving Friends with Benefits a three-star rating, The Boston Globe journalist Ty Burr opined that the film "works like a charm." He added that it mostly keeps its manic energy in check, and that it plays to chick-flick formulas without ever groveling – which is due almost entirely to the leads."{{cite web|url=https://www.boston.com/ae/movies/articles/2011/07/22/timberlake_and_kunis_make_friends_worth_watching/?camp=pm |title=Friends With Benefits |first=Ty |last=Burr |work=Boston Globe |date=July 22, 2011 |access-date=October 22, 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150923232835/http://www.boston.com/ae/movies/articles/2011/07/22/timberlake_and_kunis_make_friends_worth_watching/?camp=pm |archive-date=September 23, 2015 }} Similar sentiments were expressed by Peter Paras of E!. Giving it a 'B' grade, Paras asserted that the film was the best romantic comedy film in a long time.{{cite web|url=http://www.eonline.com/news/253709/movie-review-friends-with-benefits-is-the-first-decent-rom-com-in-like-forever |title=Movie Review: Friends With Benefits Is the First Decent Rom–Com in, Like, Forever |first=Peter |last=Paras |publisher=E! |date=July 21, 2011 |access-date=October 22, 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924034600/http://www.eonline.com/news/253709/movie-review-friends-with-benefits-is-the-first-decent-rom-com-in-like-forever |archive-date=September 24, 2015 }} Melissa Leong of the National Post wrote, "While the film takes jabs at the Hollywood fairy tale, ... Gluck adheres to the formula."{{cite web|url=http://news.nationalpost.com/arts/film-review-friends-with-benefits-3-stars |title=Film review: Friends With Benefits (3 stars) |first=Melissa |last=Leong |work=National Post |date=July 21, 2011 |access-date=October 22, 2011 }}

According to The New York Times, Friends with Benefits, a film "about love and sex in the age of social networking, gets some of its juice and tang partly by trash-talking its own genre. The setup is familiar, as are the essential elements: a single man and a single woman, two battered hearts yet a pair of resilient, eager, pretty bodies ... Friends with Benefits starts from the premise that its characters, and you, are sick of the romantic comedy clichés they may secretly, or not so secretly, adore." Drew Pinsky, an addiction medicine specialist felt that the film's central characters, both of whom were raised by a single parent in the film, "start looking for ways to solve that problem because they were never given the opportunity to grow an emotional landscape from a nurturing, available parent. They were just quickly parentalized and became a caretaker. And the caretaking is all part of the 'going for a broken person' and trying to fix them." He further added that "love addiction ending in 'happily ever after' is not a great message."{{cite news|last1=Stern |first1=Marlow |title=Dr. Drew on 'Friends with Benefits' |url=http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/07/20/dr-drew-on-justin-timberlake-mila-kunis-movie-friends-with-benefits.html |access-date=September 8, 2015 |work=The Daily Beast |date=July 20, 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150907055243/http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/07/20/dr-drew-on-justin-timberlake-mila-kunis-movie-friends-with-benefits.html |archive-date=September 7, 2015 }}

Timberlake added that Friends with Benefits is a film for "our generation; people that are between 25 and 30 years of age that are moving into a different part of their life. They are not sure what type of commitment they are comfortable with or what they're gonna do for the rest of their life".{{cite web|last1=Daniels |first1=Hunter |title=Exclusive: Justin Timberlake and Mila Kunis Talk Friends with Benefits, Ted and in Time |url=https://collider.com/justin-timberlake-mila-kunis-interview-friends-with-benefits-ted-in-time/ |publisher=Collider |access-date=September 8, 2015 |date=July 19, 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130213025624/http://collider.com/justin-timberlake-mila-kunis-interview-friends-with-benefits-ted-in-time/ |archive-date=February 13, 2013 }}

Friends with Benefits was released in North America on July 22, 2011, in 2,926 theaters. It collected $6,801,594 on its opening day and then grossed a total of $18,622,150 in its opening weekend, finishing third at the box office, behind Captain America: The First Avenger and Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2. The film grossed $55.8 million in the United States and Canada.

The film had similar success internationally. In Australia, it premiered on August 18, 2011, and earned $2.4 million during its opening weekend, charting above Green Lantern to finish first at the box office.{{cite news|url= https://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/movies/friends-with-benefits-at-top-of-box-office-20110822-1j714.html |title=Friends with Benefits at top of box office |work=The Sydney Morning Herald |date=August 22, 2011 |access-date=August 22, 2011 |url-status = live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121108181051/http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/movies/friends-with-benefits-at-top-of-box-office-20110822-1j714.html |archive-date=November 8, 2012 }} The film expanded into Europe in September 2011. It grossed $10.6 million from over 20 territories in its first weekend.{{cite web|url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/news/?id=3271&p=.htm |title=Around–the–World Roundup: 'Smurfs,' 'Apes' Are One–Two Punch for Fifth Straight Weekend |publisher=Box Office Mojo |date=September 11, 2011 |access-date=September 12, 2011 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110922033710/http://boxofficemojo.com/news/?id=3271&p=.htm |archive-date=September 22, 2011 }} Friends with Benefits topped first place in France, where it opened with $1.8 million. The film performed highest in the United Kingdom and Germany, where it grossed $3.1 million and $2.6 million in its first weekend upon release, respectively. By mid-September, the film had grossed over $29.6 million internationally. It went on to gross over $149.5 million worldwide, with international grosses standing at $93.7 million.

{{Notelist}}

{{Reflist}}

{{Commons category}}

• {{Official website|http://www.sonypictures.com/movies/friendswithbenefits/}}
• {{IMDb title|1632708}}
• {{Mojo title|1632708}}
• {{Rotten Tomatoes|friends_with_benefits}}

{{Will Gluck}}

{{Good article}}

Category:2011 films

Category:2011 romantic comedy films

Category:2010s English-language films

Category:2010s sex comedy films

Category:American romantic comedy films

Category:American sex comedy films

Category:Castle Rock Entertainment films

Category:Films about casual sex

Category:Films directed by Will Gluck

Category:Films set in Los Angeles

Category:Films set in New York City

Category:Films shot in Los Angeles

Category:Films shot in New York City

Category:Screen Gems films

Category:2010s American films

Category:Films produced by Jerry Zucker

Category:English-language romantic comedy films

Category:English-language sex comedy films