GNOME Web#Extensions

GNOME Web was originally named "Epiphany", but was rebranded in 2012 as part of GNOME 3.4. The name Epiphany is still used internally, as its code name, for development and in the source code. The package remains epiphany-browser in Debian (to avoid a name collision with a video game that is also called "Epiphany") and epiphany in Fedora and Arch Linux.{{Cite web |title=Arch Linux - epiphany 44.7-1 (x86_64) |url=https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/epiphany/ |access-date=2023-09-21 |website=archlinux.org}}

{{main|Galeon}}

Marco Pesenti Gritti, the initiator of Galeon, originally developed Epiphany in 2002 as a fork of Galeon. The fork occurred because of the disagreement between Gritti and the rest of Galeon developers about new features. Gritti regarded Galeon's monolithic design and the number of user-configurable features as factors that were limiting Galeon's maintainability and usability, but the rest of the Galeon developers wanted to add more features.{{Citation needed|date=March 2022}}

Around the same time, the GNOME project adopted a set of human interface guidelines, which promoted simplification of user interfaces. As Galeon was oriented towards power users, most developers disapproved. As a result, Gritti created a new browser based on Galeon, with most of the non-critical features removed. He intended Epiphany to comply with the GNOME HIG. As such, Epiphany used the global GNOME theme and other settings from inception.

Gritti explained his motivations:

{{quote|While Mozilla has an excellent rendering engine, its default XUL-based interface is considered to be overcrowded and bloated. Furthermore, on slower processors even trivial tasks such as pulling down a menu is less than responsive.

Epiphany aims to utilize the simplest interface possible for a browser. Keep in mind that simple does not necessarily mean less powerful. We believe the commonly used browsers of today are too big, buggy, and bloated. Epiphany addresses simplicity with a small browser designed for the web—not mail, newsgroups, file management, instant messaging or coffee making. The Unix philosophy is to design small tools that do one thing, and do it well.

[..]

Epiphany's main goal is to be integrated with the gnome desktop. We don't aim to make Epiphany usable outside Gnome. If someone will like to use it anyway, it's just a plus. For example: Making people happy that don't have control center installed is not a good reason to have mime configuration in Epiphany itself.|Marco Pesenti Gritti}}

Galeon continued after the fork, but lost momentum due to the remaining developers' failure to keep up with changes in the Mozilla platform. Galeon development stalled and the developers decided to work on extensions to bring Galeon's advanced features to Epiphany.

Gritti ended his work on Epiphany and a GNOME team led by Xan Lopez, Christian Persch and Jean-François Rameau now direct the project. Gritti died of cancer on May 23, 2015.

The first version of Epiphany was released on December 24, 2002.

Epiphany initially used the Gecko layout engine from the Mozilla project to display web pages. It provided a GNOME graphical user interface for Gecko, instead of Mozilla's cross-platform interface.

The development of Epiphany was mainly focused on usability improvements compared to major browsers at the time. The most notable was the new text entry widget, which was introduced in version 1.8. The new widget supported icons inside the text area and reduced the screen space needed to present information, while improving GNOME integration.

The next major milestone was version 2.14, which was the first to follow GNOME's version numbering. It also featured network awareness using NetworkManager, smart bookmarks improvements, and the option to build with XULRunner.{{Citation needed|date=March 2022}}

The latter was critical. Previously, Epiphany could only use an installed Mozilla web browser as a web engine provider. The XULRunner support made it possible to install Epiphany as the only web browser on the system.

File:GNOME Web 40 (released in 2021-03) -- Web Inspector.png-like user interface]]

The development process suffered from major problems related to the Gecko backend. Notably, the release cycles of the two projects did not line up efficiently. Additionally, Mozilla increasingly disregarded third-party software that wished to make use of Gecko, until it became viewed as an integrated Firefox component. To address these issues, in July 2007, the Epiphany team added support for WebKit as an alternative rendering engine. On {{dts|2008|4|1}}, the team announced that it would remove the ability to build it using Gecko and proceed using only WebKit.

The size of the team and complexity of porting the browser to WebKit caused version 2.22 to be re-released with bugfixes alongside GNOME 2.24, so the releases stagnated until {{dts|2009|7|1}}, when it was announced that 2.26 would be the final Gecko-based version.

In September 2009, the transition to WebKit was completed as part of GNOME 2.28.

Developers of GNOME Web maintain a complete and accurate changelog in its official repository that shows complete and detailed changes between all the releases,{{Cite web |title=NEWS · main · GNOME / Epiphany · GitLab |url=https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/epiphany/-/blob/main/NEWS |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240722134947/https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/epiphany/-/raw/main/NEWS |archive-date=July 22, 2024 |access-date=July 22, 2024 |website=GNOME GitLab}} following table just shows arbitrarily mentioned some notable and important changes:

File:GNOME Web 41 (released in 2021-09) — Preferences.png

File:Screenshot of tabs in GNOME Web.png

As a component of GNOME Core Applications, it provides full integration with GNOME settings and other components like GNOME Keyring to securely store passwords, following the GNOME Human Interface Guidelines and the GNOME software stack to provide first-class support for the all new-adopted edge technologies such as Wayland and the latest major GTK versions, multimedia support using GStreamer, small package size (2.6MB) and very fast execution/startup time due to using shared components; other features include the reader mode, mouse gestures, smart bookmarks, praised web application integration mechanism, built-in ad blocking, the "Insert Emoji" option in the context menu for quick and easy inserting of Emoji and Miscellaneous Symbols and Pictographs into the text boxes, Google Safe Browsing, supports reading and saving MHTML,{{Cite web|url=https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/epiphany/-/blob/master/NEWS#L1316|title=NEWS · master · GNOME / Epiphany|access-date=May 27, 2020|archive-date=August 1, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200801035317/https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/epiphany/-/blob/master/NEWS#L1316|url-status=live}} an archive format for web pages that combines all the files of web pages into only one single file; and consume fewer system resources than the major cross-platform web browsers.{{Citation needed|date=March 2022}}

The underlying WebKit browser engine provides support for HTML 4, XHTML, CSS 1 and 2, most of HTML 5 and CSS 3, and a Web Inspector (web development debugging tool).

Encrypted Media Extensions support is not a goal, as the standard does not specify a Content Decryption Module to use, all available modules are proprietary even if licensing is possible, and the system imposes digital rights management that hides what the user's computer is doing to make copying "premium content" difficult. However, Media Source Extensions is supported, as YouTube began to require this technology in November 2018.{{Cite web|title=WebKitGTK+ 2.22.2 and 2.22.3, Media Source Extensions, and YouTube – Michael Catanzaro|date=November 2, 2018 |url=https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2018/11/02/webkitgtk-2-22-2-and-2-22-3-media-source-extensions-and-youtube/|language=en-US|access-date=2020-05-26|archive-date=August 1, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200801052541/https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2018/11/02/webkitgtk-2-22-2-and-2-22-3-media-source-extensions-and-youtube/|url-status=live}}

Apple, which is the primary corporate backer of WebKit, rejected at least 16 web APIs because they could be used in a fingerprinting attack to help personally identify users and track them, while providing limited or no benefit to the user.{{Cite web|last=Cimpanu|first=Catalin|title=Apple declined to implement 16 Web APIs in Safari due to privacy concerns|url=https://www.zdnet.com/article/apple-declined-to-implement-16-web-apis-in-safari-due-to-privacy-concerns/|access-date=2020-06-29|website=ZDNet|language=en|archive-date=June 29, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200629102118/https://www.zdnet.com/article/apple-declined-to-implement-16-web-apis-in-safari-due-to-privacy-concerns/|url-status=live}} As HTML5test checks for most of these APIs, it artificially lowers WebKit's "score" in points (as does lack of DRM support).{{Citation needed|date=March 2022}}

Web once supported NPAPI plug-ins, such as Java and Adobe Flash, but support was removed in GNOME 3.34. In the modern web platform, these have fallen out of favor and support has been removed from all major browsers. Flash has been deprecated by Adobe itself.{{Cite web|url=https://techcrunch.com/2017/07/25/get-ready-to-say-goodbye-to-flash-in-2020/|title=Get ready to finally say goodbye to Flash — in 2020|date=July 25, 2017}} Flash had gained infamy throughout the years for usability and stability issues, incessant security vulnerabilities,{{Cite web|url=https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list.php?vendor_id=53&product_id=6761|title=Adobe Flash Player : List of security vulnerabilities|website=www.cvedetails.com|access-date=September 29, 2019|archive-date=August 1, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200801080330/https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list.php?vendor_id=53&product_id=6761|url-status=live}} its proprietary nature, its ability to let sites deploy particularly obnoxious web ads, and Adobe's poor and inconsistent Linux support. Many of these issues were raised by Steve Jobs, then CEO of Apple, in his essay Thoughts on Flash.

File:GNOME Shell with GNOME Web in mobile form factor, 300% scaling (both in version 3.36).png

Web reuses GNOME frameworks and settings, including the user interface theme, network settings, and printing. Settings are stored with GSettings and GNOME default applications are used for internet media types handling. The user configures these, centrally, in GNOME's settings app.

The built-in preference manager for Web presents basic browser-specific settings while advanced settings which could radically alter Web's behavior can be changed with utilities such as dconf (command line) and dconf-editor (graphical).

Web follows the GNOME Human Interface Guidelines and platform-wide design decisions. For example, in Web 3.4, the menu for application actions was moved to the GNOME Shell's top panel application menu and the menu bar was replaced with "super menu" button, which triggers the display of window-specific menu entries.

Since GNOME 3.32, Web can adjust to various form factors with the help of Libadwaita.{{Cite web |last=Sneddon |first=Joey |date=2023-07-01 |title=Slick New Feature Added to GNOME's Web Browser |url=https://www.omglinux.com/epiphany-browser-slick-tab-overview/ |access-date=2024-09-13 |website=OMG! Linux |language=en-US}} It supports desktop, tablet and phone form factors. ("Narrow Mode").{{cite web |title=Work is Underway to Make the GNOME Web Browser Mobile Friendly |url=https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2018/05/gnome-web-browser-librem-5 |website=OMG! Ubuntu! |date=May 11, 2018 |access-date=8 May 2020 |quote="Web have two modes that I named normal and narrow. The normal mode is Web as you know it, while the narrow mode moves all buttons from the header bar but the hamburger menu to a new action bar at the bottom, letting the windows reach yet unreachable widths." |archive-date=August 1, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200801025625/https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2018/05/gnome-web-browser-librem-5 |url-status=live }}

Since GNOME 3.18, Web is configured to block ads and pop-ups by default. In GNOME 3.34, the existing ad blocker was removed. This code was only partially functional and had been the source of many bugs. Web adopted the "Content Blockers" system from the WebKit engine.{{Cite web|url=https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/epiphany/-/issues/288|title=Port the adblocker to the Content Blockers API (#288) · Issues · GNOME / Epiphany|website=GitLab|date=November 9, 2015 |access-date=May 26, 2020|archive-date=August 1, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200801044839/https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/epiphany/-/issues/288|url-status=live}}{{Cite web|url=https://webkit.org/blog/3476/content-blockers-first-look/|title=Introduction to WebKit Content Blockers|date=June 12, 2015|access-date=September 29, 2019|archive-date=September 29, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190929191102/https://webkit.org/blog/3476/content-blockers-first-look/|url-status=live}}

One of the developers, Adrián Pérez de Castro, compared the old and new ad blockers. He found that the switch saved approximately 80 MiB of RAM per browser tab.{{Cite web|url=https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/epiphany/-/merge_requests/178|title=Use the new WebKit content filters API for the adblocker (!178) · Merge Requests · GNOME / Epiphany|website=GitLab|date=February 2019 |access-date=May 26, 2020|archive-date=August 1, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200801031059/https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/epiphany/-/merge_requests/178|url-status=live}}

Since GNOME 3.28, Web has support for Google Safe Browsing, to help prevent users from visiting malicious websites.{{cite web|url=https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Epiphany-3.27.1-Released|title=Epiphany 3.28 Development Kicks Off With Safe Browsing, Better Flatpak Handling – Phoronix|website=phoronix.com|access-date=April 9, 2018|archive-date=April 9, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180409043718/https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Epiphany-3.27.1-Released|url-status=live}}

Since GNOME 3.34, Web explicitly requires a minimum of WebKitGTK 2.26 or later.{{Cite web|url=https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/epiphany/commit/8c63e4b3c6f04f925c6339ba2fb416ddf21fdad8|title=Require WebKitGTK 2.26.0 (8c63e4b3) · Commits · GNOME / Epiphany|website=GitLab|date=September 13, 2019 |access-date=September 29, 2019|archive-date=September 29, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190929183402/https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/epiphany/commit/8c63e4b3c6f04f925c6339ba2fb416ddf21fdad8|url-status=live}} This provides the "Bubblewrap Sandbox"{{Cite web|url=https://lwn.net/Articles/686113/|title=Sandboxing for the unprivileged with bubblewrap [LWN.net]|website=lwn.net|access-date=September 29, 2019|archive-date=September 29, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190929183358/https://lwn.net/Articles/686113/|url-status=live}} for tab processes, which is intended to prevent malicious websites from hijacking the browser and using it to spy on other tabs or run malicious code on the user's computer. If such code found another exploit in the operating system allowing it to become root, the result could be a disaster for all users of the system.

Making the sandbox a priority was brought on, according to Michael Catanzaro, because he was particularly concerned with the code quality of OpenJPEG and the numerous security problems that had been discovered in it, including many years of failing security reviews by Ubuntu.{{Cite web|url=https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjpeg2/+bug/711061|title=Bug #711061 "[MIR] openjpeg2" : Bugs : openjpeg2 package : Ubuntu|website=bugs.launchpad.net|date=February 2011 |access-date=September 29, 2019|archive-date=September 29, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190929211627/https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/%2Bsource/openjpeg2/%2Bbug/711061|url-status=live}} He further explained that web compatibility requires that sites believe that Web is a major browser. Sending them the user agent of Apple Safari causes fewer broken websites than others (due to sharing the WebKit engine), but also causes caching servers to deliver JPEG 2000 images,{{Cite web|url=https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=186272|title=186272 – [GTK][WPE] Support JPEG 2000 images|website=bugs.webkit.org|access-date=September 29, 2019|archive-date=August 1, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200801035259/https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=186272|url-status=live}} of which Safari is the only major browser to support. There is no other usable open source option for JPEG 2000 support. Fixing OpenJPEG, which is the official reference software, will be a massive undertaking that could take years to sort out. Enabling the Bubblewrap Sandbox would cause many vulnerabilities in this and other components to become "minimally useful" to potential attackers.{{Cite web|url=https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2019/06/09/on-ubuntu-updates/|title=On Ubuntu Updates – Michael Catanzaro|date=June 9, 2019 |access-date=September 29, 2019|archive-date=June 24, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190624124815/https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2019/06/09/on-ubuntu-updates/|url-status=live}}

In GNOME 3.36, Web gained native support for PDF documents by using PDF.js. Michael Catanzaro explained that having websites open Evince to display PDF files was insecure, as it could be used to escape the browser's security sandbox. Since Evince was the last user of NPAPI, this allowed the remaining support code for the obsolete plug-in model (where additional vulnerabilities could be hiding) to be removed. Since the NPAPI support had a hard dependency on X11, moving to PDF.js also allowed that dependency to be dropped.

Since PDF.js internally converts PDF documents so that they can be displayed by the web browser's engine, it does not add security vulnerabilities to the browser the way that compiled plug-ins such as Adobe Acrobat or Evince could.

File:GNOME Web 41 (released in 2021-09) — Bookmark management 01.png

While most browsers feature a hierarchical folder-based bookmark system, Web uses categorized bookmarks, where a single bookmark (e.g. this page) can exist in multiple categories (such as "Web Browsers", "GNOME", and "Computer Software"). A special category includes bookmarks that have not yet been categorized. Bookmarks, along with browsing history, are accessed from the address bar in find-as-you-type manner.

Another innovative concept supported by Web (though originally from Galeon) is "smart bookmarks". These take a single argument specified from the address bar, or from a textbox in a toolbar.

{{-}}

File:GNOME Web 3.36 application manager.png

{{main|Site-specific browser}}

Since GNOME 3.2, released in September 2011, Web allows creating application launchers for web applications. The subsequent invocation of a launcher brings up a plain site-specific browser (single instance) of Web limited to one domain, with off-site links opening in a normal browser. The launcher created this way is accessible from the desktop and is not limited to GNOME Shell. For instance it may be used with Unity, used on Ubuntu. This feature facilitates the integration of the desktop and World Wide Web, which is a goal of Web's developers. Similar features can be found in the Windows version of Google Chrome. For the same purpose Mozilla Foundation previously developed a standalone application Mozilla Prism, which was superseded by the project Chromeless.

Web applications are managed within the browser's main instance. The applications can be deleted from the page, accessible with a special URI about:applications. This approach was supposed to be a temporary while a centralized GNOME web application management was to be implemented in GNOME 3.4, but this never happened.

Since GNOME 3.26 and until GNOME 47, Web had support for Firefox Sync, which allowed users to sync their bookmarks, history, passwords, and open tabs with Firefox Sync, which could then be shared between any copy of Firefox or Web that the user signed into Firefox Sync with.{{cite web|url=https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2017/08/09/on-firefox-sync/|title=On Firefox Sync – Michael Catanzaro|website=blogs.gnome.org|date=August 9, 2017 |access-date=September 25, 2017|archive-date=September 25, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170925132346/https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2017/08/09/on-firefox-sync/|url-status=live}}

In GNOME 47, it was disabled because of Mozilla changing the way Firefox Sync worked.{{Cite web |title=Making sure you're not a bot! |url=https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/epiphany/-/issues/2337 |access-date=2025-05-05 |website=gitlab.gnome.org}}

=== Extensions ===

Web once supported extensions and a package was maintained containing the official ones. This was later removed due to problems with stability and maintainability.{{Citation needed|date=March 2022}}

Some popular extensions, such as ad blocking, were moved to the core application.{{Citation needed|date=March 2022}}

The project has expressed an interest in implementing support for the WebExtension add-on format used by Chrome, Firefox, and some other major browsers, if interested contributors can be found.{{Cite web|url=https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Web/Docs/FrequentlyAskedQuestions#Does_Epiphany_support_extensions.3F|title=Apps/Web/Docs/FrequentlyAskedQuestions - GNOME Wiki!|website=wiki.gnome.org|access-date=January 5, 2019|archive-date=July 17, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190717180810/https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Web/Docs/FrequentlyAskedQuestions#Does_Epiphany_support_extensions.3F|url-status=live}} Experimental support for WebExtensions was introduced in GNOME 43.{{Cite web|url=https://debugpointnews.com/gnome-web-43-extension/|title=GNOME Web (Epiphany) Gets WebExtension Support, Coming in GNOME 43|website=DebugPoint NEWS|date=July 1, 2022|access-date=May 25, 2023}}

File:Epiphany 2.26.1 - 3.2.0.png area than in 3.2.0 (right)]]

In reviewing the WebKit-powered Epiphany 2.28 in September 2009, Ryan Paul of Ars Technica said "Epiphany is quite snappy in GNOME 2.28 and scores 100/100 on the Acid3 test. Using WebKit will help differentiate Epiphany from Firefox, which is shipped as the default browser by most of the major Linux distributors."

In reviewing Epiphany 2.30 in July 2010, Jack Wallen described it as "efficient, but different" and noted its problem with crashes. "When I first started working with Epiphany it crashed on most sites I visited. After doing a little research (and then a little debugging) I realized the issue was with JavaScript. Epiphany (in its current release), for some strange reason, doesn't like JavaScript. The only way around this was to disable JavaScript. Yes this means a lot of features won't work on a lot of sites – but this also means those same sites will load faster and won't be so prone to having issues (like crashing my browser)." Wallen concluded positively about the browser, "Although Epiphany hasn't fully replaced Chrome and Firefox as my one-stop-shop browser, I now use it much more than I would have previously. [It has a] small footprint, fast startup, and clean interface."{{Cite news|url = http://www.ghacks.net/2010/07/01/epiphany-an-efficient-but-different-web-browser/|title = Epiphany: An efficient, but different, web browser|access-date = March 24, 2011|last = Wallen|first = Jack|date = July 2010|work = Ghacks.net|archive-date = July 30, 2011|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110730154959/http://www.ghacks.net/2010/07/01/epiphany-an-efficient-but-different-web-browser/|url-status = live}}

In March 2011, Veronica Henry reviewed Epiphany 2.32, saying "To be fair, this would be a hard sell as a primary desktop browser for most users. In fact, there isn't even a setting to let you designate it as your default browser. But for those instance where you need to fire up a lightning-fast browser for quick surfing, Epiphany will do the trick." She further noted, "Though I still use Firefox as my primary browser, lately it seems to run at a snail's pace. So, one of the first things I noticed about Epiphany is how quickly it launches. And subsequent page loads on my system are equally as fast." Henry criticized Epiphany for its short list of extensions, singling out the lack of Firebug as a deficiency. Web instead supports Web Inspector offered by the WebKit engine, which has similar functionality.

In April 2012, Ryan Paul of Ars Technica used Web as an example to his criticism of GNOME 3.4 design decisions: "Aside from the poor initial discoverability of the panel menu, this model works reasonably well for simple applications. [...] Unfortunately, it doesn't scale well in complex applications. The best example of where this approach can pose difficulties is in GNOME's default Web browser. [...] Having the application's functionality split across two completely separate menus does not constitute a usability improvement." This was addressed in later versions, with a single unified menu.

In an October 2016 review, Bertel King Jr. noted on MakeUseOf, "Later versions offer the best integration you will find with GNOME Shell. It lacks the add-ons found in mainstream browsers, but some users will like the minimalism, the speed, and the tab isolation that prevents one misbehaving site from crashing the entire browser."{{cite web|url=http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/best-linux-software/|last=King|first=Bertel Jr.|title=The Best Linux Software|work=makeuseof.com|access-date=October 11, 2016|archive-date=October 10, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161010121008/http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/best-linux-software/|url-status=live}}

In an April 2019 review, Bertel King Jr. wrote another article on MakeUseOf, this time reviewing GNOME Web for its Web Applications Mode. He stated, "When you check your email, you’re using a web app. If you open YouTube, Netflix, or Spotify in a browser, again, you’re using a web app. These days, you can replace most of your desktop apps with web apps. [...] GNOME Web provides tools to better integrate web apps with the rest of your desktop, so you can open them via your app launcher and view them in your dock or taskbar. This way they feel more like apps and less like sites." He also praised the security provided by walling off Web Applications from the rest of the browser and each other. Like Mozilla's container feature, this helps prevent sites such as Facebook from seeing what the user is doing in the main browser. It also allows the user to create multiple "apps" for the same site, to easily switch between different accounts.{{cite web |title=5 Reasons to Start Using GNOME Epiphany Web Apps |url=https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/epiphany-web-apps-integrate-web-desktop/ |website=makeuseof.com |access-date=June 13, 2019 |date=April 4, 2019 |archive-date=May 25, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190525202703/https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/epiphany-web-apps-integrate-web-desktop/ |url-status=live }}

• {{slink|About URI scheme|GNOME Web}}
• Midori, another web browser formerly based on GTK and WebKitGTK
• List of web browsers for Unix and Unix-like operating systems

{{Portal bar|Free and open-source software|Linux|Internet}}

{{Reflist|30em|refs=

{{citation |url = http://blogs.gnome.org/epiphany/2006/02/27/198-released-xulrunner/ |title = 1.9.8 released; XULRunner |work = The GNOME Web Browser Developers |date = February 27, 2006 |access-date = October 17, 2011 |archive-date = June 12, 2007 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070612113349/http://blogs.gnome.org/epiphany/2006/02/27/198-released-xulrunner/ |url-status = live }}

{{citation

|url = https://arstechnica.com/business/news/2012/04/hands-on-gnome-34-arrives-introducing-significant-design-changes.ars

|title = Hands-on: GNOME 3.4 arrives, introducing significant design changes

|first = Ryan

|last = Paul

|work = Ars Technica

|date = April 1, 2012

|access-date = April 1, 2012

|archive-date = April 3, 2012

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120403144510/http://arstechnica.com/business/news/2012/04/hands-on-gnome-34-arrives-introducing-significant-design-changes.ars

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = https://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/09/linux-garden-gets-a-new-gnome-with-version-228.ars

|title = Linux garden gets a new GNOME with version 2.28

|first = Ryan

|last = Paul

|work = Ars Technica

|date = September 24, 2009

|access-date = October 16, 2011

|archive-date = November 7, 2011

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20111107125526/http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2009/09/linux-garden-gets-a-new-gnome-with-version-228.ars

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=IGFPnJpa5cIC

|first = Scott

|last = Granneman

|title = Don't click on the blue e!: switching to Firefox

|publisher = O'Reilly Media

|publication-date = October 16, 2005

|publication-place = Sebastopol, CA, United States

|isbn = 0-596-00939-9

|page = [https://books.google.com/books?id=IGFPnJpa5cIC&pg=PT201 201]

|year = 2005

|access-date = October 20, 2016

|archive-date = December 23, 2016

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20161223011937/https://books.google.com/books?id=IGFPnJpa5cIC

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://live.gnome.org/Epiphany/RelNotes216

|title = Epiphany 2.16 Release Notes

|date = March 2, 2008

|access-date = February 9, 2025

|work = The GNOME Project

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080908075132/http://live.gnome.org/Epiphany/RelNotes216

|archive-date = September 8, 2008

|url-status = dead }}

{{citation

|url = http://blogs.gnome.org/xan/2008/04/06/epiphany-%e2%99%a5-webkit/

|title = Epiphany ♥ WebKit

|first = Xan

|last = Lopez

|date = April 6, 2008

|access-date = November 25, 2011

|archive-date = November 3, 2011

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20111103213159/http://blogs.gnome.org/xan/2008/04/06/epiphany-%e2%99%a5-webkit/

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://projects.gnome.org/epiphany/smartbookmarks.html

|title = Smart Bookmarks

|work = The GNOME Project

|access-date = December 14, 2011

|archive-date = November 30, 2011

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20111130230745/http://projects.gnome.org/epiphany/smartbookmarks.html

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://blogs.gnome.org/epiphany/2009/12/24/epiphany-turns-7/

|title = Epiphany turns 7

|work = The GNOME Web Browser Developers

|date = December 24, 2009

|access-date = June 15, 2011

|archive-date = May 6, 2011

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110506045544/http://blogs.gnome.org/epiphany/2009/12/24/epiphany-turns-7/

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=yZ7Z6Wq3EdcC

|first = Richard

|last = Peterson

|title = Fedora 10 Linux Desktop

|publisher = Surfing Turtle Press

|publication-date = June 15, 2008

|publication-place = San Francisco, United States

|isbn = 978-0984103621

|page = [https://books.google.com/books?id=yZ7Z6Wq3EdcC&pg=PA224 224]

|date = May 2009

|access-date = October 20, 2016

|archive-date = March 26, 2015

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150326183018/http://books.google.com/books?id=yZ7Z6Wq3EdcC

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://blogs.gnome.org/epiphany/2007/03/04/foresight-and-epilicious/

|title = Foresight and Epilicious

|work = The GNOME Web Browser Developers

|date = March 4, 2007

|access-date = October 16, 2011

|archive-date = April 2, 2012

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120402032251/http://blogs.gnome.org/epiphany/2007/03/04/foresight-and-epilicious/

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/books/ubuntu_applications/epiphany

|title = Epiphany, the ultimate Gnome browser

|last = Min

|first = Andrew

|work = The Ubuntu Applications book (under construction)

|publisher = Free Software Magazine

|access-date = October 16, 2011

|url-status = dead

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20081031231829/http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/books/ubuntu_applications/epiphany

|archive-date = October 31, 2008

|df = mdy-all }}

{{citation

|url = http://galeon.sourceforge.net/links/history.php

|title = Galeon, A History or, why Galeon is the way it is

|last = DeRosia

|first = Chris

|date = July 29, 2003

|access-date = October 16, 2011

|archive-date = October 13, 2011

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20111013014019/http://galeon.sourceforge.net/links/history.php

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://blogs.gnome.org/epiphany/2009/07/01/gecko-end-of-life/

|title = Gecko end-of-life

|work = The GNOME Web Browser Developers

|date = July 1, 2009

|access-date = November 25, 2011

|archive-date = July 17, 2011

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110717141939/http://blogs.gnome.org/epiphany/2009/07/01/gecko-end-of-life/

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation |url = http://git.gnome.org/browse/epiphany/plain/NEWS |archive-url = https://archive.today/20130113050307/http://git.gnome.org/browse/epiphany/plain/NEWS |url-status = dead |archive-date = January 13, 2013 |title = NEWS file |work = The GNOME Project's git repository |access-date = October 17, 2011 }}

{{citation

|url = https://help.gnome.org/misc/release-notes/3.2/#epiphany

|title = GNOME 3.2 Release Notes

|first1 = Olav

|last1 = Vitters

|first2 = André

|last2 = Klapper

|first3 = Allan

|last3 = Day

|work = The GNOME Project

|date = September 28, 2011

|access-date = February 9, 2025

|archive-date = December 23, 2012

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20121223210950/http://library.gnome.org/misc/release-notes/3.2/#epiphany

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = https://help.gnome.org/misc/release-notes/

|title = GNOME Release Notes

|work = The GNOME Project

|access-date = February 9, 2025

|archive-date = November 14, 2011

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20111114213459/http://library.gnome.org/misc/release-notes/

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://www.webupd8.org/2011/10/install-epiphany-320-with-web.html

|title = Install Epiphany 3.2.0 with Web Application mode in Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot

|author = Andrew

|date = October 3, 2011

|access-date = October 16, 2011

|archive-date = October 24, 2011

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20111024011913/http://www.webupd8.org/2011/10/install-epiphany-320-with-web.html

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=fTvN7BfU_WoC

|first = Rickford

|last = Grand

|title = Linux for non-geeks: a hands-on, project-based, take-it-slow guidebook

|publisher = No Starch Press

|publication-date = October 16, 2004

|publication-place = San Francisco, United States

|isbn = 1-59327-034-8

|pages = [https://books.google.com/books?id=fTvN7BfU_WoC&pg=PA116 116–117]

|year = 2004

|access-date = October 20, 2016

|archive-date = March 26, 2015

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150326173426/http://books.google.com/books?id=fTvN7BfU_WoC

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://epiphany.mozdev.org/

|title = Epiphany's initial home page

|author = Marco Pesenti Gritti

|date = December 8, 2002

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20030424094846/http://epiphany.mozdev.org/

|archive-date = April 24, 2003

|access-date = October 17, 2011 }}

{{citation

|title = Prism is now Chromeless

|url = https://mozillalabs.com/blog/2011/02/prism-is-now-chromeless/

|first = Lloyd

|last = Hilaiel

|work = Mozilla Labs

|date = February 11, 2011

|access-date = November 14, 2011

|url-status = dead

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110808002516/http://mozillalabs.com/blog/2011/02/prism-is-now-chromeless

|archive-date = August 8, 2011 }}

{{citation

|url = http://www.mozillazine.org/talkback.html?article=3440

|title = Epiphany 0.8.0 Released

|work = mozillaZine

|date = July 13, 2003

|access-date = October 17, 2011

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20101126060025/http://mozillazine.org/talkback.html?article=3440

|archive-date = November 26, 2010

|url-status = live }}

{{citation

|url = http://blogs.gnome.org/epiphany/2005/08/03/new-text-entry-field-with-focus-indication-and-icons/

|title = New text entry field with focus indication and icons

|work = The GNOME Web Browser Developers

|date = August 3, 2005

|access-date = October 17, 2011

|archive-date = June 25, 2011

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110625065928/http://blogs.gnome.org/epiphany/2005/08/03/new-text-entry-field-with-focus-indication-and-icons/

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://blogs.gnome.org/epiphany/2006/03/14/%cf%80-1/

|title = π -1

|work = The GNOME Web Browser Developers

|date = March 14, 2006

|access-date = October 16, 2011

|archive-date = April 2, 2012

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120402032242/http://blogs.gnome.org/epiphany/2006/03/14/%cf%80-1/

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://blogs.gnome.org/xan/2007/07/24/if-you-see-the-buddha-on-the-road-port-it-to-gtk/

|title = If you see the Buddha on the road, port it to GTK

|first = Xan

|last = Lopez

|date = July 24, 2007

|access-date = November 25, 2011

|archive-date = November 3, 2011

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20111103143645/http://blogs.gnome.org/xan/2007/07/24/if-you-see-the-buddha-on-the-road-port-it-to-gtk/

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://mail.gnome.org/archives/epiphany-list/2002-December/thread.html#00018

|title = [Epiphany] Epiphany 0.4

|first = Marco Pesenti

|last = Gritti

|date = December 25, 2002

|work = epiphany mailing list

|access-date = December 14, 2011

|archive-date = February 2, 2012

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120202042443/http://mail.gnome.org/archives/epiphany-list/2002-December/thread.html#00018

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://mail.gnome.org/archives/epiphany-list/2003-April/msg00028.html

|title = [Epiphany] Epiphany 0.5.0

|first = Marco Pesenti

|last = Gritti

|date = April 13, 2003

|work = epiphany mailing list

|access-date = December 14, 2011

|archive-date = May 29, 2012

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120529185157/https://mail.gnome.org/archives/epiphany-list/2003-April/msg00028.html

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://mail.gnome.org/archives/epiphany-list/2003-May/msg00022.html

|title = [Epiphany] Epiphany 0.6.0

|first = Marco Pesenti

|last = Gritti

|date = May 4, 2003

|work = epiphany mailing list

|access-date = December 14, 2011

|archive-date = May 29, 2012

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120529185416/https://mail.gnome.org/archives/epiphany-list/2003-May/msg00022.html

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://mail.gnome.org/archives/epiphany-list/2003-June/msg00053.html

|title = [Epiphany] Epiphany 0.7.0

|first = Marco Pesenti

|last = Gritti

|date = June 7, 2003

|work = epiphany mailing list

|access-date = December 14, 2011

|archive-date = May 29, 2012

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120529185512/https://mail.gnome.org/archives/epiphany-list/2003-June/msg00053.html

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://mail.gnome.org/archives/epiphany-list/2003-August/msg00150.html

|title = [Epiphany] Epiphany 0.9.0

|first = Marco Pesenti

|last = Gritti

|date = August 22, 2003

|work = epiphany mailing list

|access-date = December 14, 2011

|archive-date = May 29, 2012

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120529185543/https://mail.gnome.org/archives/epiphany-list/2003-August/msg00150.html

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://mail.gnome.org/archives/epiphany-list/2003-September/msg00043.html

|title = [Epiphany] Epiphany 1.0

|first = Marco Pesenti

|last = Gritti

|date = September 8, 2003

|work = epiphany mailing list

|access-date = December 14, 2011

|archive-date = May 29, 2012

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120529185746/https://mail.gnome.org/archives/epiphany-list/2003-September/msg00043.html

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://mail.gnome.org/archives/epiphany-list/2004-March/msg00045.html

|title = Epiphany 1.2.0

|first = Marco Pesenti

|last = Gritti

|date = March 15, 2004

|work = epiphany mailing list

|access-date = December 14, 2011

|archive-date = May 29, 2012

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120529185903/https://mail.gnome.org/archives/epiphany-list/2004-March/msg00045.html

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://mail.gnome.org/archives/epiphany-list/2004-September/msg00030.html

|title = Epiphany 1.4.0

|first = Christian

|last = Persch

|date = September 13, 2004

|work = epiphany mailing list

|access-date = December 14, 2011

|archive-date = May 29, 2012

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120529190144/https://mail.gnome.org/archives/epiphany-list/2004-September/msg00030.html

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://mail.gnome.org/archives/epiphany-list/2005-March/msg00003.html

|title = Epiphany 1.6.0

|first = Christian

|last = Persch

|date = March 9, 2005

|work = epiphany mailing list

|access-date = December 14, 2011

|archive-date = May 29, 2012

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120529190423/https://mail.gnome.org/archives/epiphany-list/2005-March/msg00003.html

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://mail.gnome.org/archives/epiphany-list/2005-September/msg00016.html

|title = Epiphany and Epiphany-extensions 1.8.0

|first = Reinout

|last = van Schouwen

|date = September 5, 2005

|work = epiphany mailing list

|access-date = December 14, 2011

|archive-date = May 29, 2012

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120529190718/https://mail.gnome.org/archives/epiphany-list/2005-September/msg00016.html

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://mail.gnome.org/archives/epiphany-list/2006-March/msg00075.html

|title = Epiphany 2.14.0 released!

|first = Reinout

|last = van Schouwen

|date = March 12, 2006

|work = epiphany mailing list

|access-date = December 14, 2011

|archive-date = May 29, 2012

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120529190537/https://mail.gnome.org/archives/epiphany-list/2006-March/msg00075.html

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-announce-list/2006-September/msg00042.html

|title = Celebrating the release of GNOME 2.16!

|date = September 6, 2006

|access-date = September 20, 2007

|work = gnome-announce mailing list

|last = Newren

|first = Elijah

|archive-date = July 5, 2017

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170705013719/https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-announce-list/2006-September/msg00042.html

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-announce-list/2007-March/msg00056.html

|title = Celebrating the release of GNOME 2.18!

|date = March 14, 2007

|access-date = September 20, 2007

|work = gnome-announce mailing list

|last = Newren

|first = Elijah

|archive-date = July 5, 2017

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20170705081021/https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-announce-list/2007-March/msg00056.html

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = https://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070919-gnome-2-20-officially-released.html

|title = GNOME 2.20 officially released

|first = Ryan

|last = Paul

|work = Ars Technica

|date = September 19, 2007

|access-date = September 20, 2007

|archive-date = October 11, 2007

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20071011163821/http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070919-gnome-2-20-officially-released.html

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-announce-list/2008-March/msg00060.html

|title = Celebrating the release of GNOME 2.22!

|date = March 12, 2008

|access-date = March 12, 2008

|work = gnome-announce mailing list-list

|last = Untz

|first = Vincent

|archive-date = April 28, 2019

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190428015433/https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-announce-list/2008-March/msg00060.html

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-announce-list/2008-September/msg00132.html

|title = Celebrating the release of GNOME 2.24!

|date = September 24, 2008

|access-date = September 27, 2008

|work = gnome-announce mailing list-list

|last = Untz

|first = Vincent

|archive-date = April 28, 2019

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190428015454/https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-announce-list/2008-September/msg00132.html

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-announce-list/2009-March/msg00091.html

|title = Celebrating the release of GNOME 2.26!

|date = March 18, 2009

|access-date = March 18, 2009

|work = gnome-announce mailing list-list

|last = Untz

|first = Vincent

|archive-date = April 28, 2019

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190428015604/https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-announce-list/2009-March/msg00091.html

|url-status = live

}}

{{cite web

|url = http://www.osnews.com/story/22224/GNOME_2_28_Released

|title = GNOME 2.28 Released

|last = Holwerda

|first = Thom

|work = OSNews

|date = September 24, 2009

|access-date = April 5, 2009

|archive-date = November 6, 2018

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20181106193900/http://www.osnews.com/story/22224/GNOME_2_28_Released

|url-status = live

}}

{{cite web

|url = http://www.osnews.com/story/23092/GNOME_2_30_Released

|title = GNOME 2.30 Released

|last = Holwerda

|first = Thom

|work = OSNews

|date = March 31, 2010

|access-date = April 4, 2010

|archive-date = November 6, 2018

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20181106192312/http://www.osnews.com/story/23092/GNOME_2_30_Released

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-announce-list/2010-September/msg00110.html

|title = Celebrating the release of GNOME 2.32!

|first = Vincent

|last = Untz

|date = September 29, 2010

|work = gnome-announce mailing list

|access-date = December 14, 2011

|archive-date = May 29, 2012

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120529190636/https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-announce-list/2010-September/msg00110.html

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-announce-list/2011-April/msg00038.html

|title = GNOME 3.0 Released

|first = Vincent

|last = Untz

|date = April 6, 2011

|work = gnome-announce mailing list

|access-date = December 14, 2011

|archive-date = November 4, 2011

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20111104133026/http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-announce-list/2011-April/msg00038.html

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-announce-list/2011-September/msg00120.html

|title = GNOME 3.2 Released

|first = Matthias

|last = Clasen

|date = September 28, 2011

|work = gnome-announce mailing list

|access-date = December 14, 2011

|archive-date = December 6, 2011

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20111206034903/http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-announce-list/2011-September/msg00120.html

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = https://help.gnome.org/misc/release-notes/3.4/

|title = GNOME 3.4 Release Notes

|date = March 28, 2012

|work = The GNOME Project

|access-date = February 9, 2025

|archive-date = March 30, 2012

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120330034004/http://library.gnome.org/misc/release-notes/3.4/

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = https://help.gnome.org/misc/release-notes/3.6/

|title = GNOME 3.6 Release Notes

|date = September 26, 2012

|work = The GNOME Project

|access-date = February 9, 2025

|archive-date = December 30, 2012

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20121230052356/http://library.gnome.org/misc/release-notes/3.6/

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = https://help.gnome.org/misc/release-notes/3.8/

|archive-url = https://archive.today/20130802014758/http://library.gnome.org/misc/release-notes/3.8/

|url-status = live

|archive-date = August 2, 2013

|title = GNOME 3.8 Release Notes

|date = March 27, 2013

|access-date = February 9, 2025

|work = The GNOME Project

}}

{{citation

|url = https://help.gnome.org/misc/release-notes/3.30/

|title = GNOME 3.30 Release Notes

|date = September 6, 2018

|work = The GNOME Project

|access-date = February 9, 2025

|archive-date = November 5, 2021

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20211105214354/https://help.gnome.org/misc/release-notes/3.30/

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=9xrE5gokRQwC

|first1 = Matthias Kalle

|last1 = Dalheimer

|first2 = Matt

|last2 = Welsh

|title = Running Linux

|edition = March 28, 5

|publisher = O'Reilly Media

|publication-date = March 28, 2006

|publication-place = Sebastopol, CA, United States

|isbn = 978-0-596-00760-7

|page = [https://books.google.com/books?id=9xrE5gokRQwC&pg=9PT94 94]

|date = December 22, 2005

|access-date = October 20, 2016

|archive-date = March 26, 2015

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150326211537/http://books.google.com/books?id=9xrE5gokRQwC

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://blogs.gnome.org/epiphany/2007/01/30/a-new-stabler-stable-release/

|title = A new stabler stable release

|work = The GNOME Web Browser Developers

|date = January 30, 2007

|access-date = October 16, 2011

|archive-date = April 2, 2012

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120402032316/http://blogs.gnome.org/epiphany/2007/01/30/a-new-stabler-stable-release/

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=P_mbgQfn3ZAC

|first = Michael

|last = McCallister

|title = SUSE Linux 10 unleashed

|series = Unleashed Series

|publisher = Sams Publishing

|publication-date = October 16, 2006

|publication-place = United States

|isbn = 0-672-32726-0

|page = [https://books.google.com/books?id=P_mbgQfn3ZAC&pg=PA225 225]

|date = January 2006

|access-date = October 20, 2016

|archive-date = March 26, 2015

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150326191124/http://books.google.com/books?id=P_mbgQfn3ZAC

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://blogs.gnome.org/epiphany/2006/01/22/topic-suggestions/

|title = Topic suggestions

|work = The GNOME Web Browser Developers

|date = January 22, 2006

|access-date = October 17, 2011

|archive-date = April 2, 2012

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120402032308/http://blogs.gnome.org/epiphany/2006/01/22/topic-suggestions/

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://www.trainsignaltraining.com/top-linux-browsers

|title = Top 3 Alternative Linux Browsers

|first = Veronica

|last = Henry

|work = Train Signal Training

|date = March 9, 2011

|access-date = March 25, 2011

|archive-date = April 4, 2011

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110404001541/http://www.trainsignaltraining.com/top-linux-browsers

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://blogs.gnome.org/xan/2011/08/31/web-application-mode-in-gnome-3-2/

|title = Web application mode in GNOME 3.2

|first = Xan

|last = Lopez

|date = August 31, 2011

|access-date = October 16, 2011

|archive-date = October 1, 2011

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20111001182426/http://blogs.gnome.org/xan/2011/08/31/web-application-mode-in-gnome-3-2/

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://blogs.gnome.org/xan/2011/04/11/the-web-comes-to-gnome-ready-or-not/

|title = The Web comes to GNOME, ready or not

|first = Xan

|last = Lopez

|date = April 11, 2011

|access-date = October 16, 2011

|archive-date = October 8, 2011

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20111008183240/http://blogs.gnome.org/xan/2011/04/11/the-web-comes-to-gnome-ready-or-not/

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://www.webkit.org/blog/197/web-inspector-redesign/

|title = Web Inspector Redesign

|last = Hatcher

|first = Timothy

|work = Webkit developers blogs

|date = September 30, 2008

|access-date = October 18, 2011

|archive-date = October 11, 2011

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20111011022948/http://www.webkit.org/blog/197/web-inspector-redesign/

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|url = http://mail.gnome.org/archives/epiphany-list/2008-April/msg00000.html

|title = ANNOUNCEMENT: The Future of Epiphany

|first = Christian

|last = Persch

|work = epiphany mailing list-list

|date = April 1, 2008

|access-date = April 5, 2008

|archive-date = February 14, 2012

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120214042734/http://mail.gnome.org/archives/epiphany-list/2008-April/msg00000.html

|url-status = live

}}

{{citation

|title = SpecSupport

|url = https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/SpecSupport

|work = WebKit project

|access-date = November 14, 2011

|archive-date = October 19, 2011

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20111019180040/http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/SpecSupport

|url-status = live

}}

{{cite web

|url = https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/epiphany-browser

|title = Debian -- Details of package epiphany-browser in bullseye

|date = April 27, 2020

|access-date = April 27, 2020

|archive-date = August 1, 2020

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200801081906/https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/epiphany-browser

|url-status = live

}}

{{cite web

|title = Frequently Asked Questions

|url = https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Web/Docs/FrequentlyAskedQuestions#What_about_Firefox_as_the_default_GNOME_browser.3F

|access-date = June 13, 2019

|archive-date = July 17, 2019

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190717180810/https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Web/Docs/FrequentlyAskedQuestions#What_about_Firefox_as_the_default_GNOME_browser.3F

|url-status = live

}}

{{cite web

|url = https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/epiphany

|title = The Epiphany GitLab repository

|access-date = May 27, 2020

|archive-date = August 1, 2020

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200801042258/https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/epiphany

|url-status = live

}}

{{cite web

|url = https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/epiphany-browser

|title = epiphany-browser package in Ubuntu

|access-date = May 20, 2016

|author = Canonical Ltd

|date = April 22, 2016

|archive-date = November 8, 2017

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20171108140401/https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/epiphany-browser

|url-status = live

}}

{{cite web

|url = https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epiphany

|title = Overview - rpms/epiphany - src.fedoraproject.org

|website = src.fedoraproject.org

|access-date = October 1, 2019

|archive-date = July 22, 2019

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190722120904/https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/epiphany

|url-status = live

}}

{{cite web

|title = GNOME Web Browser is Adding a Reader Mode – OMG! Ubuntu!

|url = https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2018/06/gnome-web-browser-reader-mode

|access-date = June 13, 2019

|date = June 22, 2018

|archive-date = September 28, 2019

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190928041229/https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2018/06/gnome-web-browser-reader-mode

|url-status = live

}}

{{cite web

|url = https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2015-May/msg00027.html

|title = Marco

|work = gnome.org

|access-date = November 28, 2015

|archive-date = March 5, 2016

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20160305222554/https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2015-May/msg00027.html

|url-status = live

}}

{{cite web

|title = Adobe U-Turns, Decides to Support Flash for Linux

|date = August 28, 2015

|url = https://www.engadget.com/2015/08/28/chrome-will-block-obnoxious-flash-ads-starting-september-1st

|access-date = September 29, 2019

|archive-date = February 12, 2019

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190212180953/https://www.engadget.com/2015/08/28/chrome-will-block-obnoxious-flash-ads-starting-september-1st/

|url-status = live

}}

{{cite web |title = Chrome will block obnoxious Flash ads starting September 1st |date = September 5, 2016 |url = https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2016/09/adobe-announced-will-restart-support-flash-linux |access-date = September 29, 2019 |archive-date = September 29, 2019 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190929214218/https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2016/09/adobe-announced-will-restart-support-flash-linux |url-status = live }}

{{cite web

|title = Thoughts on Flash – Apple

|url = https://www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughts-on-flash

|access-date = September 29, 2019

|archive-date = September 29, 2019

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20190929153127/https://www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughts-on-flash/

|url-status = live

}}

}}

{{Commons category|GNOME Web}}

• {{Official website}}
• [https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/epiphany/blob/master/NEWS complete change-log]
• [https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Web/Docs/FrequentlyAskedQuestions#What_about_Firefox_as_the_default_GNOME_browser.3F Firefox vs GNOME Web]
• [https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Web/Docs/FrequentlyAskedQuestions Frequently asked questions (FAQ)]

{{GNOME}}

{{Web browsers|Active}}

{{Timeline of web browsers|2000s}}

{{gopher clients}}

{{aggregators}}

Category:2002 software

Category:Free software programmed in C

Category:Free web browsers

Category:GNOME Core Applications

Category:MacOS web browsers

Category:POSIX web browsers

Category:Software based on WebKit

Category:Software forks

Category:Software that uses Meson

Category:Web browsers that use GTK