Gallardo v. Marstiller

{{Use mdy dates|date=May 2022}}

{{Infobox SCOTUS case

|Litigants=Gallardo v. Marstiller

|ArgueDate=January 10

|ArgueYear=2022

|DecideDate=June 6

|DecideYear=2022

|FullName=Gianinna Gallardo, an Incapacitated Person, By and Through Her Parents and Co-Guardians Pilar Vassallo and Walter Gallardo v. Simone Marstiller, In Her Official Capacity as Secretary of the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration

|USVol=596

|USPage=___

|ParallelCitations=

|Docket=20-1263

|OralArgument=https://www.oyez.org/cases/2021/20-1263

|Prior=

|Subsequent=

|Holding=

|Majority=Thomas

|JoinMajority=Roberts, Alito, Kagan, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett

|Dissent=Sotomayor

|JoinDissent=Breyer

|LawsApplied=Medicaid Act

}}

Gallardo v. Marstiller, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case that held the Medicaid Act permits a state to seek reimbursement from settlement payments allocated for future medical care. The case was brought by the parents of Gianinna Gallardo, who was in a persistent vegetative state.{{Cite web|url=https://www.oyez.org/cases/2021/20-1263|title=Gallardo v. Marstiller|website=Oyez}}{{Cite web |date=2022-06-06 |title=Justices validate states' right to take tort recoveries from Medicaid beneficiaries |url=https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/06/justices-validate-states-right-to-take-tort-recoveries-from-medicaid-beneficiaries/ |access-date=2024-11-02 |website=SCOTUSblog |language=en-US}}