General Electric F110#F-15

The F110 emerged from an intersection of efforts in the 1970s by General Electric to reenter the U.S. fighter engine market and the U.S. Air Force's desire to address the reliability, longevity, and maintenance issues with the Pratt & Whitney F100 engines that powered its F-15s and F-16s. In 1975, General Electric used its own funds to begin developing the F101X, a derivative of its F101 engine for the B-1 bomber; the F101X would inherit much of the core design while having a smaller fan that was upscaled from the F404 so that its thermodynamic cycle and thrust were better suited for a fighter engine. The convergent-divergent iris nozzle was also derived from the F404.{{cite report |author=Frank Camm |url=https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/notes/2007/N3618.pdf |title=The Development of the F100-PW-220 and F110-GE-100 Engines: A Case Study of Risk Management and Risk Assessment |work=RAND |date=1993}}

The cancellation of the B-1A by the Carter Administration (in lieu of the Advanced Technology Bomber which became the B-2) meant a loss of business for General Electric, and provided further impetus to provide the F101X for the fighter engine market. The engine attracted the interest of the Air Force's Engine Model Derivative Program (EMDP), and in 1979 began funding it as the F101 Derivative Fighter Engine, or F101 DFE. The Air Force saw the F101 DFE as a potential alternative to the F100 and also a way to coerce better performance from Pratt & Whitney in addressing issues with the F100.

File:General Electric F110 AEDC 84-1128 USAF.jpg.]]

Following the completion of ground tests in 1980, the F101 DFE was first fitted on an F-16 for flight testing, where it showed considerable improvement in performance and operability over the existing F100. In 1982, the Air Force began the full-scale development of the F101 DFE as an option to compete with the F100 for application in future F-15 and F-16 production; the engine was eventually selected for the F-16 and designated F110-GE-100. The threat by the F110 has been cited as a reason for Pratt & Whitney to more quickly rectify the issues affecting the F100 and developing the improved F100-PW-220 variant.{{cite book |last=Coalson |first=M.S. |title=Status Report of the USAF's Engine Model Derivative Program |url=https://doi.org/10.1115/82-GT-183 |publisher=American Society of Mechanical Engineers |doi=10.1115/82-GT-183 |date=18 April 1982|isbn=978-0-7918-7957-3 |s2cid=109148328 }} Seeking to drive unit costs down and improve contractor performance, the Air Force implemented the Alternate Fighter Engine (AFE) competition between the F100 and F110 in 1983 in what was nicknamed "The Great Engine War", where the engine contract would be awarded through competition. The Air Force would buy both engines starting in 1984, with contracts being competed every fiscal year and the percentages of F100 versus F110 would vary based on contract; the competitions eventually ended in 1992.{{cite web |url=https://www.tinker.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/846020/f110-129-the-end-of-an-era/ |title=F110-129, the end of an era |work=U.S. Air Force |date=21 November 2014}}

File:F-14B Tomcat prototype in flight c1973.jpg

The F101 DFE was also tested in the F-14B prototype in 1981, and the aircraft saw considerable performance improvement over the existing Pratt & Whitney TF30.{{cite report |author1=Reubush, David E. |author2=Carlson, John R. |url=https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19820011307 |title=Effects of installation of F101 DFE exhaust nozzles on the afterbody-nozzle characteristics of the F-14 airplane |publisher=NASA |date=1 March 1982}} Although further testing was halted by the Navy in 1982, it would use the results of the Air Force's AFE evaluation to choose the powerplant for future F-14s. The F101 DFE was eventually chosen by the Navy in 1984 and was designated F110-GE-400.

File:General Electric F110-GE-100 - 177th Fighter Wing gas turbine engine testing.ogv

The F110-GE-100/400 is a low-bypass axial-flow afterburning turbofan. It has a 3-stage fan driven by a two-stage low-pressure turbine and a 9-stage compressor driven by a one-stage high-pressure turbine; overall pressure ratio is 30.4 and bypass ratio is 0.87.{{cite tech report |first1=Michael S. |last1=Coalson |title=DEVELOPMENT OF THE F110-GE-100 ENGINE |number=84-GT-13 |institution=ASME |year=1984 |url=https://doi.org/10.1115/84-GT-132}} In contrast to the ambitious raw performance goals for the F100 of high thrust and low weight, the F110 placed a greater emphasis on balancing between reliability, operability, and performance. The fan and inlet guide vanes were designed to smooth airflow to increase resistance to compressor stalls. The engine has an electronic and hydromechanical control system that make it more forgiving of rapid throttle inputs. The main difference between the -100 and the -400 is the latter's augmentor section, being about 50 inches longer. The -100, used on the F-16C/D Block 30/40, had an uninstalled static thrust of {{convert|16600|lbf|kN|1|abbr=on}} in intermediate power and {{convert|28200|lbf|kN|1|abbr=on}} in afterburner; the figures for the -400, used on the F-14B/D, were {{convert|16333|lbf|kN|1|abbr=on}} and {{convert|26950|lbf|kN|1|abbr=on}} respectively.{{cite web |url=https://www.geaerospace.com/press-release/military-engines/ge-aircraft-engines-military-engine-status-report-1 |title=GE Aircraft Engines Military Engine Status Report |work=General Electric Aerospace |date=15 June 1997 |access-date=25 January 2023 |archive-date=18 July 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230718161613/https://www.geaerospace.com/press-release/military-engines/ge-aircraft-engines-military-engine-status-report-1 |url-status=dead }}

In the mid-1980s, the Air Force sought greater power for its tactical fighters and began Improved Performance Engine (IPE) programs for the F100 and F110, with the goal of achieving thrust in the {{convert|29000|lbf|kN|0|abbr=on}} class, while retaining the durability improvements achieved in the F100-220 and F110-100. The result would be the Pratt & Whitney F100-PW-229 and General Electric F110-GE-129. Compared to the F110-100, the -129 incorporated component improvements, including a full authority digital engine control (FADEC), that allowed maximum thrust to be achieved in a wider range of conditions and across larger portions of the flight envelope, while retaining 80% commonality; bypass ratio was slightly reduced to 0.76. The -129 produces {{convert|17155|lbf|kN|1|abbr=on}} of thrust in intermediate power and {{convert|29500|lbf|kN|1|abbr=on}} in full afterburner, and was first fielded in 1992 on the F-16C/D Block 50; the engine would also power enhanced F-15E variants, starting with the F-15K for South Korea.

File:Thrust vectoring nozzle test.gif

A non-afterburning variant of the F110, designated the F118, would power the B-2 stealth bomber and the re-engined U-2S reconnaissance aircraft. A variant of the F110-100 fitted with a 3-dimensional axisymmetric thrust vectoring nozzle, referred by General Electric as the Axisymmetric Vectoring Exhaust Nozzle (AVEN), was tested on a specially modified F-16 called the NF-16D VISTA under the Multi-Axis Thrust-Vectoring (MATV) program;{{cite web |url=https://www.edwards.af.mil/X62A-Vista/ |title=X-62A VISTA fact sheet |work=Edwards AFB (U.S. Air Force) |access-date=2022-11-12 |archive-date=2022-11-12 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221112122640/https://www.edwards.af.mil/X62A-Vista/ |url-status=dead }}{{cite tech report |author1=Paul D. Anna |author2=David S. Kidman |url=https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19950007831/downloads/19950007831.pdf |title=Flight test results of the F-16 aircraft modified with the axisymmetric vectoring exhaust nozzl |publisher=NASA Dryden Flight Research Center |location=Edwards, CA |year=1994}} the nozzle could vector the exhaust up to 17 degrees from the axial line in any direction.{{cite tech report |author=Ashley, Steven |title=Thrust vectoring: a new angle to air superiority |work=Mechanical Engineering-CIME |volume=117 |issue=1 |publisher=American Society of Mechanical Engineers |year=1995}}

The F110 would see the development of a further enhanced variant starting in 2000 with the F110-GE-132, initially referred to as the F110-GE-129EFE (Enhanced Fighter Engine). Both the -132 and its competitor, the Pratt & Whitney F100-PW-232, were designed to make full use of the F-16's Modular Common Inlet Duct (MCID), or "Big Mouth" inlet introduced in the Block 30 variant. The -132 incorporates an improved fan that is more efficient and can increase maximum airflow, composite fan duct, durability improvements to the hot section, radial augmentor, and control system improvements. The engine leveraged research performed under the Integrated High Performance Turbine Engine Technology (IHPTET) program. The -132 produces {{convert|19000|lbf|kN|1|abbr=on}} of thrust in intermediate power and {{convert|32500|lbf|kN|1|abbr=on}} in afterburner but can also be tuned to run at -129 thrust levels to increase inspection intervals from 4,300 cycles to 6,000; the older -129 can be upgraded to the -132 configuration, with the new fan being a modular component. The F110-132 was selected to power the F-16E/F Block 60 for the United Arab Emirates.{{cite web |url=https://www.geaviation.com/press-release/military-engines/ge-launches-f110-fighter-engine-variant-400-million-win-united-arab |title=GE Launches F110 Fighter Engine Variant with $400 Million Win at United Arab Emirates |work=General Electric |date=14 March 2000}}{{cite web |title=F110-GE-132 turbofan engines |url=https://www.geaviation.com/sites/default/files/datasheet-F110-GE-132.pdf |work=General Electric}} Flight tests began in 2003, and the first engine was delivered in 2005.{{cite web |url= https://www.flightglobal.com/ge-starts-up-f110-132-test-programme/49409.article |title=GE starts up F110-132 test programme |work=Flight Global |date=23 June 2003}}

Technology from the -132 as well as from commercial CFM56 developments have been applied to the F110 Service Life Extension Program (SLEP), and F110-129 upgraded with SLEP technology were given the designation -129C. Further improved subvariants with 6,000-cycle intervals were designated -129D (for the F-16) and -129E (for the F-15).{{cite press release |url=https://www.geaerospace.com/news/press-releases/defense-engines/proven-experience-program-upgrades-spark-ge-f110-and-f404414 |title=Proven Experience, Program Upgrades Spark GE F110 and F404/414 Popularity |work=GE Aerospace |date=19 July 2010}} The -129E also powers the TAI Kaan prototype.{{cite web |url=https://www.defenceturkey.com/en/content/first-batch-of-f110-engines-delivered-for-the-national-combat-aircraft-5091 |title=First Batch of F110 Engines Delivered for the National Combat Aircraft |work=Defence Turkey |date=2 June 2022}}

File:F110-GE viewed through exhaust nozzle of an F-14.jpg

The F-14A entered service with the United States Navy in 1973 powered by Pratt & Whitney TF30s. By the end of the decade, following numerous problems with the original engine (and similar problems with the F100 on the F-15 and F-16), the DoD began procuring the upgraded TF30-P-414As. While these engines solved the serviceability problems, the fuel consumption and thrust was comparable to the initial model—considerably less than what the F-14 had been designed for; the F-14's originally planned Pratt & Whitney F401, an upscaled naval development of the F100 design, was also canceled due to costs and reliability issues.

After reviewing the results of the Air Force's AFE evaluation, the Navy would choose the F101 DFE to re-engine the F-14 in 1984, with the variant designated the F110-GE-400; the primary difference between the -400 and the Air Force's F110-GE-100 is length — the -400 had a {{convert|50|in|m|adj=on}} tailpipe extension to suit the F-14 airframe, which was fitted downstream of the augmentor. During initial years of service, the -400's lengthened tailpipe created unanticipated hot spots in the afterburner liner, resulting in the loss of several F-14s before the issue was rectified.{{cite news |last=Dosey |first=Jack |url=https://scholar.lib.vt.edu/VA-news/VA-Pilot/issues/1996/vp960204/02040038.htm |title=Now-Released Details of F-14 Crash in '93 Show Repairs Lagged |publisher=The Virginian Pilot |date=4 February 1996}} The engine produced {{convert|26950|lbf|kN|1|abbr=on}} of uninstalled thrust with afterburner;{{cite web|title=F−14 TF30−P−414 TO F110−GE−400 ENGINE UPGRADE TECHNICAL COMPARISON |url=http://www.ausairpower.net/engines.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100615180813/http://ausairpower.net/engines.pdf |archive-date=2010-06-15 }}{{cite report |title=Standard Aircraft Characteristics (SAC) F-14D |url=https://www.alternatewars.com/SAC/F-14D_Tomcat_SAC_-_July_1985_(Partially_Declas).pdf |date=July 1985 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220721192334/http://www.alternatewars.com/SAC/F-14D_Tomcat_SAC_-_July_1985_(Partially_Declas).pdf |archive-date=21 July 2022}} installed thrust is {{convert|23400|lbf|kN|1|abbr=on}} with afterburner at sea level, which rose to {{convert|30200|lbf|kN|1|abbr=on}} at Mach 0.9.NAVAIR 01-F-14AAD-1A F-14D NATOPS FLIGHT MANUAL January 2004 PART 1 CH-2 Section 2.2 "Engine" pg "2-9". This was similar to the F-14's originally intended F401 and provided a significant increase over the TF30's maximum uninstalled thrust of 20,900 lbf (93 kN).[http://www.flightglobal.com/FlightPDFArchive/1985/1985%20-%200882.PDF Flight Global Archive] These upgraded jets were initially known as F-14A+ before being re-designated as the F-14B, as were new production aircraft powered by the F110. The same engine also powered the final variant of the aircraft, the F-14D.

Proposed upgraded variants of the F-14, such as the Super Tomcat 21 (ST-21), were to be powered by the F110-GE-429, the naval variant of the F110-GE-129 IPE.Donald, David. "Northrop Grumman F-14 Tomcat, U.S. Navy today". Warplanes of the Fleet. London: AIRtime Publishing Inc, 2004. ISBN 1-880588-81-1.

The F-16 Fighting Falcon entered service powered by the Pratt & Whitney F100 afterburning turbofan. Seeking a way to drive unit costs down, the USAF implemented the Alternate Fighter Engine (AFE) program in 1984, under which the engine contract would be awarded through competition. As of June 2005, the F110 powered 86% of the USAF's F-16C/Ds. While the F110-GE-100 can provide around {{cvt|4000|lbf|kN|1}} more thrust than the F100-PW-200, it requires more airflow for the jet to fully exploit the engine; the standard normal shock inlet (NSI) limited the F110 to {{cvt|25735|lbf|kN|1}}. This led to the increase in the area of the engine inlet for the MCID. The F-16C/D Block 30/32s were the first to be built with a common engine bay, able to accept both engines, with Block 30s having the bigger MCID inlet (also known as "Big Mouth") for the F110 and Block 32s retaining the standard inlet for the F100.

File:Lockheed F-16C USAF 92-3894 PACAF F-16 Demo Team RJNK.jpg

The F-16C/D Block 30 and 40 were powered by the {{cvt|28200|lbf|kN|1|adj=on}} F110-GE-100, while the Block 50 was powered by the {{cvt|29500|lbf|kN|1|adj=on}} F110-GE-129 IPE. The United Arab Emirates' F-16E/F Block 60 is powered by the {{cvt|32500|lbf|kN|1|adj=on}} F110-GE-132, as was the proposed Lockheed Martin-Tata F-21, based on the Block 60 and initially designated F-16IN, for the Indian Air Force MMRCA competition.[http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/systems/f110.htm Global Security: F110] Retrieved 21 June 2008.{{cite web |title=F110-GE-132 Engine Completes Initial Flight Tests |url=http://www.geae.com/aboutgeae/presscenter/military/military_2003616.html |website=GE Aviation |date=16 June 2003 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051211094922/http://www.geae.com/aboutgeae/presscenter/military/military_2003616.html |archive-date=11 December 2005}} Current production F-16C Block 70 are equipped with the F110-129D with increased lifespan and durability.{{Cite web|url=https://www.geaviation.com/military/engines/f110-engine|title = The F110 Engine | GE Aviation}}

Two derivatives of the F-16, the Mitsubishi F-2 and the General Dynamics F-16XL, are powered by the -129 IPE. The engines for the F-2 were license-built by IHI Corporation and designated F110-IHI-129,{{citation needed|date=April 2024}} prior to the reporting of an IHI company whistleblower in February 2024.{{cite news |title=Japan's IHI rigged data for over 4,000 engines at least since 2003 |url=https://english.kyodonews.net/news/2024/04/1b35909379dd-japans-ihi-rigged-data-for-over-4000-engines-at-least-since-2003.html |access-date=29 April 2024 |work=english.kyodonews.net |publisher=Kyodo News}} On April 24, 2024, IHI announced that investigation was underway by Japan's Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism of its subsidiary, IHI Power Systems Co., which had falsified its engine data since 2003, impacting over 4,000 engines globally.{{cite news |title=IHI Subsidiary Falsifies Data on Engine Performances of Ships and Trains |url=https://japannews.yomiuri.co.jp/business/companies/20240424-182175/ |access-date=29 April 2024 |work=The Japan News}}

File:공군 제11전투 비행단 (7438363072).jpg

Although the Air Force chose the Pratt & Whitney F100-PW-229 as the IPE for the F-15E Strike Eagle, a pair of F110-GE-129s were mounted on one aircraft for flight testing.{{cite journal |last=DeLisi |first=J.W. |url=https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.1990-1266 |title=F-15E/GE-129 Increased Performance Engine initial development flight test program |journal=American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics |doi=10.2514/6.1990-1266 |date=16 April 1990|url-access=subscription }}{{cite web |url=https://www.flightglobal.com/ge-on-f-15e/10465.article |title=GE on F-15E |work=Flight Global |date=30 April 1996}} South Korea would choose the -129 to power 40 F-15K fighters, the first time production F-15s were powered by a General Electric engine. The engines were manufactured through a joint licensing agreement with Samsung Techwin Company. It has also been chosen by the Republic of Singapore Air Force (RSAF) to power its F-15SG.

The F-15E would be further developed into the Advanced Eagle with a new fly-by-wire control system that incorporates the F110-GE-129's FADEC. The Advanced Eagle with the F110-129E would be the basis for Saudi Arabia's F-15SA, Qatar's F-15QA, and the U.S. Air Force's F-15EX.{{Cite web|url=https://www.flightglobal.com/defence/ge-ships-first-engines-for-f-15ex-fighter/140194.article|title=GE ships first engines for F-15EX fighter}}

• F110-GE-100: Initial variant resulting from the F101 DFE (Derivative Fighter Engine), powers the F-16 Block 30 and 40.
• F110-GE-400: Naval variant of the -100 with a 50” augmentor extension to fit the F-14, powers the F-14A+ (later designated F-14B) and F-14D.
• F110-GE-129: Improved performance engine variant, powers the F-16 Block 50 and 70 and the F-15K, SG, SA, QA, and EX.
• F110-GE-132: Further enhanced thrust variant powering the F-16 Block 60.

• General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon
• General Dynamics F-16XL
• Grumman F-14A+ (F-14B) and F-14D Super Tomcat
• McDonnell Douglas F-15E Strike Eagle and Boeing F-15EX Eagle II
• Mitsubishi F-2
• TAI TF Kaan{{Cite web|url=https://www.defensenews.com/industry/2018/10/31/general-electric-beats-rolls-royce-to-power-turkeys-indigenous-fighter-jet/|title=General Electric beats Rolls-Royce to power Turkey's indigenous fighter jet|date=31 October 2018}}

{{jetspecs

|ref=American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR)

|type=Afterburning turbofan

|length= {{cvt|181.9|in|cm|lk=on}} for -100, {{cvt|232|in|cm|0}} for -400

|diameter= {{cvt|35.66|in|cm|1}} inlet, {{cvt|46.5|in|cm|1}} overall

|weight= {{cvt|3,830|lb|kg|lk=on}} for -100, {{cvt|4,183|lb|kg}} for -400

|compressor= 2 spool, 3-stage fan and 9-stage HPC

|combustion=Annular

|turbine= 1-stage HPT and 2-stage LPT

• Bypass ratio: 0.87:1

|fueltype=

|oilsystem=

|power=

|thrust=

• -100: {{cvt|16600|lbf|kN|1|lk=on}} intermediate, {{cvt|28200|lbf|kN|1}} full afterburner
• -400: {{cvt|16333|lbf|kN|1}} intermediate, {{cvt|26950|lbf|kN|1}} full afterburner

|compression= 30.4:1

|aircon=270 lb/s (122.4 kg/s), 254 lb/s (115.2 kg/s) with small F-16 inlet

|turbinetemp=

|fuelcon=

|specfuelcon=

|power/weight=

|thrust/weight=4.33:1 intermediate power, 7.36:1 in afterburner

}}

{{jetspecs

|ref=General Electric,[https://www.geaviation.com/military/engines/f110-engine GE Aviation F110-GE-129/F110-GE-132][https://www.geaviation.com/sites/default/files/datasheet-F110-GE-129.pdf datasheet GE-129 - pdf] American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME),{{cite tech report |first1=A.R. |last1=Wadia |first2=F.D. |last2=James |title=F110-GE-129 EFE – Enhanced Power Through Low Risk Derivative Technology |number= |institution=ASME |year=2000 |url=https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Fan-Efficiency-Technology-Comparison_fig4_267483234}} MTU[https://www.mtu.de/engines/military-aircraft-engines/fighter-aircraft/f110/ F110-GE-129 datasheet]

|type=Afterburning turbofan

|length= {{cvt|181.9|in|cm}}

|diameter= {{cvt|46.5|in|cm|1}}

|weight= {{cvt|3,920|lb|kg}}

|compressor= 2 spool, 3-stage fan and 9-stage HPC

|combustion=Annular

|turbine= 1-stage HPT and 2-stage LPT

• Bypass ratio: 0.76:1

|fueltype=

|oilsystem=

|power=

|thrust=

• Intermediate power: {{cvt|17155|lbf|kN|1}}
• Full afterburner: {{cvt|29500|lbf|kN|1}}

|compression= 30.7:1

|aircon=270 lb/s (122.4 kg/s)

|turbinetemp={{cvt|2750|F|C K|lk=on}}

|fuelcon=

|specfuelcon=

|power/weight=

|thrust/weight=4.38:1 intermediate power, 7.50:1 in afterburner

}}

{{jetspecs

|ref=General Electric, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), Forecast International[http://www.fi-powerweb.com/Engine/General-Electric-F110.html General Electric F110]

|type=Afterburning turbofan

|length= {{cvt|181.9|in|cm}}

|diameter= {{cvt|46.5|in|cm|1}}

|weight= {{cvt|4,050|lb|kg}}

|compressor= 2 spool, 3-stage fan and 9-stage HPC

|combustion=Annular

|turbine= 1-stage HPT and 2-stage LPT

• Bypass ratio: 0.68:1

|fueltype=

|oilsystem=

|power=

|thrust=

• Intermediate power: {{cvt|19000|lbf|kN|1}}
• Full afterburner: {{cvt|32500|lbf|kN|1}}

|compression= 33.3:1

|aircon=275 lb/s (124.7 kg/s)

|fuelcon=

|specfuelcon=

|power/weight=

|thrust/weight=4.69:1 intermediate power, 8.02:1 in afterburner

}}

{{Aircontent

|related=

• General Electric F101
• General Electric F118

|similar engines=

• Pratt & Whitney F100
• Pratt & Whitney F401
• Saturn AL-31
• Shenyang WS-10

|lists=

• List of aircraft engines

|see also=

}}

{{reflist}}

{{Commons category|General Electric F110}}

• [https://www.geaviation.com/military/engines/f110-engine GE Aviation F110 page]
• [https://web.archive.org/web/20060902233211/http://enginehistory.org/f110ge100.htm Aircraft Engine Historical Society] - F110-GE-100 Gallery
• [http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/systems/f110.htm Global Security] - F110

{{GE aeroengines}}

{{USAF gas turbine engines}}

{{USAF system codes}}

Category:Low-bypass turbofan engines

F110

Category:1980s turbofan engines